ON SUBMAXIMAL DIMENSION OF THE GROUP OF ALMOST ISOMETRIES OF FINSLER METRICS.

Similar documents
Monochromatic metrics are generalized Berwald

Finsler conformal Lichnerowicz conjecture

On isometries of Finsler manifolds

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

arxiv: v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

On the interplay between Lorentzian Causality and Finsler metrics of Randers type

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

Loos Symmetric Cones. Jimmie Lawson Louisiana State University. July, 2018

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

Theorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

AFFINE IMAGES OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS

Geometric Structures in Mathematical Physics Non-existence of almost complex structures on quaternion-kähler manifolds of positive type

Lecture 3 - Lie Groups and Geometry

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 49(3)

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

Hopf-Rinow and Hadamard Theorems

REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES

Integration and Manifolds

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

SOME ASPECTS ON CIRCLES AND HELICES IN A COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACE. Toshiaki Adachi* and Sadahiro Maeda

A crash course the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Metrics and Holonomy

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv: v5 [math.dg] 25 Jan 2017

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

On homogeneous Randers spaces with Douglas or naturally reductive metrics

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

A Crash Course in Topological Groups

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

RIGIDITY OF MINIMAL ISOMETRIC IMMERSIONS OF SPHERES INTO SPHERES. Christine M. Escher Oregon State University. September 10, 1997

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(1)

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 29 Sep 1998

The geometry of a positively curved Zoll surface of revolution

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

Curvature-homogeneous spaces of type (1,3)

LECTURE 2. (TEXED): IN CLASS: PROBABLY LECTURE 3. MANIFOLDS 1. FALL TANGENT VECTORS.

The Calabi Conjecture

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

Lifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions

A Note on V. I. Arnold s Chord Conjecture. Casim Abbas. 1 Introduction

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

A Convexity Theorem For Isoparametric Submanifolds

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

Chapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves

Geometric inequalities for black holes

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

HARMONIC MAPS INTO GRASSMANNIANS AND A GENERALIZATION OF DO CARMO-WALLACH THEOREM

NEGATIVITY OF THE CURVATURE OPERATOR OF A BOUNDED DOMAIN. Dedicated to Professor Tadashi Kuroda on his sixtieth birthday. (Received May 16, 1986)

Projective geometry and spacetime structure. David Delphenich Bethany College Lindsborg, KS USA

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

Changing sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation

Math 598 Feb 14, Geometry and Topology II Spring 2005, PSU

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 40(3)

Lagrangian Submanifolds with Constant Angle Functions in the Nearly Kähler S 3 S 3

MANIFOLDS. (2) X is" a parallel vectorfield on M. HOMOGENEITY AND BOUNDED ISOMETRIES IN

X-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES. (Communicated by Jan Boman)

Cohomology of the Mumford Quotient

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Holomorphic Geodesic Transformations. of Almost Hermitian Manifold

The Geometrization Theorem

An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people

Negative sectional curvature and the product complex structure. Harish Sheshadri. Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

A little taste of symplectic geometry

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Isometries of Riemannian and sub-riemannian structures on 3D Lie groups

Strictly convex functions on complete Finsler manifolds

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

AFFINE SPHERES AND KÄHLER-EINSTEIN METRICS. metric makes sense under projective coordinate changes. See e.g. [10]. Form a cone (1) C = s>0

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY COMPACT METRIC SPACES. Jean BELLISSARD 1. Collaboration:

LAGRANGIAN HOMOLOGY CLASSES WITHOUT REGULAR MINIMIZERS

Transcription:

