Analysis of TMT Primary Mirror Control-Structure Interaction (SPIE )

Similar documents
Actuator. Position command. Wind forces Segment (492)

Robustness of the Thirty Meter Telescope Primary Mirror Control System

Control System Modeling for the Thirty Meter Telescope Primary Mirror

Control of the Keck and CELT Telescopes. Douglas G. MacMartin Control & Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology

Control-Structure Interaction in Extremely Large Telescopes

Dynamic Analysis of TMT

Overview of Thirty Meter Telescope Project

Lessons learned from the TMT site testing campaign

Interaction Matrix Uncertainty in Active (and Adaptive) Optics

Thermal Performance Prediction of the TMT Optics

Keck Segment Surface Artifacts: Impacts on Segment Phasing and Image Quality

Active optics challenges of a thirty meter segmented mirror telescope

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL ACTIVE ISOLATION CONCEPT 1

Stability of CL System

Wind Buffeting of Large Telescopes

Thermal Performance Prediction of the TMT Telescope Structure

Active Control? Contact : Website : Teaching

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 4 Aug 2016

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Interaction matrix uncertainty in active (and adaptive) optics

Active Optics for Large Segmented Mirrors: Scale Effects

Engraving Machine Example

ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design

Parametric modeling and control of telescope wind-induced vibration

Evaluation of active structural vibration control strategies in milling process

Computationally efficient performance simulations for a Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) point design

EECE 460. Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems. Guy A. Dumont. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 23 Aug 2018

Piezoelectric Resonators ME 2082

INITIAL CONTROL RESULTS FOR THE THIRTY METER TELESCOPE

Acceleration Feedback

Analysis of the NOT Primary Mirror Dynamics

Closed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

UNIMORPH DEFORMABLE MIRROR FOR TELESCOPES AND LASER APPLICATIONS IN SPACE

Robust Control. 8th class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) Tue., 29th May, 2018, 10:45~11:30, S423 Lecture Room

SDL. Control of the UltraLITE Precision Deployable Test Article Using Adaptive Spatio-Temporal Filtering Based Control

Robust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room

Hydraulic Actuators for the LIGO Seismic Retrofit

Modeling and Control of a Large Deformable Mirror

Control of a hyper-segmented space telescope

OOFELIE::Multiphysics 2014

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Rejection of fixed direction disturbances in multivariable electromechanical motion systems

Lecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30

Intelligent Control of a SPM System Design with Parameter Variations

Chapter 23: Principles of Passive Vibration Control: Design of absorber

DISCUSSION ITEM DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE THIRTY METER TELESCOPE AND THE PARTICIPATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time

The Distributed Defining System for the Primary Mirrors

Distributed Control of Large Deformable Mirrors

H -Control of Acoustic Noise in a Duct with a Feedforward Configuration

Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems

Collocated versus non-collocated control [H04Q7]

The Importance of Feet on Machine Applications. Compliance in the Wrong area can be worse than no compliance

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

ACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL OF A SMART BEAM. 1. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

APPENDIX 4.4.A STRAWMAN STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF A 30-M GSMT

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

DISTURBANCE ATTENUATION IN A MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM WITH ACCELERATION FEEDBACK

Chapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a

Structured Uncertainty and Robust Performance

TMT Site Selection Survey: Instruments, Methods and Operations

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

Wind buffeting of large telescopes

Telescope Project Development Seminar

PUBLICATION. Active vibration isolation of high precision machines

Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018

Open Engineering: Strongly Coupled Multiphysics

Design Methods for Control Systems

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method

and Mixed / Control of Dual-Actuator Hard Disk Drive via LMIs

Progress in Parametric Model Reduction. J. Mohring, Paris,

A Park - like transform for fluid power systems : application to pneumatic stiffness control

Effect of adaptive telescope mirror dynamics on the residual of atmospheric turbulence correction

Concept, modeling, and performance prediction of a low-cost, large deformable mirror

FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control

Mechatronic Motion System

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries

Measurement accuracy in control of segmented-mirror telescopes

Disturbance Feedforward Control for Vibration Suppression in Adaptive Optics of Large Telescopes

