Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Similar documents
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

² 2015 Program Year. Farm Tract McLeod County, Minnesota 1:4, NHEL NHEL

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Carrick Road $798,000

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. BOWLSBEY 320 LIBERTY ISLAND ROAD BUYER: RASSMUSSEN TRUST

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Hartmann Ranch. potential vineyard ground acres +/

TRACT 7: ±252 Acres Irrigated Farmland Grassland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

Custom Soil Resource Report for Stevens County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Atlantic County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Fall River Valley Irrigated Farmland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas


Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cumberland County, New Jersey

Transcription:

95 30' 19'' W Soil Taxonomy Classification Franklin County, Kansas 95 29' 28'' W 38 33' 8'' N 281700 281800 281900 282000 282100 282200 282300 282400 282500 282600 282700 282800 282900 38 33' 8'' N 4269300 4269400 4269500 4269600 4269700 4269800 4269900 4270000 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 4269300 4269400 4269500 4269600 4269700 4269800 4269900 4270000 38 32' 42'' N 281700 281800 281900 282000 282100 282200 282300 282400 282500 282600 282700 282800 38 32' 42'' N 95 30' 19'' W N Map Scale: 1:5,640 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 250 500 1000 1500 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 95 29' 28'' W Page 1 of 5

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Rating Polygons Soil Rating Lines thermic Aquic Vertic thermic Aquic Soil Rating Points Water Features Vertic thermic Aquic Vertic Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Franklin County, Kansas Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 20, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 16, 2017 Oct 20, 2014 Mar The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 2 of 5

Soil Taxonomy Classification Soil Taxonomy Classification Summary by Map Unit Franklin County, Kansas (KS059) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8659 Clareson-Eram complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky superactive, thermic Typic 15.7 15.0% 8775 Kenoma silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 8791 Lebo-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes MT250B MT487C Aliceville silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Eram-Aliceville complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes Vertic superactive, thermic Typic thermic Oxyaquic Vertic thermic Aquic 26.1 25.0% 1.4 1.3% 24.9 23.8% 36.4 34.9% Totals for Area of Interest 104.4 100.0% Page 3 of 5

Description This rating presents the taxonomic classification based on Soil Taxonomy. The system of soil classification used by the has six categories (Soil Survey Staff, 1999 and 2003). Beginning with the broadest, these categories are the order, suborder, great group, subgroup, family, and series. Classification is based on soil properties observed in the field or inferred from those observations or from laboratory measurements. This table shows the classification of the soils in the survey area. The categories are defined in the following paragraphs. ORDER. Twelve soil orders are recognized. The differences among orders reflect the dominant soil-forming processes and the degree of soil formation. Each order is identified by a word ending in sol. An example is Alfisols. SUBORDER. Each order is divided into suborders primarily on the basis of properties that influence soil genesis and are important to plant growth or properties that reflect the most important variables within the orders. The last syllable in the name of a suborder indicates the order. An example is Udalfs (Ud, meaning humid, plus alfs, from Alfisols). GREAT GROUP. Each suborder is divided into great groups on the basis of close similarities in kind, arrangement, and degree of development of pedogenic horizons; soil moisture and temperature regimes; type of saturation; and base status. Each great group is identified by the name of a suborder and by a prefix that indicates a property of the soil. An example is Hapludalfs (Hapl, meaning minimal horizonation, plus udalfs, the suborder of the Alfisols that has a udic moisture regime). SUBGROUP. Each great group has a typic subgroup. Other subgroups are intergrades or extragrades. The typic subgroup is the central concept of the great group; it is not necessarily the most extensive. Intergrades are transitions to other orders, suborders, or great groups. Extragrades have some properties that are not representative of the great group but do not indicate transitions to any other taxonomic class. Each subgroup is identified by one or more adjectives preceding the name of the great group. The adjective Typic identifies the subgroup that typifies the great group. An example is Typic Hapludalfs. FAMILY. Families are established within a subgroup on the basis of physical and chemical properties and other characteristics that affect management. Generally, the properties are those of horizons below plow depth where there is much biological activity. Among the properties and characteristics considered are particle-size class, mineralogy class, cation-exchange activity class, soil temperature regime, soil depth, and reaction class. A family name consists of the name of a subgroup preceded by terms that indicate soil properties. An example is fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs. SERIES. The series consists of soils within a family that have horizons similar in color, texture, structure, reaction, consistence, mineral and chemical composition, and arrangement in the profile. Page 4 of 5

References: Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition.. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture,. (The soils in a given survey area may have been classified according to earlier editions of this publication.) Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Page 5 of 5