The Contragredient. Spherical Unitary Dual for Complex Classical Groups

Similar documents
Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

SPHERICAL UNITARY DUAL FOR COMPLEX CLASSICAL GROUPS

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group

Unipotent Representations and the Dual Pairs Correspondence

arxiv: v2 [math.rt] 8 Jun 2018

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS

Unitarizable Minimal Principal Series of Reductive Groups

Lecture 4: LS Cells, Twisted Induction, and Duality

Notes on the Hermitian Dual

The Omega-Regular Unitary Dual of the Metaplectic Group of Rank 2

On Cuspidal Spectrum of Classical Groups

Computing the Unitary Dual. Jeffrey Adams, David Vogan, Peter Trapa and Marc van Leeuwen

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT

Hermitian and Unitary Representations for Affine Hecke Algebras

Local systems on nilpotent orbits and weighted Dynkin diagrams

Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters

Fourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups. Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

REDUCIBLE PRINCIPAL SERIES REPRESENTATIONS, AND LANGLANDS PARAMETERS FOR REAL GROUPS. May 15, 2018 arxiv: v2 [math.

Colette Mœglin and Marko Tadić

Marko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

SEMISIMPLE SYMPLECTIC CHARACTERS OF FINITE UNITARY GROUPS

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

Unitarity of non-spherical principal series

UNITARY FUNCTORIAL CORRESPONDENCES FOR p ADIC GROUPS

Whittaker unitary dual of affine graded Hecke algebras of type E

Contragredient representations and characterizing the local Langlands correspondence

2 PETER E. TRAPA so denes an innitesimal character for g. The following denition is perhaps the simplest possible, but masks most of the deeper ideas

Half the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant

Tempered endoscopy for real groups III: inversion of transfer and L-packet structure

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

On the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group

WHITTAKER UNITARY DUAL OF AFFINE GRADED HECKE ALGEBRAS OF TYPE E

Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence

ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig

The Geometry of Conjugacy Classes of Nilpotent Matrices

The Lusztig-Vogan Bijection in the Case of the Trivial Representation

Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence

Spin norm: combinatorics and representations

Parameters for Representations of Real Groups Atlas Workshop, July 2004 updated for Workshop, July 2005

REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)

Langlands parameters and finite-dimensional representations

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

LECTURE 2: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR G. 1. Introduction. If we view the flow of information in the Langlands Correspondence as

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th

UNRAMIFIED UNITARY DUALS FOR SPLIT CLASSICAL p ADIC GROUPS; THE TOPOLOGY AND ISOLATED REPRESENTATIONS

JACQUET MODULES AND IRRREDUCIBILITY OF INDUCED REPRESENTATIONS FOR CLASSICAL p-adic GROUPS

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Representations and Linear Actions

1 Introduction. 2 Background. October 9, 2002

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2

Subsystems, Nilpotent Orbits, and Weyl Group Representations

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

On the unitary dual of classical and exceptional real split groups. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine MIT, March, 2010

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits

Nilpotent Orbits and Weyl Group Representations, I

The L 3 (4) near octagon

Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Category O and its basic properties

TWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. In memory of Sibe Mardešić

`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

DECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY C.M. RINGEL)

Invariant Distributions and Gelfand Pairs

Degree Graphs of Simple Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups

IMAGE OF FUNCTORIALITY FOR GENERAL SPIN GROUPS

Shintani lifting and real-valued characters

A Langlands classification for unitary representations

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8. Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia

Subquotients of Minimal Principal Series

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

UNITARY DUAL OF GL(n) AT ARCHIMEDEAN PLACES AND GLOBAL JACQUET-LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE

Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups

Certain Induced Complementary Series of the Universal Covering of the Symplectic Group

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Essays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 14 Dec 2015

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

SOME REMARKS ON DEGENERATE PRINCIPAL SERIES. Chris Jantzen

On the Non-vanishing of the Central Value of Certain L-functions: Unitary Groups

Transcription:

The Contragredient Joint with D. Vogan Spherical Unitary Dual for Complex Classical Groups Joint with D. Barbasch

The Contragredient Problem: Compute the involution φ φ of the space of L-homomorphisms corresponding to π π (the contragredient) i.e. φ : W F L G, π Π φ π Π φ what φ? (Assume φ Π φ known... ) (Well defined, same for all π Π φ?) Nowhere to be found ( much needed gap in the literature ), even for F = R

