Measurement of 37 Ar to support technology for On-site Inspection under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

Similar documents
Measurement of Radioxenon and Argon-37 Released into a Nuclear Explosion Cavity for Development and Evaluation of OSI Field Sampling Methods

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies AUTOMATED QA/QC CHECK

Single Channel Beta-Gamma Coincidence Detection of Radioactive Xenon Using Digital Pulse Shape Analysis of Phoswich Detector Signals

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies DESIGN OF A PHOSWICH WELL DETECTOR FOR RADIOXENON MONITORING

DIGITAL PULSE SHAPE ANALYSIS WITH PHOSWICH DETECTORS TO SIMPLIFY COINCIDENCE MEASUREMENTS OF RADIOACTIVE XENON

MOBILE SAMPLING AND MEASURING COMPLEX SLARS (Subsoil Liquefied ARgon Scintillations) Sergei Pakhomov

Select Assay Capabilities at PNNL

Measurement of 39 Ar in Underground Argon for Dark Matter Experiments

arxiv:physics/ v1 3 Aug 2006

Understanding the Radionuclide Source Term for Underground Nuclear Explosions A review of recent research

Introduction to Environmental Measurement Techniques Radioactivity. Dana Pittauer 1of 48

A gamma-gamma coincidence spectrometer for nuclear attribution and safeguard applications

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies. IMPROVED β-γ COINCIDENCE DETECTOR FOR RADIOXENON DETECTION

2010 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 29 Jun 2011

THE DOE AUTOMATED RADIOXENON SAMPLER-ANALYZER (ARSA) BETA-GAMMA COINCIDENCE SPECTROMETER DATA ANALYZER

Radionuclide Monitoring BY ANDERS RINGBOM AND HARRY MILEY

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF RADIOXENON

The CoGeNT Dark Matter experiment

Development of a Radioxenon Detection System Using CdZnTe, Array of SiPMs, and a Plastic Scintillator

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies AUTOMATED QA/QC CHECK

Mass of the electron m 0

Studies of the XENON100 Electromagnetic Background

Germanium Detectors in Homeland Security at PNNL

Radioactivity and Ionizing Radiation

Status of the GERDA experiment

Study well-shaped germanium detectors for lowbackground

He-3 Neutron Detectors

Coincidence gamma-ray spectrometry

Gamma Spectroscopy. References: Objectives:

Background Free Search for 0 Decay of 76Ge with GERDA

1220 QUANTULUS The Ultra Low Level Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer

David Reyna Belkis Cabrera-Palmer AAP2010, Japan

Neutron Detector Gamma Insensitivity Criteria

Scintillation Detector

Overview of Current Radioxenon Research

Detection and measurement of gamma-radiation by gammaspectroscopy

Rivelazione di neutrini solari - Borexino Lino Miramonti 6 Giugno 2006 Gran Sasso

Nuclear Lifetimes. = (Eq. 1) (Eq. 2)

UCLA Dark Matter 2014 Symposium. Origins and Distributions of the Backgrounds. 15 min

Non-Destructive Assay Applications Using Temperature-Stabilized Large Volume CeBr Detectors 14277

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

Distinguishing fissions of 232 Th, 237 Np and 238 U with beta-delayed gamma rays

national security, nonproliferation, defense, border security, and homeland security applications.

Fundamentals of Radionuclide Metrology

Design, Construction, Operation, and Simulation of a Radioactivity Assay Chamber

Ultra-Low Background Measurement Capabilities At SNOLAB

Figure 1. Decay Scheme for 60Co

Majorana Double Beta Decay Search Project (Majorana Demonstrator)

Nuclear Physics Laboratory. Gamma spectroscopy with scintillation detectors. M. Makek Faculty of Science Department of Physics

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 8 Feb 2013

Gamma and X-Ray Detection

Ultra-Low Background Counting and Assay Studies At SNOLAB

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

SYSTEM OF MONITORING THE ATMOSPHERICAL RADON WITH AN IONIZATION CHAMBER DETECTOR TYPE IN PULSE MODE

LOW ENERGY SOLAR NEUTRINOS WITH BOREXINO. Lea Di Noto on behalf of the Borexino collaboration

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

Quality Assurance. Purity control. Polycrystalline Ingots

SCI-O11. Design of a Compton Spectrometer Experiment for Studying Electron Response of a Scintillator

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Charge readout and double phase

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Nuclear Physics Lab I: Geiger-Müller Counter and Nuclear Counting Statistics

