EQ Ground Motions. Strong Ground Motion and Concept of Response Spectrum. March Sudhir K Jain, IIT Gandhinagar. Low Amplitude Vibrations

Similar documents
An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

STRONG -MOTION EARTHQUAKE

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

IMPORTANCE OF SEVERE PULSE-TYPE GROUND MOTIONS IN PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING: HISTORICAL AND CRITICAL REVIEW

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

Design Spectra. Reading Assignment Course Information Lecture Notes Pp Kramer Appendix B7 Kramer

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZING THE SEISMIC DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO EVALUATION

3. MDOF Systems: Modal Spectral Analysis

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

QUAKE/W ProShake Comparison

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

CE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A

Stochastic Structural Dynamics Prof. Dr. C. S. Manohar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

A NEW DEFINITION OF STRONG MOTION DURATION AND RELATED PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE RESPONSE OF MEDIUM-LONG PERIOD STRUCTURES

ESTIMATION OF INPUT SEISMIC ENERGY BY MEANS OF A NEW DEFINITION OF STRONG MOTION DURATION

CHAPTER 7 EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC SYSTEMS. Base shear force in a linearly elastic system due to ground excitation is Vb

SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS

STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTORS CONSIDERING SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION

IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES TO NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTION

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL INTENSITIES OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION

Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading

Characterization and modelling of seismic action

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) and Response Spectrum

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF COMBINATION RULES FOR STRUCTURES UNDER BI-DIRECTIONAL EARTHQUAKE EXCITATIONS

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

SEISMOLOGICAL INFORMATION FOR DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER S WISH LIST

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

Introduction to structural dynamics

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Evaluation of the Seismic Load Level in Korea based on Global Earthquake Records

Address for Correspondence

Adaptation of Energy Principles in Seismic Design of Turkish RC Frame Structures. Part I: Input Energy Spectrum

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

STUDY ON THE BI-NORMALIZED EARTHQUAKE ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRA

Evaluating the effects of near-field earthquakes on the behavior of moment resisting frames

Seismic Collapse Margin of Structures Using Modified Mode-based Global Damage Model

SHAKING TABLE DEMONSTRATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BASE-ISOLATED BUILDINGS ***** Instructor Manual *****

A simplified method for the analysis of embedded footings accounting for soil inelasticity and foundation uplifting

The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems

Prob. 1 SDOF Structure subjected to Ground Shaking

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

Estimation Method of Seismic Response Based on Momentary Input Energy Considering Hysteresis Shapes of a Building Structure

Seismic site response analysis for Australia

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS DEGRADING SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Associate Professor, Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian. China

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

Software Verification

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

Analyzing the Effect of Moving Resonance on Seismic Response of Structures Using Wavelet Transforms

Comparative Seismic Analysis of EL Centro and Japan Earthquakes using Response Spectra Method

Earthquake-Induced Structural Damage Classification Algorithm

Dynamics of Structures

Department of Civil Engineering, Serbia

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LINEAR-ELASTIC AND NONLINEAR- INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSES OF FLUID-TANK SYSTEMS

AN EERI SEMINAR EARTHQUAKE RECORDS AND DESIGN

CORRELATION OF NONLINEAR DISPLACEMENT RESPONSES WITH BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF EARTHQUAKE MOTION

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

Improvements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra. Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT

INELASTIC EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO TORSION

Frequency content indicators of strong ground motions

SHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

I Main Topics A Seismic records B AcceleraDon, velocity and displacement spectra B Resonance and natural frequencies C Response of structures

Comparison of base-isolated liquid storage tank models under bi-directional earthquakes

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION, WAVE PASSAGE EFFECTS AND ASSYMETRY IN NONLINEAR SOIL RESPONSE

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Introduction to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Response of Elastic and Inelastic Structures with Damping Systems to Near-Field and Soft-Soil Ground Motions