ON SUBMAXIMAL DIMENSION OF THE GROUP OF ALMOST ISOMETRIES OF FINSLER METRICS. VLADIMIR S. MATVEEV Abstract. We show that the second greatest possible dimension of the group of (local) almost isometries of a Finsler metric is n n + 1 for n = dim(m) 4 and n n + = 8 for n = 4. If a Finsler metric has the group of almost isometries of dimension greater than n n + 1, then the Finsler metric is Randers, i.e., F (x, y) = g x (y, y) + τ(y). Moreover, if n 4, the Riemannian metric g has constant sectional curvature and, if in addition n, the 1-form τ is closed, so (locally) the metric admits the group of local isometries of the maximal dimension n(n+1). In the remaining dimensions and 4, we describe all examples of Finsler metrics with 3 resp. 8-dimensional group of almost isometries. 1. Definition and results Let (M, F ) be a connected Finsler manifold of dimension n. We assume that all objects in our paper are sufficiently smooth. We require that F is strictly convex but allow F to be not reversible. Definition ([]). A diffeomorphism φ : U V, where U, V M, is called an almost isometry, if T (p, q, r) = T (φ(p), φ(q), φ(r)) for all p, q, r U, where T is the triangular function given by (1.1) T (p, q, r) := d(p, q) + d(q, r) d(p, r), where d is the (generally, nonsymmetric) distance corresponding to F, i.e. { 1 } d(p, q) = inf F (c(t), c(t) )dt c C 1 ([0, 1]; M) with c(0) = p, c(1) = q. 0 Similarly, a vector field K is an almost Killing, if its local flow acts by almost isometries. Example 1. Let φ : U V be a diffeomorphism such that φ (F ) = F + df, where f is a smooth function (the metric transformation F Institute of Mathematics, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07737 Jena Germany; vladimir.matveev@uni-jena.de Partially supported by DFG (GK 153) and FSU Jena. 1

VLADIMIR S. MATVEEV F + df was called trivial projective change in [5]). Then, φ is an almost isometry. Indeed, the transformation F F +df adds f(q) f(p) (resp. f(r) f(q), resp. f(p) f(r)) to the length of every curve connecting p and q (resp. q and r, resp. r and p) and therefore does not change the value of T (p, q, r). Fact ([], Proposition 3.). Every almost isometry is as in Example 1. In our paper we answer the following natural question: what is the submaximal dimension of the group of almost isometries, and when it is greater than the submaximal dimension of the group of isometries? Since in view of Fact every almost isometry of F is an isometry of the symmetrized Finsler metric F sym (x, y) = 1 (F (x, y) + F (x, y)), the dimension of the group of almost isometries can not be greater than the dimension of the group of isometries of F sym which, in view of [1, Theorem 3.3] and [6, 3], is at most n(n+1) dimensional. It is easy to construct examples of (nonriemannian) reversible Finsler metrics whose group of isometries (and therefore the group of almost isometries) has dimension n n + 1, see [6, 3]. All our considerations are local, so we actually speak not about the group of almost isometries, but about the linear vector space of almost Killing vector fields. Most examples and statements survive or could be generalized for the global setup though. Example 3. Let g be a Riemannian metric of constant sectional curvature (locally it has n(n+1) dimensional space of Killing vector fields). Consider a closed 1-form τ such that its g-norm τ g < 1 at all points. Then, any Killing vector field of g is an almost Killing vector field of the Randers Finsler metrics F g,τ defined by F g,τ (x, y) = g x (y, y) + τ(y), and vice versa. Indeed, the implication follows from Example 1 and the implication follows from the above mentioned observation that almost isometries are isometries of the symmetrized metric (which in the case of Randers metrics is essentially the initial metric g). The main results of our papers are Theorems 4, 5, 8, 9 and Examples 6, 7 below. Theorem 4. Assume the vector space of almost Killing vector fields on (M, F ) is more than n n + 1- dimensional. Then, F is a Randers metric, i.e., F (x, y) = g x (y, y) + τ(y) for a Riemannian metric g and for a 1-form τ with τ g < 1.

