Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture

Similar documents
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters

The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

The local Langlands correspondence for inner forms of SL n. Plymen, Roger. MIMS EPrint:

Marko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character

l-adic Representations

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

LECTURE 2: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR G. 1. Introduction. If we view the flow of information in the Langlands Correspondence as

ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF HERMITIAN QUATERNIONIC INNER FORM OF SO 8. Neven Grbac University of Rijeka, Croatia

THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE FOR Sp(4)

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

10 l-adic representations

ABSTRACT. Professor Jeffrey Adams Department of Mathematics

ARCHIMEDEAN ASPECTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF DEGREE 2

SOME REMARKS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF QUATERNION DIVISION ALGEBRAS

9 Artin representations

ON THE MODIFIED MOD p LOCAL LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 2 (Q l )

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

FUNCTORIALITY AND THE INVERSE GALOIS PROBLEM II: GROUPS OF TYPE B n AND G 2

Colette Mœglin and Marko Tadić

`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

ON RESIDUAL COHOMOLOGY CLASSES ATTACHED TO RELATIVE RANK ONE EISENSTEIN SERIES FOR THE SYMPLECTIC GROUP

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation

Inertial types and automorphic representations with prescribed ramification. William Conley

ON THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE AND RELATED PROBLEMS OVER p-adic LOCAL FIELDS

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups

Representations of Galois and of GL 2 in characteristic p

9 Artin representations

CUBIC UNIPOTENT ARTHUR PARAMETERS AND MULTIPLICITIES OF SQUARE INTEGRABLE AUTOMORPHIC FORMS

On splitting of the normalizer of a maximal torus in groups of Lie type

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

On the Langlands Program

LECTURE 1: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCES FOR GL n. We begin with variations on the theme of Converse Theorems. This is a coda to SF s lectures.

Unitarity of non-spherical principal series

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

BESSEL MODELS FOR GSp(4)

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

ON SATAKE PARAMETERS FOR REPRESENTATIONS WITH PARAHORIC FIXED VECTORS. 1. Introduction

STABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION. James Arthur University of Toronto

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

CURTIS HOMOMORPHISMS AND THE INTEGRAL BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR GL n

The Nonabelian Reciprocity Law for Local Fields

arxiv: v2 [math.rt] 29 Jun 2018

SEMISIMPLE SYMPLECTIC CHARACTERS OF FINITE UNITARY GROUPS

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

Subgroups of Linear Algebraic Groups

Honours Research Project: Modular forms and Galois representations mod p, and the nilpotent action of Hecke operators mod 2

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

On Artin s L-Functions*

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)

LIFTING OF GENERIC DEPTH ZERO REPRESENTATIONS OF CLASSICAL GROUPS

Profinite Groups. Hendrik Lenstra. 1. Introduction

SEMI-GROUP AND BASIC FUNCTIONS

Unramified CFT for proper smooth varieties

On the geometric Langlands duality

TWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. In memory of Sibe Mardešić

FIELD THEORY. Contents

PROOF OF THE AUBERT-BAUM-PLYMEN-SOLLEVELD CONJECTURE FOR SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Apr 2016

L-functions and Automorphic Representations

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

Shintani lifting and real-valued characters

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

2-ADIC PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN MODULAR FORMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS

A CLASSIFICATION OF IRREDUCIBLE ADMISSIBLE MOD p REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Algebraic Hecke Characters

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

Lifting Galois Representations, and a Conjecture of Fontaine and Mazur

REDUCIBLE PRINCIPAL SERIES REPRESENTATIONS, AND LANGLANDS PARAMETERS FOR REAL GROUPS. May 15, 2018 arxiv: v2 [math.

Geometric structure in the representation theory of p-adic groups II. Aubert, Anne-Marie and Baum, Paul and Plymen, Roger. MIMS EPrint: 2010.

Conditional base change for unitary groups. Michael Harris. Jean-Pierre Labesse. Introduction

THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE. David A. Vogan, Jr.

ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS SUPPORTED IN THE SIEGEL MAXIMAL PARABOLIC SUBGROUP

AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.

