Forecast Postalised Tariff 2015/ /20. Utility Regulator Explanatory Note. August Introduction

Similar documents
LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT COST ALLOCATION TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND

Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy

Financial. year Provisional. annual accounts of the European Commission. Annex A : Revenue. Detail reports on implementation of the budget

Multivariate Regression Model Results

13 August Dear Shareholders UPDATE. I am writing to update shareholders on the profit impact of the recent poor harvest and associated matters.

Statement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

2013 WEATHER NORMALIZATION SURVEY. Industry Practices

Weekly Operational Constraints Update

RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CORKSCREW FARMS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017

UPDATE ELECTRICITY STATEMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET

NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT UPDATE FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET

Rebate Report. $15,990,000 Public Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (Voyager Foundation, Inc. Project) Series 2012A

Tariff Decision (BPSA) OR Tambo International Airport (ORTIA) Period covered by tariff application: 01 January December 2015.

RD1 - Page 469 of 578

PROJECT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

2017/18 Wider Cancellation Charge Statement. Version 1. Effective from 1 st April Based Upon: User Commitment Methodology.

2018/19 Wider Cancellation Charge Statement. Version 2.0. Effective from 1 st April Based Upon: User Commitment Methodology.

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 3

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

Wind Rules and Forecasting Project Update Market Issues Working Group 12/14/2007

SUBJECT: Adjustments to Photovoltaic and Electric Vehicle Forecasts to be Used in Southern California Edison Company's Distribution Planning

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO. Office of the Board of Education Norwood City Schooll District January, To the County Auditor:

Payment of Funds

CMP239 Workgroup meeting 2

TRANSMISSION BUSINESS LOAD FORECAST AND METHODOLOGY

Important Developments in International Coke Markets

Monthly Trading Report July 2018

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

INVOICE EXPLAINER GAS

Battery Energy Storage

2006 IRP Technical Workshop Load Forecasting Tuesday, January 24, :00 am 3:30 pm (Pacific) Meeting Summary

Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts

SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. BUDGET INTRODUCTION... 1 II. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET ANALYSIS... 2 III. PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET... 4

CHAPTER 5 - QUEENSLAND FORECASTS

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

The financial reports included in your board packet represent IHLS Financial Activities through July 31, 2018.

SECTION T: SETTLEMENT AND TRADING CHARGES (Version 9 including Approved Modifications yet to be implemented)

March 5, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Statistical Bulletin, June 2011 INTRODUCTORY NOTES SUMMARISED ACCOUNTS OF THE BANKING SYSTEM

More information at

Power System Seminar Presentation Wind Forecasting and Dispatch 7 th July, Wind Power Forecasting tools and methodologies

Short-Term Demand Forecasting Methodology for Scheduling and Dispatch

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON UE 294. Load Forecast PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. Direct Testimony and Exhibits of

PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS CIRCULAR

Accounts at a Glance (As at the end of JULY 2013)

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2)

Resource Adequacy Load Forecast A Report to the Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee

Get in touch. orstedbusiness.co.uk. Page 1 of 14

SHORT TERM LOAD FORECASTING

Budget Estimates

Budget Estimates

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Weather Derivatives. AgBiz Insurance Workshop 08 October Raphael N. Karuaihe, PhD

WIND INTEGRATION IN ELECTRICITY GRIDS WORK PACKAGE 3: SIMULATION USING HISTORICAL WIND DATA

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: October 21, 2016

SECTION T: SETTLEMENT AND TRADING CHARGES (Version 9 including Approved Modifications yet to be implemented)

Information Document Calculation of Pool Price and Transmission Constraint Rebalancing Costs During a Constraint Event ID # R

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

Gorge Area Demand Forecast. Prepared for: Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, Vermont Prepared by:

FINAL PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR. Prepared by the

EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE: Large-scale cross-country forecasting with the help of Ensemble Forecasts

Madison City Schools Budget. FY 2018 Proposed Budget 2nd Public Hearing August 31,

