Hurwitz Number Fields David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris. 1. Context coming from mass formulas

Similar documents
Hurwitz Number Fields David P. Roberts, U. of Minnesota, Morris Akshay Venkatesh, Stanford University

Chebyshev covers and exceptional number fields David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

Introduction to Number Fields David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

HURWITZ-BELYI MAPS DAVID P. ROBERTS

The Inverse Galois Problem David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

An LMFDB perspective on motives David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

THE REPRESENTATION THEORY, GEOMETRY, AND COMBINATORICS OF BRANCHED COVERS

POLYNOMIALS WITH PRESCRIBED BAD PRIMES DAVID P. ROBERTS

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOCAL FIELDS

1.6.1 What are Néron Models?

MODULAR TOWERS. Date: June 5,

Some algebraic number theory and the reciprocity map

For more, see my paper of the same title!

Non CM p-adic analytic families of modular forms

VARIETIES WITHOUT EXTRA AUTOMORPHISMS II: HYPERELLIPTIC CURVES

( ) = 1 x. g( x) = x3 +2

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES

AUTOMORPHISMS OF X(11) OVER CHARACTERISTIC 3, AND THE MATHIEU GROUP M 11

GALOIS NUMBER FIELDS WITH SMALL ROOT DISCRIMINANT

An ABC construction of number fields

Computing complete lists of Artin representations given a group, character, and conductor bound

Riemann Surfaces and Algebraic Curves

Polynomials. Exponents. End Behavior. Writing. Solving Factoring. Graphing. End Behavior. Polynomial Notes. Synthetic Division.

The Berkovich Ramification Locus: Structure and Applications

GENERATORS OF FINITE FIELDS WITH POWERS OF TRACE ZERO AND CYCLOTOMIC FUNCTION FIELDS. 1. Introduction

The Kronecker-Weber Theorem

OCTIC 2-ADIC FIELDS JOHN W. JONES AND DAVID P. ROBERTS

this to include the explicit maps, please do so!

AN INTRODUCTION TO ARITHMETIC AND RIEMANN SURFACE. We describe points on the unit circle with coordinate satisfying

Math 213br HW 3 solutions

Residual modular Galois representations: images and applications

What is the Langlands program all about?

A CLASS GROUP HEURISTIC BASED ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF 1-EIGENSPACES IN MATRIX GROUPS

Higher Ramification Groups

A Number Theorist s Perspective on Dynamical Systems

SOME 4-POINT HURWITZ NUMBERS IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC

Lesson 2 The Unit Circle: A Rich Example for Gaining Perspective

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Universität Regensburg Mathematik

Two Denegeration Techniques for Maps of Curves

The Bell locus of rational functions and problems of Goldberg

ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE PICARD GROUP FOR K3 SURFACES

Maximal Class Numbers of CM Number Fields

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

RAMIFIED PRIMES IN THE FIELD OF DEFINITION FOR THE MORDELL-WEIL GROUP OF AN ELLIPTIC SURFACE

1 Rings 1 RINGS 1. Theorem 1.1 (Substitution Principle). Let ϕ : R R be a ring homomorphism

Algebra 1 Correlation of the ALEKS course Algebra 1 to the Washington Algebra 1 Standards

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, University of California at Los Angeles, and Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

A Weil bound free proof of Schur s conjecture

THE TAME-WILD PRINCIPLE FOR DISCRIMINANT RELATIONS FOR NUMBER FIELDS

Sect Introduction to Rational Expressions

Exercises for algebraic curves

An abelian surface with constrained 3-power torsion

SCHUR COVERS and CARLITZ S CONJECTURE

Up to twist, there are only finitely many potentially p-ordinary abelian varieties over. conductor

WHY WORD PROBLEMS ARE HARD

Torsion subgroups of rational elliptic curves over the compositum of all cubic fields

Families of Abelian Varieties with Big Monodromy

Arboreal Galois Representations

x mv = 1, v v M K IxI v = 1,

Bjorn Poonen. MSRI Introductory Workshop on Rational and Integral Points on Higher-dimensional Varieties. January 17, 2006

Limits of Functions (a, L)

8 Complete fields and valuation rings

On the Moduli Space of Klein Four Covers of the Projective Line

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

A survey of Galois theory of curves in characteristic p

THE ÉTALE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF AN ELLIPTIC CURVE