Character: θ π (g) = θ π (g 1 ) Lemma: There is an automorphism C of L G satisfying: C (g) is G -conjugate to g 1 for g semisimple (The Chevalley automorphism, extended to L G) Lemma: there is an automorphism τ of W R satisfying: τ(g) is W R conjugate to g 1 (τ(z) = z 1, τ(j) = j)

Theorem (F = R): (1) φ = C φ (2) φ = φ τ Proof: Not entirely elementary; characterize π by θ π (g) = θ π (g 1 ) Need a formula relating φ and θ π... True for tori... Key lemma: action of C on the normalizer of a torus

Conjecture/Desiderata: (1) is true for all other local fields (φ = C φ) Buzzard: true for unramified principal series (?) Note: Probably nothing like τ exists in general??

Spherical Unitary Dual for Complex Classical Groups Joint with D. Barbasch Hat-tip: P. Trapa, M. McGovern, E. Sommers Barbasch 1989 (full unitary dual) Spherical unitary dual for split real and p-adic groups: Barbasch 2005 Nice picture in terms of nilpotent orbits for G Plan: Revisit complex case from this point of view Application: Compute behavior of unitarity under the dual pair correspondence Application: Organize and understand the upcoming Atlas computation of the unitary dual

Problem: How to organize the answer? Sp(4, C)

(1) complex groups are quasisplit but not split (2) Orbits are induced in many ways; complementary series overlap in complicated ways (3) Organize the answer via nilpotent orbits in G and/or G? (4) There is no nonlinear cover of Sp(2n, C); the oscillator representation lives on the linear group

G = GL(n, C), SO(n, C), Sp(2n, C) (some statements hold for exceptional groups) π(λ) = irreducible, spherical representation with infinitesimal character λ h real: λ X (H) R (λ R n in the usual coordinates) Π sph = {irreducible, real, spherical representations}

Definition: O = nilpotent adjoint G-orbit C(O) = { real, irreducible, unitary, spherical π AV (π) = O} AV (π) is the associated variety of π [AV (π) = W F(π) = AV (Ann(π)] via various identifications Π sph = O C(O) (disjoint union)

Nilpotent Orbits in Classical Groups GL(n): partitions of n Sp(2n): partitions of n, odd parts have even multiplicity O(n): partitions of n, even parts have even multiplicity

M G = Levi factor O = Ind G M (O M) Induction of Orbits induction GL(n): combine orbits Ind GL(n) GL(a) GL(b) (p q) = p q (a 1, a 2,...,) (b 1, b 2,...) = (a 1 + b 1, a 2 + b 2,...) Type X=B,C,D: double the GL(m) partitions, combine, and X-collapse Example: Ind Sp(4) GL(1) SL(2) (trivial) = (2) (11) = (31) (22) Ind Sp(4) GL(2) (trivial) := (22) (double (11) for GL(2) to get (22))

Problem: orbits can be induced in more than one way (leading to overlapping series of representations) Definition: O = Ind G M (O M) is proper if no collapsing is required O is P-rigid if it is not properly induced Lemma: (type BCD) O is P-rigid if and only if all parts 1, 2,..., k occur with nonzero multiplicity. (Rigid is slightly stronger: certain rows of multiplicity 2 are not allowed) Lemma: O is uniquely properly induced from a P-rigid orbit i.e. (M, O M ) unique up to G-conjugacy Conjecture: Proper induction is equivalent to: the corresponding moment map is birational.

Program: (1) O P-rigid λ = λ(o) π(λ) unipotent (2) O arbitrary (M, O M ) (O M rigid, O properly induced from O M ) M = GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) M 0 O M P-rigid τ unipotent for M 0 Ind G GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) M 0 (1 1 τ) is irreducible and unitary

Study: Program (continued): Ind G GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) M 0 ( det x 1 det x k τ) Since induction is irreducible when all x i = 0, some deformations are allowed... Example: if all x i are small, deform them to 0 Example: G = Sp(6), λ = (.4,.5,.8). Deform to (.4,.4,.8), which is induced from the unitary representation: Stein(.4) π(.8) on GL(2) SL(2) Basic idea (Barbasch, 1989): these operations suffice to find all the irreducible unitary ones

Punch line: Recall O M, τ, Program (continued): ( ) Ind G GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) M 0 ( det x 1 det x k τ) Main Theorem: (rough version): (0) The 0-complementary series C(0 p ) can be explicitly described (M = GL(1) n ) (1) The representations (*) which are irreducible, and can be irreducibly deformed to a unitarily induced representation can be described in terms of C(0 p ) for a smaller group (2) This gives all the irreducible unitary representations (*) (3) The complementary series C(O) consists of precisely these representations. Recall Π sph = O C(O)

