DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5

Similar documents
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5. Show that the law of cosines in spherical geometry is. cos c = cos a cos b + sin a sin b cos θ.

MATH 434 Fall 2016 Homework 1, due on Wednesday August 31

ISOMETRIES OF THE HYPERBOLIC PLANE

Möbius Transformation

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 4. Show that a catenoid and helicoid are locally isometric.

274 Curves on Surfaces, Lecture 4

Hyperbolic Geometry on Geometric Surfaces

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

612 CLASS LECTURE: HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY

Lecture Figure 4.5. Relating curvature to the circumference of a circle.

GEOMETRY HW (t, 0, e 1/t2 ), t > 0 1/t2, 0), t < 0. (0, 0, 0), t = 0

Hyperbolic Transformations

We introduce the third of the classical geometries, hyperbolic geometry.

Continued fractions and geodesics on the modular surface

Highly complex: Möbius transformations, hyperbolic tessellations and pearl fractals

Stratification of 3 3 Matrices

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 12

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY MA205 Complex Analysis Autumn 2012

GEOMETRY FINAL CLAY SHONKWILER

GEOMETRY MID-TERM CLAY SHONKWILER

ν(u, v) = N(u, v) G(r(u, v)) E r(u,v) 3.

MATH 311: COMPLEX ANALYSIS CONFORMAL MAPPINGS LECTURE

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Fuchsian groups. 2.1 Definitions and discreteness

III.3. Analytic Functions as Mapping, Möbius Transformations

CHAPTER 2. CONFORMAL MAPPINGS 58

GEOMETRY HW Consider the parametrized surface (Enneper s surface)

z, w = z 1 w 1 + z 2 w 2 z, w 2 z 2 w 2. d([z], [w]) = 2 φ : P(C 2 ) \ [1 : 0] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 1 z 2 ψ : P(C 2 ) \ [0 : 1] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 2 z 1

A crash course the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces

5.3 The Upper Half Plane

Conformal Mappings. Chapter Schwarz Lemma

THE SELBERG TRACE FORMULA OF COMPACT RIEMANN SURFACES

Math 814 HW 3. October 16, p. 54: 9, 14, 18, 24, 25, 26

Conformal Mapping, Möbius Transformations. Slides-13

CHAPTER 9. Conformal Mapping and Bilinear Transformation. Dr. Pulak Sahoo

The Geometrization Theorem

Möbius transformations and its applications

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jun 2008

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

TOPOLOGY HW 2. x x ± y

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Plane hyperbolic geometry

Solutions to Exercises 6.1

THE AUTOMORPHISM GROUP ON THE RIEMANN SPHERE

2 Differential Geometry of Riemann Surfaces

The Mathematics of Maps Lecture 4. Dennis The The Mathematics of Maps Lecture 4 1/29

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 9

GEOMETRY HW 7 CLAY SHONKWILER

(7) Suppose α, β, γ are nonzero complex numbers such that α = β = γ.

Riemann Surface. David Gu. SMI 2012 Course. University of New York at Stony Brook. 1 Department of Computer Science

Lecture 14 Conformal Mapping. 1 Conformality. 1.1 Preservation of angle. 1.2 Length and area. MATH-GA Complex Variables

Lectures in Discrete Differential Geometry 2 Surfaces

Part II. Geometry and Groups. Year

INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRY

Junior Seminar: Hyperbolic Geometry Lecture Notes

Topic 4 Notes Jeremy Orloff

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

GEOMETRY Notes Easter 2002

Stereographic projection and inverse geometry

Poincaré Models of Hyperbolic Geometry

Mobius transformations and AdS 3 geometry

1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles

Practice Final Solutions

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday 10 February 2004 (Day 1)

Part IB. Geometry. Year

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

Theorem III.3.4. If f : G C is analytic then f preserves angles at each point z 0 of G where f (z 0 ) 0.

