The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) Investigation for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

Similar documents
CRaTER Science Requirements

IAC-08-A MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF ENERGY LOSSES BY SPACE PROTONS IN THE CRATER DETECTOR

CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (PSR) Instrument Calibration Science Requirements Compliance

CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Science Requirements Update

CRaTER Instrument Requirements Document Instrument Performance and Data Products Specification. Dwg. No

Parameterizations of the linear energy transfer spectrum for the CRaTER instrument during the LRO mission

Radiation environment at the Moon: Comparisons of transport code modeling and measurements from the CRaTER instrument

Cosmic RAy Telescope for the Effects of Radiation. (CRaTER): Science Overview

Measurements of galactic cosmic ray shielding with the CRaTER instrument

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation to Spacecraft Mechanical Interface Control Document

N. A. Schwadron, J. K. Wilson, M. D. Looper, A. P. Jordan, H. E. Spence, J. B. Blake, A. W. Case, Y. Iwata, J. C. Kasper, W. M. Farrell, D. J.

DRAFT. Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter 431-ICD Date: September 15, 2005

The radiation environment near the lunar surface: CRaTER observations and Geant4 simulations

DRAFT. Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)

CRaTER Project Monthly Technical Progress and Schedule Status Report (NNG05EB92C DRD 20 & 21) April 2005

The radiation environment near the lunar surface: CRaTER observations and Geant4 simulations

Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Module (EMMREM): A Tool For Energetic Particle Fluxes and Radiation Doses Prediction In the Inner Heliosphere

TITLE. Paper presented at HPS 54 th Annual Meeting, July 12-16, Minneapolis, MN USA

New measurements of total ionizing dose in the lunar environment

SIMULATION OF SPACE RADIATION FOR NANOSATELLITES IN EARTH ORBIT *

Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation to Spacecraft Thermal Interface Control Document

ICALEPCS Oct. 6-11, 2013

Requirements for Space Radiation Dosimetry Walter Schimmerling, Francis A. Cucinotta, and John W. Wilson

Analyses of Measurements from the CRaTER Instrument on the LRO Spacecraft using Space Radiation Transport Codes

Radiation Shielding Simulation For Interplanetary Manned Missions

Radiation Shielding Simulation For Interplanetary Manned Missions

Space Radiation Dosimetry - Recent Measurements and Future Tasks

,RD-R14i 134 SURVEY OF ATMOSPHERIC RDIATION COMPONENTS FOR THE i/i GAMMA AND COSMIC RAY A..(U) SEVERNCCOMMUNICRTIONS CORP SEVERNA PARK MD 15 FEB 84

3164 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 55, NO. 6, DECEMBER /$ IEEE

Solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment

CRaTER Project Monthly Technical Progress and Schedule Status Report (NNG05EB92C DRD 20 & 21) May 2005

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Requirements. September 14, 2006

Lomonosov Moscow State University. NUCLEON Chemical Composition and Energy Spectra of Cosmic Rays at TeV

The Effects of Atmospheric Variations on the High Energy Radiation Environment at the Surface of Mars

Radiation Transport Tools for Space Applications: A Review

AE9/AP9 Internal Charging Kernel Utility Beam-Slab Geometry Adapted to Hemispherical Shell for Aluminum Shields

CRaTER Thermal Analysis

Deep Space Test Bed. POC Deep Space Test Bed (DSTB)

Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation to Spacecraft Thermal Interface Control Document

Tritel: 3D Silicon Detector Telescope used for Space Dosimetry. Tamás Pázmándi, Attila Hirn, Sándor Deme, István Apáthy, Antal Csőke, *László Bodnár

Simulation of Radiation Monitors for Future Space Missions

Portable, Low-cost Proportional Counters for Space, Atmospheric and Ground based Applications

Implications of the Worsening GCR Radiation Environment

USING SPACE WEATHER VARIABILITY IN EVALUATING THE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NASA'S CONSTELLATION PROGRAM

Update on Calibration Studies of the Canadian High-Energy Neutron Spectrometry System (CHENSS)

Internal Charging Hazards in Near-Earth Space during Solar Cycle 24 Maximum: Van Allen Probes Measurements

SREM: 8 years experience of radiation monitoring with a standard instrument

Assessing access of galactic cosmic rays at Moon s orbit

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Environment Specification. August 25, 2005

ISSCREM: International Space Station Cosmic Radiation Exposure Model

Overview. Objective Background Design Constraints User Requirements Alternatives Selected Concept Design Evaluation Plan

Shielding Considerations

Fragmentation and space radioprotection

AE9/AP9 Proton Single-Event Effect Kernel Utility

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project. Radiation Requirements. August 5, 2005

