Uncertainties in the measurement of the mechanical properties of Nb 3 Sn coil constituents and cable stacks

Similar documents
Simultaneous measurement of critical current, stress, strain and lattice distortions in high temperature superconductors

Superconductive coil characterization for next dipoles and quadrupoles generation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, VOL. 14, NO. 2, JUNE A. Nijhuis, Yu. Ilyin, W. Abbas, B. ten Haken, and H. H. J.

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

STANDARD SAMPLE. Reduced section " Diameter. Diameter. 2" Gauge length. Radius

Batavia, Illinois, 60510, USA

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Stress-Strain Behavior

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

ME 243. Mechanics of Solids

CHAPTER 6 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF METALS PROBLEM SOLUTIONS

COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5

The science of elasticity

Tensile stress strain curves for different materials. Shows in figure below

Residual Stress analysis

Strain Gage Calibration Factors for Constant Room Temperature Conditions. Gage Resistance, Gage Factor and Transverse Sensitivity Coefficient)

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

6.4 A cylindrical specimen of a titanium alloy having an elastic modulus of 107 GPa ( psi) and

ME 207 Material Science I

EuCARD-2 Enhanced European Coordination for Accelerator Research & Development. Journal Publication

PDDC 1 st Semester Civil Engineering Department Assignments of Mechanics of Solids [ ] Introduction, Fundamentals of Statics

Strain Measurement. Prof. Yu Qiao. Department of Structural Engineering, UCSD. Strain Measurement

Mechanical properties 1 Elastic behaviour of materials

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering

I. INTRODUCTION. Fig. 1. Experimental apparatus for the strain measurements.

Outline. 4 Mechanical Sensors Introduction General Mechanical properties Piezoresistivity Piezoresistive Sensors Capacitive sensors Applications

Multiphysics Simulations for the design of a Superconducting magnet for proton therapy

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Experiment Five (5) Principal of Stress and Strain

6.37 Determine the modulus of resilience for each of the following alloys:

Tensile Properties of Ag Alloy Clad Bi-2212 Round Wires

Strength of Materials (15CV 32)

: APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LIFTING DEVICE DETECTOR SUPPORTS FOR THE LHCb VERTEX LOCATOR (VELO)

CHAPTER 3 THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS

Outline. Tensile-Test Specimen and Machine. Stress-Strain Curve. Review of Mechanical Properties. Mechanical Behaviour

Exercise: concepts from chapter 8

ISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING

Use of High Temperature Superconductors for Future Fusion Magnet Systems

Field Quality Measurements in a Single-Aperture 11 T Nb 3 Sn Demonstrator Dipole for LHC Upgrades

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

PES Institute of Technology

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Laboratory for Particle Physics

N = Shear stress / Shear strain

N = N A Pb A Pb. = ln N Q v kt. = kt ln v N

CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS FOR LINEAR ELASTIC SOLIDS

Solid Mechanics Chapter 1: Tension, Compression and Shear

Module-4. Mechanical Properties of Metals

Prediction of Elastic Constants on 3D Four-directional Braided

Bending Load & Calibration Module

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Lecture 19. Measurement of Solid-Mechanical Quantities (Chapter 8) Measuring Strain Measuring Displacement Measuring Linear Velocity

Strain Measurement Techniques for Composite Coupon Testing

Title conductor measured by a Walters spr. Author(s) Itoh, K; Kiyoshi, T; Wada, H; Selva

Chapter 7. Highlights:

[5] Stress and Strain

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

4.MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS

Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Related content. To cite this article: E Fischer et al 2010 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

Computational Analysis for Composites

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE INVESTIGATION OF INTERACTING DEFECTS: COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF STRESS CONCENTRATION AND MAGNETIC SHIELDING

Stability Analysis of the Interconnection of the LHC Main Superconducting Bus Bars

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

12/8/2009. Prof. A.K.M.B. Rashid Department of MME BUET, Dhaka

DIVIDED SYLLABUS ( ) - CLASS XI PHYSICS (CODE 042) COURSE STRUCTURE APRIL

Lecture 2: Training, fine filaments & cables

Accelerator Quality HTS Dipole Magnet Demonstrator Designs for the EuCARD-2, 5 Tesla 40 mm Clear Aperture Magnet

X has a higher value of the Young modulus. Y has a lower maximum tensile stress than X

STRESS, STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

C.J. Bennett, W. Sun Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

JT-60 SA Toroidal Field coil structural analysis

INTRODUCTION TO STRAIN

Central Solenoid Winding Pack Design

Chapter 2: Elasticity

THEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT?