Riemann surfaces. 3.1 Definitions

Arc Length and Riemannian Metric Geometry

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

Geometric structures on 3 manifolds

CHAPTER 3. Gauss map. In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3.

Geometric Complex Analysis. Davoud Cheraghi Imperial College London

Calculus III. Math 233 Spring Final exam May 3rd. Suggested solutions

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

A local characterization for constant curvature metrics in 2-dimensional Lorentz manifolds

zi z i, zi+1 z i,, zn z i. z j, zj+1 z j,, zj 1 z j,, zn

Transport Continuity Property

7.2 Conformal mappings

2 hours THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER.?? January 2017??:????:??

Contents. MATH 32B-2 (18W) (L) G. Liu / (TA) A. Zhou Calculus of Several Variables. 1 Multiple Integrals 3. 2 Vector Fields 9

f(p i )Area(T i ) F ( r(u, w) ) (r u r w ) da

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Aero III/IV Conformal Mapping

IV. Conformal Maps. 1. Geometric interpretation of differentiability. 2. Automorphisms of the Riemann sphere: Möbius transformations

Isometries of Hyperbolic Space

Chapter 4. The First Fundamental Form (Induced Metric)

The hyperbolic plane and a regular 24-faced polyhedron

Math 460: Complex Analysis MWF 11am, Fulton Hall 425 Homework 5 Please write neatly, and in complete sentences when possible.

Math 20C Homework 2 Partial Solutions

INTEGRATION WORKSHOP 2003 COMPLEX ANALYSIS EXERCISES

1 The Differential Geometry of Surfaces

A Discussion of Thurston s Geometrization Conjecture

Bending deformation of quasi-fuchsian groups

Spacetime and 4 vectors

Tutorial Exercises: Geometric Connections

THE UNIFORMISATION THEOREM OF RIEMANN SURFACES

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 7

Transcription:

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 CLAY SHONKWILER 1 Check the calculations above that the Gaussian curvature of the upper half-plane and Poincaré disk models of the hyperbolic plane is 1. Proof. The calculations check out. (a): Show that if we have an orthogonal parametrization of a surface (that is, F = 0), then the gaussian curvature K is given by K = 1 [ ] (EG) 1/ (E v (EG) 1/) ) v + (G u (EG) 1/ ) u. Proof. Note that, using this formula, K = 1 [ (EG) 1/ E vv (EG) 1/ E v(e v G + EG v ) (EG) 3/ + G uu (EG) 1/ G ] u(e u G + EG u ) (EG) 3/ = E vv EG + E vg + EE v G v 4(EG) G uu EG + E ugg u EG u 4(EG) = E v 4E G + E vg v 4EG + E ug u 4E G + G u 4EG + E vv EG + G uu EG = E v + E u G u 4E G + G u + E v G v 4EG Recall the Gauss formula EK = Γ 1 1Γ 11 + Γ 1,u + Γ 1Γ 1 Γ 1 11Γ 1 Γ 11,v Γ 11Γ 11. Using the fact that F = 0, this reduces to ( ) EK = E v 4EG + Gu + G u G u 4G E ( ) ug u 4EG Ev + E vg v G v 4G so K = E v + E u G u 4E G = G u + E v G v 4EG + G u GG uu EG u + GE vv E v G v EG v 1