Introduction. Neutron Effects NSEU. Neutron Testing Basics User Requirements Conclusions

H. Koshiishi, H. Matsumoto, A. Chishiki, T. Goka, and T. Omodaka. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2015), Vol. 166, No. 1 4, pp Advance Access publication 11 May 2015

Van Allen Probes Mission and Applications

PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH SCINTILLATION COUNTER

Launched April 01, reached Mars Oct. 01. Two-hour circular, polar mapping orbit established by Feb p.m. day/5 a.m. night

MoonCal An electromagnetic calorimeter on the lunar surface. R.Battiston, M.T.Brunetti, F. Cervelli, C.Fidani, F.Pilo

Radiation Environment and Radiation Dosimetry in the Upper Atmosphere

Production of Beryllium and Boron by Spallation in Supernova Ejecta

Analysis distribution of galactic cosmic rays particle energy with polar orbit satellite for Geant4 application

Telescope Mechanical Design

A Novel Configuration for Superconducting Space Radiation Shield. The Pumpkin Configuration

Geant4 Based Space Radiation Application for Planar and Spherical Geometries

Monitoring solar energetic particles with ESA SREM units

Comparison of JGO and JEO

Jovian Radiation Environment Models at JPL

1 Introduction STATUS OF THE GLAST LARGE AREA TELESCOPE. SLAC-PUB December Richard Dubois. Abstract

NASA: BACK TO THE MOON

Simulation of Radiation Effects on NGST. Bryan Fodness, Thomas Jordan, Jim Pickel, Robert Reed, Paul Marshall, Ray Ladbury

A New Look at the Galactic Diffuse GeV Excess

Lunar Flashlight Project

Engineering Models for Galactic Cosmic Rays and Solar Protons: Current Status

FIRST RESULTS OF THE TRITEL SPACE DOSIMETRY TELESCOPE FROM THE MISSION ON BOARD THE BEXUS-12 STRATOSPHERIC BALLOON

An Interdigitated Pixel PIN Detector for Energetic Particle Spectroscopy in Space

Lunar Precursor Robotics Program

A New JPL Interplanetary Solar HighEnergy Particle Environment Model

Lunar Discovery and Exploration program

Background and Sensitivity Simulation of a Space Based Germanium Compton Telescope

AE9/AP9 Proton Displacement Damage Kernels (version 2)

Developing AE9/AP9 Kernels from Third-Party Effects Codes

On the possibility to forecast severe radiation storms by data from surface and space-born facilities

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

Lunar Exploration Initiative. Ionizing Radiation on the Moon David A. Kring

SPACE DOSIMETRY WITH A 3D SILICON DETECTOR TELESCOPE

User Documentation and Examples (II) in GEANT p01

M. PourArsalan, L.W. Townsend Department of Nuclear Engineering University of Tennessee

DOSIMETRY ON THE FOTON M2/BIOPAN-5 SATELLITE

R&T PROTON DIRECT IONIZATION

JUICE/Laplace Mission Summary & Status

Neutron Metrology Activities at CIAE (2009~2010)

Radiation Effects in MMIC Devices

ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection

REVISED COORDINATES FOR APOLLO HARDWARE

Fluence-to-Dose Conversion Coefficients for Muons and Pions Calculated Based on ICRP Publication 103 Using the PHITS Code

Transcription:

The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) Investigation for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter J. E. Mazur 1, H. E. Spence 2, J. B. Blake 1, E. L. Kepko 2, J. Kasper 2,3, L. Townsend 4, M. J. Golightly 5, M. D. Looper 1, Y. Charara 4 1 The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA 90245 2 Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 3 Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02139 4 Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 5 Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA 01731 35-WORD ABSTRACT We describe an investigation to measure linear energy transfer spectra in lunar orbit. The measurements and improvements to radiation transport models will address the effects of the lunar radiation environment on human and technological systems. Corresponding and presenting author: J. E. Mazur, The Aerospace Corporation, 15049 Conference Center Drive, CH3/210, Chantilly, VA 20151 (USA), phone: 703-324-8915, fax: 703-324-0135, email: joseph.mazur@aero.org Contributing authors: H. Spence, Boston University, CAS Room 410, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215 (USA), phone: 617-353-7421, fax: 617-353-6463, email: spence@bu.edu J. B. Blake, The Aerospace Corporation, M2/259, 2350 El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245 (USA), phone: 310-336-7078, fax: 310-336-1636, email: j.bernard.blake@aero.org E. L. Kepko, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston MA 02215 (USA), phone: 617-353-7410, fax: 617-353-6463, email: lkepko@bu.edu J. Kasper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 37-673, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge MA 02139 (USA), phone: 617-253-7611, fax: 617-253-0861, email: jck@mit.edu L. Townsend, Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 (USA), phone: 865-974-5048, fax: 865-974-0668, email: ltownsen@utk.edu M. J. Golightly, AFRL/VSB, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731 (USA), phone: 781-377-4083, fax: 781-377-3160, email: Michael.Golightly@hanscom.af.mil M. D. Looper, The Aerospace Corporation, M2/259, 2350 El Segundo Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245 (USA), phone: 310-336-6302, fax: 310-336-1636, email: mark.d.looper@aero.org Y. Charara, Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 (USA), phone: 865-974-2525, fax: 865-974-0668, email: ysharara@utk.edu Session preference: Space and terrestrial environments Presentation preference: Poster