ORTEC AN34 Experiment 10 Compton Scattering

Chapter Seven (Nuclear Detectors)

Alpha-Gamma discrimination by Pulse Shape in LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce

Preparatory experiments for cold-neutron induced fission studies at IKI

The IAEA-CU world wide open proficiency test on the determination of radionuclides in soil, spinach and water

Scintillation Detectors

NUCL 3000/5030 Laboratory 2 Fall 2013

Gamma background measurements in the Boulby Underground Laboratory

AUTOMATIC AND INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR BETA- GAMMA COINCIDENCE SYSTEMS USED IN CTBT MONITORING

Evaluation of Nondestructive Assay Characterization Methods for Pipe- Over-Pack Containers

Gamma Spectroscopy. Calligaris Luca Massironi Andrea Presotto Luca. Academic Year 2006/2007

GERDA experiment A search for neutrinoless double beta decay. Roberto Santorelli (Physik-Institut der Universität Zürich)

PARAMETERISATION OF FISSION NEUTRON SPECTRA (TRIGA REACTOR) FOR NEUTRON ACTIVATION WITHOUT THE USED OF STANDARD

Low Background Experiments and Material Assay. Tessa Johnson NSSC Summer School July 2016

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v2 21 Jul 2005

A Prototype of LaBr3:Ce in situ Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Marine Environmental Monitoring

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

1 of :32

X-ray ionization yields and energy spectra in liquid argon

ɣ-radiochromatography

New Scintillators for the Border Monitoring Equipment

COUNT RATE EFFECTS ON PEAK SHAPE AND THROUGHPUT IN DIGITAL AND ANALOG GAMMA RAY SPECTROMETRY

THE DOE AUTOMATED RADIOXENON SAMPLER-ANALYZER (ARSA) BETA-GAMMA COINCIDENCE SPECTROMETER DATA ANALYZER

A TER. Observation of Xe with the PNNL ARSA System PNNL UC-7 13

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

Radionuclide Imaging MII Detection of Nuclear Emission

Gamma-ray Spectroscopy with LaBr 3 :Ce Scintillator Readout by a Silicon Drift Detector

Background Modeling and Materials Screening for the LUX and LZ Detectors. David Malling Brown University LUX Collaboration AARM Meeting February 2011

The JUNO veto detector system. Haoqi Lu Institute of High Energy physics (On Behalf of the JUNO Collaboration) TIPP2017, May22-26,Beijing

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)074. Darkside Status and Prospects. Charles Jeff Martoff Temple University

Background optimization for a new spherical gas detector for very light WIMP detection

Cherenkov Detector. Cosmic Rays Cherenkov Detector. Lodovico Lappetito. CherenkovDetector_ENG - 28/04/2016 Pag. 1

A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF COMPTON SUPPRESSION FOR NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS. Joshua Frye Adviser Chris Grant 8/24/2012 ABSTRACT

Basic hands-on gamma calibration for low activity environmental levels

Understanding the response of LXe to electronic and nuclear recoils at low energies

Transcription:

1 Measurement of Ar to support technology for On-site Inspection under the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty C.E. Aalseth, A.R. Day, D.A. Haas, E.W. Hoppe, B.J. Hyronimus, M.E. Keillor, E.K. Mace, J.L. Orrell, * A. Seifert, V.T. Woods Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard., Richland, WA 99352, USA Dates: Received date here; revised date here; accepted date here Abstract On-Site Inspection (OSI) is a key component of the verification regime for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Measurements of radionuclide isotopes created by an underground nuclear explosion are a valuable signature of a Treaty violation. Argon- is produced from neutron interaction with calcium in soil, 40 Ca(n,α) Ar. For OSI, the 35-day halflife of Ar provides both high specific activity and sufficient time for completion of an inspection before decay limits sensitivity. This paper presents a low-background internal-source gas proportional counter with an Ar measurement sensitivity level equivalent to 45.1 mbq/scm in whole air. Keywords: Nuclear weapons monitoring; CTBT On-site Inspection; Radioactive argon isotopes; Low energy threshold proportional counter. PACS: 29.40.Cs, 23.40.-s, 28.70.+y 1. Introduction Nuclear reaction products are the ultimate confirmatory signatures an explosion was nuclear in nature, with chemically inert noble gases being the most likely to escape into the environment. Radioxenon collection and analysis is a standard technique used to monitor for evidence of nuclear detonations. More than fifty days past an underground nuclear detonation, the Ar signature should be stronger than the radioxenon signature. This prediction was verified during Project Gasbuggy, a 27-kt underground test. Gas samples from a well drilled near the cavity showed the initial activity was on the order of 75-200 MBq per standard cubic meter (MBq/SCM) air [1]. The measurement of Ar is well understood but challenging, typically employing low-background * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-509-6-4361; fax: +1-509-6-3868; e-mail: john.orrell@pnl.gov. proportional counters where the Ar gas is included in 90% argon / % methane (P) counting gas. The 35-day half-life of Ar makes it amenable to collection, recovery, and measurement after a nuclear detonation. The challenge resides in measuring the residual X-rays and/or Auger electrons from the ground-to-ground state electron capture decay of Ar to Cl. The atomic shell cascade process results in an energy peak signature in a proportional counter at 2.822 kev [2]. The proportional counter must therefore have both a low energy threshold (< 1 kev) as well as a low intrinsic radioactive background. In the context of On-Site Inspection (OSI) under the auspices of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), the MARDS system [3] was developed to separate argon from whole air and measure for Ar activity. A lowest background rate of 0.16 counts/second under the Ar peak was reported for the MARDS proportional counter [3]. This paper presents initial development of an ultra-