CLAY SHONKWILER (b): Use this formula to compute the Gaussian curvature of the upper half-plane and Poincaré disk models of the hyperbolic plane. Answer: For the upper half-plane, K = 1 [ ] (EG) 1/ (E v (EG) 1/) ) v + (G u (EG) 1/ ) u = v = v [( ) v v 3 [( v = v v = 1. ) For the Poincaré disk, v ] v ] + 0 K = 1 (EG) 1/ [ (E v (EG) 1/) ) v + (G u (EG) 1/ ) u ] = (1 u v ) 8 = (1 u v ) 8 = (1 u v ) 8 = (1 u v ) 8 = 8 8 = 1 [( 16v(1 u v ) ) ( 16u(1 u v ) ) ] 4(1 u v ) 3 + v 4(1 u v ) 3 u [( ) ( ) ] 4v 4u 1 u v + v 1 u v u [ 4(1 u v ) 4v( v) (1 u v ) + 4(1 u v ] ) 4u( u) (1 u v ) [ 8(1 u v ) + 8v + 8u ] (1 u v ) 3 (a): Check that ds = dr + r dθ describes the Euclidean metric in R, and compute that the Gaussian curvature is K 0. Proof. The Euclidean metric on R is given by the parametrization Hence, X(r, θ) = (x, y) = (r cos θ, r sin θ). X r = (cos θ, sin θ) X θ = ( r sin θ, r cos θ),

so DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 3 X r, X r = cos θ + sin θ = 1 X r, X θ = r sin θ cos θ + r sin θ cos θ = 0 X θ, X θ = r sin θ + r cos θ = r. Thus, E = 1, F = 0 and G = r, so ds = dr + r dθ. Furthermore, using the formula from (a), K = 1 [ ] (EG) 1/ (E θ (EG) 1/) ) θ + (G r (EG) 1/ ) r = 1 r = 0. [ 0 + ( r r ) r ] (b): Check that ds = dr + sin rdθ describes the round metric on the -sphere S, and compute that the Gaussian curvature is K 1. Note that r measures distance along the sphere. Proof. The parametrization for the round -sphere is given by X(r, θ) = (x, y, z) = (cos θ sin r, sin θ sin r, cos r). Note that this really is the round sphere, since, x + y + z = cos θ sin r + sin θ sin r + cos r = sin r + cos r = 1. Now, so X r = (cos θ cos r, sin θ cos r, sin r) X θ = ( sin θ sin r, cos θ sin r, 0), X r, X r = cos θ cos r + sin θ cos r + sin r = 1 X r, X θ = sin θ cos θ sin r cos r + sin θ cos θ sin r cos r = 0 X θ, X θ = sin θ sin r + cos θ sin r = sin r. Hence, E = 1, F = 0 and G = sin r, so ds = dr + sin rdθ. Furthermore, using the formula from (a), K = 1 [ ] (EG) 1/ (E θ (EG) 1/) ) θ + (G r (EG) 1/ ) r = 1 sin r = 1 [ 0 + ( sin r) sin r = 1. ( ) ] sin r cos r sin r r

4 CLAY SHONKWILER (c): Show that ds = dr +sinh rdθ describes a metric with Gaussian curvature K 1. Proof. With this fundamental form, E = 1, F = 0, g = sinh r. Using the formula from (a), K = 1 [ ] (EG) 1/ (E θ (EG) 1/) ) θ + (G r (EG) 1/ ) r = 1 [ ( ) ] sinh r cosh r 0 + sinh r sinh r r = 1 ( sinh r) sinh r = 1. 4 Find as many examples you can of complete surfaces with Gaussian curvature K 0. Are the all locally homogeneous? Homogeneous? Examples: Obviously, R is a complete surface with Gaussian curvature zero. The infinite cylinder is also a complete surface and has Gaussian curvature zero. Similarly, thinking of the infinite Möbius strip as the strip {(x, y) R 1 x < 1} with the endlines identified oppositely, this is a complete surface. Under the metric it inherits from R, it has Gaussian curvature zero. Similarly, the torus is a complete surface and inherits a flat metric from R. By adjusting the orientations of the edges of this square, we get the Klein bottle and RP,