APPLICATIONS OF HERMETICALLY SEALED FLUID DAMPERS FOR LOW LEVEL, WIDE BANDWIDTH VIBRATION ISOLATION

1. Background: 2. Objective: 3. Equipments: 1 Experimental structural dynamics report (Firdaus)

Chapter 8. Model of the Accelerometer. 8.1 The static model 8.2 The dynamic model 8.3 Sensor System simulation

Mechanical Systems Part A: State-Space Systems Lecture AL12

Problem Set 4 Solution 1

Design of Robust AMB Controllers for Rotors Subjected to Varying and Uncertain Seal Forces

Requirements for Active Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Feedback Control

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop

INTEGRATED DAMPING PARAMETERS AND SERVO CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR OPTIMAL H 2 PERFORMANCE IN HARD DISK DRIVES

Systems Analysis and Control

Servo Control of a Turbine Gas Metering Valve by Physics-Based Robust Controls (μ) Synthesis

Vibration analysis and control of the LIGO observatories large chambers and support piers

Lecture 7 (Weeks 13-14)

Why You Can t Ignore Those Vibration Fixture Resonances Peter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Fall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08

Transcription:

Analysis of TMT Primary Mirror Control-Structure Interaction (SPIE 7017-41) Douglas MacMynowski (Caltech) Peter Thompson (Systems Tech.) Mark Sirota (TMT Observatory)

Control Problems TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 2

Primary Mirror Control System (M1CS) Sensors measure relative displacement between segments, estimate segment position: Actuators: approach TBD, but candidates include Soft (e.g. voice-coil), stiffened by servo loop Hard (e.g. screw-type actuator), here I assume open loop Control Servo control loop (if soft actuators used), ~20 Hz bandwidth to obtain low frequency desired stiffness (see 7012-58) Global control loop: need ~1 Hz bandwidth to reject wind (see 7017-31) Mirror cell introduces structural coupling that affects both of these TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 3

Outline Primary Mirror Control System Control-Structure Interaction TMT structural dynamics Actuator servo control loop Global M1 control loop TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 4

Control-Structure Interaction (CSI) Design without knowledge of structure clear potential for problems Control (both global & servo) can couple into structural modes Potential for interacting control loops, e.g. each loop stable on its own, but the combination is unstable Aubrun & Lorell study on ASCIE in early 90 s: destabilization proportional to number of control loops Aubrun & Lorell Keck CSI analysis: 0.5 Hz maximum bandwidth Start with a really simple problem to build intuition (see paper), then apply to TMT M1CS It is the ratio of total segment mass n m to mirror cell mass M that determines stability (not n alone) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 5

M1 Dynamics f i m m m m x i k k k u i k z i Mirror cell 492 copies! TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 6

Computational Simplification Use structural modes: good intuition for isolated mirror cell, but actual modes are not orthogonal when evaluated at segment loc ns. Use to show that coupling depends on total mass ratio μ=(n m)/m Analyze dynamics in Zernike basis Coupling converges with relatively few basis vectors More convenient to describe patterns of segment motion rather than individual segment motion Dynamics will be coupled; MIMO analysis is required Z 2,0 Z 2,+2 Z 2,-2 TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 7

Telescope Structure Finite element model of full telescope without segments - Compliance is highest at low spatial frequency - Assume 0.5% damping 10-6 Structure (LR) Segment support Compliance (m/n) 10-7 10-8 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01Zernike basis function radial degree8

Modeling Approach Telescope FEM has no segment dynamics (intentionally) Allows relevant segment dynamics to be added as needed for analysis using separate (detailed) FEM of segment assembly Segment model reduced to 33 modes for CSI analysis Telescope model and segment model connected at actuator nodes. Projected into Zernike basis Connect with stiff spring segment (w/ rigid body modes) cell TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 9

Idealized Actuator Assumptions Soft (voice-coil) actuator: Local position (servo) loop between force and collocated displacement Offload spring in parallel f, y m k=1.6e5 N/m Potential to add damping in parallel Leads to a simple servo control m Hard actuator (e.g. screw + piezo): Perfect displacement device (output = command at all frequencies) Pure stiffness (1e7 N/m) with zero damping k=1e7 N/m d TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 10