2 low-background proportional counter for measurement of Ar relevant to CTBT OSI. 2. Production and transfer of radioargon Two methods were considered for generating an Ar sample. The first method is the 40 Ca(n,α) Ar process where neutrons are supplied by a nuclear reactor. This is the same (n,α) reaction process that produces Ar from calcium in rock and soil surrounding an underground nuclear detonation. The second method is irradiation of natural argon with reactor neutrons. The second method was selected based upon the authors familiarity with irradiation and handling of noble gases. A 1 cm 3 volume of commercial high purity natural argon was irradiated with neutrons at an in-core position in the University of Texas at Austin TRIGA reactor. Figure 1 shows an example calculation of the radioargon isotope s activity levels versus time after a 3600 second irradiation. For the sample produced, the actual irradiation time was ~5400 seconds. The 41 Ar 1294-keV γ-ray (99.1% intensity) provides a convenient means for estimating the Ar activity. Approximately 1 day after irradiation, the argon was transferred into a stainless steel 50 cm 3 shipping-container and counted at a standoff distance using a high purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectrometer with geometric detection efficiency measured by an 152 Eu standard. This determined the 41 Ar activity was 12.40±0.17 MBq at the end of the irradiation period. The uncertainty (1.4%) is due primarily to the counting statistics of the 41 Ar 1294- kev γ-ray peak. The Ar activity is determined through a calculated ratio of the production cross sections of 40 Ar(n,γ) 41 Ar to 36 Ar(n,γ) Ar. This ratio is uncertain at the % level due to the knowledge of the neutron spectrum at the location of the irradiation vessel in the reactor, resulting in a calculated initial Ar activity of 1.31±0.13 kbq. After transport to PNNL, a 1.34±0.18 Bq aliquot of gas was loaded from the shipping-container into an ultra-lowbackground proportional counter (ULBPC). The ULBPC was then back-filled to 1516 Torr with P counting gas. Prior to loading the aliquot of gas into the ULBPC (~7 days after irradiation), the shipping container was Fig. 1. Calculated activity of radioargon isotopes from a 3600 second in-core neutron irradiation of 1 cm 3 of natural argon gas. counted for ~4 days on a low-background HPGe detector. No γ-ray peaks were found beyond those attributed to ubiquitous environmental radioisotopes. 3. Proportional counter measurement and analysis The detector used is the product of an effort to produce a low-background, physically robust gas proportional counter for applications like radon emanation measurements, groundwater tritium, and Ar [4]. The ultra-low-background proportional counter (ULBPC) was designed to handle a wider range of gas volumes, have higher efficiency, and be easier to assemble than current ultra-low background solutions. The materials chosen for the detector were specifically selected for their proven radiopurity. High-purity electroformed copper offers excellent radiopurity along with good electrical, thermal, and vacuum properties. The ULBPC s body is an electroformed copper cylinder roughly 9 in length having a ~0.1 L internal volume. The plastic CPTFE, which forms the gas seal and provides high voltage insulation, was chosen for its very low gas permeability and reasonable measured background level. The ULBPC s anode wire is 0.001-inchdiameter niobium, a radiopure material used successfully in the IGEX experiment [5]. The ULBPC was operated in an aboveground lead shield consisting of 2, 4, and 8 thick walls (top, sides, and bottom, respectively). Two 2 polyvinyl toluene (PVT) cosmic ray veto panels were placed above and below the lead shield, each having 33 14 are 56 19 footprints, respectively. A CAEN A1833P supplied high voltage to the veto panel photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and the ULBPC. The bottom veto panel s single Saint- Gobain 200-5888 PMT was operated at 945 V. The