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 5 both of which are complete surfaces and inherit a flat metric from R : Of course, we can get different versions of all these spaces (homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic) by taking them to be quotients of R by different lattices. All of the surfaces we ve described are homogeneous, since each is covered by R and so we can p to q via an isometry by taking a point in the fiber over p to a point in the fiber over q by an isometry of R ; passing to the quotient is still an isometry. 6 Show that on a surface of constant curvature K, the length of the circle of radius r is L = πr (π/3)kr 3 +.... Proof. If K 0, this is trivial. Suppose K 0. By definition, if C is the circle, ( 1 L = ds = dr + sin( Kr)dθ). K 0 C C Since r is constant, the dr term contributes nothing, so this reduces to π 1 L = sin( Kr)dθ = π sin( [ Kr) = π Kr ( ] Kr) 3 +... K K K 3! = πr π 3 Kr3 +... 7 Start with the disk model of the hyperbolic plane, ds = 4(dx + dy )/(1 x y ), switch to geodesic polar coordinates, and show directly that ds = dr + sinh rdθ.

6 CLAY SHONKWILER Proof. We know that, in geodesic polar coordinates, ds = dr +G(r, θ) dθ. Now, since rotations of the Poincar disk preserve the metric and every point in the disk can be rotated to a point on the non-negative x-axis, we may as well compute ds at a point on the non-negative x-axis. On the positive x-axis, the positive y direction corresponds to the positive θ direction, so the component of ds in the dθ direction is given by (1) dy 1 x dθ dθ since the component in the y-direction is given by dy. Now, dy 1 x dθ gives the rate of change of y with respect to θ; since the y and θ directions correspond, this will simply be a scalar. The multiplier will be r and, since we re on the x-axis, r = x, so dy dθ = x. Hence, (1) reduces to () Now, since r = x 0 x 1 x dθ. x [ 1/ 1 t dt = 0 1 t + 1/ ] dt 1 + t [ 1 = log 1 x + 1 ] log 1 + x = log x + 1 x 1 and 0 x < 1, Therefore, sinh r = er e r r = log = ( ) x 1. x + 1 x 1 x+1 x+1 x 1 = 4x (x 1) = x 1 x. Hence, () is equal to sinh r and so, from (1), the component of ds in the dθ direction is sinh rdθ. In turn, this implies that G(r, θ) = sinh r, so ds = dr + sinh rdθ. Show that w = f(z) = z i z+i 8 is an isometry from H D.

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 7 Proof. First, note that, if x R, then f(x) = x i x + i = (x i) x + 1 = x 1 x + 1 i x x + 1 ( x ) 1 = x + 4x + 1 (x + 1) = x + x + 1 (x + 1) = 1, so f maps the real line to the unit circle. Then, since f(i) = i i i + i = 0 D, we see that f : H D. Since, as we know from complex analysis, LFTs are biholomorphic where they are defined and f is only undefined at i, we see that f : H D is a diffeomorphism. Thus, to show that f is an isometry, we need only show that f preserves the first fundamental form. To that end, note that dz = dx + idy and d z = dx idy, so dz = dzd z = dx + dy, meaning that Also, w = w w = x + y, so Now, 1 w = 1 z i z + i = 1 ds H = dz I(z). ds D = dw 1 w. (z i)(z i) (z i)( z + i) = 1 (z + i)(z + i) z + i z z i z + iz + 1 = 1 z + i = 1 z + 1 I(z) z + i = z + i z 1 + I(z) z + i z z + i z iz + 1 z z 1 + I(z) = z + i = 4I(z) z + i.

