Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps

Similar documents
Bifurcation of Unimodal Maps *

Personal notes on renormalization

The real analytic Feigenbaum-Coullet-Tresser attractor in the disk.

Renormalization for Lorenz maps

On the Invariant Cantor Sets of Period Doubling Type of Infinitely Renormalizable Area-Preserving Maps

FIXED POINTS OF RENORMALIZATION.

April 13, We now extend the structure of the horseshoe to more general kinds of invariant. x (v) λ n v.

HYPERBOLIC SETS WITH NONEMPTY INTERIOR

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

Near-parabolic Renormalization and Rigidity

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

Changing coordinates to adapt to a map of constant rank

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

The Existence of Chaos in the Lorenz System

Analytic Continuation of Analytic (Fractal) Functions

Geometry of the Feigenbaum map. by Xavier Buff Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire Emile Picard, Toulouse cedex France. Abstract.

New rotation sets in a family of toral homeomorphisms

Essential hyperbolicity versus homoclinic bifurcations. Global dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity, Beijing 2009 Sylvain Crovisier - Enrique Pujals

Minicourse on Complex Hénon Maps

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ds] 28 Mar 1991

Dynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets

Robustly transitive diffeomorphisms

Hyperbolic Dynamics. Todd Fisher. Department of Mathematics University of Maryland, College Park. Hyperbolic Dynamics p.

Universality for the golden mean Siegel Disks, and existence of Siegel cylinders

The dynamics of circle maps

TRIVIAL CENTRALIZERS FOR AXIOM A DIFFEOMORPHISMS

LECTURE Itineraries We start with a simple example of a dynamical system obtained by iterating the quadratic polynomial

A Complex Gap Lemma. Sébastien Biebler

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS PROBLEMS. asgor/ (1) Which of the following maps are topologically transitive (minimal,

An entropic tour of the Mandelbrot set

Lecture 11 Hyperbolicity.

Viviane Baladi. Linear response for intermittent maps (joint work with M. Todd)

Ratner fails for ΩM 2

The Structure of Hyperbolic Sets

Rigidity for real polynomials

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 16 Nov 2010

Return times of polynomials as meta-fibonacci numbers

An application of the the Renormalization Group Method to the Navier-Stokes System

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 6 Jun 2016

Introduction. Chapter 1. Contents. EECS 600 Function Space Methods in System Theory Lecture Notes J. Fessler 1.1

SOME REMARKS ON THE TOPOLOGY OF HYPERBOLIC ACTIONS OF R n ON n-manifolds

Non Locally-Connected Julia Sets constructed by iterated tuning

Foliation dynamics, shape and classification

A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND

MAPPING CLASS ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math 9 (2003),

Globalization and compactness of McCrory Parusiński conditions. Riccardo Ghiloni 1

Mathematische Annalen

Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds

Selçuk Demir WS 2017 Functional Analysis Homework Sheet

= F (b) F (a) F (x i ) F (x i+1 ). a x 0 x 1 x n b i

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.gt] 5 Sep 2006

Symbolic dynamics for Lozi maps

27. Topological classification of complex linear foliations

AN EXTENSION OF THE NOTION OF ZERO-EPI MAPS TO THE CONTEXT OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Peak Point Theorems for Uniform Algebras on Smooth Manifolds

TECHNIQUES FOR ESTABLISHING DOMINATED SPLITTINGS

On dynamical properties of multidimensional diffeomorphisms from Newhouse regions: I

A COMPUTER-ASSISTED PROOF OF THE FEIGENBAUM CONJECTURES

30 Surfaces and nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms

Renormalized Volume of Hyperbolic 3-Manifolds

Symbolic dynamics and chaos in plane Couette flow

p(r)=hmsup sup (r»),!! 1^ n >oo zeb

Math 5052 Measure Theory and Functional Analysis II Homework Assignment 7

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS. I Clark: Robinson. Stability, Symbolic Dynamics, and Chaos. CRC Press Boca Raton Ann Arbor London Tokyo

