General Thermodynamics for Process Simulation. Dr. Jungho Cho, Professor Department of Chemical Engineering Dong Yang University

Similar documents
y i x P vap 10 A T SOLUTION TO HOMEWORK #7 #Problem

PETE 310 Lectures # 24 & 25 Chapter 12 Gas Liquid Equilibrium

Name: SID: Discussion Session:

Introduction to Vapor/Liquid Equilibrium, part 2. Raoult s Law:

Energy, Entropy, and Availability Balances Phase Equilibria. Nonideal Thermodynamic Property Models. Selecting an Appropriate Model

(1) The saturation vapor pressure as a function of temperature, often given by the Antoine equation:

If two volatile and miscible liquids are combined to form a solution, Raoult s law is not obeyed. Use the experimental data in Table 9.

3. Be able to derive the chemical equilibrium constants from statistical mechanics.

Lecture 8. Chapter 7. - Thermodynamic Web - Departure Functions - Review Equations of state (chapter 4, briefly)

Non-Ideality Through Fugacity and Activity

The ChemSep Book. Harry A. Kooijman Consultant. Ross Taylor Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

4.2 Chemical Driving Force

Solution Thermodynamics

Estimation of the composition of the liquid and vapor streams exiting a flash unit with a supercritical component

University of Washington Department of Chemistry Chemistry 452/456 Summer Quarter 2014

INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICAL PROCESS SIMULATORS

Vapor-Liquid Equilibria for Water+Hydrochloric Acid+Magnesium Chloride and Water+Hydrochloric Acid+Calcium Chloride Systems at Atmospheric Pressure

Supplementary Notes for Chapter 9 Mixture Thermodynamics

10.34 Numerical Methods Applied to Chemical Engineering Fall Homework #3: Systems of Nonlinear Equations and Optimization

I wish to publish my paper on The International Journal of Thermophysics. A Practical Method to Calculate Partial Properties from Equation of State

Chapter 8 Solutions Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics 2e

Determination of Structure and Formation Conditions of Gas Hydrate by Using TPD Method and Flash Calculations

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

Prediction of steady state input multiplicities for the reactive flash separation using reactioninvariant composition variables

Computation of Phase Equilibrium and Phase Envelopes

Lecture. Polymer Thermodynamics 0331 L Chemical Potential

( ) 1/ 2. ( P SO2 )( P O2 ) 1/ 2.

Appendix II Summary of Important Equations

Simulation of Ethanol Dehydration Using Cyclohexane as an Entrainer

Equation of State Modeling of Phase Equilibrium in the Low-Density Polyethylene Process

University of Washington Department of Chemistry Chemistry 452/456 Summer Quarter 2014

NAME and Section No. it is found that 0.6 mol of O

Non-Commercial Use Only

Solution Thermodynamics

Chemical Engineering Department University of Washington

Exercises of Fundamentals of Chemical Processes

McCabe-Thiele Diagrams for Binary Distillation

VAPOR LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM DATA GENERATION FOR ACETIC ACID AND p-xylene AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE

Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Bucharest, Bd. Regina Elisabeta 4-12, , Bucharest, Romania

A Self-Consistent Gibbs Excess Mixing Rule for Cubic Equations of State: derivation and fugacity coefficients

Chapter 18, Part 1. Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling

( ) Phase equilibrium Some basic principles for phase calculations

Chemical Equilibrium. Chapter 6 Spontaneity of Reactive Mixtures (gases) Taking into account there are many types of work that a sysem can perform

Outline. Unit Eight Calculations with Entropy. The Second Law. Second Law Notes. Uses of Entropy. Entropy is a Property.