Data on the Dual Group: From now on take G = Sp(2n) A(O) = Cent G (X)/Cent G (X) 0 A(O) = Lusztig s quotient Lemma: O =nilpotent orbit for SO(2n + 1) O = b 0, a 1, b 1,...a r, b r b 0 a 1 b 1... O = (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 )...(a r, b r ) A(O ) = (Z/2Z) k where k is the number of a i < b i with b i odd

d: duality of nilpotent orbits: d : O d(o) = special nilpotent G -orbit Proposition (Barbasch/Vogan, Sommers) If O is even, there is a canonical bijection (O, s) O A(O ) {O d(o) = O }

Lemma: If O is P-rigid then d(o) is even Definition A P-rigid symbol for G is: with a i, b i odd, a i < b i, ǫ i = ±1 Assume: (1) ǫ i = 1 b i a i > 2 (2) ǫ i = ǫ i+1 = 1 b i < a i+1 Σ = (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1...(a r, b r ) ǫr These are certain pairs (O, s) Lemma The P-rigid symbols parametrize P-rigid orbits

Definition: Σ = (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1...(a r, b r ) ǫr (a, b) 1 1 2 (b 1, b 3,..., a + 1) (a + b)/2 terms (a, b) 1 1 2 (b 1, b 3,..., a+1)+ 1 2 (1,...,1) (b 0 ) 1 2 (b 1, b 3,...,1) (b 1)/2 terms Do this for each i, concatenate λ = λ(σ) = λ(o) Example: Σ = (5)(5, 7) (7, 11) +, O = 5555433211,RRR (a+b)/2 terms (5,7) (5) {}}{{}}{ 7 ( 2, 1, 2, 5 2, 3 2, 1 (7,11) + 2, 1 2, 3 2, {}}{ 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3).

Conjecture: λ(o) = λ BV (O) (certainly true for rigid orbits) Theorem (Barbasch 1989): O P-rigid λ = λ(o) π(λ) is unitary This completes the first part of the program

Symbol: Σ = {c 1, c 1 }... {c k, c k } : (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1...(a r, b r ) ǫr Assume: (0) (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1... is a P-rigid symbol; (1) if a i < c j < b i, ǫ i = 1 then c j is even; (2) if a i < c j < b i, ǫ i = 1 then c j is odd; (3) if c i < b 0 then c i is even M(Σ) = GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) Sp(2m) Lemma: Symbols parametrize pairs (M, O M ) where O M is P-rigid and Ind G M (O M) is proper (Conditions 1-3 give the proper induction) In other words there are canonical bijections: (1) Orbits O (2) Pairs (M, O M ) (O M P-rigid, the induction is proper) (3) P-rigid symbols Σ