Metric Spaces and Topology

LECTURE 2. defined recursively by x i+1 := f λ (x i ) with starting point x 0 = 1/2. If we plot the set of accumulation points of P λ, that is,

Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

The dynamics of Kuperberg flows

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday January 20, 2015 (Day 1)

10. The ergodic theory of hyperbolic dynamical systems

NATIONAL BOARD FOR HIGHER MATHEMATICS. Research Scholarships Screening Test. Saturday, February 2, Time Allowed: Two Hours Maximum Marks: 40

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons

Persistent Chaos in High-Dimensional Neural Networks

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

URSULA HAMENSTÄDT. To the memory of Martine Babillot

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

RENORMALIZATION IN THE HÉNON FAMILY, I: UNIVERSALITY BUT NON-RIGIDITY

ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS

Generic family with robustly infinitely many sinks

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES

Introduction to Continuous Dynamical Systems

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Quasiconformal Maps and Circle Packings

Weak Topologies, Reflexivity, Adjoint operators

The Quadratic Family as a Qualitatively Solvable Model of Chaos

UNIFORMLY PERFECT ANALYTIC AND CONFORMAL ATTRACTOR SETS. 1. Introduction and results

1 Introduction Definitons Markov... 2

Lipschitz matchbox manifolds

4 Countability axioms

Topology of the regular part for infinitely renormalizable quadratic polynomials

LINEAR CHAOS? Nathan S. Feldman

Periodic Sinks and Observable Chaos

Topological entropy of quadratic polynomials and sections of the Mandelbrot set

Math 354 Transition graphs and subshifts November 26, 2014

CONTINUITY OF CORE ENTROPY OF QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS

CONTINUITY OF CORE ENTROPY OF QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS

Beyond Kuperberg Flows

3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces

Transcription:

Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps A guided tour Edson de Faria Department of Mathematics IME-USP December 13, 2010 (joint work with W. de Melo and A. Pinto) Ann. of Math. 164(2006), 731 824

History Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 2 / 31

History Coullet & Tresser (1978) and Feigenbaum (1978): In one-parameter families of unimodals, they found remarkable universal scaling laws for cascades of period-doubling bifurcations, both in parameter space and in the geometry of the post-critical set of the map at the end of the cascade. Proposed explanation: a period-doubling renomalization operator (with hyperbolic fixed-point). Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 2 / 31

History Coullet & Tresser (1978) and Feigenbaum (1978): In one-parameter families of unimodals, they found remarkable universal scaling laws for cascades of period-doubling bifurcations, both in parameter space and in the geometry of the post-critical set of the map at the end of the cascade. Proposed explanation: a period-doubling renomalization operator (with hyperbolic fixed-point). Lanford (1982): Gave a computer-assisted proof of the existence and hyperbolicity of the fixed-point of the period-doubling operator in a suitable Banach space of real-analytic maps. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 2 / 31

History Coullet & Tresser (1978) and Feigenbaum (1978): In one-parameter families of unimodals, they found remarkable universal scaling laws for cascades of period-doubling bifurcations, both in parameter space and in the geometry of the post-critical set of the map at the end of the cascade. Proposed explanation: a period-doubling renomalization operator (with hyperbolic fixed-point). Lanford (1982): Gave a computer-assisted proof of the existence and hyperbolicity of the fixed-point of the period-doubling operator in a suitable Banach space of real-analytic maps. Campanino & Epstein (1981): Gave a proof of existence of the fixed-point without essential help from computers. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 2 / 31

History Coullet & Tresser (1978) and Feigenbaum (1978): In one-parameter families of unimodals, they found remarkable universal scaling laws for cascades of period-doubling bifurcations, both in parameter space and in the geometry of the post-critical set of the map at the end of the cascade. Proposed explanation: a period-doubling renomalization operator (with hyperbolic fixed-point). Lanford (1982): Gave a computer-assisted proof of the existence and hyperbolicity of the fixed-point of the period-doubling operator in a suitable Banach space of real-analytic maps. Campanino & Epstein (1981): Gave a proof of existence of the fixed-point without essential help from computers. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 2 / 31

