Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

Similar documents
Physics 504, Lecture 9 Feb. 21, 2011

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Electrodynamics II: Lecture 9

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Physics 504, Spring 2010 Electricity and Magnetism

So far we have derived two electrostatic equations E = 0 (6.2) B = 0 (6.3) which are to be modified due to Faraday s observation,

Quantum Mechanics II

Physics 506 Winter 2008 Homework Assignment #4 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 9: 9.6, 9.11, 9.16, 9.17

Radiation Fields. Lecture 12

Scattering cross-section (µm 2 )

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

A Primer on Three Vectors

Radiation Integrals and Auxiliary Potential Functions

Joel A. Shapiro January 20, 2011

Magnetostatics and the vector potential

Lecture 8 February 18, 2010

Expansion of 1/r potential in Legendre polynomials

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant,

Scattering. March 20, 2016

Scalar electromagnetic integral equations

Electromagnetism Answers to Problem Set 9 Spring 2006

Physics 218. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine. Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 11

Chapter 2 Acoustical Background

Chapter 1 Mathematical Foundations

Electromagnetic Theory I

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Multipole Radiation. February 29, The electromagnetic field of an isolated, oscillating source

Physics 110. Electricity and Magnetism. Professor Dine. Spring, Handout: Vectors and Tensors: Everything You Need to Know

(a) Show that electric field and magnetic field have units (force)/area or energy/volume.

Classical Field Theory: Electrostatics-Magnetostatics

11.D.2. Collision Operators

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

Maxwell's Equations and Conservation Laws

Multipoles, Electrostatics of Macroscopic Media, Dielectrics

EM radiation - Lecture 14

PHY752, Fall 2016, Assigned Problems

Solution Set of Homework # 2. Friday, September 09, 2017

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of

Central potential problem and angular momentum. Separating the Angular and Radial wave equations. Asymptotics of the radial equation

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Calculation of Scattering Intensities for the Interaction of Light with a Cluster of Dielectric Objects

Universidad de Cantabria Facultad de Ciencias

d 1 µ 2 Θ = 0. (4.1) consider first the case of m = 0 where there is no azimuthal dependence on the angle φ.

General review: - a) Dot Product

Notes: Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Jackson, Chap. 2, 3, and 4, and Di Bartolo, Chap. 2. 2π nx i a. ( ) = G n.

Radiation by a dielectric wedge

Scattering. 1 Classical scattering of a charged particle (Rutherford Scattering)

Invisible lenses with positive isotropic refractive index

Spherical Coordinates and Legendre Functions

2 Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING

Solutions to Laplace s Equation in Cylindrical Coordinates and Numerical solutions. ρ + (1/ρ) 2 V

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

SUMMARY PHYSICS 707 Electrostatics. E(x) = 4πρ(x) and E(x) = 0 (1)

Theory of Electromagnetic Fields

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect

1.2 Deutsch s Problem

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

Electromagnetic Waves Retarded potentials 2. Energy and the Poynting vector 3. Wave equations for E and B 4. Plane EM waves in free space

ME equations. Cylindrical symmetry. Bessel functions 1 kind Bessel functions 2 kind Modifies Bessel functions 1 kind Modifies Bessel functions 2 kind

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Lecture 11 March 1, 2010

A family of closed form expressions for the scalar field of strongly focused

Kirchhoff, Fresnel, Fraunhofer, Born approximation and more

Electric and magnetic multipoles

Multipole Fields in the Vacuum Gauge. June 26, 2016

Scattering is perhaps the most important experimental technique for exploring the structure of matter.

Quantization of the E-M field

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Linear and Nonlinear Oscillators (Lecture 2)

Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions

MATTER THEORY OF EXPANDED MAXWELL EQUATIONS

Maxwell s equations for electrostatics

Electric fields in matter

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute

QBX and the DPIE for the Maxwell Equations

The Helmholtz Decomposition and the Coulomb Gauge

Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010

1-2 Vector and scalar potentials

Green s functions for planarly layered media

Microscopic electrodynamics. Trond Saue (LCPQ, Toulouse) Microscopic electrodynamics Virginia Tech / 46

Fiber Optics. Equivalently θ < θ max = cos 1 (n 0 /n 1 ). This is geometrical optics. Needs λ a. Two kinds of fibers:

Addition of Angular Momenta

Photonic band structure in periodic dielectric structures

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

Errata for Quantum Mechanics by Ernest Abers August 1, 2004

Coordinate systems and vectors in three spatial dimensions

ANTENNAS. Vector and Scalar Potentials. Maxwell's Equations. E = jωb. H = J + jωd. D = ρ (M3) B = 0 (M4) D = εe

Non-relativistic scattering

Theory of Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation

ψ( ) k (r) which take the asymtotic form far away from the scattering center: k (r) = E kψ (±) φ k (r) = e ikr

221B Lecture Notes Scattering Theory II

Diffraction. S.M.Lea. Fall 1998

PHYS 408, Optics. Problem Set 1 - Spring Posted: Fri, January 8, 2015 Due: Thu, January 21, 2015.