Sp(10) Σ (L, O L ) O λ (11) (Sp(10), triv) 1 10 (5,4,3,2,1) (1)(1, 9) + (Sp(10), 2 2 1 6 ) 2 2 1 6 (4,3,2,1,0) (1)(1, 9) (Sp(10), 21 8 ) 21 8 ( 9 2, 7 2, 2 5, 3 2, 2 1) (1)(3, 7) + (Sp(10), 2 4 1 2 ) 2 4 1 2 (3, 2, 1, 0, 1) (1)(3, 7) (Sp(10), 2 3 1 4 ) 2 3 1 4 ( 2 9, 7 2, 2 5, 3 2, 2 1) {2, 2} : (7) (GL(2) Sp(6), triv) 3 2 1 4 (3, 2, 1, 1 2, 1 2 ) {1, 1} : (1)(1, 7) + (GL(1) Sp(8), triv 2 2 1 4 ) 421 4 (3, 2, 1, 0, 0) {1, 1} : (1)(1, 7) (GL(1) Sp(8), triv 21 6 ) 41 6 ( 2 7, 5 2, 2 3, 1 2, 0) {5, 5} : (1) (GL(5), triv) 2 5 (2, 1, 0, 1, 2) (3)(3, 5) (Sp(10), 33211) 33211 ( 2 5, 3 2, 2 1, 1 2, 1) {1, 1} : (1)(3, 5) (GL(1) Sp(8), triv 2 3 1 2 ) 42211 ( 5 2, 3 2, 2 1, 1 2, 0) {2, 2} : (1)(1, 5) + (GL(2) Sp(6), triv 2211) 4411 (2, 1, 0, 1 2, 1 2 ) {1, 1} 2 : (1)(1, 5) + (GL(1) 2 Sp(6), triv 2211 6211 (2, 1, 0, 0, 0) {1, 1} 2 : (1)(1, 5) (GL(1) 2 Sp(6), triv 21 4 ) 61 4 ( 5 2, 3 2, 2 1, 0, 0) {4, 4} : (3) (GL(4) Sp(2), triv) 3322 ( 3 2, 1 2, 1 2, 3 2, 1) {1, 1}{4, 4} : (1) (GL(1) GL(4), triv) 42 3 ( 2 3, 1 2, 1 2, 3 2, 0) {3, 3} : (1)(1, 3) (GL(3) Sp(4), triv 211 433 ( 2 3, 1, 1, 0, 1) 2 {2, 2}{3, 3} : (1) (GL(2) GL(3), triv) 442 (1, 0, 1, 2 1, 1 2 ) {1, 1} 2 {3, 3} : (1) (GL(1) 2 GL(3), triv) 622 (1, 0, 1, 0, 0) {2, 2} 2 : (3) (GL(2) 2 Sp(4), triv) 55 ( 2 1, 1 2, 1 2, 1 2, 0) {1, 1} 3 : (1)(1, 3) (GL(1) 3 Sp(4), triv 211 811 ( 2 3, 1, 0, 0, 0) 2 {1, 1}{2, 2} 2 : (1) (GL(1) GL(2) 2, triv) 64 ( 2 1, 1 2, 1 2, 1 2, 0) {1, 1} 3 {2, 2} : (1) (GL(1) 3 GL(2), triv) 82 ( 2 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) 2 {1, 1} 4 : (1) (GL(1) 4, triv) 10 (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)

Σ = {c 1, c 1 }... {c k, c k } : (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1...(a r, b r ) ǫr M = M(σ), (M, O M ) τ on Sp(2m) O = Ind G M (O M) λ(σ) as before, using: {c i, c i } (c i, c i ) 1 1 2 (c i 1,..., c i + 1) λ(σ) = λ(o) I(Σ) = Ind Sp(2n) GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) Sp(2m)(1 1 τ) Proposition: I(Σ) is irreducible and unitary (unitarity is obvious)

Inducing Data: (Σ, ν) = {c 1, c 1 } x1... {c k, c k } xk : (b 0 )(a 1, b 1 ) ǫ1...(a r, b r ) ǫr I(Σ, ν) = Ind Sp(2n) GL(c 1 ) GL(c k ) Sp(2m) ( det x 1 det x k τ) For each 1 j k define: B a i c j b i for some 1 i r; X j = B c j b 0 ; C otherwise.

Relabel thing by grouping c i s which are equal: d 1 {}}{{}}{ {c 1, c 1 } x 1 1... {c 1, c 1 } x 1... {c d1 l, c l } x l... {c 1 l, c l } x l dl with 0 < c 1 < c 2 < < c l. x j 1 xj 2 xj d j (1 j l). (1) d l

Theorem: (1) I(Σ, ν) is irreducible and unitary if (x j 1,...,xj d j ) is in the 0-complementary of type X j for all j and if c j+1 = c j + 1 then x j s + x j+1 t < 3 2 Call these (Σ, ν) or ν admissible λ = λ(o) = λ(σ, ν), π(σ, ν) = I(Σ, ν) = π(λ) for all s and t. (2) I(Σ, ν) (admissible) satisfies AV (I(σ, ν)) = O (3) C(O) = {I(Σ, ν) ν is admissible} Recall Π sph = O C(O)

0-Complementary Series: type B: λ = (x 1,...,x n ): x i < 1 2 for all i type C: λ = (x 1, x 1,...,x r, y 1,...,y s ) 0 x 1 x r 1 2 < y 1 < y 2 < < y s < 1. (1) x i + x j, x i + y j 1 for all i, j; (2) If s 1, {1 i r 1 x i < y 1 } is even (3) For all 1 j s 1, {i y j < 1 x i < y j+1 } is odd (In short: all irreducible deformations, removing Stein complementary series)

Appendix: Dual Pair Correspondence for Sp(4)/SO(5) Sp(4)

SO(5)

Sp(4)/SO(5) Dual Pair Correspondence