PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Study of Aspect Ratio Effects on Kinetic MHD Instabilities in NSTX and DIII-D

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

GA A27806 TURBULENCE BEHAVIOR AND TRANSPORT RESPONSE APPROACHING BURNING PLASMA RELEVANT PARAMETERS

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

GA A23713 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D

Parametric Instabilities in Laser/Matter Interaction: From Noise Levels to Relativistic Regimes

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Observation of Energetic Particle Driven Modes Relevant to Advanced Tokamak Regimes

GA A23977 DETAILED MEASUREMENTS OF ECCD EFFICIENCY ON DIII D FOR COMPARISON WITH THEORY

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

C.K. Phillips, et ai.

GA A27235 EULERIAN SIMULATIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL FLOWS AND TRANSPORT IN THE TOKAMAK PLASMA EDGE AND OUTER CORE

GA A24016 PHYSICS OF OFF-AXIS ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE

Simulation of Double-Null Divertor Plasmas with the UEDGE Code

UNDERSTANDING TRANSPORT THROUGH DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETER SCALING EXPERIMENTS

GA A25410 DISRUPTION CHARACTERIZATION AND DATABASE ACTIVITIES FOR ITER

GA A24166 SUPER-INTENSE QUASI-NEUTRAL PROTON BEAMS INTERACTING WITH PLASMA: A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

GA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Role of Flow Shear in Enhanced Core Confinement

GA A26686 FAST ION EFFECTS DURING TEST BLANKET MODULE SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS IN DIII-D

GA A27805 EXPANDING THE PHYSICS BASIS OF THE BASELINE Q=10 SCENRAIO TOWARD ITER CONDITIONS

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

GA A THERMAL ION ORBIT LOSS AND RADIAL ELECTRIC FIELD IN DIII-D by J.S. degrassie, J.A. BOEDO, B.A. GRIERSON, and R.J.

RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENT-THEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER

SciDAC CENTER FOR SIMULATION OF WAVE-PLASMA INTERACTIONS

STABILIZATION OF m=2/n=1 TEARING MODES BY ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE IN THE DIII D TOKAMAK

GA A26684 DISRUPTION, HALO CURRENT AND RAPID SHUTDOWN DATABASE ACTIVITIES FOR ITER

Improved Plasma Confinement by Ion Bernstein Waves (IBWs) Interacting with Ions in JET (Joint European Torus)

GA A26057 DEMONSTRATION OF ITER OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS ON DIII-D

Modeling of MHD Equilibria and Current Profile Evolution during the ERS Mode in TFTR

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

IMPACT OF EDGE CURRENT DENSITY AND PRESSURE GRADIENT ON THE STABILITY OF DIII-D HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCHARGES

PREDICTIVE MODELING OF PLASMA HALO EVOLUTION IN POST-THERMAL QUENCH DISRUPTING PLASMAS

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

Generation of Plasma Rotation in a Tokamak by Ion-Cyclotron Absorption of Fast Alfven Waves

GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

Scaling of divertor heat flux profile widths in DIII-D

Improved Plasma Confinement by Ion Bernstein Waves (IBWs) Interacting with Ions in JET

GA A23114 DEPENDENCE OF HEAT AND PARTICLE TRANSPORT ON THE RATIO OF THE ION AND ELECTRON TEMPERATURES

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

HEAT TRANSFER AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSES OF A GLASS BEAM DUMP

GA A26807 RESULTS OF ITER TEST BLANKET MODULE MOCK-UP EXPERIMENTS ON DIII-D

GA A22571 REDUCTION OF TOROIDAL ROTATION BY FAST WAVE POWER IN DIII D

Modified Kriging: Evaluation, Modification, Recommendations

PLASMA MASS DENSITY, SPECIES MIX AND FLUCTUATION DIAGNOSTICS USING FAST ALFVEN WAVE

Impurity Transport Studies of Intrinsic MO and Injected Ge in High Temperature ECRH Heated FTU Tokamak Plasmas

DML and Foil Measurements of ETA Beam Radius

GA A26785 GIANT SAWTEETH IN DIII-D AND THE QUASI-INTERCHANGE MODE

GA A25351 PHYSICS ADVANCES IN THE ITER HYBRID SCENARIO IN DIII-D

GA A27433 THE EPED PEDESTAL MODEL: EXTENSIONS, APPLICATION TO ELM-SUPPRESSED REGIMES, AND ITER PREDICTIONS

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Rotation and Particle Loss in Tore Supra. R. B. Whitel, F. W. Perkinsz, X. Garbet3j C. Bourdelle3, V. Basiuk3, L. G. Eriksson

