COS Cycle 17: 20 programs 149 external orbits 446 internals FUV Detector Sensitivity Monitor 36 0 Oct. 3, 2010

Similar documents
Cycle 20 COS Calibration Plan. Jerry Kriss & COS/STIS Team 9/13/2012

Cycle 21 COS Calibration Plan. Julia Roman-Duval Justin Ely & COS/STIS Team 9/10/2013

Cycle 24 COS Calibration Plan. Paule Sonnentrucker Gisella De Rosa & COS Team 9/12/2016

Summary of COS Cycle 23 Calibration Plan

Summary of the COS Cycle 18 Calibration Program

COS FUV Dispersion Solution Verification at the New Lifetime Position

Updates to the COS/NUV Dispersion Solution Zero-points

Verification of COS/FUV Bright Object Aperture (BOA) Operations at Lifetime Position 3

Flat Fields and Flux Calibrations for the COS FUV Channel at Lifetime Position 4

COS FUV Focus Determination for the G140L Grating

COS/FUV Spatial and Spectral Resolution at the new Lifetime Position

Dark Rate of the STIS NUV Detector

SMOV Absolute Flux Calibration of the COS FUV Modes

NICMOS Status and Plans

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Handbook for Cycle 19

Impacts of focus on aspects of STIS UV Spectroscopy

Wavelength Calibration Accuracy for the STIS CCD and MAMA Modes

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Handbook for Cycle 21

COS Design Reference Mission and Ground System Volume Requirements

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Handbook for Cycle 23

WFPC2 Cycle 7 Calibration Plan

Characterizing the COS OSM1 Drift in the Dispersion Direction

Absolute Flux Calibration for STIS First-Order, Low-Resolution Modes

STIS Update. Charles R. Proffitt

Improvements to the COS FUV G130M and G160M Wavelength Solutions at Lifetime Position 1

IRS-TR 05001: Detector Substrate Voltage and Focal Plane Temperature of the LH module

WFC3/IR Persistence as Measured in Cycle 17 using Tungsten Lamp Exposures

11041,11042,11043: ACS CCD Daily Monitor

SBC FLATS: PRISM P-FLATS and IMAGING L-FLATS

Studies of diffuse UV radiation

BigBOSS Data Reduction Software

Calibration of ACS Prism Slitless Spectroscopy Modes

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Mini-Handbook for Cycle 12

Extraction of Point Source Spectra from STIS Long Slit Data

WFC3 IR Blobs, IR Sky Flats and the measured IR background levels

The in-orbit wavelength calibration of the WFC G800L grism

New On-Orbit Sensitivity Calibration for All STIS Echelle Modes

Fringe Correction for STIS Near-IR Long-Slit Spectra using Contemporaneous Tungsten Flat Fields

Internal Flat Field Monitoring II. Stability of the Lamps, Flat Fields, and Gain Ratios

COS Monthly Status Review. August 19, Ball

Delivery of a new ACS SBC throughput curve for Synphot

TIPS-JIM Meeting 13 October 2005, 10am, Auditorium

Observer Anomaly(?): Recent Jitter and PSF Variations

Monitoring The HRC-S UV Rate: Observations of Vega

GOODS/VIMOS Spectroscopy: Data Release Version 2.0.1

NICMOS Cycles 13 and 14 Calibration Plans

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)

GALEX GR1 Instrument Performance and Calibration Review

A Python Script for Aligning the STIS Echelle Blaze Function

ACS after SM4: RELATIVE GAIN VALUES AMONG THE FOUR WFC AMPLIFIERS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 1 Jun 2016

An Algorithm for Correcting CTE Loss in Spectrophotometry of Point Sources with the STIS CCD

624 SNPP VIIRS Solar Diffuser BRDF Degradation Trend Changes in Early Evan Haas* and Frank De Luccia The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo CA

Escaping the Zodi Light! Harvey Moseley! NASA/GSFC! The View from 5 AU! March 26, 2010!