TAMAGAWA NUMBERS OF ELLIPTIC CURVES WITH C 13 TORSION OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

ON GALOIS GROUPS OF ABELIAN EXTENSIONS OVER MAXIMAL CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS. Mamoru Asada. Introduction

UNRAMIFIED COVERS OF GALOIS COVERS OF LOW GENUS CURVES

Diophantine equations and beyond

NUMBER FIELDS UNRAMIFIED AWAY FROM 2

GEOMETRIC CLASS FIELD THEORY I

On elliptic curves in characteristic 2 with wild additive reduction

ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS GROUPS OF NUMBER FIELDS

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

On the centralizer of a regular, semi-simple, stable conjugacy class. Benedict H. Gross

Complex Algebraic Geometry: Smooth Curves Aaron Bertram, First Steps Towards Classifying Curves. The Riemann-Roch Theorem is a powerful tool

Semistable reduction of curves and computation of bad Euler factors of L-functions

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry

Quasi-reducible Polynomials

Limits and Continuity

Results of modern sieve methods in prime number theory and more

12 Ramification, Haar measure, the product formula

Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3)

p-adic fields Chapter 7

3.4. ZEROS OF POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

Abstract Algebra Study Sheet

Constructing Class invariants

24 Artin reciprocity in the unramified case

UNIT 4 NOTES: PROPERTIES & EXPRESSIONS

SOLVING SOLVABLE QUINTICS. D. S. Dummit

Fundamental Groups in Characteristic p

Titchmarsh divisor problem for abelian varieties of type I, II, III, and IV

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 1 Apr 2014

A MORE GENERAL ABC CONJECTURE. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 2 December 1998

Elliptic Curves over p-adic Fields

Corollary. Let X Y be a dominant map of varieties, with general fiber F. If Y and F are rationally connected, then X is.

Transcription:

Hurwitz Number Fields David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris. Context coming from mass formulas. Sketch of definitions and key properties. A full Hurwitz number field with Galois group A 5 and discriminant d = 56 5 0. Results and open problems

. Context coming from mass formulas. The mass of an Q-algebra F is by definition µ(f ) = Aut(F ). Examples: F = R : µ(r r C s ) = r!s! s F = Q p : µ(q p f ) = f The mass of a class of Q-algebras is the sum of the masses of one representing algebra for each isomorphism type. For example, the class of all unramified Q p -algebras of degree n has total mass, as in the case n = : µ(q p )+µ(q p Q p )+µ(q p Q p Q p ) = + + 6 =. More generally, for any tame partition τ n the class of Q p -algebras with ramification partition τ has total mass. Total mass µ n (Q v ) of Q v -algebras of degree n: v\n 5 6 7 8 9.66.7...05.0.0 5 6 0 5 80 57 7 9 9 8 99 7 00 5 5 7 55 8 0

Let NF n (d) be the number of degree n number fields of absolute discriminant d, which are full in the sense that G {A n, S n }. Some average cardinalities NF n (d) : 00 00 00-000 -000-000 -000 Limit 5.000.00.00.006.50 [B].08.0.05.056.5 [B].5.77.8.97.77 [DH] ζ().607.6.60.6.608 ζ() A natural local-global heuristic for n is that on average NF n ( p p cp ) µ n(r) p µ n (Q p, p cp ). Here µ n (Q p, p c p) is the total mass of Q p -algebras of degree n and discriminant p c p. For n =,, and 5, this heuristic is exactly right in the limit of large d.

What about the vertical rather than horizontal direction? Let NF n (P) be the set of full fields of degree n ramified within a given finite set P of primes. The heuristic gives e.g. the following predictions for NF n ({,, 5}). 0 5 0 0 0 5 50 00 50 n In fact, for any fixed P, the heuristic says that NF n (P) is eventually zero. However with Venkatesh we expect that Hurwitz number fields form an enormous exception to the mass heuristic: Conjecture. Suppose P contains the set of primes dividing a finite nonabelian simple group. Then lim sup NF n (P) =.

. Sketch of definitions and key properties. A Hurwitz parameter is a triple h = (G, C, ν) where G is a finite centerless group, C = (C,..., C r ) is a list of conjugacy classes, ν = (ν,..., ν r ) is a list of positive integers, The quotient elements [C i ] generate G ab and satisfy [C i ] ν i =. A Hurwitz parameter h determines an unramified covering of complex algebraic varieties: π h : Hur h Conf ν. Here the cover Hur h is a Hurwitz variety parameterizing certain covers of the complex projective line P of type h. The base is the variety whose points are tuples (D,..., D r ) of disjoint divisors D i in P, with D i consisting of ν i distinct points. The map π h sends a cover to its branch locus.