TRILINEAR FORMS AND TRIPLE PRODUCT EPSILON FACTORS WEE TECK GAN

U = 1 b. We fix the identification G a (F ) U sending b to ( 1 b

Langlands parameters and finite-dimensional representations

WHITTAKER MODELS AND THE INTEGRAL BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR GL n

TWO SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS OF METAPLECTIC GROUPS. Marko Tadić

A CLASSIFICATION OF IRREDUCIBLE ADMISSIBLE MOD p REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Galois groups with restricted ramification

SOME PROPERTIES OF CHARACTER SHEAVES. Anne-Marie Aubert. Dedicated to the memory of Olga Taussky-Todd. 1. Introduction.

An LMFDB perspective on motives David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

SMOOTH REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Local root numbers of elliptic curves over dyadic fields

Introduction to L-functions II: of Automorphic L-functions.

Maarten Solleveld IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525AJ Nijmegen, the Netherlands

NOTES ON MODULAR REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic GROUPS, AND THE LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem

Field Theory Qual Review

Reductive subgroup schemes of a parahoric group scheme

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Maximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields

What is the Langlands program all about?

Transcription:

Local Langlands correspondence and examples of ABPS conjecture Ahmed Moussaoui UPMC Paris VI - IMJ 23/08/203

Notation F non-archimedean local field : finite extension of Q p or F p ((t)) O F = {x F, v(x) 0}, ring of integers of F p F = {x F, v(x) > 0}, unique maximal ideal of O F k F = O F /p F F q, residual field of F (finite field) ϖ F O F uniformizer of F F separable algebraic closure of F

K/F finite extension ϖ F O K = ϖ e K O K,e ramification index of K/F k K /k F finite extension, f = [k K : k F ] residual degree of K/F K/F finite Galois extension, k K /k F is also Galois extension σ Gal(K/F), σ(o K ) = O K, σ(p K ) = p K I K/F Gal(K/F) Gal(k K /k F )

Definition An extension K/F is unramified if the ramification index e(k/f) = and k K /k F is separable. Theorem n,! F F n F unramified extension of degree n F n /F is Galois, k Fn F q n and Gal(F n /F) Gal(k Fn /k F ) φ n Gal(F n /F) (x x q ) Gal(k Fn /k F ) Φ n = φn, Φ n, Gal(F n /F) Z/nZ F ur = composite of all F n F ur /F is the unique maximal unramified extension of F Gal(F ur /F) lim Z/nZ = Ẑ n Φ F Gal(F ur /F), Φ F Fn = Φ n

Definition The absolute Galois group of F is Γ F = Gal(F/F) Γ F lim Gal(E/F) where E ranges over finite Galois extension such that F E F Topology on Γ F : Open neighborhood basis at the identity are Gal(F/K) with K/F finite extension Γ F is a compact Haussdorf profinite group

I F Gal(F/F) Gal(F ur /F)Ẑ 0 I F W F < Φ > ZZ 0 Definition The Weil group of F is the topological group, with underlying abstract group the inverse image in Γ F of < Φ >, such that : I F is an open subgroup of W F the topology on I F, as subspace of W F, coincides with its natural topology as subspace of Γ F

Let WF der = [W F, W F ] and WF ab = W F/WF der. Artin Reciprocity Map There is a canonical continuous group morphism with the following properties. a F : W F F a F induces a topological isomorphism W ab F F x W F is a geometric Frobenius, if and only if a F (x) is an uniformizer of F a F (I F ) = O F

The Artin Reciprocity Map induces a bijection between { irreducible representations of F } { admissible morphisms GL (F) GL (C) W F GL (C) } If T is a split torus over F, then { irreducible representations of T T GL (C) } { admissible morphisms W F T } (+ equality of L-functions) This is the local Langlands correspondence for GL() and for split tori.

