Wright County, MN Overview 461 ft Legend Roads CSAHCL CTYCL MUNICL PRIVATECL TWPCL Highways Interstate State Hwy US Hwy City/Township Limits c t Subdivisions Parcels Water 2' Contours 842; 844; 846; 848; 852; 854; 856; 858; 862; 864; 866; 868; 872; 874; 876; 878; 882; 884; 886; 888; 892; 894; 896; 898; 902; 904; 906; 908; 912; 914; 916; 918; 922; 924; 926; 928; 932; 934; 936; 938; 942; 944; 946; 948; 952; 954; 956; 958; 962; 964; 966; 968; 972; 974; 976; 978; 982; 984; 986; 988; 992; 994; 996; 998; 1002; 1004; 1006; 1008; 1012; 1014; 1016; 1018; 1022; 1024; 1026; 1028; 1032; 1034; 1036; 1038; 1042; 1044; 1046; 1048; 1052; 1054; 1056; 1058; 1062; 1064; 1066; 1068; 1072; 1074;
94 1' 13'' W Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota 94 0' 47'' W 45 16' 21'' N 45 15' 57'' N 5013000 5013090 5013180 5013270 5013360 5013450 5013540 5013630 5013720 419960 420050 420140 420230 420320 420410 420500 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 419960 420050 420140 420230 420320 420410 420500 5013000 5013090 5013180 5013270 5013360 5013450 5013540 5013630 5013720 45 16' 21'' N 45 15' 57'' N 94 1' 13'' W N Map Scale: 1:3,650 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 94 0' 47'' W Page 1 of 7
Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Very limited Somewhat limited Not limited Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Very limited Somewhat limited Not limited Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Very limited Somewhat limited Not limited Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11, Oct 5, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 2, 2016 Aug 17, 2013 Aug The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 2 of 7
Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota Dwellings Without Basements Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (numeric values) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 106C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 106D2 Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 106E Lester loam, 10 to 22 percent slopes 109 Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 239 Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 539 Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Lester, moderately eroded (85%) Le Sueur (3%) Lester, moderately eroded (85%) Lester, moderately eroded (3%) Le Sueur (2%) (0.16) (0.99) (0.13) 14.0 25.3% Slope (0.96) 1.9 3.3% (0.16) (0.16) (0.99) (0.13) Very limited Lester (85%) Slope 0.3 0.5% (0.13) Very limited Cordova (85%) Somewhat limited Very limited (0.27) Glencoe (5%) Ponding Le Sueur (80%) Lester (5%) Klossner, drained (90%) (0.02) (0.99) (0.13) (0.05) 1.3 2.4% 0.1 0.1% Ponding 6.6 11.9% Page 3 of 7
Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (numeric values) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Subsidence Organic matter content Okoboji (5%) Ponding (0.96) 740 Hamel-Glencoe complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1080 Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 Canisteo (5%) Very limited Hamel (55%) Very limited (0.11) Glencoe (35%) Ponding Klossner, ponded (35%) Okoboji, ponded (30%) Glencoe, ponded (25%) (0.02) 9.1 16.4% Ponding 3.2 5.8% Subsidence Organic matter content Ponding (0.96) Ponding (0.02) Page 4 of 7
Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (numeric values) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 1362B 1901B Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Angus-Le Sueur complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Glencoe (5%) Ponding Canisteo (3%) Houghton, ponded (2%) Angus (80%) Angus, moderately eroded (10%) Angus (60%) Le Sueur (30%) (0.02) Ponding Subsidence Organic matter content (0.15) (0.14) (0.25) (0.99) (0.25) 15.5 28.0% 3.4 6.1% W Water Not rated Water (100%) 0.1 0.1% Totals for Area of Interest 55.4 100.0% Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Somewhat limited 34.8 62.9% Very limited 20.5 37.0% Null or Not Rated 0.1 0.1% Totals for Area of Interest 55.4 100.0% Page 5 of 7
Dwellings Without Basements Wright County, Minnesota Description Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings without basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential), and compressibility. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification of the soil. The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Page 6 of 7
94 1' 13'' W Farmland Classification Wright County, Minnesota 94 0' 47'' W 45 16' 21'' N 45 15' 57'' N 5013000 5013090 5013180 5013270 5013360 5013450 5013540 5013630 5013720 419960 420050 420140 420230 420320 420410 420500 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 419960 420050 420140 420230 420320 420410 420500 5013000 5013090 5013180 5013270 5013360 5013450 5013540 5013630 5013720 45 16' 21'' N 45 15' 57'' N 94 1' 13'' W N Map Scale: 1:3,650 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 94 0' 47'' W Page 1 of 4
Farmland Classification Wright County, Minnesota MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Rating Polygons Not prime farmland All areas are prime farmland drained protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season irrigated drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season irrigated and drained irrigated and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season Soil Rating Lines subsoiled, completely removing the root inhibiting soil layer irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 irrigated and reclaimed of excess salts and sodium Farmland of statewide Farmland of local Farmland of unique Not rated or not available Not prime farmland All areas are prime farmland drained protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season irrigated drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season irrigated and drained irrigated and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season subsoiled, completely removing the root inhibiting soil layer irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 irrigated and reclaimed of excess salts and sodium Farmland of statewide Farmland of local Soil Rating Points Farmland of unique Not rated or not available Not prime farmland All areas are prime farmland drained protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season irrigated drained and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season Water Features irrigated and drained irrigated and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season subsoiled, completely removing the root inhibiting soil layer irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 irrigated and reclaimed of excess salts and sodium Farmland of statewide Farmland of local Farmland of unique Not rated or not available Page 2 of 4
Farmland Classification Wright County, Minnesota MAP INFORMATION Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 11, Oct 5, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 2, 2016 Aug 17, 2013 Aug The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 3 of 4
Farmland Classification Wright County, Minnesota Farmland Classification Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 106C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10, moderately eroded Farmland of statewide 14.0 25.3% 106D2 Lester loam, 10 to 16, moderately eroded 106E Lester loam, 10 to 22 Not prime farmland 1.9 3.3% Not prime farmland 0.3 0.5% 109 Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 239 Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 539 Klossner muck, 0 to 1 740 Hamel-Glencoe complex, 0 to 2 1080 Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 1362B Angus loam, 2 to 6 1901B Angus-Le Sueur complex, 1 to 5 drained All areas are prime farmland Farmland of statewide drained 1.3 2.4% 0.1 0.1% 6.6 11.9% 9.1 16.4% Not prime farmland 3.2 5.8% All areas are prime farmland All areas are prime farmland 15.5 28.0% 3.4 6.1% W Water Not prime farmland 0.1 0.1% Totals for Area of Interest 55.4 100.0% Description Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide, farmland of local, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, 1978. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Page 4 of 4