Analytical and Numerical Investigations on the Vertical Seismic Site Response

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East

PHASE ANGLE PROPERTIES OF EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTIONS: A CRITICAL LOOK

Capacity-Demand Index Relationships for Performance- Based Seismic Design

Seismic Responses of RC Frames under Wavelet-Based Matched Accelerograms and Real Records

Comparison of Natural and Artificial Time Histories for Non-Linear Seismic Analyses of Structures

Safety Margin Ratio-Based Design of Isolation Gap Size for Base-isolated Structures

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Giacomo Boffi. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Ambientale e Territoriale Politecnico di Milano

Influence of Time Duration between Successive Earthquakes on the Nonlinear Response of SDOF Structure

COMPARISON OF LABVIEW WITH SAP2000 AND NONLIN FOR STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS PROBLEMS

CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTHQUAKE SHAKING EFFECTS

RELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

Dynamic Response of SDOF System: A Comparative Study Between Newmark s Method and IS1893 Response Spectra

Contributions to the Chilean Code for Seismic Design of Buildings with Energy Dissipation Devices

Transcription:

Amplitude Strong Ground Motion and Concept of Response Spectrum March 2013 Sudhir K Jain, IIT Gandhinagar Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 1 EQ Ground Motions Low Amplitude Vibrations Long distance events Usually displacements Earth Scientists Teleseismic Earthquake Recording P PP S Surface Waves 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time (s) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 2 1

Accn. (g) EQ Ground Motions Strong Ground Motions Near-field ground motions Usually accelerations Engineers 0.3 0.2 PGA=0.32g 0.1 0-0.1-0.2-0.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time (seconds) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 3 Peak Ground Parameters Acceleration (PGA) Velocity (PGV) Displacement (PGD) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 4 2

Maximum Recorded Motion Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 (Martinez-Pereira, Slide 1999) 5 Characteristics Parameters Duration of Significant Shaking Frequency Content 1985 Mexico Earthquake (SCT 1A; N90E) 0.5g 1940 Imperial Valley Earthquake (El Centro; S00E) 1971 San Fernando Earthquake (Pacoima Dam; N76W) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) 1991 Uttarkashi Earthquake (Uttarkashi, N75E) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 6 3

Characteristics Influence of Magnitude of EQ Source mechanism Type of faulting Fault Distance from source Fault Soil/rock medium along travel path Local soil site, geology, topology, etc.,. Attenuation with Distance Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 7 Accelerogram During ground shaking, one can measure ground acceleration versus time (accelerogram) using an accelerograph Accelerograph is the instrument Accelerogram is the record obtained from it Accelerogram is the variation of ground acceleration with time (also called time history of ground motion) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 8 4

Typical Accelerograph This is a typical analog instrument. These days, digital instruments are becoming popular (photo from Earthquakes by Bolt) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 9 Typical Accelerograms From Dynamics of Structures by A K Chopra, Prentice Hall Time, sec Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 10 5

Response Spectrum (contd ) If the ground moves as per the given accelerogram, what is the maximum response of a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system (of given natural period and damping)? Response may mean any quantity of interest, e.g., deformation, acceleration T=2 sec, a(t)/g Damping =2% Ground motion time history Time, sec Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 11 Response Spectrum (contd ) Using a computer, one can calculate the response of SDOF system with time (time history of response) Can pick maximum response of this SDOF system (of given T and damping) from this response time history See next slide Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 12 6

Response Spectrum (contd ) Maximum response = 7.47 in. d(t) Time, sec Time History of Deformation (relative displacement of mass with respect to base) response T=2 sec, Damping =2% a(t)/g Ground motion time history Time, sec Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 13 Response Spectrum (contd ) Repeat this exercise for different values of natural period. For design, we usually need only the maximum response. Hence, for future use, plot maximum response versus natural period (for a given value of damping). Such a plot of maximum response versus natural period for a given accelerogram is called response spectrum. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 14 7

Response Spectrum (contd ) T=0.5 sec =2% a g (t)/g d(t)/g Time, sec Displacement Response Spectrum for the above time history T=1.0 sec =2% d(t)/g T=2.0 sec =2% d(t)/g d max Time, sec Figure After Chopra, 2001 T, sec Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 15 Response Spectrum (contd ) Response Spectrum is useful to obtain maximum response of any SDOF system for that accelerogram and for that value of damping. See example on next slide Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 16 8