History (cont.) Lanford & others: Realized that the period-doubling operator is the restriction of a much larger renormalization operator and formulated the following. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 3 / 31

History (cont.) Lanford & others: Realized that the period-doubling operator is the restriction of a much larger renormalization operator and formulated the following. Conjecture (Renormalization Conjecture) The limit set of the renormalization operator (in the space of maps of bounded combinatorial type) is a hyperbolic Cantor set where the operator acts as the full shift in a finite number of symbols. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 3 / 31

History (cont.) Lanford & others: Realized that the period-doubling operator is the restriction of a much larger renormalization operator and formulated the following. Conjecture (Renormalization Conjecture) The limit set of the renormalization operator (in the space of maps of bounded combinatorial type) is a hyperbolic Cantor set where the operator acts as the full shift in a finite number of symbols. The challenge: to find a purely conceptual proof of this conjecture. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 3 / 31

History (cont.) Lanford & others: Realized that the period-doubling operator is the restriction of a much larger renormalization operator and formulated the following. Conjecture (Renormalization Conjecture) The limit set of the renormalization operator (in the space of maps of bounded combinatorial type) is a hyperbolic Cantor set where the operator acts as the full shift in a finite number of symbols. The challenge: to find a purely conceptual proof of this conjecture. Davie (1996): Using hard analysis, extended the hyperbolicity picture (local stable and unstable manifolds) from Lanford s Banach space to the space of C 2+ǫ maps. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 3 / 31

Major Breakthroughs Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 4 / 31

Major Breakthroughs Sullivan (1992): Tied the subject to the theory of quadratic-like maps. Established real and complex a priori bounds for renormalization. Gave the first conceptual proof of existence of the Cantor limit set (the attractor of renormalization), and proved convergence towards the attractor (without a rate). Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 4 / 31

Major Breakthroughs Sullivan (1992): Tied the subject to the theory of quadratic-like maps. Established real and complex a priori bounds for renormalization. Gave the first conceptual proof of existence of the Cantor limit set (the attractor of renormalization), and proved convergence towards the attractor (without a rate). McMullen (1996): Proved that the convergence towards the attractor takes place at an exponential rate. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 4 / 31

Major Breakthroughs Sullivan (1992): Tied the subject to the theory of quadratic-like maps. Established real and complex a priori bounds for renormalization. Gave the first conceptual proof of existence of the Cantor limit set (the attractor of renormalization), and proved convergence towards the attractor (without a rate). McMullen (1996): Proved that the convergence towards the attractor takes place at an exponential rate. Lyubich (1999): Established the conjecture in the space of quadratic-like germs up to affine equivalence, where the renormalization operator is analytic. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 4 / 31

Major Breakthroughs Sullivan (1992): Tied the subject to the theory of quadratic-like maps. Established real and complex a priori bounds for renormalization. Gave the first conceptual proof of existence of the Cantor limit set (the attractor of renormalization), and proved convergence towards the attractor (without a rate). McMullen (1996): Proved that the convergence towards the attractor takes place at an exponential rate. Lyubich (1999): Established the conjecture in the space of quadratic-like germs up to affine equivalence, where the renormalization operator is analytic. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 4 / 31

Our Main Results df, de Melo, Pinto (2006): Established Lanford s conjecture in the space of C r quadratic unimodal maps. Here r is any real number 2 + α, where α < 1 is the largest of the Hausdorff dimensions of the post-critical sets of maps in the attractor. The proof combines Lyubich s theorem with Davie s tour de force. The authors also went beyond the conjecture, proving that the local stable manifolds form a C 0 lamination whose holonomy is C 1+β for some β > 0. In particular, every smooth curve which is transversal to such lamination intersects it at a set of constant Hausdorff dimension less than one. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 5 / 31

