Lecture Notes for January 8, 2009; part 2

Similar documents
Lecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.

2.9. V = u(x,y) + a(x-f(l x,t x )) + b(y-g(l y,t y )) + c(l o -L x -L y ) + d(t o -T x -T y ) (1) (a) Suggested Answer: V u a 0 (2) u x = -a b 0 (3)

General Equilibrium and Welfare

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Lecture Notes for Chapter 12

Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics

Short correct answers are sufficient and get full credit. Including irrelevant (though correct) information in an answer will not increase the score.

Differentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries

Problem Set 1 Welfare Economics

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium

Economics 101 Lecture 5 - Firms and Production

The Consumer, the Firm, and an Economy

Microeconomics II. MOSEC, LUISS Guido Carli Problem Set n 3

Market Equilibrium and the Core

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.

The Ohio State University Department of Economics. Homework Set Questions and Answers

Maximum Value Functions and the Envelope Theorem

Equilibrium in Factors Market: Properties

Economics 200A part 2 UCSD Fall quarter 2011 Prof. R. Starr Mr. Troy Kravitz1 FINAL EXAMINATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS

Second Welfare Theorem

INTRODUCTORY MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS MSCS. LECTURE 3: MULTIVARIABLE FUNCTIONS AND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION. HUW DAVID DIXON CARDIFF BUSINESS SCHOOL.

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

Short correct answers are sufficient and get full credit. Including irrelevant (though correct) information in an answer will not increase the score.

(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

ECONOMICS 001 Microeconomic Theory Summer Mid-semester Exam 2. There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.

Monetary Economics. Lecture 15: unemployment in the new Keynesian model, part one. Chris Edmond. 2nd Semester 2014

Adding Production to the Theory

Problem Set Suggested Answers

Introduction to General Equilibrium

Public Economics Ben Heijdra Chapter 9: Introduction to Normative Public Economics

Lecture #3. General equilibrium

The Debreu-Scarf Theorem: The Core Converges to the Walrasian Allocations

ECON 186 Class Notes: Optimization Part 2

Economics 201b Spring 2010 Solutions to Problem Set 1 John Zhu

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions

Handout: Competitive Equilibrium

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

problem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

Introductory Microeconomics

Equilibrium in a Production Economy

Notes on General Equilibrium

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.

Lecture 2 The Centralized Economy

Partial Differentiation

Notes IV General Equilibrium and Welfare Properties

Competitive Equilibrium

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis V Suggested Solutions for the First Midterm. max

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Answers Econ 805

Basic Techniques. Ping Wang Department of Economics Washington University in St. Louis. January 2018

MTAEA Implicit Functions

1 The Basic RBC Model

Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale

Lecture 5: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory

Practice Questions for Mid-Term I. Question 1: Consider the Cobb-Douglas production function in intensive form:

Advanced Microeconomics Problem Set 1

Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis Suggested Solution for Midterm 1

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

Aggregate Supply. Econ 208. April 3, Lecture 16. Econ 208 (Lecture 16) Aggregate Supply April 3, / 12

Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 8: Optimal Minimum Wage and Introduction to Capital Taxation

Duality. for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume

B Search and Rest Unemployment Fernando Alvarez and Robert Shimer Additional Appendixes not for Publication

The Utility Frontier

Housing with overlapping generations

First Welfare Theorem

; p. p y p y p y. Production Set: We have 2 constraints on production - demand for each factor of production must be less than its endowment

Competitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems

Market Failure: Externalities

Assumption 5. The technology is represented by a production function, F : R 3 + R +, F (K t, N t, A t )

The Heckscher-Ohlin Model: Brief Review

Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules

A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF EXCHANGE

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture VII: Equilibrium in a Competitive Market

Equilibrium Conditions and Algorithm for Numerical Solution of Kaplan, Moll and Violante (2017) HANK Model.