INTRODUCTION A top priority of the NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission is the characterization of the global lunar radiation environment and its biological impacts and potential mitigation, as well as investigation of shielding capabilities and validation of other deep-space radiation mitigation strategies involving materials [1]. LRO is the first mission in the NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration Program and is currently planned for launch in late 2008. The overall mission objective is to prepare for and support future human exploration of the moon. To achieve the mission objective, LRO includes investigations that will characterize the lunar radiation environment, develop a high-resolution geodetic grid of the lunar surface for selection of future landing sites, assess the resources and environments of the lunar poles, and map the surface composition. The operational orbit will be 50 ± 20 km altitude polar orbit. The spacecraft will be 3-axis stabilized with a primary mission duration of 1 year [2]. We present here a summary of the preliminary design of the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) sensor for LRO. The CRaTER investigation will address the effects of ionizing energy loss in materials due to solar energetic particle events and galactic cosmic rays, specifically in silicon and in an analogue to human tissue. Our investigation focuses on understanding the linear energy transfer (LET) spectrum inside materials through direct measurement in the space radiation environment, particularly ions with energies above 10 MeV/nucleon, combined with models of radiation transport through materials. The CRaTER results will have direct application to the biological effects of the lunar radiation environment as well as the environmental effects on electronic systems. The details of the LET spectra will have direct use in evaluating Single Event Effect vulnerabilities. INVESTIGATION GOALS AND APPROACH The CRaTER investigation goals are to: Measure and characterize that aspect of the deep space radiation environment, LET spectra of galactic and solar cosmic rays (particularly above 10 MeV), most critically important to the engineering and modeling communities to assure safe, long-term, human presence in space. Develop a simple, compact, and comparatively low-cost instrument, but with a sufficiently large geometric factor needed to measure LET spectra and its time variation, globally, in the lunar orbit. Investigate the effects of shielding by measuring LET spectra behind different amounts and types of areal density, including tissue-equivalent plastic. Test models of radiation effects and shielding by verifying/validating model predictions of LET spectra with LRO measurements, using high-quality galactic and solar particle spectra available contemporaneously on ongoing/planned NASA spacecraft (e.g. ACE & STEREO) and other agency spacecraft (e.g. NOAA-GOES). There are several alternatives for measuring the radiation environment near the Moon. For example, a dosimeter is a low-cost option that demands minimal spacecraft resources. However, a total dose measurement provides neither information about the spectral shape of the deposited energy nor information on the particle distribution with ion mass. It is well known that different energies and different ion populations produce different effects in electronic materials and in human tissue. A dosimeter provides only an integrated measure of total absorbed energy; all useful information on how the energy was deposited is lost. In principle, modeling of the particle transport through the dosimeter could recover information about the deposition, but only after significant modeling efforts with attendant uncertainties. 1

Another alternative is to measure the incident particles with a cosmic ray spectrometer. Highresolution measurements of the galactic and solar energy spectra (above 10 MeV/nucleon) with elemental composition are ideally required to fully understand the deep space radiation environment. From fully resolved energy spectra of individual ion species, one could use models to transform the incident fluxes into net LET spectra behind a given areal density of material. However, the instrumentation required to resolve these populations (including the important Z>2 ions above ~100 MeV/nucleon) typically demands large resources. Our approach for LRO is a cosmic ray spectrometer designed with less capable mass resolution than is achievable with state-of-the-art instruments. Coarse mass resolution allows for a less technically challenging spectrometer. Nevertheless, in order to obtain the important high-energy coverage of the heavy ions, significant solid-state detector material is still required to stop the particles and thus record total energy (e.g. the range of 170 MeV/nucleon Fe is > 8mm in silicon). Fortunately, during the LRO mission, several current and planned NASA spacecraft (ACE, STEREO) as well as spacecraft from other agencies (e.g., NOAA GOES) will be measuring galactic and solar particle spectra contemporaneously from well above low-earth orbit. The populations measured at these high-altitude locations will serve as excellent proxies for the population of cosmic rays present at the lunar orbit at the same time (or at some easily calculated propagation time delay in the case of SEP events). Galactic cosmic rays are not considerably localized in space, so that measurements anywhere within several hundred Earth radii of the Moon will be sufficient. Figure 1 shows an example of the spectra that will be obtained by and made available to our team by ACE and future space science missions. While the parent cosmic ray populations are arguably important for LRO, such high quality measurements will be available in a leveraged manner. Reproducing them on LRO would unnecessarily strain valuable spacecraft resources by duplicating measurements already provided by other spacecraft assets. It is more important to focus on the direct measurements of the ionizing energy loss of these particles, their secondaries, and the improvements in radiation transport models that will result. Fig. 1: Left panel shows solar particle energy spectra in the 6 November 1997 solar particle event as measured on ACE. The right panel shows fits to these energy spectra as functions of LET in free space. 2

