Lecture 20: Isoparametric Formulations.

Similar documents
Lecture 21: Isoparametric Formulation of Plane Elements.

Lecture 15: Revisiting bars and beams.

Stress analysis of a stepped bar

Lecture 1: Course Introduction.

Structural Analysis of Truss Structures using Stiffness Matrix. Dr. Nasrellah Hassan Ahmed

MMJ1153 COMPUTATIONAL METHOD IN SOLID MECHANICS PRELIMINARIES TO FEM


Finite Element Method-Part II Isoparametric FE Formulation and some numerical examples Lecture 29 Smart and Micro Systems

ME FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FORMULAS

The Plane Stress Problem

1.571 Structural Analysis and Control Prof. Connor Section 2: Linear Formulation for a General Planar Member. x X

MECh300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods. Finite Element Analysis (F.E.A.) of 1-D Problems

JEPPIAAR ENGINEERING COLLEGE

3. Numerical integration

Lecture 5: 3-D Rotation Matrices.

Lecture 7: The Beam Element Equations.

C:\Users\whit\Desktop\Active\304_2012_ver_2\_Notes\4_Torsion\1_torsion.docx 6

Chapter 6 2D Elements Plate Elements

Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements

Numerical integration in the axisymmetric finite element formulation

The Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Linear Systems

F = m a. t 2. stress = k(x) strain

Introduction to Finite Element Method. Dr. Aamer Haque

Lecture 8: Assembly of beam elements.

KINEMATIC RELATIONS IN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS

Section 6: PRISMATIC BEAMS. Beam Theory

Nonlinear RC beam element model under combined action of axial, bending and shear

Formal Methods for Deriving Element Equations

University of Alberta ENGM 541: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #5

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

Shape functions in 1D

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ME 6603 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS PART A (2 MARKS)

BHAR AT HID AS AN ENGIN E ERI N G C O L L E G E NATTR A MPA LL I

Development of Truss Equations

Lecture notes Models of Mechanics

Chapter 2. Formulation of Finite Element Method by Variational Principle

1 Lecture 1 Fundamental Concepts. 1.1 Introduction

IV B.Tech. I Semester Supplementary Examinations, February/March FINITE ELEMENT METHODS (Mechanical Engineering) Time: 3 Hours Max Marks: 80

Example: RR Robot. Illustrate the column vector of the Jacobian in the space at the end-effector point.

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Chapter 11 Three-Dimensional Stress Analysis. Chapter 11 Three-Dimensional Stress Analysis

Chapter 10 INTEGRATION METHODS Introduction Unit Coordinate Integration

Finite Element Method

Chapter 3 Variational Formulation & the Galerkin Method

ME 1401 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS UNIT I PART -A. 2. Why polynomial type of interpolation functions is mostly used in FEM?

MAE 323: Chapter 4. Plane Stress and Plane Strain. The Stress Equilibrium Equation

Robotics I Kinematics, Dynamics and Control of Robotic Manipulators. Velocity Kinematics

Review of Engineering Dynamics

Methods of Analysis. Force or Flexibility Method

Prepared by M. GUNASHANKAR AP/MECH DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Chapter 9. Derivatives. Josef Leydold Mathematical Methods WS 2018/19 9 Derivatives 1 / 51. f x. (x 0, f (x 0 ))

Basic concepts to start Mechanics of Materials

FEA Solution Procedure

Applications in Solid Mechanics

Lecture 22: 1-D Heat Transfer.

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 06

Chapter 14 Truss Analysis Using the Stiffness Method

Robotics I. April 1, the motion starts and ends with zero Cartesian velocity and acceleration;

Stretching of a Prismatic Bar by its Own Weight

The Plane Stress Problem

Zero Energy Modes in One Dimension: An Introduction to Hourglass Modes

Solution Manual A First Course in the Finite Element Method 5th Edition Logan

. D CR Nomenclature D 1

Topic 5: Finite Element Method

x 1 To help us here we invoke MacLaurin, 1 + t = 1 + t/2 + O(t 2 ) for small t, and write

4.5 The framework element stiffness matrix

ENGI Duffing s Equation Page 4.65

CHAPTER 4 NUMERICAL INTEGRATION METHODS TO EVALUATE TRIPLE INTEGRALS USING GENERALIZED GAUSSIAN QUADRATURE

ENGI 4430 Advanced Calculus for Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Problem Set 3 Solutions [Multiple Integration; Lines of Force]

Robot Manipulator Control. Hesheng Wang Dept. of Automation

Using the finite element method of structural analysis, determine displacements at nodes 1 and 2.

