On local properties of non- Archimedean analytic spaces.

Similar documents
NON-ARCHIMEDEAN ANALYTIC SPACES. Vladimir G. BERKOVICH. Department of Mathematics, The Weizmann Institute of Science P.O.B. 26, Rehovot, ISRAEL

Rigid Geometry and Applications II. Kazuhiro Fujiwara & Fumiharu Kato

Adic Spaces. Torsten Wedhorn. June 19, 2012

15 Lecture 15: Points and lft maps

A Mini-Course on Formal and Rigid Geometry

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

Constructible isocrystals (London 2015)

Adic Spaces. 1 Huber rings. Notes by Tony Feng for a talk by Torsten Wedhorn. April 4, 2016

INTEGRATION OF ONE-FORMS ON p-adic ANALYTIC SPACES

14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces

Toric coordinates in relative p-adic Hodge theory

Problems on adic spaces and perfectoid spaces

Geometric motivic integration

Locally G-ringed spaces and rigid spaces

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

Factorization of birational maps on steroids

Half a Century of Rigid Analytic Spaces

Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms

MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

An Introduction to Rigid Analytic Geometry

7 Lecture 7: Rational domains, Tate rings and analytic points

Factorization of birational maps for qe schemes in characteristic 0

Notes on p-divisible Groups

BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

SCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, February-March 2005

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 5

MOISHEZON SPACES IN RIGID GEOMETRY

ADIC SPACES FLORENT MARTIN

Sections of tropicalization maps (joint work with Walter Gubler and Joe Rabinoff)

CHEAT SHEET: PROPERTIES OF MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES

1. Valuative Criteria Specialization vs being closed

Lecture 6: Etale Fundamental Group

Wild coverings of Berkovich curves. Conference in honor of Arthur Ogus

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

Vanishing cycles for formal schemes. II

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

Lecture 9 - Faithfully Flat Descent

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Tunisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the Tunisian Mathematical Society

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

RELATIVE AMPLENESS IN RIGID-ANALYTIC GEOMETRY

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

Reflexivity of Locally Convex Spaces over Local Fields

NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

Basic notions of rigid analytic geometry. Peter Schneider

UNIFORM STRUCTURES AND BERKOVICH SPACES

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].

p-adic Modular Forms: Serre, Katz, Coleman, Kassaei

The overconvergent site

Homologically trivial and annihilator locally C -algebras

6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings

Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

Math 731: Topics in Algebraic Geometry I Berkovich Spaces

ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 29 Aug 2018

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25

Smooth morphisms. Peter Bruin 21 February 2007

Odds and ends on equivariant cohomology and traces

THE KEEL MORI THEOREM VIA STACKS

AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES

214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN

Weight functions on non-archimedean analytic spaces and the Kontsevich Soibelman skeleton

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

TROPICAL BRILL-NOETHER THEORY

The Overconvergent Site I. Coefficients

Eigenvarieties. Kevin Buzzard. August 2, 2006

CONTINUOUS VALUATIONS AND THE ADIC SPECTRUM

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 28 Jul 2016

p-adic Analysis in Arithmetic Geometry

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

NAGATA COMPACTIFICATION FOR ALGEBRAIC SPACES. To the memory of Masayoshi Nagata

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

EXCLUDED HOMEOMORPHISM TYPES FOR DUAL COMPLEXES OF SURFACES

MV-algebras and fuzzy topologies: Stone duality extended

GLUING SCHEMES AND A SCHEME WITHOUT CLOSED POINTS

DESCENT THEORY (JOE RABINOFF S EXPOSITION)

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 2 Feb 2017

A locally convex topology and an inner product 1

Cohomological Descent of Rigid Cohomology for Etale Coverings.

1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim

OFER GABBER, QING LIU, AND DINO LORENZINI

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!

Hom M (J P (V ), U) Hom M (U(δ), J P (V )),

Math 203A - Solution Set 3

Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS A Note on an Anabelian Open Basis for a Smooth Variety. Yuichiro HOSHI.

THE SHIMURA-TANIYAMA FORMULA AND p-divisible GROUPS

Cohomology and Base Change

LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL

What is p-adic geometry?

Transcription:

On local properties of non- Archimedean analytic spaces. Michael Temkin (talk at Muenster Workshop, April 4, 2000) Plan: 1. Introduction. 2. Category bir k. 3. The reduction functor. 4. Main result. 5. Applications. 1

1. Introduction. Let k be a non-archimedean field with nontrivial valuation. All analytic spaces considered are strictly k-analytic. Red : Germs bir k (X x X x ) Main results give criterions 1. for an analytic space X to be good at a point x X; 2. for a morphism Y X to be closed at a point y Y. Applications (W. Lütkebohmert, 1990, for k with discrete valuation): 1. f s : Y s X s is proper f η : Y η X η is proper. 2. X R is a separated morphism to an affinoid space any affinoid domain U X has an affinoid extension V X s.t. U Int(V/R). 2

2. Category bir k. In this section the base field k is arbitrary. Def: For a field K/k, P K = {ν k O ν K}, its topology basis consists of affine sets P K {f 1,..., f n } = {ν f 1,..., f n O ν }. Def: bir k is the category of maps X f X P K, where f X is a local homeomorphism and X is a connected quasi-compact and quasi-separated space. A morphism is a pair, an embedding i : K L and a commutative diagram Y f X h i # X f Y P L P K Def: (i,h) is separated (resp. proper) if Y P L PK X is injective (resp. bijective). 3