Monthly Trading Report Trading Date: Dec Monthly Trading Report December 2017

Demand Forecasting Models

3. If a forecast is too high when compared to an actual outcome, will that forecast error be positive or negative?

Value of Forecasts in Unit Commitment Problems

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model

Total Market Demand Wed Jan 02 Thu Jan 03 Fri Jan 04 Sat Jan 05 Sun Jan 06 Mon Jan 07 Tue Jan 08

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WIND STUDY REPORT SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ADVISORY FUNCTIONS

Formula Rate - Non-Levelized Rate Formula Template For the 12 months ended 12/31/14 Utilizing FERC Form 1 Data

DEMAND FORECASTING PROTOCOL

Sonae s retail businesses surpassed 1,000 stores and reached total sales of 4,562 M in 2011, strengthening market leadership

Energy and demand projections

Management of the GB System Overnight

DRIVING ROI. The Business Case for Advanced Weather Solutions for the Energy Market

Report on System-Level Estimation of Demand Response Program Impact

Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 17th October 2011

Put the Weather to Work for Your Company

1 GROSS REVENUE REQUIREMENT (page 3, line 31, column 5) $ 124,067,858

GLOUCESTER COAL LTD 2006 Annual Results Media Presentation 25 August 2006

Seasonal Hazard Outlook

From Sales to Peak, Getting It Right Long-Term Demand Forecasting

Operations Report. Tag B. Short, Director South Region Operations. Entergy Regional State Committee (ERSC) February 14, 2018

FORECAST ACCURACY REPORT 2017 FOR THE 2016 NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT

CASE No. 33 of In the matter of Determination of Generic Tariff for Renewable Energy for FY

Page No. (and line no. if applicable):

( FEI ), ( FEFN ), ( FEVI ), ( FEW

2013 FORECAST ACCURACY BENCHMARKING SURVEY AND ENERGY

Information Bulletin 11/2011

2014 FORECASTING BENCHMARK AND OUTLOOK SURVEY. Mark Quan and Stuart McMenamin September 16, 2014 Forecasting Brown Bag Seminar

Into Avista s Electricity Forecasts. Presented by Randy Barcus Avista Chief Economist Itron s Energy Forecaster s Group Meeting

Baltic regional gas market study Final Report. 8 th April 2016

Supplement to The cyclical dynamics of illiquid housing, debt, and foreclosures (Quantitative Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2016, )

Demand Forecasting. for. Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Operations. User Guide. Release 7.1. April 2018

Budget Estimate

Wind power and management of the electric system. EWEA Wind Power Forecasting 2015 Leuven, BELGIUM - 02/10/2015

NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

Transcription:

Forecast Postalised Tariff 2015/16 2019/20 Utility Regulator Explanatory Note August 2015 1 Introduction Pursuant to condition 2A.4.3.1 (b) of the Gas Conveyance licences granted to GNI (UK) 1, Premier Transmission Limited and Belfast Gas Transmission Limited, the Postalisation System Administrator ( PSA ) has completed its annual calculation of the forecast postalised tariff for 2015/16 and the following four gas years. The 15/16 gas year is the first year for which forecast tariffs have been calculated at entry and exit points. The Gas Regulation contains a number of new obligations in respect of tariffs. Article 13 explicitly states that tariffs shall be set separately for every entry point into or exit point out of the transmission system. In addition the CAM 2 Code requires TSOs to offer a number of capacity products yearly, quarterly, monthly, daily and within day capacity. These products must be offered at Interconnection Points (IPs) by November 2015. It should be noted that these non-annual capacity products are available at entry points, with annual capacity only available at the exit point. This note explains what the inputs for calculating the postalised tariff are based on and explains any differences from the previous years forecasts. It should be noted that the forecasts for the gas years 2016/17 to 2019/20 are included for indicative purposes only. 2 Inputs 2.1 Forecast Required Revenues (i). Premier Transmission Limited (PTL) The calculation of the PTL Forecast Required Revenue is based upon the existing licence formula where the figures are made up of the repayments on the 107,012,500 bond at a rate of 2.461% as well as forecast Operating Expenditure. The PTL Allowed Revenue is reduced for the forecast payment made by Stranraer. (ii). Gas Networks Ireland (UK) 1 Formerly BGE(NI). 2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 984/2013 Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.