High Tech High Top Hat Technicians. An Introduction to Solid Mechanics. Is that supposed to bend there?

Materials and Structures. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 6

Effect of Specimen Dimensions on Flexural Modulus in a 3-Point Bending Test

Members Subjected to Torsional Loads

ME 176 Final Exam, Fall 1997

Geology 2112 Principles and Applications of Geophysical Methods WEEK 1. Lecture Notes Week 1

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

STRAIN GAUGES YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Discrete Element Modelling of a Reinforced Concrete Structure

Limits to high field magnets for particle accelerators

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

20 T Block Dipole: Features and Challenges

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

TORSION TEST. Figure 1 Schematic view of torsion test

MgB 2 and BSCCO. S.I. SCHLACHTER, W. GOLDACKER KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, INSTITUTE FOR TECHNICAL PHYSICS

Volume 2 Fatigue Theory Reference Manual

High Field Magnets Perspectives from High Energy Physics. Dr. Glen Crawford Director, Research and Technology R&D DOE Office of High Energy Physics

Design Aspects of High-Field Block-Coil Superconducting Dipole Magnets

Transcription:

Uncertainties in the measurement of the mechanical properties of Nb 3 Sn coil constituents and cable stacks C. Scheuerlein, F. Lackner Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable characterization for accelerator magnets workshop, 17 th November 2017, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain

Outline Test sample geometries Uncertainties in dynamic Young s modulus measurements Uncertainties in stress-strain measurements using homogeneous samples with ideal testing geometry Stress strain behaviour dependence on the load direction Non linear stress-strain behaviour Elastic anisotropy of the coil constituent materials Uncertainties in Nb 3 Sn composite wire stress-strain measurements Uncertainties in the determination of the Nb 3 Sn mechanical properties Uncertainties in stress-strain measurements of reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks Conclusion

Sample geometries for standardised mechanical testing Standardized test samples for dynamic and static tensile and compression tests. All samples have been extracted from a Ti6Al4V pole wedge. Sample for Poisson s ratio measurement and extensometers for axial and transverse strain measurements. The sample has been extracted from a DISCUP coil wedge.

Dynamic Young s modulus measurements For dynamic test methods (resonance and impulse excitation) the key elements defining the measurement uncertainty are the mass and physical size of the specimen [i]. For both test methods a measurement uncertainty < 1 % is realistic [ii,iii]. Typical differences between dynamic and static Young s moduli (adiabatic vs isothermal modulus) are <1 % [ii]. Since dynamic Young s modulus measurements are non destructive temperature dependent measurements are possible [iv]. Resonance peak of the first bending oscillation of rectangular 316LN specimen at different temperatures [iv]. [i] J.D. Lord, R. Morrell, NPL Good Practice Guide No. 98 Elastic Modulus Measurement, NPL London 2006 [ii] F.H. Newmann, V.H.L. Searle, The general properties of matter. Issue 5, Edward Arnold, 1962 [iii] ASTM E 1875 Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young s Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson s Ratio by Sonic Resonance. 2013, ASTM International. [iv] C. Scheuerlein, F. Lackner, F. Savary, B. Rehmer, M. Finn, C. Meyer, Thermomechanical behavior of the HL-LHC 11 Tesla Nb 3 Sn magnet coil constituents during reaction heat treatment, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., submitted

Stress-strain behaviour dependence on the load direction at the example of stainless steel From: The European Stainless Steel Development Association Euro Inox and The Steel Construction Institute, Design manual for structural stainless steel-commentary (2 nd Edition), 2003

Stress (MPa) Uncertainties in static Young s modulus measurements Precise Young s moduli can be derived from stress-strain measurements of materials that exhibit pronounced linear elastic behaviour (e.g. Ti6Al4V). Comparatively large uncertainty in the Young s modulus results of materials that do not exhibit linear behaviour, like stainless steels. 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 Ti-6Al-4V pole wedge YUS130 collar 316LN steel shell DISCUP coil wedge 100 Annealed Cu stabiliser 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Tensile strain (%) Comparison of the RT engineering stress-strain curves of different coil and magnet materials [iv]. Comparison of 316LN and Ti6Al4V stress-strain curves and linear fits for the determination of Young s modulus [v]. [iv] C. Scheuerlein, F. Lackner, F. Savary, B. Rehmer, M. Finn, C. Meyer, Thermomechanical behavior of the HL-LHC 11 Tesla Nb 3 Sn magnet coil constituents during reaction heat treatment, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., submitted [v] C. Scheuerlein, F. Lackner, F. Savary, B. Rehmer, M. Finn, P. Uhlemann, Mechanical properties of the HL-LHC 11 Tesla Nb 3 Sn magnet constituent materials, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 27(4), (2017), 4003007