MATTER THEORY OF EXPANDED MAXWELL EQUATIONS

We finally come to the determination of the CMB anisotropy power spectrum. This set of lectures will be divided into five parts:

Transcription:

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz February 2013

We seek a more systematic treatment of the multipole expansion for radiation. The strategy will be to consider three regions: 1 Radiation zone: r λ d. This is the region we have already considered for the dipole radiation. But we will see that there is a deeper connection between the usual multipole moments and the radiation at large distances (which in all cases falls as 1/r). 2 Intermediate zone (static zone): λ r d. Note that time derivatives are of order 1/λ (c = 1), while derivatives with respect to r are of order 1/r, so in this region time derivatives are negligible, and the fields appear static. Here we can do a conventional multipole expansion. 3 Near zone: d r. Here is is more difficult to find simple approximations for the fields.

Our goal is to match the solutions in the intermediate and radiation zones. We will see that in the intermediate zone, because of the static nature of the field, there is a multipole expansion identical to that of electrostatics (where moments are evaluated at each instant). This solution will match onto outgoing spherical waves, all falling as eikr iωt r, but with a sequence of terms suppressed by powers of d/λ. So we have two kinds of expansion going on, a different one in each region.

Let s first review some of the special functions we will need for this analysis. The basic equation which will interest is the Helmholtz equation (similar to the Schrodinger equation): ( 2 + ω 2 )ψ( x, ω) = 0. (1) One can expand the solutions for fixed r, in spherical coordinates: ψ( x, ω) = l,m f l,m (r)y l,m (θ, φ). (2) f l,m obeys: [ d 2 dr 2 + 2 r d dr + k 2 ] l(l + 1) r 2 f l (r) = 0. (3)

The f l (r) s are spherical Bessel functions," f l (r) = g l (kr). The g l s are rather nice functions (you will encounter them in quantum mechanics in studying scattering theory). Typically they are presented as four types, the j l s, n l s, and h l s, spherical Bessel, Neumann, and Hankel functions. They are distinguished by their behaviors at the origin and at. The j l s are regular at the origin, n l s are singular; both behave like sines at. There are actually two types of h s, h (1) l = j l + in l ; h (2) l = j l in l. (4) These behave as e ±ix at, corresponding to outgoing and incoming spherical waves. They are both singular at the origin (a suitable linear combination is not).

j 0 (x) = sin x n 0 (x) = cos(x) x x with relatively simple asymptotics: h (1) eix 0 (x) = ix (5) x 0 : j l (x) x l (2l + 1)!! (2l 1)!! n l (x) x l+1. (6) x : j l (x) 1 x sin(x lπ 2 ) n l(x) 1 x cos(x lπ ). (7) 2 h (1) l l+1 eix ( i) x h (2) l (i) l+1 e ix x (8) With e iωt time dependence, h (1) l e iωt+ikr is an outgoing spherical wave.

Green s function for the Helmholtz equation: ( 2 + k 2 )G( x, x ) = δ( x x ) (9) G( x, x ) = eik x x 4π x x (10) = l,m g l (r, r )Y l,m (θ φ )Y lm (θφ) where g l (r, r ) = ikj l (kr < )h (1) l (kr > ).

Jackson proves this by looking at the equations for the coefficients of each Y lm. But we can see why this must be correct rather simply. First, for r < r, say, for each l the equation for g l is the same equation we studied above, in both r and r. As r 0, the result should be non-singular, so we must take the j l s. For r, as r, we would like outgoing spherical wave behavior, which fixes h (1) l. The argument is symmetric in r and r, which explains the r <, r >.

Now we can fix the coefficients by requiring that as k 0, this should go over to 1 1 2l + 1 l,m r > ( r< r > ) l Y lm (θ, φ )Y lm (θ, φ). (11) Examining the expansions of h,j for small argument, yields the coefficient above: ik (kr <) l ( ) (2l 1)!! (2l + 1)!! (kr > ) l+1 (12) = 1 1 2l + 1 r > ( ) l r< r >

So we are ready to attack the problem. We seek a generalization of the static multipole expansion. We will follow a slight modification of Jackson s strategy. We start by considering the intermediate zone. It turns out to be simpler to work with E and H (I will follow Jackson in using H rather than B). E and H are vector quantities. It is helpful to start by considering the scalar quantities r E and r H. The first, in electrostatics, can be completely determined from the charge distribution; this is the same problem we will encounter in the intermediate zone. r H is similar. We will focus mostly on the first.

Since 2 r E = r 2 E + 2 E = r 2 E (13) and similarly for H, it follows that: { ( 2 + ω 2 r ) H } r E = 0. (14) These are scalar quantities, so they can readily be expanded in spherical harmonics: r E = l,m k l(l + 1)a E (l, m)g l,m (kr)y l,m (Ω). (15) and similarly for r H.