National Accelerator Laboratory

GA A22689 SLOW LINER FUSION

Undulator Interruption in

RESONANCE INTERFERENCE AND ABSOLUTE CROSS SECTIONS IN NEAR-THRESHOLD ELECTRON-IMPACT EXCITATION OF MULTICHARGED IONS

Safety Considerations for Laser Power on Metals in Contact with High Explosives-Experimental and Calculational Results

The Radiological Hazard of Plutonium Isotopes and Specific Plutonium Mixtures

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

TARGET PLATE CONDITIONS DURING STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY OPERATION ON DIII D

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

Two-Screen Method for Determining Electron Beam Energy and Deflection from Laser Wakefield Acceleration

GA A23066 ENHANCEMENT OF RUNAWAY AVALANCHE BY LOWER HYBRID WAVES

DISCLAIMER. and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Multicusp Sources for Ion Beam Lithography Applications

Analysis of D Pellet Injection Experiments in the W7-AS Stellarator*

RECXWH2 W/o s3-1

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

Start-up Noise in 3-D Self-AmpMed

ust/ aphysics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

On Lithium Wall and Performance of Magnetic Fusion Device

Los Alamos IMPROVED INTRA-SPECIES COLLISION MODELS FOR PIC SIMULATIONS. Michael E. Jones, XPA Don S. Lemons, XPA & Bethel College Dan Winske, XPA

Design of Current Leads for the MICE Coupling Magnet

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

single-domain chromium

The temperature dependence of the C1+ propylene rate coefficient and the Arrhenius fit are shown in Figure 1.

LLNL DATA COLLECTION DURING NOAAETL COPE EXPERIMENT

John Falconer Richard Noble

LQSAlamos National Laboratory

P.Jacquet*, P.Bibet, P.Froissard, G.Rey, F.Surle, M.Tareb. Centre d' 6tudes de Cadarache Association Euratom-CEA

GA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIII-D

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Using the X-FEL to understand X-ray Thomson scattering for partially ionized plasmas

Colliding Crystalline Beams

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

AC dipole based optics measurement and correction at RHIC

GA A22722 CENTRAL THOMSON SCATTERING UPGRADE ON DIII D

The Graphite Isotope Ratio Method (GIRM): A Plutonium Production Verification Tool

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND HIGH RESOLUTION MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY OF WEAKLY BOUND COMPLEXES. Final Progress Report

Transcription:

PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, UNDER CONTRACT DE-AC-76CH373 PPPL-3835 UC-7 PPPL-3835 Plasma Dielectric Tensor for Non-Maxellian Distributions in the FLR Limit by C.K. Phillips, A. Pletzer, R.J. Dumont, and D.N. Smithe July 3 PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

PPPL Reports Disclaimer This report as prepared as an account of ork sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any arranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use ould not infringe privately oned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The vies and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Availability This report is posted on the U.S. Department of Energy s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Publications and Reports eb site in Fiscal Year 3. The home page for PPPL Reports and Publications is: http://.pppl.gov/pub_report/ DOE and DOE Contractors can obtain copies of this report from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information DOE Technical Information Services (DTIS) P.O. Box 6 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (865) 576-841 Fax: (865) 576-578 Email: reports@adonis.osti.gov This report is available to the general public from: National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 585 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 161 Telephone: 1-8-553-6847 or (73) 65-6 Fax: (73) 31-8547 Internet: http://.ntis.gov/ordering.htm

Plasma Dielectric Tensor for Non-Maxellian Distributions in the FLR Limit C.K. Phillips 1, A. Pletzer 1, R.J. Dumont and D.N. Smithe 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, NJ 854, U.S.A. Association Euratom-CEA sur la Fusion Contrôlée, F-1318 St Paul lez Durance, France 3 Mission Research Corp., Neington, VA 1, U.S.A. Abstract. Previous analytical and numerical studies have noted that the presence of fully non- Maxellian plasma species can significantly alter the dynamics of electromagnetic aves in magnetized plasmas. In this paper, a general form for the hot plasma dielectric tensor for non- Maxellian distributions is derived that is valid in the finite Larmor radius approximation. This model provides some insight into understanding the limitations on representing non-maxellian plasma species ith equivalent Maxellian components in modeling RF ave propagation and absorption. INTRODUCTION Laboratory fusion plasmas as ell as many space plasmas can be comprised of both thermal and non-thermal species. In collisionless space plasmas, turbulent heating or shock processes can accelerate particles, resulting in velocity-space distributions that are Lorentzian or poer-la-like in nature [1-3]. Neutral beam injection and fusion reactions in laboratory fusion plasmas both introduce energetic ions, hich follo a sloing-don type distribution in velocity space. Finally, hen electromagnetic aves are applied to heat or else to drive noninductive currents in magnetized plasmas, the ave-induced particle acceleration results in velocity-space distributions that feature energetic tails or extended quasilinear plateaus. In all of these situations, the question that arises is hether or not these non-thermal plasma species have a noticeable impact on electromagnetic ave dynamics in these plasmas. Previous analytical and numerical studies [1-6] have shon that ave dynamics can be affected if a sizeable non-thermal ion population is present in the plasma. Most of these studies have focused on modifications to ave absorption or to instability thresholds. A number of these studies [4,5,7] have noted that poer absorption on a non-maxellian distribution can be approximated by that on an equivalent Maxellian, chosen so that the thermal speed of the equivalent Maxellian is equal to the velocity-space averaged perpendicular speed of the non-thermal distribution. More recently, a 1D all-orders local full ave, METS [8], has been extended to include the effects of non-thermal species on both ave propagation and absorption. Results from this code indicate that the absorption and ave propagation in plasmas ith isotropic, non-maxellian species can be reasonably simulated ith equivalent