Def: V ar k is the category of dominant morphisms Spec(K) X, where X is integral of finite type over k. Morphisms are commutative diagrams Spec(L) i Spec(K) Y X f Def: A morphism (i, f) is 1. separated (resp. proper) if f is separated (resp. proper); 2. birational if i is an isomorphism and f is proper. 4

Construction: V al : V ar k bir k V al(spec(k) X) = {O ν K, Spec(O ν ) X}. Fact: V al(spec(k) X) lim Y, where the limit is taken over all birational morphisms Spec(K) Spec(K) In particular, it is quasi-compact and quasiseparated. Y X Fact: V al induces an equivalence of categories V ar k /{birational morphisms} bir k. 5

3. Reduction functor. Def: The spectrum M(A) of a Banach k- algebra A is the set of all bounded multiplicative seminorms on A. x M(A) χ x : A H(x), where χ x is bounded, H(x) is a non-archimedean field and H(x) = Q(χ x (A)). Analytic spaces are glued from spectra of affinoid algebras. An analytic space is good if any its point has an affinoid neighborhood. Fact: Y X are affinoid, y Y is a point H X (y) = H Y (y). Corollary: For any analytic space X and a point x X the morphism M(H(x)) i x X is well defined. 6

Construction: The reduction functor Red : Germs bir k (X x X x ) is defined as follows: X x Ob(Germs) Y x (with compact Y ) (Y, x Y ) (Spec( H(x)) ĩx Y s ) (Spec( H(x)) ĩx Im(ĩx)) Ob(V ar k) X x Ob(bir k) where Y is an admissible formal k -scheme and Y η Y. If Y is such that Y η Y, then Y proper over both Y and Y and such that Y η Y. Hence the result does not depend on the choice of Y. 7

Fact: Y X is an analytic subdomain, x Y Ỹx X x is an open embedding. Fact: x Y, Z X Y x Z x Ỹx Z x and Y x Z x Ỹx Z x ; if X = M(A) and f A, then X x {f} X x { f}. Th: {equiv. classes of subdomains Y x X x } {open quasi-comp. subsets of X x }. Remark: In Huber s adic spaces, X x x. 8

4. Main result. Th: A germ X x is good iff X x is affine. Proof (sketch): Step 1: We may assume, that X x = Y x Z x, Y x and Z x are good, Ỹx = X x { f} and Z x = X x { f 1 }. Step 2: Given step 1, X x is good. Lemma: Let X = M(B) M(C), M(A) = M(B) M(C), A = B{f 1 } = C{g}, k{t 1,..., T n, S, ps 1 } φ B : T i f i, S f k{t 1,..., T n, q 1 S, S 1 } ψ C : T i g i, S g p 1 q, f i g i A < 1, f g A < 1 and A is induced from k{t i, S, S 1 } X = M(D) and k{t i, q 1 S, ps 1 } D : T i h i, S h. 9

5. Applications. Def: Let A be a k-affinoid algebra and φ : B D a bounded A-homomorphism, where B is A-affinoid and D is A-Banach. Then φ is inner w.r.t. A if ψ : A{T 1,..., T n } B s.t. φ(ψ(t i )) sup < 1. Notation: Let M(B) = Y Y = M(B ) be affinoid spaces over X = M(A) s.t. B B is inner w.r.t. A, then one writes Y X Y. Def (Kiehl): Y f X is locally proper if X = X i and f 1 (X i ) = j Ji Y ij = j Ji Y ij s.t. Y ij Xi Y ij ; if J i may be chosen finite, then f is proper. 10

f Def: Given M(B) = Y X = M(A) and y Y, suppose that B χ y H(y) is inner w.r.t. A, then y Int(Y/X) and f is closed at y. Def: A morphism f : Y X of good spaces is closed if Y = Int(Y/X); f is proper if in addition it is a proper map of topological spaces. Def: f : Y X is closed (resp. proper) if for any morphism X X with good X, the base change morphism f : Y X X X is a closed (resp. proper) morphism of good spaces. 11

Recall, that a germ X x is good iff X x is affine. Corollary: A morphism Y y X x is closed (resp. separated) iff its reduction Ỹy X x is proper (resp. separated). Corollary: Y X is a proper (resp. locally proper) morphism of admissible formal k -schemes Y η X η is proper (resp. closed) in the sense of Berkovich Y rig X rig is proper (resp. locally proper) in the sense of Kiehl. 12

Th: X R, R is affinoid, M(D) = U Int(X/R) U R U = M(D ) and U is a Weierstrass domain in U. Proof (sketch): Step 1: We may assume, that U{f} and U{f 1 } have analogous extensions. Step 2: Reduction to the relative version of the previous lemma. 13

Rigid definition of good spaces: X is good if it is separated and X = I X i = I X i s.t. X i, X i are affinoid and X i X X i, i.e. for any affinoid Y X and i I we have (X i Y ) Y (X i Y ). Conjecture: If X is good, then for any affinoid subdomain Y X there exists a bigger affinoid subdomain Y s.t. Y X Y. 14