Now for the problems which typically interest us, in which we have a localized source of radiation, of size much smaller than a wavelength, we can rather easily figure out the coefficients a E. Consider, first, the intermediate zone", λ r d. In this regime, the fields are essentially static. You can see this by comparing derivatives: r 1 r 1 c t 1 λ. (16) So we can neglect time derivatives in this regime. But this means that E φ (17)

In this static regime, φ d 3 x ρ( x ) x x. (18) (this also follows from the form of the Green s function of the Helmholtz equation in the limit that we can neglect k). Then r E = r φ = φ r (19)

But we know the form of φ far from a localized charge distribution: φ( x) = 4π q l,m Y l,m (Ω) 2l + 1 r l+1. (20) l,m We can construct φ r, so for small r, a l,m l(l + 1)gl (kr) 4π l + 1 1 2l + 1 r l+1 q l,m. (21)

Now we want to match to the general solution. Away from r = 0, we have g l (kr) = h (1) l (kr) (22) due to the requirement of outgoing spherical wave boundary conditions. Now we match, noting that (eqns. 9.85,9.88 in Jackson) h (1) (2l 1)!! l i x l+1 (23) so a E (l, m) = ck l+2 i(2l + 1)!! ( ) l + 1 1/2 q lm. (24) l

Knowledge of r E determines H and E, through the usual equations for plane waves in free space: H = i k E E = i k H (25) So, e.g., for the TM" ( r H = 0) case, let s solve the full set of equations. Take (a guess) H lm = A lm (r) LY l,m (26) Note first that LA(r) = 0. Using the language of quantum mechanics, this is because A(r) is rotationally invariant, and L is the generator of infinitesimal rotations. But it follows from: iɛ ijk x j k A(r) = iɛ ijk x j x k r A(r) r = 0. (27)

Then it is easy to see that: r E = i k r ( H) = i k r iɛ ijk A lm j L k Y lm (28) 1 k L 2 A lm (r)y l,m = 1 k A lml(l + 1)Y lm. so that the connection of A(r) and the expansion coefficients of r E can be read off immediately (Jackson s 9.122). You can check that this configuration (with the appropriate H, as above) solves the full set of Maxwell s equations; similarly for the "TE" modes.

It is natural to define vector spherical harmonics": X lm (θ, φ) = 1 l(l + 1) LYlm (θ, φ). (29) From the properties of the spherical harmonics, it is easy to see that: X lm X l m dω = δ l,l δ m,m (30) X lm ( r X l m )dω = 0 (31) (the last follows from an integration by parts and use of the commutation relations of L and r). H = lm A lm (r) l(l + 1) X lm. (32)

Following your text, we can derive this more directly. Rather than work with A and φ, it is convenient to work with r E and r H directly. We focus on the latter. Defining a field, E which is divergence free, E = E + i J (33) ωɛ 0 we have the Maxwell equations (in Jacksons 9.160, set Z 0 = 1, and M = 0) H = 0 E = 0 (34) E ik H = i ωɛ 0 J H + ik E = 0.

Now take the curl of the third equation, substitute for H from the fourth, to give: ( 2 + k 2 ) E = i/k ( J). (35) (There is a similar equation for H). So ( 2 + k 2 ) r E = i/k ( L J). (36)

So now we can solve for r E using the Green s function for the Helmholtz equation: r E (x) = 1 e ik x x 4πk x x L J( x )d 3 x. (37) Now L J = i( r ) ( J) (38) can be simplified using our ɛ identity trick.

We need to be careful about the ordering of the derivatives. The expression above is: iɛ ijk ɛ klm (r i j l J m ) (39) = i(r i j i J j r i j j J i ) = ir i 2 J i i r ( J) = i 2 (r i J i ) 2i J i r ( J)

This can be rewritten: L J = i 2 ( r J) i r r (r 2 A) (40)

So using this, we have (using the expansion of the Green s function in spherical Bessel functions, eqns. 9.95-9.97 in Jackson: a E (l, m) = k 2 l(l + 1) j l (kr)y l,m [ 1 k 2 2 ( r J) ic k 1 r ] r (r 2 ρ) d 3 x. (41) Integrating by parts on the 2 term twice, and using the wave equation (without sources) gives a factor of k 2 ; but we can actually drop this term in the case of a localized source, leaving our earlier expression for a E (using the small argument limit of the Bessel functions). Exercise: Verify the matching for the electric dipole and quadrupole moments, i.e. check that these results reproduce our calculation of the dipole and quadrupole radiation, checking the connection between the large and small distance expressions.

Applications Jackson considers two applications of this method. First are cases where low moments vanish. This happens in some atoms and nuclei. Alternatively, it is interesting, for example, for antennae when the wavelength is not too different than the size of the antenna. (Think of FM, 100 MHz). Jackson also (in 9.4) discusses the problem of determining the current in an antenna, and shows that this is actually a boundary value problem, where one must solve simultaneously for the current and the field.