Structure of Proof of Hyperbolicity Conjecture Real and Complex Bounds (Sullivan) Existence of topological attractor K of R Exponential C 0 convergence towards the attractor (McMullen) Combinatorial Rigidity (Lyubich) Davie s linear FA techniques Hyperbolicity of K in space of q-like germs (Lyubich) Davie s non-linear FA techniques Tangent space to stable manifold in C r Hyperbolicity of R in a Banach space of C ω maps Stable manifold theorem for robust operators Hyperbolicity of R in a Banach space of C r maps (r 2 + α, α < 1 close to 1) Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 6 / 31

Spaces of Unimodal Maps Normalization: I = [ 1,1], f : I I unimodal, even; f (0) = 0, f (0) = 1. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 7 / 31

Spaces of Unimodal Maps Normalization: I = [ 1,1], f : I I unimodal, even; f (0) = 0, f (0) = 1. 1 Underlying Banach spaces: A r = {v C r (I) : v is even and v(0) = 0}, with C r norm. B r = { v = ϕ q C r (I) : ϕ C r ([0, 1]), ϕ(0) = 0, q(x) = x 2}, the norm of v being the C r norm of ϕ. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 7 / 31

Spaces of Unimodal Maps Normalization: I = [ 1,1], f : I I unimodal, even; f (0) = 0, f (0) = 1. 1 Underlying Banach spaces: A r = {v C r (I) : v is even and v(0) = 0}, with C r norm. B r = { v = ϕ q C r (I) : ϕ C r ([0, 1]), ϕ(0) = 0, q(x) = x 2}, the norm of v being the C r norm of ϕ. 2 Corresponding spaces of unimodal maps: U r 1 + A r C r (I) consists of all f : I I of the form f (x) = 1 + v(x), v A r with v (0) < 0 (r 2). V r 1 + B r consists of those f = φ q such that φ([0, 1]) ( 1, 1], φ(0) = 1 and φ (x) < 0 for all 0 x 1. Remark: For each s r, the inclusion B r A s is (linear and ) continuous. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 7 / 31

Renormalizing unimodal maps f U r is said to be renormalizable if there exist p = p(f ) > 1 and λ = λ(f ) = f p (0) such that f p [ λ, λ ] is unimodal and maps [ λ, λ ] into itself. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 8 / 31

Renormalizing unimodal maps f U r is said to be renormalizable if there exist p = p(f ) > 1 and λ = λ(f ) = f p (0) such that f p [ λ, λ ] is unimodal and maps [ λ, λ ] into itself. With p smallest possible, the first renormalization of f is the map Rf : [ 1,1] [ 1,1] given by Rf (x) = 1 λ f p (λx) (1) Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 8 / 31

Renormalizing unimodal maps f U r is said to be renormalizable if there exist p = p(f ) > 1 and λ = λ(f ) = f p (0) such that f p [ λ, λ ] is unimodal and maps [ λ, λ ] into itself. With p smallest possible, the first renormalization of f is the map Rf : [ 1,1] [ 1,1] given by Rf (x) = 1 λ f p (λx) (1) j = f j ([ λ, λ ]), for 0 j p 1, are pairwise disjoint and their relative order inside [ 1,1] determines a unimodal permutation θ of {0,1,...,p 1}. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 8 / 31

Renormalizing unimodal maps f U r is said to be renormalizable if there exist p = p(f ) > 1 and λ = λ(f ) = f p (0) such that f p [ λ, λ ] is unimodal and maps [ λ, λ ] into itself. With p smallest possible, the first renormalization of f is the map Rf : [ 1,1] [ 1,1] given by Rf (x) = 1 λ f p (λx) (1) j = f j ([ λ, λ ]), for 0 j p 1, are pairwise disjoint and their relative order inside [ 1,1] determines a unimodal permutation θ of {0,1,...,p 1}. The set of all unimodal permutations is denoted P. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 8 / 31