The GNI (UK) Allowed Revenue is based on capital expenditure of circa 138m 3 and an allowance for controllable and uncontrollable operating expenditure as part of the GNI(UK) 2012/13-2016/17 Price Control Determination. GNI(UK) s Capital Expenditure is recovered at a constant real amount at a rate of return of 5.83% (vanilla 4 ). (iii). Belfast Gas Transmission Limited (BGTL) The BGTL Allowed Revenue is based on the repayment of the 109,000,000 bond at a rate of 2.387% plus forecast operating expenditure. 2.2 Capacity The forecast capacity figures for the two power stations and the two distribution markets are based upon the actual and/or forecast peak-day capacity requirements. The distribution companies submit their forecast capacity figures based upon data supplied by the gas suppliers operating within their respective networks. The power stations submit their capacity figures based on forecast electricity generation. The forecast entry capacity bookings for each product, both annual and non-annual, are submitted by suppliers using the entry point. 2.3 Volumes Volume figures are based on end customer s best estimate using the number of customers, load factors and electricity generation output assumptions. 3 Difference between the forecast 2014/15 Annual Tariff and forecast 2015/16 Annual Tariff Table 1: Annual Forecast Tariffs Annual Forecast Tariffs 2014/15 2015/16 Difference Entry Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Exit Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Total Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d 0.45013 0.54088 20.16% Commodity Charge ( per kwh) 0.0009841 0.0009445-4.02% In addition to this summary Table the Forecast Tariff Spreadsheet (Annex 1) outlines the tariffs for all annual and non-annual products for the gas years 2015/16 to 2019/20. 3 As at 1 st October 2015. 4 A vanilla rate of return is the post-tax return on equity and pre-tax return on debt. 2

As can be seen from Table 1 the 2015/16 total capacity tariff has increased compared to the 2014/15 figure. The main factor driving this change is a reduction in the amount of forecast capacity booked as explained in section 3.1 below. The forecast 2015/16 commodity tariff is slightly lower than the 2014/15 tariff. A review of the annual capacity, volumes and forecast required revenues is provided below. The short term capacity tariffs (auction reserve prices) are included in the 2015/16 Forecast Tariff Spreadsheet. 3.1 Capacity and Volumes Volumes Overall the 2015 forecast gas volumes for the gas year 2015/16 have increased by 4.93% compared to volumes forecast for 2014/2015. The forecast increase is due to additional demand of 5.84% at Coolkeeragh and Ballylumford power stations compared to 2014/15 forecasts. The increase is based upon operating estimates including expected scheduling forecasts within the SEM. Forecast volumes within the distribution sector have also increased by 3.89% compared to 2014/15 figures. There is a forecast increase in volumes within the Belfast distribution area of 2.21% and an increase of 8.09% in the Ten Towns distribution area. Capacity The analysis of the forecast capacity data has been reviewed against previous years capacity usage, while also accounting for future expansion and an increase in network usage. There has been an overall decrease of 11% in the forecast exit capacity figures for 2015/16 compared to 2014/15. This is driven by the expected reduction in the running of Ballylumford power station in 15/16. While the Ballylumford capacity booking has decreased, their forecast annual consumption has increased due to changes in their capacity utilisation associated with their load factor. This is in anticipation of the Moyle interconnector being fully available in 15/16 and due to the impact of alternative forecast commodity costs such as coal. The subsequent year s forecasts also indicate a decrease in forecast capacity booked. The decrease is slightly offset by an increase in exit capacity booked by the distribution companies of 5.66% compared to 2014/15 figures. 3

