Rocket Propulsion Basics Thrust

Similar documents
Basic Ascent Performance Analyses

Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design

AAE SOLID ROCKET PROPULSION (SRP) SYSTEMS

Rocket Dynamics. Forces on the Rocket

Rocket Science 102 : Energy Analysis, Available vs Required

IV. Rocket Propulsion Systems. A. Overview

Propulsion and Energy Systems. Kimiya KOMURASAKI, Professor, Dept. Aeronautics & Astronautics, The University of Tokyo

SOLAR ROCKET PROPULSION Ground and Space Technology Demonstration. Dr. Michael Holmes, AFRL/PRSS

Rocket Propulsion Overview

Mass Estimating Relationships MARYLAND. Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

PROPULSIONE SPAZIALE. Chemical Rocket Propellant Performance Analysis

Technology of Rocket

A little more about costing Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

Rocket Propulsion. Combustion chamber Throat Nozzle

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

Comparison of Return to Launch Site Options for a Reusable Booster Stage

Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Solid rocket motors Liquid rocket engines. Hybrid rocket engines Auxiliary propulsion systems

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

SOLUTIONS MANUAL. ROCKET PROPULSION ELEMENTS, 8 th EDITION. By George P. Sutton and Oscar Biblarz. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Ballistic Entry ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

Rockets, Missiles, and Spacecrafts

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: Project Diana U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE Launch and Entry Vehicle Design

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

11.1 Survey of Spacecraft Propulsion Systems

Applied Thermodynamics - II

Study of Required Thrust Profile Determination of a Three Stages Small Launch Vehicle

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

Departures from Ideal Performance for Conical Nozzles and Bell Nozzles, Straight-Cut Throats and Rounded Throats Charles E. Rogers

Unified Propulsion Quiz May 7, 2004

Satellite Engineering

A trendsetting Micro-Launcher for Europe

The motion of a Rocket

MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Propulsion Systems Design MARYLAND. Rocket engine basics Survey of the technologies Propellant feed systems Propulsion systems design

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

Gravity Turn Concept. Curvilinear Coordinate System Gravity Turn Manoeuvre concept Solutions for Constant Pitch Rate

Engineering Sciences and Technology. Trip to Mars

Propulsion Systems Design

Rocket Performance MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Rocket Performance. ENAE 483/788D - Principles of Space Systems Design

Chapter 7 Rocket Propulsion Physics

Solar Thermal Propulsion

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

Satellite Orbital Maneuvers and Transfers. Dr Ugur GUVEN

Investigation of Combined Airbreathing/Rocket. Air Launch of Micro-Satellites from a Combat Aircraft

High Speed Propulsion

V Requirements for a Gun Assisted Launch to Circular Orbit

Lesson 7. Luis Anchordoqui. Physics 168. Tuesday, October 10, 17

Bifrost: A 4 th Generation Launch Architecture Concept

High-Power Rocketry. Calculating the motion of a rocket for purely vertical flight.

PROBLEM SCORE Problem 1 (30 Pts) Problem 2 (30 Pts) Choose Problem #2 or #3! Problem 4 (40 Pts) TOTAL (100 Pts)

Propulsion Systems Design

Homework 2, part 2! ii) Calculate and plot design spike contour,

Some Questions We ll Address Today

Propulsion Technology Assessment: Science and Enabling Technologies to Explore the Interstellar Medium

Design And Analysis Of Thrust Chamber Of A Cryogenic Rocket Engine S. Senthilkumar 1, Dr. P. Maniiarasan 2,Christy Oomman Jacob 2, T.

Rocket Thermodynamics

Nuclear Thermal Rockets Lecture 24 G. L. Kulcinski March 22, Rawlings-SAIC

Parametric Design MARYLAND. The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Mission to Mars. MAE 598: Design Optimization Final Project. By: Trevor Slawson, Jenna Lynch, Adrian Maranon, and Matt Catlett

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

AAE 251 Formulas. Standard Atmosphere. Compiled Fall 2016 by Nicholas D. Turo-Shields, student at Purdue University. Gradient Layer.