CHAPTER 10 Techniques for Background Measurement and Mosaicing

UVIT IN ORBIT CALIBRATIONS AND CALIBRATION TOOLS. Annapurni Subramaniam IIA (On behalf of the UVIT team)

estec NIRSpec Technical Note NTN Spectral intensity of the MSA glow sources Abstract:

FLAT FIELDS FROM THE MOONLIT EARTH

Detection of X-Rays. Solid state detectors Proportional counters Microcalorimeters Detector characteristics

NAOYUKI TAMURA Subaru Instrument Astronomer Subaru Telescope, NAOJ

Corrections for time-dependence of ACIS gain

Data Processing in DES

Breathing, Position Drift, and PSF Variations on the UVIS Detector

FUV Grating Performance for the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph

Performance of the NICMOS ETC Against Archived Data

SBC L-Flat Corrections and Time-Dependent Sensitivity

COS Ultraviolet Baryon Survey (CUBS) Cycle: 25, Proposal Category: GO (UV Initiative) (Availability Mode: SUPPORTED)

The IRS Flats. Spitzer Science Center

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Alpha spectrometry systems. A users perspective. George Ham. 26 th May Date Month Year

HST & Servicing Mission 4

WFC3 TV2 Testing: UVIS-2 Dark Frames and Rates

Science Policy. Neill Reid SMO. STUC: 20 October

High Signal-to-Noise, Differential NICMOS Spectrophotometry

Improved Photometry for G750L

WFC3 TV2 Testing: IR Channel Read Noise

R&D for the International Linear Collider Damping Rings

Detection of Artificial Satellites in Images Acquired in Track Rate Mode.

The Challenge of AZ Cas-Part 1. John Menke Barnesville, MD Abstract

SOLSTICE I and II: Ultraviolet Variability. Marty Snow, Bill McClintock, Tom Woods, and Gary Rottman Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics

Persistence in the WFC3 IR Detector: Spatial Variations

Analysis of wavelength shifts reported for X-shooter spectra

INTEGRAL/IBIS calibration status

Ground and On-Orbit Characterization and Calibration of the Geosynchronous Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS)

Spitzer Space Telescope Current Status and Future Plans

Updated flux calibration and fringe modelling for the ACS/WFC G800L grism

Calibration Goals and Plans

Angelika Dehn Rob Koopman 10 Years GOME on ERS-2 Workshop

Re-examining the Lyman Continuum in Starburst Galaxies Observed with the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope

The FUSE Archival Data Handbook

Earth Flats. 1. Introduction. Instrument Science Report ACS R. C. Bohlin, J. Mack, G. Hartig, & M. Sirianni October 25, 2005

The Galaxy Viewed at Very Short Time-Scales with the Berkeley Visible Image Tube (BVIT)

Reduction procedure of long-slit optical spectra. Astrophysical observatory of Asiago

WFC3 Cycle 18 Calibration Program

GOODS/FORS2 Final Data Release: Version 3.0

Updated Measurements of ACS/SBC Dark Rates

WFPC2 Dark Current vs. Time

9.1 Years of All-Sky Hard X-ray Monitoring with BATSE

RCUS. MIT Kavli Institute. 1 Summary. 2 Diffuse Sky Simulation. MEMORANDUM November 16, 2017

Annapurni Subramaniam IIA UVIT-PMB Meeting 08 June 2012

Transcription:

Prop. ID Title External Internal Status/End obs Cycle 17 11891 NUV MAMA Fold Distribution 0 2 last visit on hold 11894 NUV Detector Dark Monitor 0 114 Oct. 31, 2010 11896 NUV Spectroscopic Sensitivity Monitor 40 0 Oct. 24, 2010 11899 NUV Imaging Sensitivity 2 0 complete 11900 NUV Internal/External Wavelength Scale Monitor 18 0 Oct. 31, 2010 11892 NUV Detector Recovery 11895 FUV Detector Dark Monitor 0 325 Oct. 31, 2010 COS Cycle 17: 20 programs 149 external orbits 446 internals 11897 FUV Detector Sensitivity Monitor 36 0 Oct. 3, 2010 11997 FUV Internal/External Wavelength Scale Monitor 12 0 Sept. 20, 2010 11893 FUV Detector Recovery 12010 COS FUV Line Spread Function 2 0 complete Supplemental 11897+ Additional FUV sensitivity monitoring 10 0 Oct. 3, 2010 12052 NUV Grating Efficiency Test 0 4 complete 12080 G140L Focus Sweep 5 0 Sept. 18, 2010 12081 Flux Calibration below 1150A with G140L/1280 3 0 Oct. 24, 2010 12082 2 new central wavelengths of G130M 5 0 complete 12083 G140L/1280 wavecal template 0 1 complete 12084 G140L/1280 Internal to External Wavelength Scales 1 0 Nov. 29, 2010 12085 Internal to External Offsets in G230L 1 0 complete 12086 Generation of 1-D Fixed Pattern Templates 11 0 complete 12096 COS FUV Detector Lifetime Positions Test 3 0 complete Totals 149 446

COS observations comprise 23.1% of prime orbits in Cycle 18 COS Cycle 18 usage statistics configuration/mode prime usage SNAP usage FUV/spectroscopy 20.8% 29.4% NUV/imaging 0% 0% NUV/spectroscopy 2.3% 0%

COS Cycle 18 calibration request PID Title External Parallel Internal Frequency NUV Monitors 12419 NUV MAMA Fold Distribution 1 once 12420 NUV Detector Dark Monitor 52 1/wk 12421 NUV Spectroscopic Sensitivity Monitor 12 3x2/L, 3x2/M 12422 NUV Internal/External Wavelength Scale Monitor 3 3x1 12430 NUV Detector Recovery After Anomalous Shutdown FUV Monitors 12423 FUV Detector Dark Monitor 130 5/alt. wks 12424 FUV Spectroscopic Sensitivity Monitor 34 12x2/G140L +G130M, 10x1/ G160M 12425 FUV Internal/External Wavelength Scale Monitor 6 6x1 12431 FUV Detector Recovery After Anomalous Shutdown Special Programs COS Observations of Geocoronal Lyman-Alpha Emission 5 12426 FUV Sensitivity Characterization 10 5x1/G130M, 5x1/G160M 12432 COS FUV Detector Gain Sag vs. High Voltage 2 5 once Totals 67 5 188

NUV MAMA Fold Distribution P.I. Tom Wheeler Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations The performance of the MAMA microchannel plates can be monitored using a MAMA fold analysis procedure that provides a measurement of the distribution of charge cloud sizes incident upon the anode giving some measure of change in the pulse-height distribution of hte MCP, and therefore, MCP gain. While illuminating the detector with a flat field, the valid event (VE) rate counter is monitored while various combinations of row and column folds are selected. The process is implemented using a time-tag exposure and special commanding. This proposal executes the same steps as Cycle 17 proposal and is described in COS TIR 2010-01. 7.9% of COS prime exposures use the NUV MAMA, 5.9% of COS SNAP exposures use the NUV MAMA. 1 internal orbit Analysis 0.2 FTE weeks Products The fold analysis findings are reported to the COS Science Team and V. Argabright of Ball Aerospace after completion of the analysis, typically one-two weeks after execution of the test. Accuracy Goals position of the peak in the fold distribution can be measured to about 5% accuracy from this procedure. Scheduling & Special Requirements special commanding is required Changes from Cycle 17 dropped from biannual frequency to annual

NUV Detector Dark Monitor P.I. Wei Zheng Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations Perform routine monitoring of MAMA detector dark current. The main purpose is to look for evidence of a change in the dark, both to track on-orbit time dependence and to check for a detector problem developing. Monitor the NUV detector dark rate by taking TIME-TAG science exposures without illuminating the detector. Once a week a 22-min exposure is taken with the NUV (MAMA) detector with the shutter closed. The length of the exposures is chosen to make them fit in Earth occultations. 25% of COS 52 internal orbits Analysis 4 FTE weeks Products CDBS Dark and bad-pixel reference file, ISR Accuracy Goals 5% Scheduling & Special Requirements one exposure every week Changes from Cycle 17 change frequency from twice per week to once per week