Maximum Velocity, in/sec Maximum Acceleration, g Acceleration, g Example 3m Mass = 10,000kg Natural Period T=1 sec Damping =5% of critical Time (sec) Ground Acceleration Time History From Response Spectrum: Spectral Acceleration (for T=1sec) = 0.48 g Max. Base Shear = Mass x Spectral Accln. =(10,000kg) x (0.48x9.81m/sec 2 ) = 47,000 N = 47 kn Max. Base Moment =(47kN) x (3m) = 141 kn-m Undamped Natural Period T (sec) Acceleration Response Spectrum for the above accelerogram for 5% damping (Fig. from Seed and Idriss, 1982) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 17 Response Spectrum (contd ) May repeat the entire process for different values of damping Velocity response spectra for N-S component of 1940 El Centro record (damping values of 0, 2, 5 and 10%) Fig From Housner, 1970 Natural Period T (sec) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 18 9

Response Spectrum (contd ) Unless otherwise mentioned, response spectrum is based on a linear elastic system Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 19 Response Spectrum (contd ) By response we may mean any response quantity of interest to us, for example: Absolute acceleration of the mass Termed as Acceleration Response Spectrum Relative velocity of the mass with respect to base Termed as Velocity Response Spectrum Relative displacement of the mass with respect to base Termed as Displacement Response Spectrum Word Spectra is used to denote plural of Spectrum. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 20 10

Velocity, ft/sec Response Spectrum (contd ) Since SDOF system responds maximum to the waves of frequency near its own natural frequency, Response spectrum is also a very good way to characterize the strong ground motion from engineering view point. For instance, relative strength of low frequency versus high frequency waves See example on next slide Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 21 Example: Velocity spectra from two accelerograms Natural Period T (sec) Note that the two response spectra above show very different frequency content. Ground motion B has more energy at low periods. An expert may be able to make out from these spectra that B is recorded at a short distance (say 15km) from a small earthquake, while A is recorded from a large earthquake at a large distance (say 100km) (Fig. edited from Housner, 1970) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 22 11

Response Spectrum (contd ) Response spectrum is a very powerful tool. Uses of response spectrum: To obtain maximum response of a SDOF system (to the original accelerogram using which response spectrum was obtained) To obtain maximum response in a particular mode of vibration of a multi degree of freedom (MDOF) system It tells about the characteristics of the ground motion (accelerogram) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 23 Response Spectrum (contd ) Different terms used in IS:1893 Design Acceleration Spectrum (clause 3.5) Response Spectrum (clause 3.27) Acceleration Response Spectrum (used in cl. 3.30) Design Spectrum (title of cl. 6.4) Structural Response Factor Average response acceleration coefficient (see terminology of Sa/g on p. 11) Title of Fig. 2: Response Spectra for. It is better if the code uses the term consistently. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 24 12

Smooth Response Spectrum Real spectrum has somewhat irregular shape with local peaks and valleys For design purpose, local peaks and valleys should be ignored Since natural period cannot be calculated with that much accuracy. Hence, smooth response spectrum used for design purposes For developing design spectra, one also needs to consider other issues We will discuss this later. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 25 Smooth Response Spectrum (contd ) Period (sec) Period (sec) Period (sec) Acceleration Spectra Velocity Spectra Displacement Spectra Shown here are typical smooth spectra used in design for different values of damping (Fig. from Housner, 1970) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 26 13

Ground Acceleration (contd...) Note the term Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) is max acceleration of ground. Because of deformation in the structure, the motion of its base and the superstructure will be different Max acceleration experienced by mass of the structure will be different from the PGA (except if the structure is rigid) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 27 Ground Acceleration ZPA stands for Zero Period Acceleration. Implies max acceleration experienced by a structure having zero natural period (T=0). Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 28 14