16.21 Techniques of Structural Analysis and Design Spring 2005 Unit #8 Principle of Virtual Displacements

Robotics I June 11, 2018

= 1 2 x (x 1) + 1 {x} (1 {x}). [t] dt = 1 x (x 1) + O (1), [t] dt = 1 2 x2 + O (x), (where the error is not now zero when x is an integer.

Geometry-dependent MITC method for a 2-node iso-beam element

4.4 Change of Variable in Integrals: The Jacobian

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Steps in the Finite Element Method. Chung Hua University Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ching I Chen

Aircraft Stress Analysis and Structural Design Summary

Vector Calculus Review

Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues 1

3.1: 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 18

Exact and Approximate Numbers:

CAAM 335 Matrix Analysis Planar Trusses

CHAPTER 5. Beam Theory

1. Solve Problem 1.3-3(c) 2. Solve Problem 2.2-2(b)

MAE 323: Chapter 6. Structural Models

Finite element modelling of structural mechanics problems

Now, if you see that x and y are present in both equations, you may write:

Rigid and Braced Frames

4 NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS

Math Notes on sections 7.8,9.1, and 9.3. Derivation of a solution in the repeated roots case: 3 4 A = 1 1. x =e t : + e t w 2.

Variational Formulation of Plane Beam Element

Hello everyone, Best, Josh

q 1 F m d p q 2 Figure 1: An automated crane with the relevant kinematic and dynamic definitions.

Bilinear Quadrilateral (Q4): CQUAD4 in GENESIS

Truss Structures: The Direct Stiffness Method

NONLINEAR CONTINUUM FORMULATIONS CONTENTS

THE GENERAL ELASTICITY PROBLEM IN SOLIDS

Transcription:

Chapter #0 Isoparametric Formulation. Isoparametric formulations help us solve two problems. Help simplify the definition of the approimate displacement field for more comple planar elements (4-sided elements, elements with curved edges, ). Significantly reduce the integration process by ensuring that we always have integrals in terms of natural coordinates that are taken over fied bounds. We start by applying the isoparametric formulation to a bar element. Move on to derivation of the stiffness matri and ee sfor a plane element that can be used in plane stress and plane strain problems. The derivations will show the set up of the integral epression. We will apply Guassian quadrature to evaluate these integrals.

0. Isoparametric Formulation of the Bar Element Euations. Step : Set the element type. Step now includes the definition of a natural (or curvilinear coordinate), s. We must create a mapping between the curvilinear coordinate s and the cartesian coordinate. This mapping will match the element boundaries/keypoints/nodes between the natural coordinate plane and the Cartesian coordinate system. Element nodes Element centroid

The mapping procedure is very similar to the creation of shape functions as in Logan Ch. s, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Set the order of the approimation: = a + as Apply some kinematic constraints on the approimation. = a + a( ) = a + a ( + ) a = a = ( s) + ( + s) + a = a

Defining the shape functions that are the core of the mapping between s and [ ] N N = ( s) ( + s) The shape functions define the variation of a quantity (now a coordinate ) over some domain of interest (now a natural coordinate s). We can apply the same shape functions to define the variation of other values over the s.. + domain ( ) N N = =

Step : Select a displacement function: u dˆ u = [ N N] = [ N N] u ˆ d

Step 3: Define the stress strain relationships. Regardless of what natural coordinates we introduce, we do not change the governing physics of the structural problem: du ε = d du du ds = d d ds Governing physics/constitutive equations. How we realize the differential term(s) in the constitutive equations. du u u = ds d L = = ds du ( u u) d ˆ ε = = = B ; B = d ( L) dˆ L L Again, we use the B notation to refer to a matri that relates displacements to strains.