Thermodynamics II. Department of Chemical Engineering. Prof. Kim, Jong Hak

MODELING THE HIGH-PRESSURE BEHAVIOR OF BINARY MIXTURES OF CARBON DIOXIDE+ALKANOLS USING AN EXCESS FREE ENERGY MIXING RULE

Electrochemical Equilibrium Electromotive Force

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

Simulation of a steady state flash

Application of Activity Coefficient Models in VLE Determination for Azeotropic System Using Othmer Type Ebulliometer

CHEMICAL REACTIONS AND DIFFUSION

Phase equilibria Introduction General equilibrium conditions

V T for n & P = constant

Thermodynamics General

Assignment 4. Adsorption Isotherms

Process Modeling. Improving or understanding chemical process operation is a major objective for developing a dynamic process model

CinChE Problem-Solving Strategy Chapter 4 Development of a Mathematical Model. formulation. procedure

Adsorption: A gas or gases from a mixture of gases or a liquid (or liquids) from a mixture of liquids is bound physically to the surface of a solid.

A Modulated Hydrothermal (MHT) Approach for the Facile. Synthesis of UiO-66-Type MOFs

THE SUMMATION NOTATION Ʃ

1st Year Thermodynamic Lectures Dr Mark R. Wormald BIBLIOGRAPHY

LNG CARGO TRANSFER CALCULATION METHODS AND ROUNDING-OFFS

Multicomponent Vaporization Modeling of Petroleum-Biofuel Mixture at High-Pressure Conditions

A New Thermodynamic Function for Phase-Splitting at Constant Temperature, Moles, and Volume

Prediction of the flash point of ternary ideal mixtures

Adiabatic Sorption of Ammonia-Water System and Depicting in p-t-x Diagram

Chapter 9: Statistical Inference and the Relationship between Two Variables

PREDICTION OF GAS HYDRATE PHASE BEHAVIOR IN THE PRESENCE OF ALCOLHOLS AND GLYCOLS WITH PRSV EQUATION OF STATE AND THE VDW-P MODEL

Envr 210, Chapter 3, Intermolecular forces and partitioning Free energies and equilibrium partitioning chemical potential fugacity activity coef.

The influence of non-ideal vapor-liquid-equilibrium on vaporization of multicomponent hydrocarbon fuels

Linear Regression Analysis: Terminology and Notation

Prediction of Ultrasonic Velocity in Binary Mixtures of a Nuclear Extractant and Monocarboxylic Acids using Several Theoretical Models

DETERMINATION OF CO 2 MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE USING SOLUBILITY PARAMETER

UNIFAC. Documentation. DDBSP Dortmund Data Bank Software Package

Structure and Property Prediction of Sub- and Super-Critical Water

Module 3: The Whole-Process Perspective for Thermochemical Hydrogen

is the calculated value of the dependent variable at point i. The best parameters have values that minimize the squares of the errors

Reliable Phase Stability Analysis for Asymmetric Models

Name ID # For relatively dilute aqueous solutions the molality and molarity are approximately equal.

Chapter 3 Thermochemistry of Fuel Air Mixtures

Outlet temperature of a WGS reactor (Stage I) for the conversion of CO, applied for the abatement of CO to a fixed value.

The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam

Q e E i /k B. i i i i

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of bulk electrolytes and calcium channels

Phase equilibria for the oxygen-water system up to elevated temperatures and pressures

1. Mean-Field Theory. 2. Bjerrum length

Chemical Engineering 160/260 Polymer Science and Engineering. Lecture 10 - Phase Equilibria and Polymer Blends February 7, 2001

Mass Transfer Processes

Topic 3 : Thermodynamics

CHE-201. I n t r o d u c t i o n t o Chemical E n g i n e e r i n g. C h a p t e r 6. Multiphase Systems

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Chemistry 163B Free Energy and Equilibrium E&R ( ch 6)

Lecture 13 APPROXIMATION OF SECOMD ORDER DERIVATIVES

2016 Wiley. Study Session 2: Ethical and Professional Standards Application

Experimental and Modeling Studies for a Reactive Batch Distillation Column

Frequency dependence of the permittivity

Determination of activity coefficients of dimethyl ether in butyl acetate and 2-propanol