For ψ : W F GL n (C) we can define a L-function by L(s, ψ) = det( ψ(φ) V I F q s ) Godement and Jacquet defined L-functions for the representations of GL n (F). For n = 2, for supercuspidal representations are for Steinberg representation (and their twist by character) involve one factor with q s for other involve two factors with q s

Definition The Weil-Deligne group is WD F = C W F where W F acts on C by wxw = w x for w W F, x C. A Langlands parameter for GL(n) is a continous morphism ψ : WD F GL n (C) such that the restriction to C is algebraic, the image of C consists of unipotent elements and the image of W F consists of semisimple elements. We can identify one Langlands parameter ψ to a pair (ρ, N) where ρ : W F GL n (C) is a continous morphism such that his image consists of semisimple elements and N gl n (C) is such that ρ(w)nρ(w) = w N for all w W F. ψ(z, w) = exp(zn)ρ(w), (z, w) WD F

( w /2 For w W F, let h w = w /2 ) SL 2 (C). There is an isomorphism ( between ) C and the subgroup G a of z SL 2 (C) of the matrices, z C. 0 The conjugation by h w in G a induce the same action as W F on C, and extend to SL 2 (C). We can consider the semidirect product SL 2 (C) W F with the product (x, w )(x 2, w 2 ) = (x h w x 2 h w, w w 2 ) This group is isomorphic to SL 2 (C) W F via the map (x, w) (xh w, w).

We denote W F = W F SL 2 (C). If a Langlands parameter is identified to (ρ, N), then it correspond ( ( )) to a morphism ψ : W F GL n(c) with ψ, = exp(n) and 0 ψ(w, h w ) = ρ(w).

Local Langlands correspondence (conjecture) Let G a split connected reductive group over F and Ĝ is Langlands dual. Let Π(G) the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of G and Φ(G) the set of equivalence classes of admissible morphisms for G. There is finite-to-one map rec : Π(G) Φ(G) with these properties π Π(G) is essentially square-integrable, if and only if, the image of W F by φ π : W F Ĝ is not contained in any proper Levi subgroup of Ĝ. π Π(G) is tempered, if and only if, the image of W F by φ π : W F Ĝ is bounded π Π(G), χ a character of F, then rec(π χ) = rec(π)χ. Equality of L-functions and ε-factors.

Let J =... and J = For M GL 4 (F), τ M = J t MJ. Let G = Sp 4 (F) = {g SL 4 (F) t gj g = J } and B = minimal parabolic subgroup of Sp 4 (F). There are three parabolic subgroups of Sp 4 (F) : B, P, Q with respective Lévi T, M, L..

t t T = 2 t 2, t i F, T (F ) 2 t {( ) } g M = τ g, g GL 2 (F), M GL 2 (F) t L = g, t F, g SL 2 (F), L GL (F) SL 2 (F) t

The Weyl group of G is W = N G (T)/T S 2 (Z/2Z) 2, generated by a =, b =

Action of W on T and on their irreducible representations w w (t, t 2 ) w (χ χ 2 ) e (t, t 2 ) χ χ 2 a (t 2, t ) χ 2 χ b (t, t2 ) χ2 ab (t2 ) χ 2 χ ba (t 2, t ) 2 χ aba (t 2) χ χ 2 bab (t2 ) χ 2 χ abab (t 2 ) χ χ2

Let χ a character of F such that χ 2 O F and χ(ϖ F ) =, ζ a character of F such that ζ 2 O F =, ζ OF and ζ (ϖ F ) =. We consider two inertial classes s = [T, χ ] and t = [T, χ ζ ]. The isotropy subgroup of s is the subgroup of elements w in W such that there exists an unramified character φ ψ(t), w (χ ) = (χ ) φ. For s and t we have W s = W t = {, b} and T s = T t = ψ(t) (C ) 2.