PVT Anticosmic Panels PVT11 Entries 193557 Mean 2.288e+04 RMS 8494 Entries 8695 Mean 1.97 RMS 2.126 3 ADC Channels / Second 8 Counts / 2-2 -3-4 -5-6 Livetime 306445.7 s PVT Anti-cosmic Panels (2 thick) Top Panel Rate 0.43 Hz Bottom Panel Rate 0.63 Hz 0 000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Energy (ADC Channel) Fig. 2. Un-scaled energy spectra from the cosmic ray veto panels when triggered in coincidence with the proportional counter. top veto panel had two Saint-Gobain 200-5887 PMTs operated at 850 V and 890 V. PMT high voltage was chosen such that an oscilloscope showed the signal pulse output from each PMT were all roughly matched in gain. Two Canberra 2005 preamplifiers (low-gain setting) amplified the PMT s signal output. The top veto panel s PMT outputs were combined (BNC T-connector) prior to entering the preamplifier, and then followed by a 50-Ohm signal attenuator. The ULBPC was operated at +20 V with a Canberra 2006 preamplifier set for high-gain. The ULBPC and veto panels signals were acquired using a XIA PIXIE-4 waveform-digitizing card. Minimum digital gains on the PIXIE-4 card input channels resulted in a broad range of energy deposition sensitivity to cosmic rays in the veto panels (Fig. 2) and an energy range of 0-20 kev in the ULBPC (Fig. 3). Pulse waveforms from the three input channels were digitized and stored for offline analysis whenever a pulse trigger was detected on the ULBPC channel. For energy calibration, γ-rays from ~80 µci of 241 Am interact in the copper walls of the ULBPC resulting in emission of K-shell X-rays. The five highest intensity Cu K-shell X-rays [6] have an intensity weighted mean energy of 8.133 kev. To obtain a two point linear energy scale fit, the Ar peak at 2.822 kev [2] is also used. Over a range of high voltage values from +1500 V to +20 V, the full width half maximum energy resolution of the Cu K-shell X-ray peak varied by less than 1%; the +20 V bias voltage for the ULBPC was selected to provide gas gain for detection of lower energy events. Counts / 0.1 kev / Second -2-3 -4-5 -6 No Veto Rate 0.695 Hz Pulse Shape Events Rate 0.028 Hz Livetime 306445.7 s Post-Cosmic Veto Rate 0.042 Hz 0 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 Energy (kev) Fig. 3. Proportional counter background spectra before and after application of a cosmic ray veto. Also shown is the spectrum of electronic noise events removed via a pulse shape risetime cut. Prior to the Ar load, the background of the ULBPC was studied (Fig. 3). A population of fastrising electronic-noise pulses was identified and removed by a pulse shape analysis requiring the %- 90% risetime of the pulse be less than 798 ns. The remaining No Veto events in Fig. 3 compose the full ULBPC background. Requiring neither veto panel has fired reduces the ULBPC background by ~16.5 times. The broad peak of the ULBPC background spectra seem consist with an estimation of ~9.5 kev deposited by minimum ionizing muons passing through the count gas volume. The similar shape of the two ULBPC background spectra in Fig. 3 is indicative of a remaining predominance of cosmic ray induced background events as well as insensitivity to ubiquitous γ-ray backgrounds. The former conclusion is expected considering the limited coverage provided by the two veto panels. Figure 4 shows the ULBPC s spectra. Before the Ar sample load, the peak at 2.8 kev is absent. The first and the last data collection runs show the decay of the intensity of the peak located at 2.8 kev. The inset to Fig. 4 shows the continuum-subtracted rate of events in the 2.8 kev peak as a function of time since the reactor irradiation. Despite the gap in measurements from days 43 to 55, an exponential fit estimates a half-life of 35.6±0.3 days, in reasonable agreement with the standardized [6] 35.04±0.04 day half-life for Ar. Using the fit results for the half-life decay value, an estimate of 1.36±0.02 counts/seconds would have been found in the Ar peak at the time of the ULBPC load. Accounting for the 90.2% branch to