NUV Spectroscopic Sensitivity Monitor P.I. Rachel Osten Purpose Monitor sensitivity of each NUV grating mode to detect any change due to contamination or other causes. Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations Obtain exposures in all NUV gratings -- G230L, G185M, G225M, and G285M -- quarterly. The first two gratings have stable behavior, while the last two are experiencing steady sensitivity declines. However, they are rarely used in Cycle 18 so quarterly observations will suffice to monitor the trends. 8.1% of COS exposures are NUV gratings (by exposure time); this breaks down to 6.8% for L-modes and 1.3% for all M-modes. 12 external orbits Analysis 3 FTE weeks Products ISR, Time-Dependent Sensitivity Reference File Accuracy Goals SNR of 30 per resel at the central wavelength Scheduling & Special Requirements 3 two-orbit visits for G230L; 3 two-orbit visits for M-modes, observed roughly every 3 months. Changes from Cycle 17 quarterly observations instead of monthly.

COS NUV TDS measurements G230L G225M G285M Stripe A Stripe B Stripe C

NUV Internal to External Wavelength Scale Monitor P.I. Cristina Oliveira Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations This program monitors the offsets between the wavelength scale set by the internal wavecal versus that defined by absorption lines in external targets. This program monitors the offsets between the internal and external wavelength scales: this offset is referred to as DELTA in the wavelength dispersion reference file and corrects for the shift between the WCA and PSA in TV03 versus the shift between the WCA and PSA in orbit: (WCA-PSA)_TV03 - (WCA-PSA)_orbit. Analysis of TV data indicates that this DELTA is cenwave and FP-POS independent for a particular grating, but it is grating and stripe dependent. To verify and monitor this, this program observes some cenwaves at different FP-POS. 8.1% of COS exposures use NUV gratings 3 external orbits Analysis 3 FTE weeks Products Accuracy Goals uncertainties of the wavelength scales are given in Table 4 of COS ISR2010-05 Scheduling & Special Requirements visits should be scheduled throughout the year, at roughly 4 month intervals. Changes from Cycle 17 decrease from 18 orbits to 3; wavelength scale has proven to be stable.

NUV Detector Recovery After Anomalous Shutdown P.I. Tom Wheeler Purpose Description This proposal is designed to permit the safe and orderly recovery of the COS/NUV MAMA detector after an anomalous shutdown. This is accomplished by using slower-than-normal MCP and PC high-voltage ramp-ups and diagnostics. Anomalous shutdowns can occur because of bright object violations, which trigger the Global Hardware Monitor or the Global oftware Monitor. Anomalous shutdowns can also occur because of MAMA hardware anomalies or failures. The cause of the shutdown should be thoroughly investigated and understood prior to recovery. Twenty-four hour wait intervals are required after each test for MCP gas desorption and data analysis. COS event flag 2 is used to prevent inadvertent MAMA usage. Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations This is a contingency proposal only. Analysis 0.4 FTE weeks Products Accuracy Goals Scheduling & Special Requirements special commanding is required Changes from Cycle 17

FUV Detector Dark Monitor P.I. Wei Zheng Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations Perform routine monitoring of FUV XDL detector dark rate. The main purpose is to look for evidence of a change in the dark rate, both to track on-orbit time dependence and to check for a detector problem developing. Monitor the FUV detector dark rate by taking TIME-TAG science exposures with no light on the detector. Five times a week a 22-min exposure is taken with the FUV detector with the shutter closed. The length of the exposures is chosen to make them fit in Earth occultations. 75% of COS 130 internal orbits Analysis 4 FTE weeks Products Dark rate reference files, ISR Accuracy Goals Obtain a few counts per exposure (for nominal case). Build up decent S/N over time. Scheduling & Special Requirements 5 one orbit visits, executed every other week Changes from Cycle 17 reduce frequency from 5 visits per week to 5 visits every other week.