Step 4: Derive the element equations: 0 T ˆ T T ˆT = ˆ B DB dv d + N b dv + N TS ds + f d V( e) V( e) S( e) For line elements the integrals reduces to integration in -D:. (uniform cross sectional area assumed in Step.) 0 L L L T ˆ T T ˆT = A ˆ B DB d d + A N b d+ P N TS d+ f d = 0 = 0 = 0 3 P Perimeter around the bar cross section.

Consider the first term in the functional : (the strain energy term that produces the stiffness matri) L s=+ T T kˆ = A B DB d = A B DB d = 0 s= d L = = ds L Jacobian d = ds matri. s=+ ˆ T L k = A B DB Jds J = s=

Some notes on the ever-present Jacobian matri: Main Entry: Ja co bi an Pronunciation: j&-'ko-be-&n, yä- Function: noun Etymology: K. G. J. Jacobi died 85 German mathematician : a determinant defined for a finite number of functions of the same number of variables in which each row consists of the first partial derivatives of the same function with respect to each of the variables Main Entry: de ter mi nant Pronunciation: di-'t&r-m&-n&nt Function: noun :an element that identifies or determines the nature of something or that fies or conditions an outcome

Some more notes on the ever-present Jacobian matri: Referred to as a Jacobian Matri or just Jacobian. Any matri that defines the conversion from one rate to another. Like a matri of currency conversions. J in this case is a scalar entity: J d change in the cartesian coordinate ' ' = ds change in the natural coordinate ' s ' Robotics: defines how a collection of joint rates maps over a translational and rotational velocity of an end effector. Basis for kinematic and dynamic robotics problems. Dynamics: how do changes in the state of a body affect the dynamic equilibrium of that body. How we measure the stiffness of a set of dynamic equations. Has consequence in how we apply numerical integrators to solve dynamics problems.

Completing the evaluation of k. s=+ ˆ T k = A B DB Jds s= s=+ AL L = E ds L L s= L AE = L So what s the big deal about introducing s?

Look at the second term in the original functional L ˆ B T f = A N b d = 0 s s=+ L = A b ds + s s= Still pretty easy to evaluate but we saw for the LST how the integrals get a lot more complicated. But now we know the limits of the integration and the shape functions are well defined over the - to + interval

0.4. Guassian Quadrature (Numerical Integration). Numerical integration methods provide a value for an integral I: I = y( ) d If we turn to numerical approaches it is because the integrand is to comple to get a useful epression for I. Numerical methods sample the integrand, y(), and approimate the integral, I, with a weighted summation of the sample values. The choice of the weighting factors is what defines the particular integration scheme. Numerical methods effectively replace the original function, y(), with a polynomial approimate.

y( i ) = value of the function at the sample point i. W i = weighting applied to this sample. I = y( ) d W y( ) n i= i i Guassian Quadrature uses n sample values to create a polynomial of order n- which replaces the original function. For MECH 40 we are integrating over domains: s.. + ( ) and/or (.. ) t +

Guassian quadrature: Uses a symmetric distribution of sample points over the - to + s domain. Symmetric points carry the same weight. Any number of points can be chosen. One-point Guassian quadrature, Two-point Guassian quadrature, If an odd number of points is chosen then one of the points is the element centroid. If we consider how the two-point quadrature formula is obtained then we can repeat this procedure to obtain quadrature formulas that are not tabulated.

Using the two point formula we could quickly discretize the body fied load we looked at earlier: s L s=+ ˆ B T L f = A N b d = A b ds s = 0 s= + s s AL AL = (.000) b + (.000) b + s + s Note: we would have to evaluate b at the points: = ( 0.57735 ) ( 0.57735 ) + + and = ( 0.57735 ) + ( + 0.57735 ) s= 0.5773 s=+ 0.5773