SUBMAXIMAL DIMENSION OF THE GROUP OF ALMOST ISOMETRIES. 3 Theorem 5. Let F = F g,τ be a Randers Finsler metric. Assume n = dim(m), 4. Suppose the space of almost Killing vector fields is more than n n + 1- dimensional. Then, F is as in Example 3, i.e., g has constant sectional curvature and the form τ is closed. The above two theorems answer our question for all dimensions except of n =, 4, and, in a certain sense, tell us that for metrics with many Killing resp. almost Killing vector fields there is no big difference between isometries and almost isometries. The case n = will be considered in Example 6 and Theorem 8; we will see that in this case the submaximal dimension of the space of almost Killing vector fields is still n n + 1 =, but the description of Finsler metrics with the space of almost Killing vector fields of the highest dimension 3 is slightly more complicated (the metric is still of constant curvature but the form τ may be not closed). The 4-dimensional case (considered in Example 7 and Theorem 9) is much more interesting: remarkably, there exist examples of Randers Finsler metrics such that they are not as in Example 3 and such that the dimension of the space of almost Killing vector fields is 8 which is greater than n n + 1 = 7; we construct them all. Example 6. Consider a Riemannian (n = )-dimensional manifold (M, g) of constant sectional curvature. Let ω = V ol g = det(g)dx dy be the volume form of g and τ be a 1-form such that for a certain constant c we have dτ = c ω. Assume that τ g < 1 so F g,τ is a Finsler metric. Then, locally, the space of almost Killing vector fields for this metric is n n + 1 + 1 = 3-dimensional. Note that Example 6 is essentially local and can not live on closed manifolds, since the volume form on a closed manifold can not be differential of a 1-form by Stokes theorem. Example 7. Consider a Kähler 4-manifold (M 4, g, ω) of constant holomophic curvature. Take a 1-form τ such that dτ = c ω for a certain constant c. Assume that τ g < 1 so F g,τ is a Finsler metric. Then, locally, the space of almost Killing vector fields for this metric is n n + 1 + 1 = 8-dimensional. Indeed, consider the space of Killing vector fields preserving the volume form ω in dimension or the Kähler symplectic form ω in dimension 4. This space is 3-dimensional in dimension (since every orientationpreserving isometry preserves the volume form) and 8-dimensional in dimension 4 (since a Kähler space of constant holomorphic curvature is a locally symmetric space with ω-preserving-isotropy subgroup isomorphic to the 4-dimensional U ). Every such Killing vector field is an

4 VLADIMIR S. MATVEEV almost Killing vector field of F g,τ. Indeed, its flow is an isometry of g and sends τ to another 1-form such that its differential is still c ω (because this isometry preserves ω). Theorem 8. Suppose a Randers Finsler metric is not as in Example 3. Assume n = dim(m) =. Then, if the space of almost Killing vector fields for this metric is (at least) n n + 1 + 1 = 3-dimensional, then the metric is as in Example 6 (with c 0). Theorem 9. Suppose a Randers Finsler metric is not as in Example 3. Assume n = dim(m) = 4. Then, if the space of almost Killing vector fields for this metric is (at least) n n + 1 + 1 = 8-dimensional, then the metric is as in Example 7. If the space of almost Killing vector fields has a higher dimension, the metric is as in Example 3.. Proofs Proof of Theorem 4. Assume a metric F on M n has at least n n + linearly independent almost Killing vector fields. Let us slightly improve the metric F, i.e., construct canonically a better metric F better such that each almost Killing vector field of F is a Killing vector field of F better. This improvement will take place in each tangent space independently, though of course the result will still smoothly depend on the point. Take a point p M and consider T p M. Consider the unit ball K F in the norm F TpM: K F := {y T p M F (p, y) 1}. It is a convex body in T p M containing the zero vector 0 T p M. Now, consider the dual space T p M and the dual(=polar) convex body there: K F := {ξ T p M ξ(y) 1 for all y K F }. Take the barycenter b F of KF and consider the convex body Kbetter := KF b F = {ξ b F ξ KF }. The barycenter of Kbetter lies at 0. Next, consider the body K better T p M dual to Kbetter and the Finsler metric F better such that at every point p the unit ball is the corresponding K better. Evidently, F better is a smooth Finsler metric. Example 10. Let F (x, y) = g x (y, y) + τ(y) be a Randers metric. Then, F better (x, y) = g x (y, y), i.e., is essentially the Riemannian metric g. Moreover, if F better is essentially a Riemannian metric, then F is a Randers metric (to see all this, it is recommended to consider a g- orthonormal basis in T x M and calculate everything in the corresponding coordinate system, which is an easy exercise).