FUV Spectroscopic Sensitivity Monitor P.I. Rachel Osten Purpose Monitor sensitivity of each FUV grating to detect any change due to contamination or other causes. Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations Obtain exposures in all FUV gratings every month. This entails a two-orbit visit to cover 2 central wavelengths of G140L and 3 central wavelengths of G130M, and a one-orbit visit to cover 3 central wavelengths of G160M. 90% of COS exposures are FUV gratings (by exposure time); this breaks down to 11% for G140L, 42% for G130M, and 37% for G160M. 34 external orbits Analysis 6 FTE weeks Products ISR, Time-Dependent Sensitivity Reference File Accuracy Goals SNR of 30 per resel at the central wavelength Scheduling & Special Requirements Changes from Cycle 17 monthly observations continuation of observing strategy at end of Cycle 17; quarterly visits of G160M to obtain two additional central wavelengths were dropped

recent FUV TDS results

FUV Internal/External Wavelength Scale Monitor P.I. Cristina Oliveira Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations This program monitors the offsets between the wavelength scale set by the internal wavecal versus that defined by absorption lines in external targets. This program monitors the offset between the internal and external wavelength scales: this offset is referred to as "DELTA" in the wavelength dispersion reference file and corrects for the shift between the WCA and PSA in TV03 versus the shift between the WCA a nd PSA in orbit : (WCA-PSA_)_TV03 - (WCA - PSA)_orbit. Analysis of TV data indicates that this DELTA (offset) is cenwave and FPPOS independent for a particular grating, but it is grating and stripe dependent. To verify and monitor this, this program observes some cenwaves at different FPPOS 90% (by time, of all COS observations) 6 external orbits Analysis 3 FTE weeks Products Accuracy Goals Uncertainties of the wavelength scales are given in table 4 of COS ISR 2010-06 Scheduling & Special Requirements visits should be scheduled at roughly 4 month intervals. Changes from Cycle 17 decrease of frequency due to stability of wavelength scale

FUV Detector Recovery After Anomalous Shutdown P.I. Tom Wheeler Purpose Description This proposal is designed to permit the conservative, safe, and orderly recovery of the COS/FUV detector after an anomalous HV shutdown. Anomalous shutdowns can occur because of bright object violations, which trigger the Count Rate Protection Monitor or the Global Software Monitor. Anomalous shutdowns can also occur because of hardware anomalies or failures. The cause of the shutdown should be thoroughly investigated and understood prior to recovery. Wait intervals are required after each test for data analysis. COS event Flag 3 is used to prevent inadvertent FUV usage. Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations This is a contingency proposal only. Analysis 0.4 FTE weeks Products Accuracy Goals Scheduling & Special Requirements special commanding is required Changes from Cycle 17

COS Observations of Geocoronal Lyman-alpha Emission P.I. van Dixon Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations To obtain G130M and G140L spectra of the geocoronal Lyman-alpha emission feature with S/N ratios sufficient to trace the line wings. We have received two requests from GOs for high-s/n observations of the geocoronal Lyman-alpha line profile observed with the G130M and G140L gratings. Such observations would allow users to model and subtract the line wings from their spectra. Observations to date provide insufficient airglow data to construct such profiles. We propose airglow observations totaling 10 ks with each grating. In Cycle 17, we obtained 3900 s with G130M and 5600 s with G140L, so need an additional 3 orbits with G130M and 2 orbits with G140L. The data will be archived, but must be reduced by the GOs themselves. 2%; mostly faint targets for which the region around Lyman alpha is of interest. 5 parallel orbits Analysis 0 FTE weeks Products none. Observers must reduce these data themselves. Accuracy Goals For G140L, SNR of 2 per pixel at 1200A; for G130M, SNR of 2 per pixel at 1213 A. Scheduling & Special Requirements observations can be obtained as parallels with STIS external calibration observations. Changes from Cycle 17 obtaining additional exposures