As this is the first year of the Entry Exit tariff regime, a new methodology has been applied to quantify the Entry and Exit forecasts. Annual Entry Capacity accounts for the substantive majority of forecast bookings, with the larger market suppliers confirming that they are not planning to purchase Short Term Entry Products for the 15/16 gas year. The Exit forecast approach is based on peak winter demands (1 in 20 requirements) at Exit. The application of this methodology provides an explanation for the variation in Entry and Exit forecast capacity. Going forward the Authority will engage with the TSOs and suppliers to review the accuracy of both the Entry and Exit forecast methodologies, with the aim of ensuring that these reflect their individual licence requirements. Given that forecast Entry capacity bookings are lower, how suppliers may pass these potential reduced costs through to customers will need to be discussed further. 3.2 Required Revenues The total required revenue forecasted for 2015/16 is 50,050,962 (in 2015/16 prices) compared to last year s 2014/15 figure of 49,700,997 (in 2014/15 prices). This is an increase of 0.70%. Table 2 provides a review of previous years FRRs for comparison. Table 2: Forecast Required Revenue Forecast Required Revenue (FRR) PTL BGTL GNI(UK) Total FRR 2011/12 18,140,340 6,791,167 17,009,445 41,940,952 FRR 2012/13 20,162,771 7,040,850 18,263,239 45,466,860 FRR 2013/14 20,834,296 7,457,184 18,284,022 46,575,502 FRR 2014/15 24,776,560 7,118,791 17,805,645 49,700,997 FRR 2015/16 24,102,261 7,994,886 17,953,815 50,050,962 Increase from -674,299 876,095 148,170 349,965 FRR 2014/15 % Change from FRR 2014/15-2.72% 12.31% 0.83% 0.70% The 15/16 FRR figures include a consideration for costs to cover the work required to implement the EU Third Internal Energy Package (IME3). The figures included in the 2015/16 FRR for IME3 costs are indicative only and will be reviewed by the Utility Regulator when all costs for IME3 have been submitted by the TSOs. The review will include the provisional IME3 allowances included in the 2013/14 and 14/15 FRR. PTL s 2015/16 FRR has decreased by 2.72% compared to 2014/15. This is due to once off high IT costs in the 2014/15 FRR. PTL s 2015/16 FRR includes a contribution of 3.2m to a number of large capital works being 4

carried out on the GNI(UK) network in Scotland. PTL are apportioned relevant costs for these works under the Transportation Agreement between PTL and GNI(UK). This also includes costs associated with a seabed survey of pipelines. BGTL s FRR has increased by 12.31%. This is due primarily to the costs associated with pipeline inspections. GNI(UK) s FRR is in line with their price control determination. 4 Comparison between 2015/16 Tariff Forecast made in 2014 and 2013 Table 3: Comparison year on year 2014 forecast of 2015/16 tariff 2015 forecast of 2015/16 tariff Difference Entry Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Exit Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d 0.42257 0.54088 28% Commodity Charge ( per kwh) 0.0009709 0.0009445-2.72% We have also included a comparison between the 2015/16 tariff forecast made in 2014 and this year s forecast for 2015/16. As noted in Table 3 above, there is a notable percentage increase in the capacity charge. This is due to the fact that the 2015/16 forecast made in 2014 included a much higher forecast exit capacity booked for Ballylumford power station compared to the updated 2015/16 forecast provided this year. The reduction in the commodity charge is due to the fact that the 2015/16 forecast made in 2014 included a slightly lower total forecast volumes compared to the updated 2015/16 forecast provided this year. 5 Forecast Postalised Tariff for years 2016/17-2019/20 Table 4: Forecast Tariffs GY+1 GY+4 2016/17 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 Entry Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Exit Capacity Charge ( per kwh/d Commodity Charge ( per kwh) 0.23233 0.24623 0.23089 0.23418 0.23233 0.24623 0.23089 0.23418 0.000832 0.000904 0.000846 0.000872 The forecast tariffs for the years 2016/17 to 2019/20 are provided in the Table 4 for indicative purposes only. 5