Young's modulus (GPa) Elastic anisotropy in the 11 T dipole DISCUP coil wedges The DISCUP Young s moduli derived from stress-strain compression tests are 89 GPa in the wedge extrusion direction and 96 GPa perpendicular to the extrusion direction [v]. These values are substantially lower than the values between 115 to 130 GPa found for ODS Copper in literature. The angular dependence of Young s modulus has been calculated from texture data obtained by neutron diffraction and from Cu single crystal elastic constants. The DISCUP wedges are strongly textured (multiples of random orientation MRD=16), which causes a strong elastic anisotropy of about 30%. 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 Voigt Hill REUSS VOIGT HILL(S) HILL(C) Measured 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Angle vs drawing direction ( ) Angular DISCUP Young s modulus dependence with respect to the wedge extrusion direction. Calculated assuming equal strains (Voigt) and equal stresses (Reuss) in all grains, respectively. Measurement results from [v] are shown for comparison. Courtesy of W. Gan, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht. 7

Summary: Uncertainties in Young s modulus measurement with ideal test samples, according to well established standards Dynamic Young s modulus measurement uncertainty <1 %. Static Young s modulus measurement by tensile tests uncertainty is typically 3% [ii], provided the material exhibits pronounced linear elastic behaviour. Static Young s modulus measurement by compression tests uncertainty is typically 5% [iii]. For materials that do not exhibit pronounced linear stress strain behaviour (e.g. stainless steel and annealed copper), the uncertainty of the E-modulus derived from static tests can be >10% [v,vi]. Important elastic anisotropy of textured coil materials (as an example DISCUP elastic anisotropy is>30%). [vi] Ch. Weißmüller, H. Frenz, Messunsicherheit bei der Ermittlung des E-Moduls im Zugversuch an Stahl, Materials Testing, vol. 55, no. 9, 2013, pp. 643-647

Uncertainties in stress-strain measurements of Nb 3 Sn/Cu composite wires The most easy to study wire load case is uniaxial tensile loading in the wire drawing direction. Nb 3 Sn/Cu composite wires are not suitable tensile test samples. the wire constituents are not stress free the filaments contain porosity at zero axial load the wires are always bended No linear part in the loading stress-strain curve. Therefore, the wire stiffness is estimated from the linear slope of unloading curves. The Nb 3 Sn/Cu wire stiffness is stress and strain dependent, even in the wire drawing direction. Strain (%) Stiffness (GPa) 0.02 139 0.04 120 0.06 117 0.08 118 0.10 118 0.12 116 0.14 117 0.16 117 9

Extensometry for wire uniaxial stress-strain measurements The precision of stress-strain measurements relies mainly on careful extensometer strain measurements. Extensometers for strain measurements in wire drawing direction are commercially available. Extensometer calibration at RT can be performed by the supplier. Calibration at 77K and 4.2 K is not easily available and requires the setting up of dedicated calibration tools [vii]. (a) (b) (a) MTS-clip on extensometer type 632.27F-21 with gauge length of 25 mm and (b) calibration tool. [vii] http://snf.ieeecsc.org/abstracts/stp466-simultaneous-measurement-critical-current-stress-strain-and-lattice-distortions 10

Mechanical behaviour of Nb 3 Sn/Cu PIT wire constituents studied by simultaneous stress-strain-xrd measurements at 4.2 K The effect of different wire constituents on the wire mechanical behaviour can be understood from combined X-ray diffractionstress-strain results : Almost no load is carried by the annealed Cu matrix Linear elastic behaviour of Nb and Nb 3 Sn Nb and Nb 3 Sn axial pre-compression in the unloaded wire Load transfer from Nb 3 Sn to Nb at a wire stress of about 270 MPa and a strain of about 0.7% Nb 3 Sn Nb barrier Cu matrix (a) 4.2 K stress-strain curve and (b) axial lattice strain vs uniaxial tensile stress [viii]. [viii] C. Scheuerlein, M. Di Michiel, F. Buta, B. Seeber, C. Senatore, R. Flükiger, T. Siegrist, T. Besara, J. Kadar, B. Bordini, A. Ballarino, L. Bottura, Stress distribution and lattice distortions in Nb 3 Sn/Cu multifilament wires under uniaxial tensile loading at 4.2 K, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, (2014), 044021. 11