Zero Period Acceleration An infinitely rigid structure Has zero natural period (T=0) Does not deform: No relative motion between its mass and its base Mass has same acceleration as of the ground Hence, ZPA is same as Peak Ground Acceleration For very low values of period, acceleration spectrum tends to be equal to PGA. We should be able to read the value of PGA from an acceleration spectrum. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 29 Peak Ground Acceleration (contd ) Average shape of acceleration response spectrum for 5% damping (Fig. on next slide) Ordinate at 0.1 to 0.3 sec ~ 2.5 times the PGA There can be a stray peak in the ground motion; i.e., unusually large peak. Such a peak does not affect most of the response spectrum and needs to be ignored. Effective Peak Ground Acceleration (EPGA) defined as 0.40 times the spectral acceleration in 0.1 to 0.3 sec range (cl. 3.11) There are also other definitions of EPGA, but we will not concern ourselves with those. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 30 15

Spectral Acceleration (g) Typical shape of acceleration spectrum 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 PGA = 0.6g 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Period (sec) Typical shape of acceleration response spectrum Spectral acceleration at zero period (T=0) gives PGA Value at 0.1-0.3 sec is ~ 2.5 times PGA value (for 5% damping) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 31 What is Design Spectrum Seismic Design Force can be specified in terms of Response Spectrum: Termed as Design Spectrum Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 32 16

Spectral Acceleration, g Response Spectrum versus Design Spectrum Consider the Acceleration Response Spectrum Notice the region of red circle marked: a slight change in natural period can lead to large variation in maximum acceleration Undamped Natural Period T (sec) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 33 Response Spectrum versus Design Spectrum (contd ) Natural period of a civil engineering structure cannot be calculated precisely Design specification should not very sensitive to a small change in natural period. Hence, design spectrum is a smooth or average shape without local peaks and valleys you see in the response spectrum Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 34 17

Spectral Acceleration, g Design Spectrum Since some damage is expected and accepted in the structure during strong shaking, design spectrum is developed considering the overstrength, redundancy, and ductility in the structure. The site may be prone to shaking from large but distant earthquakes as well as from medium but nearby earthquakes: design spectrum may account for these as well. See Fig. next slide. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 35 Design Spectrum (contd ) Natural vibration period T n, sec Fig. from Dynamics of Structures by Chopra, 2001 Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 36 18

Design Spectrum (contd ) Design Spectrum is a design specification It must take into account any issues that have bearing on seismic safety. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 37 Design Spectrum (contd ) Design Spectrum must be accompanied by: Load factors or permissible stresses that must be used Different choice of load factors will give different seismic safety to the structure Damping to be used in design Variation in the value of damping used will affect the design force. Method of calculation of natural period Depending on modeling assumptions, one can get different values of natural period. Type of detailing for ductility Design force can be lowered if structure has higher ductility. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 38 19

Spectral Acceleration Coefficient (S a /g) Soil Effect Recorded earthquake motions show that response spectrum shape differs for different type of soil profile at the site Fig. from Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, by Kramer, 1996 Period (sec) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 39 Soil Effect (contd ) This variation in ground motion characteristic for different sites is now accounted for through different shapes of response spectrum for three types of sites. Fig. from IS:1893-2002 Period(s) Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 40 20

Spectral acceleration Shape of Design Spectrum The three curves in Fig. 2 have been drawn based on general trends of average response spectra shapes. In recent years, the US codes (UBC, NEHRP and IBC) have provided more sophistication wherein the shape of design spectrum varies from area to area depending on the ground motion characteristics expected. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 41 Design Spectrum for Stiff Structures For very stiff structures (T < 0.1sec), ductility is not helpful in reducing the design force. As a stiff structure gets damaged during the Design spectrum assumes peak shaking, its period extends to T=0 Actual shape of response spectrum elongates (may be used for higher modes only) i.e., during the same ground shaking, a very stiff structure may ride up the ascending part of the graph. Codes tend to disallow the reduction in force in the period range of T < 0.1sec T(seconds) Concept sometimes used by the codes for response spectrum in low period range. Sudhir K. Jain March 2013 Slide 42 21