Servo open-loop TF on structure: Zernike basis Transfer function from voice-coil force to position In Zernike basis, mounted on structure Note maximum structure 10-4 resonance included is Z 0,0 36 Hz (static correction Z retained to 2000 modes, 1,+1 ~70 Hz) 10-6 Note that response on different basis functions is NOT orthogonal; multivariable stability robustness analysis is required! Response (m/n) 10-8 Z 1,-1 Z 2,+2 Z 2,-2 Z 2,0 Rigid Coupling to telescope structure Segment piston/tip/tilt, on offload spring Segment support modes 10 0 10 1 10 2 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 11

Servo open-loop TF on structure: Zernike basis Transfer function from voice-coil force to position In Zernike basis, mounted on structure Note maximum structure 10-4 resonance included is Z 0,0 36 Hz (static correction Z retained to 2000 modes, 1,+1 ~70 Hz) 10-6 Note that response on different basis functions is NOT orthogonal; multivariable stability robustness analysis is required! Response (m/n) 10-8 Z 1,-1 Z 2,+2 Z 2,-2 Z 2,0 Rigid Coupling to telescope structure Segment piston/tip/tilt, on offload spring Segment support modes 10 0 10 1 10 2 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 12

Servo Loop Design Two strategies: 1. No change to plant: difficult to simultaneously navigate CSI with telescope (most low frequency) and interaction with segment dynamics (high frequency) 10 8 2. Add passive damping in parallel to actuator: stabilizes 90 Hz+ segment dynamic modes Gain (N/m) 10 7 See P. Thompson et al. for details (SPIE 7012-xx) 10 6 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 13

Multivariable (MIMO) Robustness Evaluation SISO analysis is not sufficient (doesn t capture coupling) Generalization is H : Want S < 2 (analogous to SISO GM/PM constraints) Plot the maximum singular value of multivariable sensitivity at each frequency Distance to critical point is 1+L = S(jω) -1 min 1+L >1/2 GM > 6dB, PM > 30 TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 14

Servo Loop Robustness Robustness is limited by structural modes that project almost entirely onto Zernike radial degree 2 and 3 Accurately predicted using only 10 (not 492) basis functions σ max (S) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 Current design not sufficiently robust! p=0 p 1 p 2 p 3 p 4 p 5 p 6 Max Sensitivity 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 S 10.5 Hz mode 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 Max Zernike radial degree included 15

Global Loop Transfer function from commanded actuator displacement to mirror motion: Telescope structure modes are visible Global control loop doesn t depend (much) on hard vs soft actuator Response (m/m) 10 1 10 0 Z 2,+2 Z 2,-2 Z 2,0 Rigid 10.3 10.5 Soft actuator 13 Response (m/m) 10 2 10 1 10 0 Soft actuator Hard actuator 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 0 10 1 10 2 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 16 10-1

Global Control Design SISO analysis: With 2-pole roll-off at 7 Hz, maximum bandwidth ~ 2Hz (6 db gain margin) Even with hard actuator, limited by telescope structure, not 35 Hz segment resonance Loop transfer fn 10 1 10 0 10-1 10-2 Z 2,0 Z 2,-2 Z 2,2 Rigid Base Mag. 0.3, Freq. 14.8 10-3 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 17

Global Control Loop MIMO Robustness Evaluation 1.5 Hz control bandwidth is achievable (Keck uses <0.1 Hz) Higher bandwidth achievable at higher spatial frequency: >2 Hz for radial degree > 4 2 Depends on assumed structural damping 1.5 Stability boundary predicted using 3 (not 492) basis functions No significant difference in global control between hard or soft actuators. σ max (S) 1 1.5 Hz control bandwidth: S =1.87 0.5 2 p 5 p=2 only Rigid base 0 0 5 10 15 Frequency (Hz) TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 18

Conclusions Control-structure interaction limits the achievable bandwidth of primary mirror control system Zernike-basis analysis simplifies computation Local control loop (soft actuator): Challenging design, plausible with passive damping in parallel Global control loop: 1 Hz desired control bandwidth appears achievable Achievable bandwidth is the same for hard or soft actuators Depends on damping assumptions Errors in A matrix may also limit bandwidth TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 19

Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the TMT partner institutions. They are the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy (ACURA), the California Institute of Technology and the University of California. This work was supported as well by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, the National Research Council of Canada, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) and the U.S. National Science Foundation. TMT.SEN.PRE.08.046.REL01 20