Summary: Sources of uncertainty in uniaxial tensile stressstrain measurements of Nb 3 Sn/Cu composite wires Nb 3 Sn/Cu composite wires are not suitable for precise tensile tests. Their constituents are not stress free, the filaments contain porosity and at zero axial load the wires are always bended. There is no linear part in the wire loading stress-strain curves. The wire stiffness is commonly estimated from the linear slope of unloading stress-strain curves. The slope of these curves is stress and strain dependent. Wire stiffness results depend strongly on test and data analysis procedures. Wire stress-strain results cannot be easily compared with results obtained with alternative test methods. Only few laboratories perform the challenging stress-strain measurements at 4.2 K.

Nb 3 Sn mechanical properties at RT Published RT Nb 3 Sn Young s modulus values vary between 32 GPa to 165 GPa. Measuring the mechanical properties of Nb 3 Sn is very tricky because: The intermetallic phase Nb 3 Sn is stable with Sn contents ranging from about 18-25 at.%. Preparation of Nb 3 Sn bulk samples which properties are representative for the Nb 3 Sn filaments in multifilament wires is extremely difficult (e.g. because of different Sn gradients, alloying elements, grain size and orientation distribution, and presence of contaminating phases). Determining Nb 3 Sn/Nb sub-element Young s moduli from tensile tests, for instance using extracted (brittle) Nb 3 Sn filaments, is very delicate. The filaments are a composite, containing Nb 3 Sn, unreacted Nb diffusion barriers, porosity and other material. For such materials rule-of-mixture estimates may not be appropriate. 13

The unusual temperature dependence of the Nb 3 Sn mechanical properties and calculation of Nb 3 Sn elastic anisotropy in PIT and RRP type wires During cooldown Nb 3 Sn undergoes a phase transformation at roughly 40 K, which causes a lattice softening. This is for instance revealed by the slope of the stress-strain curves acquired at RT and at 4.2 K [viii]. The Nb 3 Sn elastic properties in PIT and RRP wires can be calculated using the Nb 3 Sn grain orientation distribution and published Nb 3 Sn single crystal elastic constants. The results illustrate the different elastic anisotropy in RRP and PIT type wires. How reliable are the Nb 3 Sn single crystal elastic constants? From: Elastic Anisotropy in Multifilament Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Wires, IEEE Trans Appl. Supercond., 25(3), (2015), 8400605 [viii] Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, (2014), 044021. 14

Summary: Uncertainties of Nb 3 Sn mechanical properties at RT and 4.2 K Preparation of Nb 3 Sn bulk samples which are representative for the Nb 3 Sn in wires for mechanical testing is nearly impossible. The mechanical Nb 3 Sn properties in the filaments of IT, PIT and Bronze route wires are different. Nb 3 Sn Young s moduli calculations rely on the availability of accurate single crystal elastic constants. During cooling to below 77 K a Nb 3 Sn lattice softening occurs. 77 K mechanical test results do not allow to predict 4.2 K Nb 3 Sn mechanical properties.

Transverse compression test of reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks Transverse compressive loading of a composite is a highly complex load case. Transverse compression tests of reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks can provide qualitative estimates of the stress-strain behaviour of the Nb 3 Sn conductor in magnet coils under monotonic and cyclic azimuthal loading. Reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks are sometimes also used to determine a socalled Elastic modulus of the Nb 3 Sn conductor in magnet coils. Since Rutherford cable stacks do not exhibit linear elastic behaviour at any stress level, the use of the term Elastic modulus in the context of stressstrain measurements of Nb 3 Sn cable stacks is misleading. From: D.R. Chichili, T.T. Arkan, I. Terechkine, J.A. Rice, Niobium- Tin Magnet Technology Development at Fermilab, Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference, New York, 1999

Sources of uncertainties in transverse compression experiments using reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks Geometry of Rutherford cable stacks is not suited for precise mechanical testing. Stiffness of Rutherford cable stacks is not uniform across the loaded area. Geometry of Rutherford cable stacks is only partly representative for the conductor in magnet coils. Strong influence of load rate and mechanical cycling on stress-strain behaviour. No standard procedures available. Very strong influence of data analysis procedures on stiffness results. Stiffness depends on the applied strain and stress. Very strong influence of the load direction on stress-strain behaviour. Integration of an extensometer in the test set-up is in many cases not possible. No easy cross check with other mechanical test methods is possible.