Regularity of competitive equilibria in a production economy with externalities

Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

BEE1024 Mathematics for Economists

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley

Econ 58 Gary Smith Spring Final Exam Answers

Welfare Economics: Lecture 12

Volume 30, Issue 3. Ramsey Fiscal Policy and Endogenous Growth: A Comment. Jenn-hong Tang Department of Economics, National Tsing-Hua University

The Heckscher-Ohlin model: Mathematical treatment*

Microeconomic Theory. Microeconomic Theory. Everyday Economics. The Course:

Permanent Income Hypothesis Intro to the Ramsey Model

Neoclassical Business Cycle Model

Lecture 4: Optimization. Maximizing a function of a single variable

Unit 3: Producer Theory

Scarf Instability and Production: A Simulation

Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1

Toulouse School of Economics, M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier. Exam Solution

Ramsey Cass Koopmans Model (1): Setup of the Model and Competitive Equilibrium Path

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012

Lecture 7. The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium. ECON 5118 Macroeconomic Theory Winter Kam Yu Department of Economics Lakehead University

Lecture 3: Growth with Overlapping Generations (Acemoglu 2009, Chapter 9, adapted from Zilibotti)

Productivity Losses from Financial Frictions: Can Self-financing Undo Capital Misallocation?

Transcription:

Economics 200B Prof. R. Starr UCSD Winter 2009 Lecture Notes for January 8, 2009; part 2 Integrating Production and Multiple Consumption Decisions: A2 2 2 Model Competitive Equilibrium: Production and consumption plans are each separately optimized at the prevailing prices the same prices facing all firms and households. Markets clear; supply equals demand. There is a single consistent point chosen in the Edgeworth box. The dimensions of the box are set to reflect the production decision. Consumption decisions are consistent with one another and with the output produced, precisely exhausting available goods. Pareto Efficiency: The production sector is technically efficient; each firm is producing maximal output from its inputs and there is no reallocation of inputs among firms that would result in a higher output of some goods without a reduction in output of others. The MRS, the tradeoff in consumption between goods, is the same for all households. Equating MRSs results in locating the consumption plan at a point on the contract curve. The MRS equals the RPT: The tradeoff in output choice is the same on both the production and consumption sides. The budget line in the Edgeworth box and the isoprofit 1

2 line tangent to the production choice have the same slope equal to the price ratio (times 1). First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics: A competitive equilibrium allocation is Pareto efficient. This is ensured by separate firm and household optimizations facing common prices. For convenience, this treatment will concentrate on corner solutions. A2 2 2 Model Two factors: land denoted T, and labor denoted L. Two goods, x and y. Two households, 1 and 2. 1 s endowment of L is L 1, 2 s is L 2. L 1 + L 2 = L o. 1 s endowment of T is T 1, 2 s is T 2. T 1 + T 2 = T o. The prevailing wage rate of labor is w, and the rental rate on land is r. f(l x,t x )=x, where L x is L used to produce x, T x is T used to produce x. f(l x,t x ) 0 for L x 0, T x 0; f(0, 0) = 0. g(l y,t y )=y where L y is L used to produce y, T y is T used to produce y. g(l y,t y ) 0 for L y 0, T y 0; g(0, 0) = 0. p x, p y. Π x = p x f(l x,t x ) wl x rt x. Π y = p y g(l y,t y ) wl y rt y. α 1x, α 1y. α 2x, α 2y. α 1x + α 2x =1. α 1y + α 2y =1. I 1 = wl 1 + rt 1 + α 1x Π x + α 1y Π y I 2 = wl 2 + rt 2 + α 2x Π x + α 2y Π y u 1 (x 1,y 1 ). u 2 (x 2,y 2 ).

Assume f, g, u 1, u 2, to be strictly concave, differentiable. Assume all solutions are interior. Subscripts denote partial derivatives. Technical Efficiency The production possibility set can be described as PPS = {(x, y) x, y 0; T x,t y,l x,l y 0; T x + T y T o ; L x + L y L o ; x f(l x,t y ); y g(l y,t y )}. It is described as the set: E = {(x,y ) x = f(l x,t x ),y = g(l y,t y ), (1)L x + L y = L o ; L x,l y 0; (2)T x + T y = T o ; T x,t y 0 L x,l y,t x,t y are chosen to maximize f(l x,t x ) subject to (1), (2) and subject to g(l y,t y )} = y o for arbitrary attainable y o. Q = f(l x,t x ) λ(g(l o L x,t o T x ) y o ). First order conditions for optimizing Q are Q L x = f L + λg L =0 (where the subscripts refer to partial derivatives) Q T x = f T + λg T =0 Rearranging terms we have f L / f dt y T = f L/f T = g dl y g=constant. L / g T = g L/g T = dtx dl x f=constant = Pareto Efficiency Definition (Pareto efficiency): x 1,y 1,x 2,y 2 is said to be Pareto efficient if it is attainable (an element of PPS) and if (x 1,y 1 ) maximizes u 1 (x, y) subject to (1), (2), and (3)x 1 + x 2 = f(l x,t x ), and (4)y 1 + y 2 = g(l y,t y ), 3