ASTRIUM. Minimum-time problem resolution under constraints for low-thrust stage trajectory computation. Nathalie DELATTRE ASTRIUM Space Transportation

Lunar Orbit Propellant Transfer

Final Examination 2015

CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

IAC-13,C4,P,44.p1,x17254 THE DYNAMIC OPERATON OF A HIGH Q EMDRIVE MICROWAVE THRUSTER. Roger Shawyer C.Eng. MIET. FRAeS. SPR Ltd UK

MARYLAND. The Design Process Regression Analysis Level I Design Example: UMd Exploration Initiative U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Focused Solar Ablation: A Nanosat-Based Method for Active Removal of Space Debris

Contents. Preface... xvii

IAC-16.A Jason A. Reiter a *, David B. Spencer b

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide SECTION 2. LV Performance

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Learn From The Proven Best!

3. Write a detailed note on the following thrust vector control methods:

Powered Space Flight

Concurrent Trajectory and Vehicle Optimization for an Orbit Transfer. Christine Taylor May 5, 2004

Appendix Q Launch Debris and Staging Impact Locations

A COMPARISON OF NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKETS WITH TRADITIONAL CHEMICAL ROCKETS FOR SPACE TRANSPORT. Joshua T. Hanes

Paper Session I-B - Nuclear Thermal Rocket Propulsion Application to Mars Missions

Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

What is the Optimum Engine Thrust Profile?

Problem Set #2 (Orbit and Propulsion Subsystems)

ANALYSIS FOR POSSIBILITY TO USE SPACE PLATFORM WITH ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM IN COMBINATION WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE FOR AIR LAUNCH

Seminar 3! Precursors to Space Flight! Orbital Motion!

4.0 Detailed Design g Payload Vehicle Overview

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

Design and Performance Characteristics of a Rocket Using Potassium Nitrate and Sucrose as Propellants

Electric Propulsion Survey: outlook on present and near future technologies / perspectives. by Ing. Giovanni Matticari

AMSAT Phase IV Propulsion and Attitude Control Systems Conceptual Design Doug May Thiokol Corporation

Work. explode. Through centuries of trial and error, rockets became more reliable. However, real advancements in rocketry depended upon a

Power, Propulsion and Thermal Design Project. Jesse Cummings Shimon Gewirtz Siddharth Parachuru Dennis Sanchez Alexander Slafkosky

Ulrich Walter. Astronautics. The Physics of Space Flight. 2nd, Enlarged and Improved Edition

Rocket Propulsion Prof. K. Ramamurthi Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

The Design Process Level I Design Example: Low-Cost Lunar Exploration Amplification on Initial Concept Review

Tim Martin Spacecraft Engineer, Propulsion Lead, Juno. Chapter 7 Rocket Propulsion Physics

Concept: Propulsion. Narayanan Komerath. Mach nmber, 1-D analysis, Thermodynamic efficiency, Propulsive efficiency, thrust,

Transcription:

Rockets 101: A Quick Primer on Propulsion & Launch Vehicle Technologies Steve Heister, Professor School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Purdue University Presentation to AFSAB, 13 January, 2010 Rocket Propulsion Basics Thrust The thrust (F) of a rocket propulsion device can be related to conditions in the combustion chamber and at the nozzle exit: F = mv ɺ + ( p p ) A Jet Thrust e e a e Pressure Thrust The Specific Impulse, Isp, is the gas mileage of a rocket propulsion system as it measures the propellant flowrate required to attain a certain thrust level: F Ae Isp = = ve/ g ( pe pa ) mg ɺ + mg ɺ System Typical Isp, sec Solid Rocket Motor 150-350 Liquid Rocket Engine 300-460 Hybrid Rocket Engine 300-350 Nuclear Thermal Engine 800-1000 Arcjet 400-1500 The nozzle exit velocity is determined from a Ion 1000-10,000 balance of thermal energy in combustion chamber and kinetic energy at the nozzle exit: 2 2γ RuTc ( 1)/ ve = [1 ( pe / p ) γ γ c ] M( γ 1) Since high Ve gives us high Isp, we can see we want propellants with large T c / M 1