Conclusion Nb 3 Sn coil and magnet materials properties are anisotropic and load direction dependent. Highly accurate Young s moduli can be obtained from dynamic measurements. In favourable cases (e.g. Ti6Al4V) Young s moduli can be derived from static stressstrain measurements, using standardised test sample geometries and test procedures. Transverse compression tests of reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks can provide qualitative estimates that may be representative for the stressstrain behaviour of the Nb 3 Sn conductor in magnet coils under monotonic and cyclic loading. Results of transverse compression tests of reacted and impregnated Nb 3 Sn Rutherford cable stacks cannot be used to precisely predict stress levels in magnets. The use of the term Young s modulus or elastic modulus in the context of stress-strain measurements of Rutherford cable stacks is misleading. Stress-strain tests at 77 K do not allow to predict Nb 3 Sn behaviour at 4.2 K.

Back-up slides 19

Calculation of Young s modulus from resonance frequencies For long thin beams with rectangular cross section the Young s modulus (E) is calculated from the mass (m), length (L), width (b) and thickness (t) of the beam, and its fundamental frequency in bending (f f ). where E = 0.9465 mf f 2 b T = 1 + 6.858 t L 2 L 3 t 3 T [iii] ASTM E 1875 Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young s Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson s Ratio by Sonic Resonance. 2013, ASTM International

Uniaxial tensile testing of extracted Nb 3 Sn filaments Stress-strain curves of a reacted RRP wire and its extracted filaments measured at room temperature. From : IEEE TAS, 25(3), (2015), 8400605 21

Summary of 11 T dipole materials elastic and plastic properties Material R p0.2 (MPa) R m (MPa) A (%) Z (%) Young s modulus dynamic (GPa) Young s modulus static (GPa) Resonance Impulse Tensile Compr. 316LN_L 351±12 674±2 54±5 63±2 191±0.3 191±0.3 183±7 n.m. 316LN_T 324±4 658±1 53±5 63±1 n.m. n.m. 203±15 n.m. Magnetil_L 117±3 241±1 n.m. 73±3 196±0.8 196±0.3 208±19 n.m. Magnetil_T 124±2 267±1 47±2 71±4 219±0.1 218±0.3 213±3 n.m. YUS-130_L 401 793 71 66 196±0.9 196±0.3 196 n.m. YUS-130_T 415 749 51 66 193±1.1 192±0.3 189 n.m. Ti-6Al-4V_L 868±5 930±12 17±1 28±2 115 114 115±1 120±2 Ti-6Al-4V_T n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. 116±2 DISCUP no-ht_l 332±2 387±1 22±2 43±4 92.9±0.2 93.8±0.3 87±1 89±1 DISCUP no-ht_t n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. n.m. 96±2 DISCUP HT_L 284±1 376±1 26±1 48±1 96.7 96.3 91±1 87±2 [v] C. Scheuerlein, F. Lackner, F. Savary, B. Rehmer, M. Finn, P. Uhlemann, Mechanical properties of the HL-LHC 11 Tesla Nb 3 Sn magnet constituent materials, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 27(4), (2017), 4003007

Nb 3 Sn Poisson ratio at 4.2 K 0.10 Nb 3 Sn transverse lattice strain (%) 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10-0.15-0.20 Bronze #26: y = -0.3516x R² = 0.9998 PIT B215: y = -0.3785x R² = 0.9956 RRP #8056: y = -0.3594x R² = 0.9953 Bronze #26 PIT B215 RRP #8056-0.25-0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Nb 3 Sn axial lattice strain (%) Comparison of the 4.2 K Nb 3 Sn Poisson ratio in the BR, PIT and RRP wire. From: Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27 (2014) 044021 (7pp) 23

Mechanical properties of unreacted Nb 3 Sn wires Comparison of the stress-strain curves of unreacted Nb 3 Sn (PIT, RRP and BR), hard drawn Cu and LHC Nb-Ti wire. From: R. Bjoersted et al, Mechanical properties of unreacted Nb 3 Sn/Cu composite wires used for cable production, CERN, Technical note EDMS Nr: 1421825 24