4 and subject to u(x 2,y 2 )=u 2 (x 2,y 2 ). To describe a Pareto efficient allocation, we will ask how to maximize u 1 (x 1,y 1 ) subject to resource and technology constraints and subject to a fixed level of u 2 (x 2,y 2 ). That is we want to choose x 1,y 1,L x,l y,t x,t y, to maximize u 1 (x 1,y 1 ) subject to u 2 (x 2,y 2 ) = u 2o and subject to L x + L y = L o, T x + T y = T o, x 1 + x 2 = f(l x,t x ), y 1 + y 2 = g(l y,t y ). This problem leads to the (world s biggest) Lagrangian, H = u 1 (x 1,y 1 )+λ[u 2 (x 2,y 2 ) u 2o ]+µ[y 1 + y 2 g(l y,t y )] +ν[x 1 + x 2 f(l x,t x )] + η[t x + T y T o ]+ɛ[l x + L y L o ] First order conditions for the Lagrangian are x 1 = u 1 x + ν =0, y 1 = u 1 y + µ =0 x 2 = λu 2 x + ν =0, y 2 = λu 2 y + µ =0 L x = νf L ɛ =0, L y = µg L ɛ =0 T x = νf T η =0, T y = µg T η =0. The first order conditions for the Lagrangian lead to u 1 x = ν, u 1 y = µ u 2 x = ν/λ, u 2 y = µ/λ, which imply u 1 x u 1 = ν y µ = u2 x u 2 y demonstrating that equality of MRS s is a necessary condition for Pareto efficiency.

The first order conditions for the Lagrangian lead to νf L = ɛ = µg L νf T = η = µg T. Hence, f L /f T = ɛ/η = g L /g T. f L /f T = g L /g T = dt dl f=constant = dt dl g=constant, which represents the absolute value of the slope of the isoquant at the efficient points the tangencies in the Edgeworth Box for inputs. We want to show that Pareto efficiency requires that u 1 x /u1 y = u2 x /u2 y = g L/f L = g T /f T. The expression g L /f L (or g T /f T ) is the marginal rate of transformation of x for y. g L /f L = ν/µ = g T /f T. But u 1 x /u1 y = ν/µ = u2 x /u2 y u 1 x /u1 y = ν/µ = u2 x /u2 y = g L/f L = ν/µ = g T /f T. Then we have g L /f L = y L y / L x x = dy dx L x +L y =L o. Similarly for g T /f T. Equality of MRS xy s across individuals and equality of the MRS xy to the RP T xy. RP T xy = g L /f L = y L y / x L x = dy dx L x +L y =L o 5. = u 1 x /u1 y = MRS1 xy = u2 x /u2 y = MRS2 xy RP T xy = g T /f T = y T y / x T x = dy dx T x +T y =T o = u 1 x/u 1 y = MRS 1 xy = u 2 x/u 2 y = MRS 2 xy

6. First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics: Competitive Equilibrium is Pareto Efficient Let s describe p x,p y,w,r,l x,l y,t x,t y,x 1,y 1,x 2,y 2, that would constitute a general competitive equilibrium for the 2 2 2 economy. The first order conditions are [ u 1 / x 1 ] [ u 1 / y 1 ] = px p y = [ u2 / x 2 ] [ u 2 / y 2 ], that is marginal rates of substitution are equated to price ratios, and p x f L = w = p y g L, p x f T = r = p y g T. That is, the marginal value product of factor inputs equals the factor prices. Competitive equilibrium is characterized by p x /p y = u 1 x/u 1 y, by utility maximization ; p x /p y = u 2 x/u 2 y, by utility maximization. p x = w/f L = r/f T, by profit maximization ; p y = w/g L = r/g T by profit maximization. But then it follows that u 1 x /u1 y = u2 x /u2 y = g L/f L = g T /f T. And it follows that g L /g T = w/r, and f L /f T = w/r. But then it follows that g L /g T = f L /f T. Thus u 1 x /u1 y = u2 x /u2 y = g L/f L = g T /f T and g L /g T = f L /f T. That is, common marginal rates of substitution in consumption equated to the marginal rate of transformation at an allocation where output is technically efficient (where firms have common marginal rates of technical substitution between inputs). This is the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics; a competitive equilibrium allocation is Pareto efficient.