Rocket Propulsion Basics - Weights The propellant mass fraction, λ, measures the structural efficiency of the system Mp λ = Mp + Mi M pl M p = M i = Useful propellant (that which is burned to provide acceleration in desired direction.) Sum of all inert masses associated with the propulsion system. Includes engines, tanks, pumps, lines, reactors, pressurant bottles, gas generators, insulation, etc. M p The best possible design in this sense would be a consumable rocket made entirely from propellant (λ=1) M i In general, λ increases with system size due to structural efficiency Mass Fractions for Several Launch Vehicle Stages Mass fractions increase with system size In general, SRMs have higher mass fractions than liquid stages 2

System Trades Both Isp and λ Matter The best system would have both high Isp and high λ. Unfortunately, these items are somewhat mutually exclusive Hot propellants give good Isp but require additional insulation (lowers λ). Large nozzle gives good Isp but reduces λ. High pressures give better Isp but require thicker-walled structures. Our consumable rocket would give high λ but lousy Isp. The Rocket (or Tsiolkovsky) Equation m(t) v(t) F(t) m g = Weight D = Drag (atmospheric) Newton s 2 nd Law F D mg = ma = dv m dt Using definition of Isp, juggling a bit, can integrate this equation to give the velocity gain, v: t b D v = g Isp ln ( Mo / M f ) dt g t b actual m velocity gain imparted 0 gravity or vel. gain by the propulsion system drag loss " g t" loss sensed by the payload This equation is the fundamental expression used in Rocket Design. It links mission requirements v, propulsion system performance Isp, and vehicle masses (Mo/Mf). To attain a low earth orbit, we need a v of about 25,000 f/s, but drag and gravity losses are near 5000 f/s so our propulsion system must provide 30,000 f/s velocity change! 3

Determining Propellant Required (Mp) for Given Mission Rearranging the rocket equation, we can solve for the v that must be imparted by the propulsion system: ( ) v = v + v + v = g Isp ln M / M Solving for the Mass Ratio, MR: MR = exp( v / g Isp ) = M / M id Drag grav o f id o f Propellant Required to Accelerate a 1 lb Payload, λ =0.9 And since Mo=Mpl+Mp/ λ., Mf=Mpl+Mi we can write: MR 1 M p = M pl MR ( MR 1) / λ Staging Multiple stages permits us to drop some inert mass midway through the process Allows higher v missions such as space access at the expense of development of more stages Results from detailed sizing studies generally look like this: Gross Liftoff Weight (GLOW) 1 stage 2 stages 3 stages 1 Stage Optimal 2 Stages Optimal 3 Stages Optimal V 4

Typical Ascent Sequence to High Orbits Delta II Launch h V Vehicle le Payload fairing (4 min; 74 mi) Stage 1 & Stage 2 (5 min; 89 mi) Apogee Burn 113-sec duration No. 2 (6 hr 28 min; 22,000 mi) Standard fairing cutoff No. 2 Stage 2 shutdown (9 min; 105 mi) Elliptical transfer orbit Stage 2 (9 min 9 sec; 105 mi) Satellite GPS Satellite Satellite orientation and deployment LEO Parking orbit cutoff No. 1 No. 1 (1 hr 9 min; 120 mi) Perigee Burn 147-sec duration Stage 1 (2 min; 28-mi high) Solid rocket (2 min, 9 sec; 32-mi high) Interstage Second stage Third stage Stage 0 TITAN IV/IUS Delta II THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION Launch Vehicle Sizing, an Example Consider a two-stage launch vehicle with the following attributes: Stg 1: LOX/RP-1, λ=0.91, Isp=300 sec. Stg 2: LOX/LH2, λ=0.89, Isp=450 sec. Vehicle is to deliver 50,000 lbf to LEO with ideal V of 30,000 f/s Assume equal V splits (15,000 f/s each) From Eq *, get Mp1=1074, Mp2=117 Klbf., GLOW=1362 Klbf A frightening (and typical) notion: Mpl is only 3.7% of GLOW MR 1 M p = M pl Eq. * MR ( MR 1) / λ 5

Understanding the sensitivities Can conduct differential analysis (or construct a set of partial derivatives) to assess the sensitivity of the design to changes in parameters Payload losses assuming a 1% decrease in λ or Isp: 1% Drop in % Loss in Payload % Change in Inert Mass λ1 4.5 12 λ2 3.0 10 Isp1 2.0 ---- Isp2 2.0 ---- Questions/Acknowledgements 6