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f x

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f x f

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f f x f

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f f x f f

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f f x f f Λ 1 f

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f f x f f Λ 1 f Rf = Λ 1 f f p Λ f

Renormalizing unimodal maps (cont.) f f x f f Λ 1 f Rf = Λ 1 f f p Λ f Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal Maps December 13, 2010 9 / 31

Infinitely renormalizable maps The set of f U r that are renormalizable with the same unimodal permutation θ P is a connected subset of U r denoted U r θ. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 10 / 31

Infinitely renormalizable maps The set of f U r that are renormalizable with the same unimodal permutation θ P is a connected subset of U r denoted U r θ. Hence we have the so-called renormalization operator R : θ P U r θ Ur. (2) Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 10 / 31

Infinitely renormalizable maps The set of f U r that are renormalizable with the same unimodal permutation θ P is a connected subset of U r denoted U r θ. Hence we have the so-called renormalization operator R : θ P U r θ Ur. (2) For Θ P finite and θ 0,θ 1,...,θ n,... Θ, write U r θ 0,θ 1,,θ n, = U r θ 0 R 1 U r θ 1 R n U r θ n, and define D r Θ = (θ 0,θ 1,,θ n, ) Θ N U r θ 0,θ 1,,θ n,. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 10 / 31

Infinitely renormalizable maps The set of f U r that are renormalizable with the same unimodal permutation θ P is a connected subset of U r denoted U r θ. Hence we have the so-called renormalization operator R : θ P U r θ Ur. (2) For Θ P finite and θ 0,θ 1,...,θ n,... Θ, write U r θ 0,θ 1,,θ n, = U r θ 0 R 1 U r θ 1 R n U r θ n, and define D r Θ = (θ 0,θ 1,,θ n, ) Θ N U r θ 0,θ 1,,θ n,. The maps in DΘ r are infinitely renormalizable maps with (bounded) combinatorics belonging to Θ. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 10 / 31

Spaces of Holomorphic Maps 1 H 0 (V ): real Banach space of holomorphic functions on V which commute with complex conjugation and are continuous up to the boundary of V, with the C 0 norm. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 11 / 31

Spaces of Holomorphic Maps 1 H 0 (V ): real Banach space of holomorphic functions on V which commute with complex conjugation and are continuous up to the boundary of V, with the C 0 norm. 2 A V H 0 (V ): closed linear subspace of functions of the form ϕ = φ q, where q(z) = z 2 and φ : q(v ) C holomorphic with φ(0) = 0. 3 U V : the set of functions of the form f = 1 + ϕ, where ϕ = φ q A V and φ is univalent on some neighborhood of [ 1,1] contained in V, such that the restriction of f to [ 1,1] is unimodal. Note that U V 1 + A V A V is open, so U V is a Banach manifold. We denote by Ω a the set of points in the complex plane whose distance from the interval [ 1,1] is smaller than a. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 11 / 31