Maxellian in many regimes. Hoever, the spatial profile of poer deposition on short avelength kinetic aves can be narroer and anisotropic effects can lead to larger discrepancies ith models based on equivalent Maxellians [8]. In this paper, the hot plasma dielectric susceptibility for a fully non-maxellian but still gyrotropic particle distribution function is derived that is valid in the finite Larmor radius limit (FLR). This model provides some insight into understanding the limitations on representing non-thermal species as equivalent Maxellians in modeling RF ave absorption and propagation. It also provides the basis for generalizing the plasma dielectric operators in FLR-based D full ave simulation codes. DERIVATIONS The hot plasma susceptibility for a given species, s, described by the gyrotropic particle velocity distribution f (v,v // ), in a homogeneous, uniformly magnetized plasma can be ritten in the folloing form: t χs = ps ps πv dv dv zz v f f // ˆˆ // 1 1 + v// v// v v s n= v U t πvdv dv// k v n T n, n= // // Ω s (1) here Tn t is given in Equation (1-48) of reference [9] by Stix. In the FLR limit, the expressions in Equation (1) may be simplified by replacing the Bessel functions in T t n by their series expansions, integrating by parts the terms involving πvdv ( v m ) f / v (...), and retaining terms through order ~ k / Ω s, here Ω s is the cyclotron frequency and is the velocity space average of the perpendicular velocity. The resulting form of the plasma susceptibility is a generalization of the Maxellian-based FLR susceptibility given by Stix in Equations (59-63) in Chapter 1 in reference [9]. It may be ritten in similar but generalized form as: χxx χxy p 1 = [ A + A ] [ A + A ]+ [ A + A ] 1, 1, 11, 11, 1, 1, () p 1 = i [ A A ] [ A A ]+ [ A A ] 1, 1, 11, 11, 1, 1, (3)

p 1 k χxz = [ B + B B B B B ] [ + ]+ [ + ] 1, 1, 11, 11, 1, 1, (4) Ω p χyy = A 1 + [ A + A 3 ] [ A + A ]+ [ A + A ] 1, 1, 1, 11, 11, 1, 1, (5) p k χyz = i B B B B 1 1 [ 1 + 1] Ω {,,,, (6) [ B 11, + B 11, ] [ B 1, + B 1, ]} 4 p χzz = k // dv// πvdv v// 1 f v v p + B {( 1 ) k, // v 1 + dv πvdv // f // f k// v// + v v 1 p + + B + B k 1 k 1 ( Ω) ( Ω),,, // // 1 k v // // } (7) here, for j=,1: A nj, = 1 dv// πvdv Hj( v//, v ) k// v// n Ω B nj, = v dv // // vdv Hj( v//, v ) k// v// n Ω π H( v //, v ) = k 1 // f k v // ( 1 // ) f ( v //, v) v// H1( v//, v ) = k f v 4 1 k v v // // ( 1 // ) f v v v 4 ( //, ) //. (8) (9) (1) (11) In the limit that f (v,v // ) = f max (v ) h(v // ), then the generalized susceptibility reduces to that given in reference [9].