ULBPC w/ Ar Load - Cosmic Veto - CalOnly earvetocalonly Entries 94464 Mean 8.393 RMS 3.711 4 Counts / 0.1 kev / Second 0.4 0.3 0.2 the K-shell for the Ar decay one arrives at an activity estimate of 1.50±0.02 Bq based on the count rate measured beneath the 2.8 kev peak. 4. Discussion Cu K-shell X-rays Ar K-shell X-ray escape Ar 1.2 Graph 40 50 60 70 Time (Days) In relation to CTBT/OSI, the quantity of interest is the sensitivity level at which a detector can measure the presence of Ar in whole air. Once the argon gas fraction is separated from the initial whole air volume, the proportional counter is in essence performing an Ar specific activity measurement. Applying the methods of Currie [7] to the presently described ULBPC, the sensitivity for a hypothetical measurement for the presence of Ar in argon extracted from whole air is determined as follows. First, a region of interest (ROI) is defined in the energy spectrum of the ULBPC from 2.0 3.6 kev. This ROI corresponds to ±2.6 times the Ar peak s Gaussian width (σ = 0.3 kev) resulting in ~99% coverage of the events in a Ar peak. The integral rate of background events after application of the risetime cut and cosmic-ray veto (see Fig. 2) is 0.003 counts/second. A measurement count time of hours is assumed resulting in a mean number of background counts µ B = 8 in the ROI. False positive and false negative errors are set at % (i.e. α = 0. and β = 0.). As defined by Currie [7], the L C = 121 counts in the ROI during the -hour count duration. The corresponding L D = 136.4 counts in the 1 0.8 0.6 Ar Peak Rate (Hz) fit t 1/2 = 35.6 ± 0.3 0.1 Before Ar Load First Ar Run Last Ar Run 0.0 0 5 15 20 Energy (kev) Fig. 4. Proportional counter energy spectra. When the counter was loaded with the Ar sample, the 241 Am calibration source was reoriented resulting in a change in the intensity of the Cu K-shell X- ray peak. Inset shows the half-life decay of the Ar peak intensity. ROI during the -hour count duration. Thus to satisfy the desired false positive and false negative rates (i.e. α and β values of %), L D µ B = 28.4 counts above the mean background rate are required in the ROI during the -hour count duration to conclude Ar has been detected. To scale this C 1 = 1 f Ar 1 ε V 3 mbq 3 L pc R K -shell T count Bq SCM number to a measurement of Ar specific activity in whole air, a constant is defined as with an assumed proportional counter measurement efficiency of ε = 90% for the K-shell branch following Ar decay, the fraction of argon gas in whole air f Ar = 0.93%, the maximum volume of argon gas in a 2 atmosphere load of the proportional counter V pc = 0.2 L, the branching ratio to the K-shell after Ar decay R K-shell = 90.2% [2], and a measurement count time of T count = 36000 seconds. Thus, the whole-air specific activity (i.e. MDC = minimum detectable concentration) for Ar corresponding to each of Currie s detection limits is: (L C µ B ) C 1 = 20.7 mbq/scm (L D µ B ) C 1 = 45.1 mbq/scm This result is interesting because sub-surface measurements [8] have shown naturally occurring background levels of Ar are present at the -0 mbq/scm level. Finally, note this calculation assumes argon gas is extracted from an unlimited quantity of whole air. In other words, as much whole air is processed as is needed to produce the 0.2 L of argon gas needed to fill the proportional counter. If argon gas extraction efficiency from whole air is estimated as 40%, the above measurement with the quoted specific activity sensitivity could be made from a 54 L sample of whole air. Acknowledgments The authors thank Steven R. Biegalski, University of Texas at Austin, for preparing the Ar samples. This research was supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.

5 References [1] C. F. Smith, Jr., UCRL-50635, Project Gasbuggy Gas Quality Analysis and Evaluation Program Tabulation of Radiochemical and Chemical Analytical Results. [2] V. I. Barsanov et al., Phys. Atom. Nucl. 70 (2007) 300 3. [3] Y.-C. Xiang et al., Acta Physica Sinica, 57 (2008) 784-789. [4] C.E. Aalseth et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 282 (2009) 233-2. [5] C.E. Aalseth et al., Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 092007. [6] R.B. Firestone et al., Table of Isotopes, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1996). [7] L.A. Currie, Anal. Chem. 40 (1968) 586-593. [8] R. Purtschert et al., Proceedings of the 4 th Mini Conference on Noble Gases in the Hydrosphere and in Natural Gas Reservoirs, (2007) Potsdam, Germany.