Complex Bounds Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Theorem (Sullivan s Complex Bounds) Let Θ P be a non-empty finite set. Then there exist a > 0, a compact subset K = K Θ A Ωa DΘ ω and µ > 0 with the following properties. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Theorem (Sullivan s Complex Bounds) Let Θ P be a non-empty finite set. Then there exist a > 0, a compact subset K = K Θ A Ωa DΘ ω and µ > 0 with the following properties. (i) Each f K has a quadratic-like extension with conformal modulus bounded from below by µ. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Theorem (Sullivan s Complex Bounds) Let Θ P be a non-empty finite set. Then there exist a > 0, a compact subset K = K Θ A Ωa DΘ ω and µ > 0 with the following properties. (i) Each f K has a quadratic-like extension with conformal modulus bounded from below by µ. (ii) We have R(K) K, and the restriction of R to K is a homeomorphism which is topologically conjugate to the two-sided shift σ : Θ Z Θ Z. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Theorem (Sullivan s Complex Bounds) Let Θ P be a non-empty finite set. Then there exist a > 0, a compact subset K = K Θ A Ωa DΘ ω and µ > 0 with the following properties. (i) Each f K has a quadratic-like extension with conformal modulus bounded from below by µ. (ii) We have R(K) K, and the restriction of R to K is a homeomorphism which is topologically conjugate to the two-sided shift σ : Θ Z Θ Z. (iii) For all g D r Θ Vr, with r 2, there exists f K with the property that R n (g) R n (f ) C 0 (I) 0 as n. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds After enough renormalizations, every -ly renormalizable map f A Ω becomes quadratic-like with definite modulus. Theorem (Sullivan s Complex Bounds) Let Θ P be a non-empty finite set. Then there exist a > 0, a compact subset K = K Θ A Ωa DΘ ω and µ > 0 with the following properties. (i) Each f K has a quadratic-like extension with conformal modulus bounded from below by µ. (ii) We have R(K) K, and the restriction of R to K is a homeomorphism which is topologically conjugate to the two-sided shift σ : Θ Z Θ Z. (iii) For all g D r Θ Vr, with r 2, there exists f K with the property that R n (g) R n (f ) C 0 (I) 0 as n. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 12 / 31

Complex Bounds (cont.) Remark: Item (ii) above means that there exists a homeomorphism H : K Θ Z such that the diagram R K K H H commutes. Θ Z σ Θ Z Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 13 / 31

Exponential convergence McMullen proved that the convergence towards K takes place at an exponential rate in the C 0 topology. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 14 / 31

Exponential convergence McMullen proved that the convergence towards K takes place at an exponential rate in the C 0 topology. Theorem (McMullen) If f and g are infinitely renormalizable quadratic-like maps with the same bounded combinatorial type in Θ P, and with conformal moduli greater than or equal to µ, we have R n f R n g C 0 (I) Cλ n for all n 0 where C = C(µ,Θ) > 0 and 0 < λ = λ(θ) < 1. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 14 / 31

Exponential convergence McMullen proved that the convergence towards K takes place at an exponential rate in the C 0 topology. Theorem (McMullen) If f and g are infinitely renormalizable quadratic-like maps with the same bounded combinatorial type in Θ P, and with conformal moduli greater than or equal to µ, we have R n f R n g C 0 (I) Cλ n for all n 0 where C = C(µ,Θ) > 0 and 0 < λ = λ(θ) < 1. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 14 / 31

Lyubich s Theorem Lyubich endowed the space QG of quadratic-like germs (modulo affine equivalence) with a complex manifold structure modeled in a topological vector space (arising as the direct limit of a certain net of Banach spaces of analytic functions). The attractor K is naturally embedded in QG as a compact set. Theorem (Lyubich) In the space QG, the renormalization operator is complex-analytic, and its limit set K is a hyperbolic basic set. This deep theorem is the crowning jewel of this theory. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 15 / 31

Hyperbolicity in a Banach space of real-analytic maps Theorem (Hyperbolicity in a real Banach space) There exist a > 0, an open set O A = A Ωa containing K = K Θ and a positive integer N with the following property. There exists a real analytic operator T : O A having K as a hyperbolic basic set with co-dimension one stable manifolds at each point, such that T(f ) [ 1,1] = R N (f [ 1,1]), for all f O, is the N-th iterate of the renormalization operator. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 16 / 31