DISCUSSION The local hot plasma susceptibility for a given species, s, described by the gyrotropic particle velocity distribution f (v,v // ), that is valid in the FLR approximation has been derived by expanding the full hot plasma susceptibility to first order in ~ k / Ω s. In the limit that k //, the FLR-based susceptibility for a general distribution differs from that of a Maxellian distribution only in terms of O(). The xx, xy, and yy elements ill be the same as that of an equivalent Maxellian in this limit, provided that the thermal speed of the Maxellian is chosen to equal. Hence, the propagation of aves, such as fast aves or ion Bernstein aves, hich depends on these elements, can be simulated exactly using the equivalent Maxellian. The χ xz and χ yz elements ill be approximately equal in this limit, provided the ratio: v πvdv dv// v// f ( v //, v ) I v = (1) v// πvdv dv// v// f( v //, v) is close to unity. More generally, the FLR-based susceptibility elements for a general, gyrotropic distribution can be computed using equivalent Maxellians, if the (velocity) n moments for the general distribution are similar to those of the equivalent Maxellian. Finally, the expressions for the FLR-based susceptibility given in Equations ()-(11) may be utilized to generalize the dielectric operator in D FLRbased full ave codes. Such a generalization is required in order to self-consistently integrate such codes ith Fokker-Planck packages. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This ork as supported by U.S.D.O.E. contract DE-AC-76CH373. REFERENCES 1. Gedalin, M., Lyubarsky, Y., Balikhin, M. and Russell, C.T., Phys. Plasmas 8, 934 (1).. Gedalin, M., Strangeay, R.J., and Russell, C.T., J. Geophys. Res. 17, SSH 1-1,6 (). 3. Heilberg, M. and Mace, R.L., Phys. Plasmas 9, 1495 (). 4. Koch, R. Phys. Letts. A 157, 399 (1991). 5. Van Eester, D., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 35, 441-451 (1993). 6. Batchelor, D.B., Jaeger, E.F., and Colestock, P.L., Phys. Fluids B1, 1174 (1989). 7. Sauter, O. and Vaclavik, J., Nucl. Fusion 3, 1455 (199). 8. Dumont, R.J., Phillips, C.K., and Smithe, D.N., Effects of non-maxellian Plasma Species on ICRF Propagation and Absorption in Toroidal Magnetic Confinement Devices, this conference. 9. Stix, T.H., Susceptibilities for a Hot Plasma in a Magnetic Field, in Waves in Plasmas, Ne York: American Institute of Physics, 199, pp. 37-64.

External Distribution Plasma Research Laboratory, Australian National University, Australia Professor I.R. Jones, Flinders University, Australia Professor João Canalle, Instituto de Fisica DEQ/IF - UERJ, Brazil Mr. Gerson O. Ludig, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas, Brazil Dr. P.H. Sakanaka, Instituto Fisica, Brazil The Librarian, Culham Laboratory, England Mrs. S.A. Hutchinson, JET Library, England Professor M.N. Bussac, Ecole Polytechnique, France Librarian, Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Germany Jolan Moldvai, Reports Library, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Central Research Institute for Physics, Hungary Dr. P. Ka, Institute for Plasma Research, India Ms. P.J. Pathak, Librarian, Institute for Plasma Research, India Ms. Clelia De Palo, Associazione EURATOM-ENEA, Italy Dr. G. Grosso, Instituto di Fisica del Plasma, Italy Librarian, Naka Fusion Research Establishment, JAERI, Japan Library, Laboratory for Complex Energy Processes, Institute for Advanced Study, Kyoto University, Japan Research Information Center, National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan Dr. O. Mitarai, Kyushu Tokai University, Japan Dr. Jiangang Li, Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, People s Republic of China Professor Yuping Huo, School of Physical Science and Technology, People s Republic of China Library, Academia Sinica, Institute of Plasma Physics, People s Republic of China Librarian, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, People s Republic of China Dr. S. Mirnov, TRINITI, Troitsk, Russian Federation, Russia Dr. V.S. Strelkov, Kurchatov Institute, Russian Federation, Russia Professor Peter Lukac, Katedra Fyziky Plazmy MFF UK, Mlynska dolina F-, Komenskeho Univerzita, SK-84 15 Bratislava, Slovakia Dr. G.S. Lee, Korea Basic Science Institute, South Korea Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, USA Librarian, Fusion Energy Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Librarian, Institute of Fusion Studies, University of Texas, USA Librarian, Magnetic Fusion Program, Larence Livermore National Laboratory, USA Library, General Atomics, USA Plasma Physics Group, Fusion Energy Research Program, University of California at San Diego, USA Plasma Physics Library, Columbia University, USA Alkesh Punjabi, Center for Fusion Research and Training, Hampton University, USA Dr. W.M. Stacey, Fusion Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Dr. John Willis, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, USA Mr. Paul H. Wright, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 7/7/3

The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory is operated by Princeton University under contract ith the U.S. Department of Energy. Information Services Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451 Princeton, NJ 8543 Phone: 69-43-75 Fax: 69-43-751 e-mail: pppl_info@pppl.gov Internet Address: http://.pppl.gov