8 CLAY SHONKWILER Now, so dw = df(z) = f (z)dz = f (z) dz = i (z + i) dz = ds D = dw 1 w = 4 dz z+i 4I(z) z+i = 4 dz 4I(z) = dz H. dz z + i, Therefore, since f(z) = w preserves the first fundamental form, we see that f : H D is an isometry. 9 Show that compositions of the above isometries give all isometries of H. Proof. Suppose h : H H is an isometry. Let G be the group generated by the translations, dilations, rotations and flips described above. Since G acts transitively on the points of H, we can conjugate h by an element of G such that h fixes a point a H ; that is, up to conjugation by G, h fixes a. Again, since G is transitive, we may as well assume a = (0, 1) H, which we identify with i C. Let γ : ( ɛ, ɛ) H by a geodesic passing through i such that γ(0) = i. Since h is an isometry, h γ is also a geodesic passing through a, since (h γ)(0) = h(γ(0)) = h(i) = i. Now, if f : H D is the isometry from problem 8, then f(i) = 0, the center of D, so any rotation of D fixes f(i). Let θ be the angle between γ (0) and dh i γ (0). Let r be a rotation of D by θ. Then the composition f 1 r f h takes γ (0) to either γ (0) or γ (0); that is, up to multiplication by an element of G, h(γ) = γ (by uniqueness of geodesics), so we may as well assume h(γ) = γ. Since h fixes i and preserves γ, there are only two possibilities for what h can be: the identity and the flip (x, y) ( x, y). However, both of these isometries are already in G, so we see that h G. Thus, compositions of the translations, dilations, rotations and flips described above give all isometries of G. Show that a LFT takes the upper half-plane H to itself. 1

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 9 Proof. Let f : z az+b cz+d. Note that f is defined on all of C except when z = d c / H, so f is defined on all of H. Now, if z = x + iy, a(x + iy) + b f(z) = f(x + iy) = c(x + iy) + d ax + b + iay cx + d icy = cx + d + icy cx + d icy which is in H, since = acx + (ad + bc)x + acy + bd + i(acxy acxy + (ad bc)y) (cx + d) + c y = acx + (ad + bc)x + acy + bd (cx + d) + c y y + i (cx + d) + c y, y (cx+d) +c y > 0. Therefore, we see that f : H H. 13 Show that the identity matrix I and its negative I are the only matrices in SL(, R) which act via LFTs as the identity. Hence we get an induced action of P SL(, R) = SL(, R)/{I, I} on the upper half-plane H. ( ) a b Proof. Suppose SL(, R) acts as the identity; that is, c d for all z C. Hence, so b = 0. Also, z = az + b cz + d b a = a b a + b c b a + d = 0, d c = a d c + b c d c + d = so we must have that c = 0. Now, ad c 1 = a(1) + b c(1) + d = a d, + b 0 so a = d. Now, since ad bc = 1, ad = 1, so a = 1 d. Therefore, a = 1 a, so d = a = ±1. Therefore, we see that I and I are the only matrices in SL(, R) that act as the identity on C, so the action of SL(, R) on C induces and action of P SL(, R) on C.,

10 CLAY SHONKWILER Define the cross ratio of four complex numbers to be 14 [z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ] = (z 1 z )(z 3 z 4 ) (z 1 z 3 )(z z 4 ). Show that LFTs preserve cross ratios. Proof. Suppose f : z az+b cz+d is an LFT. Then [f(z 1 ), f(z ), f(z 3 ), f(z 4 )] = (f(z 1) f(z ))(f(z 3 ) f(z 4 )) (f(z 1 ) f(z 3 ))(f(z ) f(z 4 )) ( ) ( ) az1 +b cz 1 +d az +b az3 +b cz +d cz 3 +d az 4+b cz 4 +d = ( ) ( ) az1 +b cz 1 +d az 3+b az +b cz 3 +d cz +d az 4+b cz 4 +d = (az 1 +b)(cz +d) (az +b)(cz 1 +d) (cz 1 +d)(cz +d) (az 1 +b)(cz 3 +d) (az 3 +b)(cz 1 +d) (cz 1 +d)(cz 3 +d) (az 3+b)(cz 4 +d) (az 4 +b)(cz 3 +d) (cz 3 +d)(cz 4 +d) (az +b)(cz 4 +d) (az 4 +b)(cz +d) (cz +d)(cz 4 +d) = ((az1+b)(cz+d) (az+b)(cz1+d))((az3+b)(cz4+d) (az4+b)(cz3+d)) ((az 1+b)(cz 3+d) (az 3+b)(cz 1+d))((az +b)(cz 4+d) (az 4+b)(cz +d)) = (acz1z+bcz+adz1+bd acz1z bcz1 adz bd)(acz3z4+bcz4+adz3+bd acz3z4 bcz3 adz4 bd) (acz 1z 3+bcz 3+adz 1+bd acz 1z 3 bcz 1 adz 3 bd)(acz z 4+bcz 4+adz +bd acz z 4 bcz adz 4 bd) = (z 1 z )(z 3 z 4 ) (z 1 z 3 )(z z 4 ) = [z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ]. Since our choice of LFT was arbitrary, we see that LFTs preserve cross ratios. 15 Let w = z + z and w = z + z, where we are using the overscore to denote complex conjugate. Let z 0 and show that [z, w, z, w] dzd z (z z) = dx + dy 4y. Conclude that, since LFTs preserve cross ratios, they also preserve and hence are isometries. dx + dy y = ds,