Hyperbolicity in a Banach space of real-analytic maps Theorem (Hyperbolicity in a real Banach space) There exist a > 0, an open set O A = A Ωa containing K = K Θ and a positive integer N with the following property. There exists a real analytic operator T : O A having K as a hyperbolic basic set with co-dimension one stable manifolds at each point, such that T(f ) [ 1,1] = R N (f [ 1,1]), for all f O, is the N-th iterate of the renormalization operator. Proof Ingredients: Lyubich s theorem + the complex bounds + skew-product renormalization. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 16 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r The renormalization operator is not Fréchet differentiable in C r. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r The renormalization operator is not Fréchet differentiable in C r. So, what does it mean to say that it is hyperbolic? Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r The renormalization operator is not Fréchet differentiable in C r. So, what does it mean to say that it is hyperbolic? Well, we can still talk about the hyperbolic picture (stable and unstable manifolds). Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r The renormalization operator is not Fréchet differentiable in C r. So, what does it mean to say that it is hyperbolic? Well, we can still talk about the hyperbolic picture (stable and unstable manifolds). More precisely, let T : O B be a continuous operator, with B Banach, O B open and K O a compact invariant set. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolicity in C r The renormalization operator is not Fréchet differentiable in C r. So, what does it mean to say that it is hyperbolic? Well, we can still talk about the hyperbolic picture (stable and unstable manifolds). More precisely, let T : O B be a continuous operator, with B Banach, O B open and K O a compact invariant set. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 17 / 31

Hyperbolic Picture Definition (Hyperbolic Picture) We say that the hyperbolic picture holds true for T (and K) if there exists 0 < θ < 1 such that: (i) For all x K, W s ǫ (x) and W u ǫ (x) are Banach submanifolds of B. (ii) If y W s (x) then T n (x) T n (y) Cθ n x y. Moreover, T(Wǫ u(x)) W ǫ u (T(x)), the restriction of T to W u ǫ (x) is one-to-one and for all y Wǫ u (x) we have T n (x) T n (y) Cθ n x y. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 18 / 31

Hyperbolic Picture (cont.) (iii) If y B(x,ǫ) is such that T i (y) B(T i (x),ǫ) for i n then dist(t n (y),w u ǫ (T n (x))) Cθ n, as well as dist(y,w s ǫ (x)) Cθn. (iv) The family of local stable manifolds (and also the family of local unstable manifolds) form a C 0 lamination: the tangent spaces to the leaves vary continuously. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 19 / 31

Hyperbolic Picture in C r Theorem (Hyperbolic Picture in U r ) If r 2 + α, where α > 0 is close to one, then the hyperbolic picture holds true for the renormalization operator acting on U r. Furthermore, (i) the local unstable manifolds are real analytic curves; (ii) the local stable manifolds are of class C 1, and together they form a continuous lamination whose holonomy is C 1+β for some β > 0; The proof is long, but not painful. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 20 / 31

Key Steps Starting from the hyperbolicity of T = R N in A (our Banach space of C ω maps), we first extend the hyperbolic splitting (stable and unstable subspaces) at each point of the attractor from A to A r. This linear part depends on the notion of compatibility. Second, we prove that the stable sets of points of K in A r are graphs of C 1 functions defined over the corresponding extended stable subspaces obtained in the first step. This non-linear part depends on the notion of robustness. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 21 / 31

Compatibility The notion of compatibility involves the following data. Banach spaces A B C (typically, each inclusion compact with a dense image). A C 1 operator T : O A (O A open) with a hyperbolic basic set K O. For each x K, we want to extend DT(x) and its hyperbolic splitting from A to B. The basic principle at work here is: boundedness in C yields pre-compactness in B. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 22 / 31

Compatibility (cont.) Definition Let θ < ρ < λ where θ,λ are the contraction and expansion exponents of T K. The pair (B, C) is ρ-compatible with (T, K) if: 1 The inclusions A B C are compact operators. 2 There exists M > 0 such that each linear operator L x = DT(x) extends to a linear operator ˆL x : C C with C ˆL x < M, ˆL x (B) B, and ˆL x (v) < M v B. B 3 The map L : K L(B, C) given by L x = ˆL x B is continuous. 4 There exists > 1 such that B( ) A is C-dense in B(1). 5 There exist K > 1 and a positive integer m such that { ˆL (m) ρ m } x (v) max B 2(1 + ) v B,K v C. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 23 / 31