The extended quotient is T s /W s = T s /W s T b s /Z W s (b) Let (t, t 2 ) T s. We have b (t, t 2 ) = (t, t 2 ) (t, t2 ) = (t, t 2 ) t 2 = ±. Ts b /W s = { (b, (z, )), z C } { (b, (z, )), z C } Remark : It is the same extended quotient for s and t

Theorem (Sally, Tadic) Let ψ, ψ 2 two characters of F. Then ψ ψ 2 is reducible, if and only if ψ ± = ν ± ψ 2 ψ i = ν ± ψ i is order two ψ ζ = ψ T ζ + ψ Tζ 2, Tζ i tempered representation of SL 2 (F) (ζ character of F of order two). ψ ν has two subquotients : ψ SL2 and ψ St SL2

s = [T, χ ] point of T s /W s cocharacter constituant representation (e, (z, z 2 )) (, ) ψ χ ψ 2 ψ χ ψ 2 (e, (z, q )) (, ) ψχ SL2 ψχ ν (b, (z, )) (, τ 2 ) ψχ St SL2 (e, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T ε ψχ ε (b, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T ε 2 T s /W s = (T s /W s ) u0 (T s /W s ) ue (T s /W s ) u0 = T s /W s Ts b /W s, cocharacter h u0 (τ) = (, ) (T s /W s ) ue = Ts b+ /W s, cocharacter h ue (τ) = (, τ 2 ) Remark : (e, (z, )) and (b, (z, )) are in the same L-packet

t = [T, χ ζ ] point of T t /W t cocharacter constituant representation (e, (z, z 2 )) (, ) ψ χ ψ 2 ψ χ ψ 2 (e, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T ζ ψχ ζ (b, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T ζ 2 (e, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T εζ (b, (z, )) (, ) ψχ T εζ 2 ψχ εζ T t /W t = (T t /W t ) u0 (T t /W t ) ue (T t /W t ) u0 = T s /W s T b s /W s, cocharacter h u0 (τ) = (, ) (T t /W t ) ue = Remark : (e, (z, )) and (b, (z, )) are in the same L-packet, for (e, (z, )) and (b, (z, )) is the same

The Langlands dual group of Sp 4 (F) is SO 5 (C), with SO 5 (C) = {g SL 5 (C), t gjg = J} and the maximal torus z z 2 T = z 2 z, z i C (C ) 2 The Lie algebra of SO 5 (C) is y x 2 x 3 x 4 0 x 2 y 2 x 23 0 x 4 so 5 (C) = x 3 x 32 0 x 23 x 3, x ij, y i C x 4 0 x 32 y 2 x 2 0 x 4 x 3 x 2 y

The Langlands parameters for χ χ 2 is ρ(χ, χ 2 ) : W F T The χ (w) χ 2 (w) w χ 2 (w) χ (w) Langlands parameters for the irreducible subquotients of ψ χ ψ 2 are (ρ(ψ χ, ψ 2 ), 0), (ρ(ψ χ, ν), 0) and (ρ(ψ χ, ν), N) with 0 0 N = 0 0 0

The Langlands parameters are also the morphisms from W F to SO 5 (C). For (ρ(ψ χ, ν), N) the corresponding morphism is φ : W F T (ψ χ)(w) (w, s) S 3 (s) (ψ χ)(w) where S 3 is the irreducible representation of dimension 3 of SL 2 (C). ( ( )) τ τ 2 We have φ, = τ τ 2

For the irreducible subquotient of ψ χ ψ 2 ζ there are (ρ(ψ χ, ψ 2 ζ ), 0). We find in this way the cocharacters and the decomposition.

s = [T, χ ] point of T s /Ws cocharacter Langands parameter constituant representation (e, (z, z 2 )) (, ) (ψ χ, ψ 2 ) T ψ χ ψ 2 ψ χ ψ 2 (e, (z, q )) (, ) (ψχ, ψχ ν) T SL2 ψχ ν (ψ χ)(w) (b, (z, )) (, τ 2 ) S 3 (s) ψχ St (ψ χ)(w) SL2 (e, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, ψχ T ε) T ε ψχ ε (b, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, ψχ T ε) T 2 ε

t = [T, χ ζ ] point of T t /W t cocharacter Langands parameter constituant representation (e, (z, z 2 )) (, ) (ψ χ, ψ 2 ) T ψ χ ψ 2 ψ χ ψ 2 (e, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, ζ ) T ψχ T ζ ψχ ζ (b, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, ζ ) T (e, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, εζ ) T (b, (z, )) (, ) (ψχ, εζ ) T ψχ T ζ 2 ψχ T εζ ψχ T εζ 2 ψχ εζ

Thank you for your attention.