FUV Sensitivity Characterization P.I. Derck Massa Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported Observations Analysis Obtain high S/N G130M and G160M data to characterize how the sensitivity depends on CENWAVE settings and to establish an accurate flux calibration. These data will also allow us to monitor changes in the COS detector flat fields. COS FUV flux calibration observations of primary standards were obtained during SMOV, but a new set of observations are now needed to produce a high quality flux calibration. Specifically, as a consequence of the high S/N data obtained during Cycle 17, we now recognize that there can be 5-10%differences in the instrumental response at the same wavelength for spectra obtained at different CENWAVEs. While the exact origin of these differences is not yet understood (possibly from large scale flat field variations or small changes in the grating illumination), they must be accurately characterized to achieve an absolute flux calibration with a precision better than 5%. The CENWAVE differences were not appreciated in the SMOV data because uncertainties in the initial instrumental response lead to conservative brightness limits and poorly exposed spectra which, together with unexpectedly strong fixed pattern noise, masked the effect. To fully characterize the flux calibration, we require high S/N spectra at each CENWAVE setting at the same time. This, in turn, requires spectra with S/N greater than about 10 per pixel (or 25 per resolution element) at each of the 4 FP-POS settings so that a high S/N spectrum that is free of flat field effects can be derived. For the standard stars available, this will require 1 orbit per CENWAVE setting, or 10 orbits in all. Although we do have recent high S/N standard star data for 2 G160M CENWAVE settings, it would be best to obtain all of the flux calibration at the same epoch, since we know that the instrumental sensitivity is time dependent. Finally, although these data will have about half the counts of the flat field data, they will be adequate for us to examine the time dependence of the COS flat fields. This is very important since we have already detected differences between the flats derived from program 12086 and those derived from the SMOV data high S/N program 11494 obtained 11 months earlier. 90% of COS observations are FUV 10 external orbits 8 FTE weeks Products G130M, G160M flux calibration reference files Accuracy Goals 1% over 2 A bands Scheduling & Special Requirements Changes from Cycle 17 1 orbit per CENWAVE (all 4 FP-POS), for 5 CENWAVES of G130M and 5 CENWAVES of G160M new program

difference in count rates at similar wavelengths in different CENWAVES implies a difference in relative flux calibration of 5-10%

difference in count rates at similar wavelengths in different CENWAVES implies a difference in relative flux calibration of 5-10%

COS FUV Detector Gain Sag vs. High Voltage P.I. Dave Sahnow Purpose Description Fraction GO/GTO Programs Supported To measure the characteristics of the detector after raising the high voltage on the FUV detector to their initial on-orbit command levels of 178 and 175 for Segments A and B. The initial COS on-orbit gain was substantially higher than that seen during ground testing. It is now suspected that this was due to some kind of contamination during or near launch that led to gas being adsorbed into the micro-channel plates. To remove artifacts induced by the higher gain, the MCP voltages were lowered to command levels of 169 and 167 (segments A and B, resp.) from the ground levels of 178 and 175. Since then the gain at the most exposed regions has declined more rapidly than was expected. This may indicate that the condition of the MCP has been restored to the conditions expected at launch. A test at both the current (command levels 169 and 167) and original (178 and 175) voltage settings will collect an orbit each of very high S/N G160M observations, using all 4 FP-POS positions. In this way, we can see if changing the voltage will extend the lifetime of the most heavily used parts of the detector. 90% of COS observations use the FUV detector Observations 1 external orbit at original voltage setting, 1 external orbit at current voltage setting, 5 internal darks Analysis 2 FTE weeks Products decision on change of voltage or lifetime position Accuracy Goals 1% over 2 A bands Scheduling & Special Requirements Changes from Cycle 17 an observation early in Cycle 18 is requested; real-time commanding to change the voltages is required new program; implications for further observations depending on the outcome

pulse height distributions have shifted over the course of Cycle 17

gain has dropped in regions subjected to heavy illumination by Lyman-alpha