ME 300 Exam 2 November 18, :30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Transcription:

General Thermodynamcs for Process Smulaton Dr. Jungho Cho, Professor Department of Chemcal Engneerng Dong Yang Unversty

Four Crtera for Equlbra μ = μ v Stuaton α T = T β α β P = P l μ = μ l1 l 2 Thermal Equlbrum Mechancal Equlbrum Condton, Phase Equlbra (VLE, LLE) G ξ T, P = 0 Chemcal Equlbrum Fugacty (or chemcal potental) s defned as an escapng tendency of a component n a certan phase nto another phase. Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Basc Phase Equlbra Relatons Vapor-lqud equlbrum calculatons The basc relatonshp for every component n vapor-lqud equlbrum s: v ( T P y ) f l ( T P x ) where : the fugacty of component n the vapor phase v fˆ l fˆ f ˆ,, = ˆ,, : the fugacty of component n the lqud phase (1) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Basc Phase Equlbra Relatons There are two methods for representng lqud fugactes. - Equaton of state method - Lqud actvty coeffcent method Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Equaton of State Method The equaton of state method defnes fugactes as: f ˆ v v = φˆ y P (2) f ˆ l l = φˆ x P (3) where: φ v φ l y x P s the vapor phase fugacty coeffcent s the lqud phase fugacty coeffcent s the mole fracton of n the vapor s the mole fracton of n the lqud s the system pressure Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Equaton of State Method We can then rewrte equaton 1 as: ˆ φ y = ˆ φ x v l (4) Ths s the standard equaton used to represent vaporlqud equlbrum usng the equaton-of-state method. φ v and φ l are both calculated by the equaton-of-state. Note that K-values are defned as: y K = (5) x Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Lqud Actvty Coeffcent Method (VLE) The actvty coeffcent method defnes lqud fugactes as: fˆ l The vapor fugacty s the same as the EOS approach: v f ˆ = φˆ = γ x f (6) v y 0 P (7) where: γ s the lqud actvty coeffcent of component 0 f v φˆ s the standard lqud fugacty of component s calculated from an equaton-of-state model We can then rewrte equaton 1 as: ˆv φ y P = x γ f 0 (8) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Lqud Actvty Coeffcent Method (LLE) For Lqud-Lqud Equlbrum (LLE) the relatonshp s: f ˆ = l1 fˆ l 2 (9) where the desgnators 1 and 2 represent the two separate lqud phases. Usng the actvty coeffcent defnton of fugacty, ths can be rewrtten and smplfed as: x l1 l1 x l 2 γ l 2 γ = (10) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