SUBMAXIMAL DIMENSION OF THE GROUP OF ALMOST ISOMETRIES. 5 Let us now show that the transformation F F + τ (where τ is a 1-form) does not change the metric F better, in the sense that the metrics F better constructed for F and for F + τ coincide. This fact is well known in the convex geometry, we prove it for convenience of the reader. First, since the sets K F, K F +τ are convex and compact, the maximum of every 1-form ξ Tp M over K F resp. K F +τ is achieved at a point of the unit sphere S F = {y T p M F (p, y) = 1} resp. S F +τ = {y T p M F (p, y) + τ(y) = 1}. Consider the bijection f : S F S F +τ, f(y) = 1 1+τ(y) y. Consider ξ KF. Then, for every element y = f(y) of S F +τ (for y S F ) we have ( ) (ξ + τ)(y 1 ) = (ξ + τ) y = 1 ξ(y) + 1 1+τ(y) τ(y) = 1. 1+τ(y) 1+τ(y) 1+τ(y) 1+τ(y) We see that for every 1-form ξ KF the 1-form ξ + τ K F +τ. Analogous we prove that for every ξ KF +τ the 1-form ξ τ lies in KF. Thus, K F +τ is the τ-parallel translation of K F. Then, the barycenter b F +τ corresponding to KF +τ is b F + τ, and the bodies K better corresponding to F +τ and F coincide, so the transformation F F +τ does not change the metric F better. Since by Fact every almost isometry sends F to a F + df, and since the addition of τ = df does not change the metric F better, every almost isometry of F is an isometry of F better. By assumptions, the initial Finsler metric F has at least n n + - dimensional space of almost Killing vector fields. Thus, the Finsler metric F better has at least n n + -dimensional space of Killing vector field. By [6, Theorem 3.1], it is essentially a Riemannian metric, i.e., F (x, y) = g x (y, y) for a certain Riemannian metric g. Then, as we explainen in Example 10, the metric F is a Randers metric as we claimed. Theorem 4 is proved. Proof of Theorem 5. We assume n = dim(m), 4 and consider a Finsler metric F such that the vector space of its almost Killing vector fields is at least n n +-dimensional. By Theorem 4, the Finsler metric is a Randers one, F (x, y) = g x (y, y) + τ(y). Take a point x M and consider the Lie subgroup of SO(T x M; g x ) (=the group of g x -isometries of T x M preserving the orientation) generated ( by almost ) Killing vector fields that vanish at 0. It is at least n n + n -dimensional. Take it closure; it is a closed Lie subgroup of SO(T x M; g x ) of dimension at least n n + n = (n 1)(n ) + 1.