Proof. By definition, Therefore, as z 0, DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 11 (z w)( z w) [z, w, z, w] = (z z)(w w) (z (z + z))( z ( z + z)) = (z z)(z + z ( z + z)) z z = (z z)(z + z ( z + z)) [z, w, z, w] dzd z (z z)(z z) = dzd z (z z). If z = x + iy, then the righthand side becomes, as we ve seen in Problem 8,. Therefore, dx +dy 4y [z, w, z, w] dx + dy 4y, so, since LFTs preserve the cross ratio, they must also preserve the righthand side, which is 1 4 the first fundamental form of the upper half-plane model of H, so we see that LFTs preserve the first fundamental form on H and, therefore, are isometries of H. 16 Show that P SL(, R) is the identity component of the group of all isometries of the hyperbolic plane. Proof. Problems 13 an 15, above, taken together demonstrate that P SL(, R) is a subgroup of the group of isometries of the hyperbolic plane; furthermore, since the identity element I P SL(, R) acts as the identity isometry on H, we know that, since P SL(, R) is connected, it is contained in the identity component of the group of isometries on the hyperbolic plane. Since compositions of translations, rotations, dilations and flips give all isometries of H and translations, dilations and rotations are orientation-preserving while flips are orientation-reversing, we see that the identity component of the group of isometries of H is given by compositions of translations, rotations and dilations. Now, as we know from complex analysis, every LFT is the composition of translations, rotations and dilations, so we see that P SL(, R) is precisely the identity component of the group of isometries of H. 17 (a): Use the existence and uniqueness theorem to show that any curve on a Riemannian surface which is the fixed point set of an isometry must be a geodesic.

1 CLAY SHONKWILER Proof. Let M be a Riemannian surface. Suppose the curve α(t) is the fixed point set of an isometry f. Let p be a point on α; without loss of generality, we may assume that α(0) = p. Then, by the existence and uniqueness theorem for geodesics, there exists a unique geodesic γ : ( ɛ, ɛ) M (for some ɛ > 0 such that γ(0) = α(0) = p and γ (0) = α (0). Now, since α is fixed by f, f α = α, so (f α) (t) = α (t) for all t. Furthermore, since γ(0) = α(0) and γ (0) = α (0), (f γ)(0) = (f α)(0) = α(0) = γ(0) and (f γ) (0) = (f α) (0) = α (0) = γ (0). On the other hand, since f is an isometry, f γ is a geodesic which, as we ve just seen, passes through p and has tangent vector at p given by α (0). Thus, by the uniqueness of geodesics, f γ = γ wherever γ is defined. Since γ is fixed by f and α is precisely the fixed point set of f, this implies that γ = α. Since our choice of α was arbitrary, we see that any curve on a Riemannian surface which is the fixed point set of an isometry must be a geodesic. (b): Conclude that the vertical lines in the upper half-plane model are geodesics, and that the rays through the origin in the Poincaré disk model are geodesics. Proof. Note, first of all, that the vertical line x = 0 is the fixed point set of the isometry (x, y) ( x, y) in the upper half-plane. Since any vertical line in the upper half-plane can be horizontally translated to the y-axis and horizontal translations have no fixed points, we see that any vertical line in the upper half-plane is the fixed point set of the isometry which is the composition of the following isometries: the horizontal translation that takes that vertical line to the y-axis, followed by the flip (x, y) ( x, y), followed by the horizontal translation taking the y-axis back to the given vertical line. Therefore, we see that every horizontal line is the fixed point set of an isometry and so, by part (a), is a geodesic. Turning to the Poincaré disk, we know, from problem 9, that any rotation about the origin is an isometry. Now, any diameter of the disk can be rotated to the diameter along the x-axis. Furthermore, using the inverse of the isometry in problem 8 above (given for w D), the diameter along the x-axis in D is taken to the y-axis in H. Thus, if h is the isometry (x, y) ( x, y) in H and f = g 1, f h g is an isometry of the disk and the diameter along the x-axis is its fixed point set. Thus, we see that any diameter is the fixed set of the isometry obtained by conjugating f h g by the rotation sending the given diameter by f 1 (w) = g(w) = i(1+w) 1 w to the x-axis. Again, by part (a), this implies that all diameters of the disk are geodesics.