K-values The k-values can be calculated from: K = y x = γ l φ sat P sat l V exp RT ˆv φ P ( sat P P ) (11) Or K = y x = ˆ φ ˆ φ l v (12) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Example 2: Ideal Raoult s Law The precedng equaton reduces to the followng deal Raoult s law: y P = x P vap Example : Pxy plot at constant T(75 o C). (P n kpa, T n o C) 2945.47 lnp vap 1 = 14.2724, lnp 2972.64 vap 2 = 14.2043 t + 224 t + 209 Soluton At 75 o C, P vap 1 = 83. 21kPa and P vap 1 = 41. 98kPa The total pressure Vapor phase composton, vap vap P x1 P1 + x2p2 P= P 2 + P P x = vap ( vap vap, ) 1 2 1 y x P vap 1 = = vap P2 + 1 2 1 x P 1 1 1 1 vap vap ( P P ) x P vap Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Pxy Dagram at Constant Temperature 100 90 a vap P 1 vap P 2 Pressure (kpa) 80 70 60 50 40 30 Lqud P x 1 c b c b P y 1 Vapor d 20 0 5 1.0 x 1, y 1 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Example 3: Slghtly Non-deal System For systems whch the lqud phase behaves nondeally: y P = γ x P vap Relaton between actvty coeffcent and excess Gbbs energy s as: lnγ = ex ( ng / RT ) n T, P, n j As an example, excess Gbbs energy expresson s as: G ex = RT Ax 1 x 2 Therefore, 1 γ and γ 2 becomes. 2 2 γ = ( ) γ = ( ) 1 exp Ax 2 So, = A( 1 x ) 2 exp Ax 1 [ ] 2 vap ( 2 ) vap x P Ax x P P exp 1 1 1 + exp 1 2 2 y 1 exp = 2 [ A( 1 x ) ] P 1 x 1 P vap 1 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Predcton wth Margules Equatons 160 Unstable 140 120 Pressure (kpa) 100 80 60 A = 0.0 A = 0.5 A = 1.0 A = 2.0 A = 3.0 40 20 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 x 1, y 1 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Devatons from Raoult s Law (1 of 2) In general, you can expect non-dealty of unlke molecules. Ether the sze and shape or the ntermolecular nteractons between components may be dssmlar. For short, these are called sze and energy asymmetry. Energy asymmetry occurs between polar and non-polar molecules and also between dfferent polar molecules. In the majorty of mxtures, actvty coeffcents s greater than unty. The result s a hgher fugacty than deal. The fugacty can be nterpreted as the tendency to vaporze. If compounds vaporze mere than n an deal soluton, then they ncrease ther average dstance. So actvty coeffcents s greater than unty ndcate repulson between unlke molecules. If the repulson s strong, lqud-lqud separaton occurs. Ths s another mechansm that decreases close contact between unlke molecules. If the actvty coeffcent s larger than unty, the system s sad to show postve devatons from Raoult s law. Negatve devatons from Raoult s law occur when the actvty coeffcent s smaller than unty. Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Devatons from Raoult s Law (2 of 2) 90 80 Sub-cooled Lqud Pressure (kpa) 70 60 50 postve negatve deal 40 Super-heated Vapor 30 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 x 1, y 1 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Isothermal Flash Calculatons Lqud feed T,P,F z T & P Flash Drum Heater Valve L, x Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Equlbrum Flash Vaporzaton The equlbrum flash separator s the smplest equlbrum-stage process wth whch the desgner must deal. Despte the fact that only one stage s nvolved, the calculaton of the compostons and the relatve amount of the vapor and lqud phases at any gven pressure and temperature usually nvolves a tedous traland-error soluton. Buford D. Smth, 1963 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton (1 of 4) MESH Equaton Materal Balance Equlbrum Relatons Summaton of Compostons Enthalpy(H) Balance Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton (2 of 4) Overall Materal Balance F = V + L (1) Component Materal Balance Fz = Vy + Lx (2) Equlbrum Relatons y = K x (3) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton (3 of 4) Summaton of Compostons x = 1 Defnng (4a) y = 1 (4b) φ =V F (5) Combnng (1) through (5), we obtan: ( 1 K ) ( K 1) ( ) z F φ = + = 0 1 φ (6) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton (4 of 4) From deal Raoult s law y P = x vap K-value can be rewrtten as: From Antone equaton y K = = x log P vap ( kpa) P P = vap P A t B ( o C) + C (7) (8) (9) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Antone Coeffcents log P vap ( kpa) = A t B ( o C) + C Benzene Toluene A 6.01788 6.08436 B 1203.677 1347.620 C 219.904 219.787 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Rachford-Rce Functon 0.10 0.05 φ = 0.707 F(φ) 0.00-0.05-0.10 ( 1 K ) ( K 1) ( ) z F φ = + = 0 1 φ -0.15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 φ Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton Results (1 of 3) Vapor Flowrate (K-mole/hr) V = Fφ = ( 100 ) (0.707) = 70. 7 (1) Lqud Flowrate (K-mole/hr) L = F V = 100 70.7 = 29.3 (2) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton Results (2 of 3) Mole Fracton at the lqud phase x = z 1+ φ 1 ( K ) x = 0.4479 = 0. 5521 B Mole Fracton at the vapor phase y = K x = x T Kz 1+ φ 1 ( K ) y = 0.6631 = 0. 3369 B y T (3) (4) (5) (6) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Flash Calculaton Results (3 of 3) 200 180 x B = 0.4329 Pressure (kpa) 160 140 120 100 y B = 0.6429 80 60 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Mole Fracton of Benzene Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