6 VLADIMIR S. MATVEEV By the classical result of [7], for n 4, every closed subgroup of SO n of dimension greater than (n 1)(n ) coincides with the whole SO n. Evidently, the flow of every almost Killing vector field preserves dτ (since it preserves the metric g and in view of Fact sends τ to τ + df which have the same differential as τ). Then, the differential of τ, which is a -form, is preserved by the whole group SO(T x M; g x ) implying it is vanishes at the (arbitrary) point x. Since SO(T x M; g x ) acts transitively on -planes in T x M, the Riemannian metric g has constant sectional curvature. Theorem is proved. Proof of Theorem 8. Consider a Randers metric F (x, y) = g x (y, y)+ τ; we assume n = dim(m) = and the existence of 3 linearly independent almost Killing vector fields. Then, the Riemannian metric g has 3 Killing vector fields implying it has constant sectional curvature. The Killing vector fields preserve the differential of τ implying dτ is proportional to the volume form. Theorem 8 is proved. Proof of Theorem 9. Consider a Randers metric F (x, y) = g x (y, y)+ τ; we assume n = dim(m) = 4 and the existence of at least 8 linearly independent almost Killing vector fields. Since almost Killing vector fields for F are Killing for g, the metric g has at least 8 linearly independent Killing vector fields. 4-dimensional Riemannian metrics with at least 8 linearly independent Killing vector fields are all known (see for example [3]): they are of constant sectional curvature, or of constant holomophic sectional curvature. In both cases the local pseudogroup of almost isometries generated by the almost Killing vector fields acts transitively. Suppose now dτ 0 at a certain point. Since the local pseudogroup of almost isometries generated by the almost Killing vector fields acts transitively, dτ 0 at all points. Consider an arbitrary point x and again, as in the proof of Theorem 5, consider the almost Killing vector fields that vanish at x, the Lie subgroup of SO(T x M; g x ) generated by these vector fields, and its closure which we denote H x SO(T x M; g x ) SO 4. It is at least 4 dimensional. Now, the closed subgroups of SO(T x M; g x ) SO 4 of dimensions 4 and larger are well-understood: any 4-dimensional closed (connected) subgroup is essentially U (in the sense that in a certain g x -orthonormal basis of T x M the group SO(T x M; g x ) and its subgroup H are precisely the standard SO 4 and the standard U standardly embedded in SO 4 ). Any closed (connected) subgroup of dimension 5 is the whole SO 4. In all cases the element id : T x M T x M is an element of H x which implies that every geodesic reflection (i.e., a local isometry I of g such that it takes the point x to itself and whose differential at x is id)

SUBMAXIMAL DIMENSION OF THE GROUP OF ALMOST ISOMETRIES. 7 can be realized by an almost isometry of F generated by almost Killing vector fields. By our assumptions, the differential dτ of the form τ is not zero. Since it is preserved by H x, it also preserved by the holonomy group of g, since the holonomy group of a symmetric space is the subgroup of the group generated by geodesic reflections. Then, dτ is covariantly constant. Since the group H x acts transitively on T x M, all the eigenvalues of the endomorphism J : T M T M defined by the condition dτ(y,.) = g(j(y),.) are ±c i, so the endomorphism 1 J is an almost c complex structure. It is covariantly constant (because g and dτ are covariantly constant), so c is a constant. Then, it is a complex structure and (M, g, ω = 1 dτ) is a Kähler manifold. Then, the metric has c constant holomorphic sectional curvature and dτ is proportional to ω with the constant coefficient as we claimed. Finally, if there exists more than 8 almost Killing vector fields, then the group H x is more than 4- dimensional, which, as we explained above, implies that it is the whole SO(T x M; g x ) so the metric has constant sectional curvature and the form τ is closed. Acknowledgement. This result was obtained and the paper was essentially written during XVII Escola de Geometria Diferencial at Manaus. My interest to the problem was motivated by the talk of Miguel Angel Javaloyes and the paper answers the problems he stated during his talk and in the discussion afterward. I thank the organizers of the conference for partial financial support and for their hospitality, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GK 153) and FSU Jena for partial financial support. References [1] S. Deng and Z. Hou, The group of isometries of a Finsler space, Pacific J. Math. 07(00), no. 1, 149 155. [] M. A. Javaloyes, L. Lichtenfelz, P. Piccione, Almost isometries of non-reversible metrics with applications to stationary spacetimes, arxiv:105.4539 [math.dg]. [3] S. Ishihara, Homogeneous Riemannian spaces, J. Math. Soc. Japan 7(1955), 345 370. [4] S. Kobayash and T. Nagano, Riemannian manifolds with abundant isometries, Differential geometry (in honor of Kentaro Yano), 195 19. Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 197. [5] V. S. Matveev, Can we make a Finsler metric complete by a trivial projective change? Proceedings of the VI International Meeting on Lorentzian Geometry (Granada, September 6 9, 011), Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 6(013), 31 43, arxiv:111.5060. [6] V. S. Matveev, M. Troyanov, The Binet-Legendre Metric in Finsler Geometry. Geometry & Topology 16(01), 135 170, arxiv:1104.1647.

8 VLADIMIR S. MATVEEV [7] D. Montgomery and H. Samelson, Transformation groups of spheres, Ann. of Math. () 44(1943), 454 470.