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5 13 18 (a): Show that the remaining geodesics in the upper half-plane model are semi-circles which meet the x-axis orthogonally. Proof. First, we show that any such semi-circle is a geodesic. Since any such circle can be transformed into the semi-circle centered at the origin of radius 1 by a combination of horizontal translations and scalings, we see that it suffices to show that the semi-circle centered at the origin of radius 1 is the fixed point set of an isometry (since we can simply conjugate by the necessary translation and dilation taking a given semi-circle to the one centered at the origin of radius 1 to get an isometry whose fixed ( point set) is the given circle). Now, f(z) = 1 0 1 z is an LFT since det = 1, so f is an isometry 1 0 of the upper half-plane. Let h : x + iy x + iy. Now, if z = x + iy such that z = 1, then 1 z = z and so ( ) 1 (h f)(z) = h(f(z)) = h = h( z) = h( x + iy) = x + iy = z. z Since h and f are both isometries, we see that h f is an isometry of the upper half-plane whose fixed point set is precisely the semi-circle of radius 1 centered at the origin. Now, suppose γ : ( ɛ, ɛ) H is a geodesic, where γ(t) = (γ 1 (t), γ (t)). If γ (0) is vertical, then the vertical line x = γ 1 (0) passes through γ(0) and is parallel to γ (0); by the uniqueness of geodesics, this implies that γ is simply a parametrization of this vertical line. If γ (0) is not vertical, then there is a semi-circle centered on the x-axis passing through γ(0) and parallel to γ (0); again, since such a semi-circle is a geodesic (as we just proved), the uniqueness of geodesics implies that γ is just a parametrization of this semi-circle. Since our choice of γ was arbitrary, we see that any geodesic in the upper half-plane is either a vertical line or a semi-circle which meets the x-axis orthogonally. (b): Show that the remaining geodesics in the Poincaré disk model are arcs of circles which meet the boundary of the disk orthogonally. Proof. Let f : H D be the isometry described in problem 8. Then f is a conformal map and so takes (generalized) circles to circles. Now, since f maps the boundary of H (that is, the real line) to the boundary of D (that is, the unit circle). Hence, f maps circles which meet the real line orthogonally to circles which meet the unit circle orthogonally, so we see that f maps the geodesics described in part (a) to arcs of circles which meet the boundary of the disk orthogonally. Hence, such arcs are geodesics in D. Since the geodesics of D are just the images under f of the geodesics of H,

14 CLAY SHONKWILER we see that all geodesics of D are either arcs of circles which meet the boundary of the disk orthogonally or diameters of the disk. DRL 3E3A, University of Pennsylvania E-mail address: shonkwil@math.upenn.edu