PRO/II Keyword Input for Flash Calculaton TITLE PROBLEM=PRBLEM-1A,PROJECT=CLASS,USER=JHCHO DIMENSION METRIC,PRES=ATM PRINT INPUT=ALL,PERC=M,FRAC=M COMPONENT DATA LIBID 1,BENZENE/2,TOLUENE THERMODYNAMIC DATA METHOD SYSTEM=IDEAL STREAM DATA PROP STREAM=1,TEMP=25,PRES=1,RATE=100,COMP=1,60/2,40 UNIT OPERATION DATA FLASH UID=F01 FEED 1 PROD V=1V,L=1L ISO TEMP=100,PRES=1.2 END Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

PRO/II Output Summary for Flash Calculaton STREAM ID 1 1L 1V NAME PHASE LIQUID LIQUID VAPOR FLUID MOLAR FRACTIONS 1 BENZENE 0.6000 0.4476 0.6629 2 TOLUENE 0.4000 0.5524 0.3371 TOTAL RATE, KG-MOL/HR 100.0000 75.6710 24.3290 TEMPERATURE, C 25.0000 100.0000 100.0000 PRESSURE, ATM 1.0000 1.2000 1.2000 ENTHALPY, M*KCAL/HR 0.0865 0.2800 0.2681 MOLECULAR WEIGHT 85.1285 85.8632 82.8433 MOLE FRAC VAPOR 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 MOLE FRAC LIQUID 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

PRO/II BVLE Analyss Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Dew & Bubble Pont Calculaton Dew Pont s the very state at whch condensaton s about to occur. Dew Pont Temperature Calculaton at a Gven Pressure Dew Pont Pressure Calculaton at a Gven Temperature Vapor Fracton s 1 at Dew Pont Bubble Pont s the very state at whch vaporzaton s about to occur. Bubble Pont Temperature Calculaton at a Gven Pressure Bubble Pont Pressure Calculaton at a Gven Temperature Vapor Fracton s 0 at Bubble Pont Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Ex-1: Bubble Pont Falure Case Calculate the bubble pont pressure at 85 o C of the followng stream. Dd you get a converged soluton? If not, why? Use SRK for your smulaton. Component Mole % C1 65 C2 15 C3 15 IC4 5 Save as Flename: EX-1.np Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Dfference between Gas and Vapor For gas, T > T c For vapor, T < T c T: System temperature, T c : Crtcal temperature Methane Gas but not Methane Vapor Water Vapor but not Water Gas Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Ex-2: C7 Plus Heavy Cut Characterzaton Calculate the bubble pressure at 45 o C and dew temperature at 1.5bar of the followng stream. Regard C6+ as NC6(1), NC7(2) and NC8(3) and compare the results. Use SRK for your smulaton. Component Mole % C1 5 C2 10 C3 15 IC4 10 NC4 20 IC5 15 NC5 20 C6+ 5 Save as Flename: EX-2A.np for NC6, EX-2B.np for NC7, EX-2C.np for NC8 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Results for EX-2 Characterzaton of heavycut s very mportant n the calculaton of dew pont temperature. EX-2A.np, EX-2B.np, EX-2C.np Bubble P Dew T C6 Plus at 45 o C at 1.5bar 18.505 30.519 NC6 18.561 42.783 NC7 18.669 59.585 NC8 Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Results for EX-2A (C6+ NC6) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Results for EX-2B (C6+ NC7) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

Results for EX-2C (C6+ NC8) Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator

The End of General Thermodynamcs The End. Thermodynamc Models bult n Smulator