INSTRUMENT DESIGN The investigation hardware consists of a single, integrated sensor and electronics box with simple electronic and mechanical interfaces to the spacecraft. The CRaTER telescope design is based on standard stacked-detector, cosmic ray telescope systems that have been flown for decades, using detectors developed for other NASA flight programs. The telescope is bidirectional and senses and analyzes particles passing through its 6 ion-implant silicon detectors (Figure 2). However, we use sections of tissue-equivalent plastic (TEP) between the detectors as analogues to human muscle. The TEP is 77.5% C and 10.1% H by weight. The charge collected in each detector is amplified and digitized using standard pulseheight processing Figure 2. Cross-section of telescope housing showing the detector and TEP spacing and fields-of-view. Entire CRaTER instrument techniques. We use with telescope housing mated to the analog and digital processing on-board lookup assembly. tables to define multiple coincidence types that can prioritize events that, for example, are incident from the zenith direction and stop in the detector stack, or events that indicate an interaction via scattering or spallation inside the telescope or inside the spacecraft. Table 1 lists the details of the detector and TEP components as well as the instrument s fields of view. Table 1. Telescope components and parameters Low LET detectors a 9.6 cm 2 circular, 1000µ thick 0.2 MeV threshold High LET detectors b 9.6 cm 2 circular, 140µ thick 2 MeV threshold TEP absorber 1 5.4 cm cylinder TEP absorber 2 2.7 cm cylinder Field of view zenith 35 c Field of view nadir 75 d Geometry factor 0.7 cm 2 sr e LET range Incident particle energy range e 0.2 7 MeV/µ (Si) >10 MeV (H) >87 MeV/nucleon (Fe) a D2, D4, D6 in Figure 2 b D1, D3, D5 in Figure 2 c For 6-fold detector coincidence events d For D3D4D5D6 coincidence events e D1D2 events including 60 mils aluminum shield in zenith view 3

Table 2 lists the preliminary CRaTER resources. The relatively high data rate takes advantage of the vehicle s 1553B network. SIMULATION RESULTS Power Volume 9.0 W ~6700 cm 3 An important component of the CRaTER investigation is the use of state-of-the-art radiation transport codes, Data rate 89.4 Kbps not only to guide the design of the flight instrument, but also as a means of code validation through ground-based tests at accelerator facilities and of course during flight. We show in Figure 3 an example of the recently updated HETC code [3] applied to the CRaTER design. This version of the code included an event generator capable of providing nuclear interaction data. The event generator predicts the interaction product yields and production angles and energies using nuclear models and Monte Carlo techniques. Specifically, the simulation followed the primary particles indicated (600 MeV/nucleon Fe and 1 GeV protons, energies near the peak galactic cosmic ray intensity) with normal incidence from the zenith. The code tracks the energy deposits in the telescope components as well as the charge-composition of the secondaries. We see considerable fragmentation in the case of Fe and interactions up to the atomic number of silicon in the case of protons. SUMMARY The CRaTER investigation will measure and characterize that aspect of the deep space radiation environment - LET spectra of galactic and energetic solar particles and their secondaries - most critically important to the engineering and modeling communities to assure safe, long-term, human presence in space. The investigation involves coordinated efforts on instrument design, ground-based accelerator testing, improvements to transport models, flight data, and concurrent space science measurements. REFERENCES Table 2. CRaTER instrument resources Mass 5.6 kg Fig. 3: Charge composition of particles exiting the CRaTER telescope in a recent HETC Monte Carlo simulation. [1] Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Requirements, ESMD-RLEP-0010, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, November 30, 2005. [2] Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Project Mission Requirements Document, 431-RQMT- 000004, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, November 15, 2005. [3] L. W. Townsend, T. M. Miller, and Tony A. Gabriel, HETC radiation transport code development for cosmic ray shielding applications in space, Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 116, No. 1-4, 135-139, 2005. 4