Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development t(satreps) Enhancement of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Technology in Peru -Research Plan- January 2010 Principal Investigator: Fumio YAMAZAKI Chiba University, Japan 1 Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development : SATREPS http://www.jst.go.jp/global/english/kadai.html http://www.jica.go.jp/english/news/press/2009/090422_02.html MEXT, JST Collaboration MOFA, JICA Support Technical Cooperation Research Institutions in Japan International ti Joint Research Research Partnership Research Institutions in Developing Countries 2
Background of the Peru Project Earthquakes and tsunami disasters are the major obstacles for sustainable developments in the Asia-Pacific region. In order to reduce disaster risks, understanding of natural hazards and upgrading of societal resilience are necessary. Since earthquakes and tsunamis are rare but devastating events, the data collection and action in a global scale is necessary. Japan is expected to serve a leading role in the promotion of international ti disaster mitigation. Hyogo Framework of Action 2005, ISDR ISDR: International Strategy of Disaster Reduction 3 Needs of EQ & T Disaster Mitigation in Peru (1) Peru locates in the circum-pacific seismic belt with high seismic and tsunami risks. Large inter-plate earthquakes occurred in Atico (2001) and in Pisco (2007), and thus EQ & T disaster mitigation draws attention in Peru. 4
Needs of EQ & T Disaster Mitigation in Peru (2) Peru has a long term relationship with Japan since 1873. CISMID was established within UNI in 1987 by the support of Gov. of Japan. CISMID became the leading center of earthquake engineering research in South America. CISMID has been in collaboration with Japanese research institutions. Peru-Japan WS, CISMID, 2005 2008 APEC-Peru 5 Significance of joint research between Peru and Japan Both countries are located in a similar seismic environment, frequently hit by damaging EQ & T. Contribution of Japanese S & T to disaster mitigation in Peru Merits to Japanese geo-science since subduction-zone EQs are rare events Tsunamis caused by subduction-zone earthquakes in South America sometimes hit Japan (1960 Chile EQ). Thus the jointresearch contributes to the tele-tsunami study in Japan. Promotion of disaster mitigation and capacity building through sharing the knowledge from the international joint research 6
Needs in Peru Sustainable Development Reduction of Losses from EQ Regional Characteristics Implementation ti Technology International Joint-research Project CISMID, UNI (PI) SENCICO, INDECI, Survey of past events IGP, Ricardo Palma Univ. Seismic & MT observation CONIDA, PCM Structural tests and surveys MINSA Assessment, Planning Peruvian Research Team Enhancement of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Technology in Peru G5: Chiba Univ.(PI) ( ) (Project Management, Disaster Mitigation Plan) Japanese Research Team G1: Chiba Univ. (Seismic M, Geotech) G2:Tohoku Univ. (Tsunami) G3: BRI (Building) G4: Tokyo Tech (Damage Assessment) Development and Implementation of EQ & T Disaster Mitigation Technology in Peru Knowledge Transfer to Other Pacific-Rim Countries Research Topics and Groups SM/GT gr. Source Model Tsunami gr. 7 Deep Structure Rock Motion Surface Motion Topography pg py& Soil Spatial Database Bathymetry Tsunami Propagation Tsunami Run-up Damage Assessment Damage Detection DA gr. Seismic Resistance Tsunami Damage Diagnosis & Retrofit T. Countermeasures Building gr. Disaster Mitigation Plan Planning gr. 8
Research Plan Project Management: PI: Fumio Yamazaki ki(chiba U) S. Nakai, S. Koshimura (Tohoku U), T. Saito (BRI), S. Midorikawa (TiTech) Project Management and Coordination Project Management, International & domestic coordination Public relations, Information dissemination, Reports International I t ti lworkshops, Symposia Peru-Japan WS 9 G1: Seismic Motion and Geotechnical Issues GL: Shoich Nakai (Chiba Univ.) H. Yamanaka (TiTech), N. Pulido (NIED), H. Arai (BRI), T. Sekiguchi 1-1 Source Modeling and Prediction of Seismic Motion Collection C of fhistorical i leqd data and seismic i records, Scenario EQs Prediction of engineering bedrock motion Development of ground structures based on seismic and microtremor observations surface Surface layers Eng. bedrock V S 0.4km/s Seismic bedrock V S 3.0km/s 10
G1: Seismic Motion and Geotechnical Issues (2) 1-2 Microzonation based on EQ and MT observations Determination of S-wave structures based on EQ and MT observations Liquefaction assessment based on borehole survey and laboratory tests Microzonation of surface layers based on seismic response analysis 1-3 Risk Assessment of Slope Failures Development of risk maps for houses on steep slopes Site amplification and damage assessment based on topography 11 G2: Tsunami Simulation and Damage Mitigation GL:Shun ichi Koshimura (Tohoku Univ.) Y. Yagi& G. Shoji (Tsukuba U), Y. Fuji (BRI) 2-1 Tsunami Source, Propagation and Impacts Assess A historical i ltsunami events and dtheir impacts in Peru Numerical simulation of tsunami propagation and runup Indentify I d potential tsunamis and the worst case scenarios 2-22 Tsunami ihazard and dimpacts Mapping Inundation modeling and building damage Tsunami impacts to infrastructures 12