Let G h be the set of tuples (g,,..., g,ν,..., g r,,..., g r,νr ) C ν Cν r r which generate G and have product. Then G acts G h by conjugation and the fiber Hur h,u above any base point u can be identified with F h = G h G. A canonical approximation to the degree n h = F h is ri= C i ν i n h = G G. When enough sufficiently different C i are present, in fact n h = n h. The fundamental group π (Conf ν, u) can be identified with a classical braid group Br ν. Under suitable hypotheses most crucially that G is close to being a nonabelian simple group the action of Br ν on Hur h,u is full, in the sense of having image all of A n or S n.

If all the C i are rational, then the map π h canonically descends to a map of varieties over Q. Fibers Hur h,u above rational points u Conf ν (Q) Conf ν are the root-sets of Hurwitz number algebras F h,u. If π h is full, then F h,u is full for generic u, by the Hilbert irreducibility theorem. The cover π h has good reduction outside of P G, the set of primes dividing G. Let Z[P] be the set of rational numbers having denominator divisible only by primes in P. Then for u Conf ν (Z[P]) the algebra can have bad reduction only at primes in P G P. The sets Conf ν (Z[P G ]) can be arbitrarily big in the way needed by the conjecture. So either the conjecture is true or specialization to u Conf ν (Z[P G ]) behaves in an extremely nongeneric way.

. A full Hurwitz number field with Galois group A 5 and discriminant d = 56 5 0. Take h = (G, C, ν) = (S 5, (, 5), (, )), u = (D, D ) = ({, 0,, }, { }). The definition requires us to look at g(z) = z 5 + z + bz + cz + dz + e with critical values {, 0,, }. Explicitly, we need to find solutions (b, c, d, e, w) C 5 to Res z (g(z) t, g (z)) = w(t + )t(t )(t ). Finding these solutions takes one second. Exactly 5 different e work. They are the roots of an irreducible degree 5 polynomial f(x). The Hurwitz number field F h,u = Q[x]f(x) has discriminant d = 56 5 0. Fixing h but varying u Conf, (Z[{,, 5}]) gives more than ten thousand different F h,u. All have d = ± a b 5 c and Galois group in {A, S, A 5, S 5 }.

The intuitive reason that a Hurwitz number field F h,u = Q[x]f(x) is special is that each root of a defining polynomial f(x) is not just a complex number. Rather behind this complex number is a delicate geometric situation: the unique covering of P t with a prescribed topology. For the five real e, the coverings P z P t are as follows (drawn in the real z-t plane and also superimposed). In general, there are n = [F h,u : Q] different geometric objects, with their arithmetic coordinated by F h,u.

To get images for all 5 different e, we draw in the t-plane. plane are 5 Then its preimages in the z

F B C E I G I J J E H A C B H B E D D D A C G F A Actions of the standard generators σ (vertical arrows), σ (symbols), and σ (horizontal arrows) of the braid group Br, are given above. 5

. Results and Open Problems. A. Explicit equations for the covers Hur h Conf ν have been worked out in a broad range of situations: exotic groups like SL (), G (), Sp (), M,... ; constrained ramification and large degrees like {,, 5} and n = 00; certain sequences with G = S d with d and n both increasing without bound. Further understanding geometry would allow computations in new regimes (higher genus..., more ramification points...)

B. Tame ramification is completely understood: given (h, u) and a tame prime p, the partition of n measuring p-adic ramification in F h,u is given by a universal braid group formula. Wild ramification experimentally is subject to strong upper bounds. For example, for degree 5 fields of discriminant ± a b 5 c, the locally allowed maxima are (a, b, c) = (0, 6, 7). The largest exponents occurring in the h = (S 5, (, 5), (, )) family are (79, 57, 5). In larger degree, the bounds are much stronger. Open problem: get formulas for wild ramification in terms of (h, u) and establish the upper bounds. C. Specialization has been observed to be near generic to start with and become more generic in higher degrees. Open problem: control specialization enough to prove the expected lim sup NF n (P) =!