Extending the Splitting Theorem If (B, C) is ρ-compatible with (T, K), then there exists a continuous splitting B = Êx u Ês x such that Êx u is the inclusion of Eu x A in B. The splitting is invariant under ˆL x. We have ˆL n x(v) B Cλ n v B, for all v Êu x. We have ˆL n x(v) B C ˆθ n v B, for all v Ês x and some 0 < ˆθ < ρ. Remark: In particular, if ρ 1, then ˆθ < 1, and so therefore the hyperbolic splitting in A remains hyperbolic in B. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 24 / 31

Extending the Splitting of Renormalization Theorem Let T and K be as above, and let λ be the expansion constant of T K. For all α > 0 the pair of spaces (A 2+α, A 0 ) is 1-compatible with (T, K). For all 1 < ρ < λ there exists α > 0 sufficiently small such that (A 2 α, A 0 ) is ρ-compatible with (T, K). Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 25 / 31

Robustness (Informal Def.) An operator T is robust if: It acts on four Banach spaces simultaneously: A B C D. In A, T has a hyperbolic basic set K (with expansion contant λ). (B, D) is 1-compatible with (T, K) (C, D) is ρ-compatible with (T, K) for some ρ < λ. As a map from B to C, T is C 1. T satisfies a uniform Gateaux condition in C for directions in B. The extension of DT to B is a reasonably good approximation of T near K. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 26 / 31

Stable Manifold Theorem for Robust Operators Theorem Let T : O A A be a C k with k 2 (or real analytic) hyperbolic operator over K O A, and robust with respect to (B, C, D). Then the hyperbolic picture holds true T acting on B. The local unstable manifolds are C k with k 2 (or real analytic) curves, and the local stable manifolds are of class C 1 and form a C 0 lamination. The proof is long and painful. Uncountably many norm estimates. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 27 / 31

Renormalization is Robust Theorem Let T = R N : O A be the renormalization operator in the Banach space of C ω maps constructed before. If s > s 0 with s 0 < 2 sufficiently close to 2 and r > s + 1 not an integer, then T is a robust operator with respect to (A r, A s, A 0 ). Remark: Here, we can take s 0 = 1 + D, where D = sup f K HD(I f ), where I f is the post-critical set of f. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 28 / 31

Key Geometric Estimates The proof that the renormalization operator T satisfies both compatibility and robustness depends on two key estimates concerning the geometry of the post-critical set of maps in the attractor. These come into play when we analyze the (formal) derivative of a power of T at f K, namely: DT k (f )v = 1 p k 1 λ k j=0 Df j (f p k j (λ k x))v(f p k j 1 (λ k x)) + 1 p k 1 [x(t k f ) (x) T k f (x)] Df j (f p k j (0))v(f p k j 1 (0)), λ f j=0 Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 29 / 31

Key Geometric Estimates (cont.) From bounded geometry (the real bounds), the terms appearing in the expression of DT k (f ) can be estimated using the lengths of renormalization intervals j,k at level k. Thus: and also for all 0 j p k 1. Df j (f p k j (λ k x)) 0,k pk j,k Df p k j 1 (λ k x) C 0,k p k j 1,k 1,k (3) (4) Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 30 / 31

Key Geometric Estimates (cont.) Given those facts, to verify compatibility and robustness one needs the following (where D = sup f K HD(I f )). Theorem For each α > 0 there exist constants C 0 and 0 < µ < 1 such that p k 1 i=0 i,k 2+α i+1,k C 0 µ k. (5) For each µ > 1 close to one, there exist 0 < α < 1 D close to zero and C 1 > 0 such that for all f K we have p k 1 i=0 i,k 2 α i+1,k C 1 µ k. Edson de Faria (IME-USP) Hyperbolicity of Renormalization for C r Unimodal MapsDecember 13, 2010 31 / 31