510 338 G2: Tsunami Simulation and Damage Mitigation (2) 2-3 Implementation of Tsunami DM Technology Develop pa general procedure for mapping tsunami hazard Strategic planning to mitigate tsunami risks and damage Tsunami propagation and dinundation Hazard Map Evacuation tower 1 Damage Probability Building inventory 避難ビル 避難場所 Tsunami Warning 0 Inundation Depth Education 13 G3: Enhancement of Seismic Resistance of Buildings GL: Taiki Saito (BRI) M. Teshigawara (Nagoya U), K. Kusunoki (Yokohama N. U.), C. Cuadra (Akita P. U.), S. Sugano 3-1 Develop database of structural test results for masonry buildings Collection of results of structural tests Development of a database of testing for masonry structures Carga L ateral (t) CISMID/FIC/UNI - Laboratorio de Estructuras Ensayo Ciclico en Muro-01 Original 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-30 -25-20 -15-10 -5-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30-10 -15-20 -25-30 Desplazamiento nivel +2705 (mm) CH100 Monitor 336 514 514 514 538 514 186 640 640 640 640 640 235 644 186 576 402 356 392 235 340 23 35 234 146 356 576 234 428 146 Actuador 514 370 554 554 348 356 576 424 356 370 444 370 186 392 174 206 206 340 174 312 340 51 340 456 Muro III Distorsión 1/125 Cara Frontal 210 510 312 174 402 340 426 312 210 402 456 340 456 428 428 308 430 308 488 488 428 308 435 308 252 430 428 252 430 210 Actuador 14
G3: Enhancement of Seismic Resistance of Buildings (2) 3-2Develop Si Seismic i Diagnosis i and dretrofit fitechnologies Develop seismic-diagnosis and retrofit technologies for different types of buildings prevalent in Peru Introduction of advanced seismic control technologies Verify the effects of retrofit technology by structural tests and analyses 3-3 3 Assessment and Retrofit of Historical Buildings Identify historical buildings that face significant EQ disaster risks Survey of historical buildings and develop their retrofit technologies G4: Geo-spatial Database and Damage Assessment GL: Saburo Midorikawa (Tokyo Tech) M. Matsuoka (AIST), H. Miura, Y. Maruyama (Chiba u) 4-1 Development of Geo-spatial Database Development of land-use maps using satellite images Development of building inventory using high-resolution satellite images Development of digital surface model using ASTER & ALOS images 15 Ikonos images and building inventory ASTER/DEM for Pisco area (AIST) 16
G4: Geo-spatial Database and Damage Assessment (2) 4-2 Damage Detection using Satellite Images Earthquake damage detection of urban areas using optical/sar images Detection of slope failures using optical/sar images and DEM 4-3 Damage Assessment for Scenario Earthquakes Predicting earthquake disaster losses of the study areas Visualization of the assessment result on GIS Damage map estimated from ALOS/PALSAR image Damage survey by CISMID 17 G5: Development of Disaster Mitigation Plan GL: Fumio Yamazaki (Chiba U) H. Kanegae (Ritsumeikan U), H. Kaji (TiTech), M. Muraki, all the GLs Formulate land-use policies for mitigation of EQ & T disasters Develop local disaster mitigation plans for the study areas Awareness raising and dissemination activities for disaster management organizations and local communities Technical seminar(jica-peru, ( 2004) ) Land-use plan after the 2007Pisco EQ (CISMID) 18
Research Items Project Management Chiba U and CISMID/UNI Schedule of the Research Project Period (2010-2014) 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 5 th WS WS WS WS WS G1: Seismic motion & Geotechnical Chiba U and CISMID, IGP 1-1 Source modeling and seismic motion 1-2Sit Site response &Microzonation 1-3 Slope failure assessment Source modeling Simulation of SM EQ and MT observation, Geological survey Microzonation Field survey, measurement Seismic Response Analysis Hazard map G2: Tsunami Tohoku U and DHN, CISMID Tsunami simulation Inundation and impact 2-1 Tsunami propagation and impacts 2-2 Tsunami hazard mapping Data collection Damage assessment method Tsunami damage analysis 2-3 Tsunami DM technology Historical tsunami data Tsunami DM technology G3: Buildings BRI and CISMID 3-1 Seismic tests database 3-2Diagnosis i and dretrofit 3-3 Retrofit of historical buildings G4; Damage Assessment Tk Tokyo Tech and dcismid, CONIDA 4-1 Geo-spatial database 4-2 Damage detection using RS 4-3 Damage assessment for Scenario EQ Literature Survey, Tests Database development Develop diagnosis method Retrofit technology, Validation tests Guideline Survey, Risk assessment Retrofit Technology Guideline Data collection Geospatial data Database development Data collection Methodology Damage detection Damage assessment method Assessment, risk map G5; Disaster Mitigation Plan Chiba U and INDECI, CISMID Literature Survey Planning Dissemination, Education 19 Expected Outputs 1. Scenarios of large-magnitude inter-plate earthquakes are identified which will cause the most significant losses in Peru (G1, G2). 2. Geographical information of the study areas is prepared (G4). 3. Tsunami disaster losses in study areas by scenario earthquakes are estimated, and mitigation technologies are developed (G2). 4. Strong motion and ground failure in study areas by scenario earthquakes are simulated (G1). 5. Earthquake disaster losses in study areas by scenario earthquakes are estimated, and mitigation technologies are developed (G4). 6. Technologies for evaluation of seismic-resistance and structural retrofit are developed, adapting to building characteristics of Peru (G3). 7. Earthquake/tsunami disaster mitigation is promoted in the study areas (G5). 20