Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

Similar documents
Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

3. MDOF Systems: Modal Spectral Analysis

Structural Dynamics Lecture 7. Outline of Lecture 7. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.) System Reduction. Vibration due to Movable Supports.

Chapter 4 Analysis of a cantilever

FREE VIBRATION RESPONSE OF UNDAMPED SYSTEMS

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMAND


STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

Missing Mass in Dynamic Analysis

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Dynamics of Structures

1. Multiple Degree-of-Freedom (MDOF) Systems: Introduction

SHOCK RESPONSE OF MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEMS Revision F By Tom Irvine May 24, 2010

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping

BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, Pilani Pilani Campus

Problem 1: A simple 3-dof shear-building model has the following equation: =

midas Civil Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading

DEPENDENCE OF ACCIDENTAL TORSION ON STRUCTURAL SYSTEM PROPERTIES

3. Mathematical Properties of MDOF Systems

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Introduction to structural dynamics

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Software Verification

Seismic Design of Tall and Slender Structures Including Rotational Components of the Ground Motion: EN Approach

Stochastic Dynamics of SDOF Systems (cont.).

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

Seismic design of bridges

Secondary Response Spectra

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Reduction in number of dofs

Selection of Rayleigh Damping Coefficients for Seismic Response Analysis of Soil Layers

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

CHAPTER 7 EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC SYSTEMS. Base shear force in a linearly elastic system due to ground excitation is Vb

In-Structure Response Spectra Development Using Complex Frequency Analysis Method

Multi Degrees of Freedom Systems

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

ANALYSIS OF ORDINARY BRIDGES CROSSING FAULT-RUPTURE ZONES

Damping Matrix. Donkey2Ft

Effects of damping matrix in the response of structures with added linear viscous dampers

Alireza Mehdipanah BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDINGS FEATURING TRANSFER BEAMS IN THE REGIONS OF LOW TO MODERATE SEISMICITY

Stochastic Structural Dynamics Prof. Dr. C. S. Manohar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

THREE-DIMENSIONAL CRITICAL SEISMIC GROUND ACCELERATION TIME HISTORIES FOR HIGH-TECH FACILITIES

Earthquake design for controlled structures

Advanced Vibrations. Elements of Analytical Dynamics. By: H. Ahmadian Lecture One

2C9 Design for seismic and climate changes. Jiří Máca

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

MODAL ANALYSIS OF PLANE FRAMES

Contents i. Contents

Numerical Solution of Equation of Motion

Modal analysis of shear buildings

Seismic Performance of RC Building Using Spectrum Response and Pushover Analyses

Seismic design of bridges

A MODIFIED RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMANDS IN ELASTIC REGULAR FRAME STRUCTURES

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

Dynamic Loads CE 543. Examples. Harmonic Loads

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

Dynamic Response of Structures With Frequency Dependent Damping

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Analysis

Finite Element Analysis Lecture 1. Dr./ Ahmed Nagib

Design Spectra. Reading Assignment Course Information Lecture Notes Pp Kramer Appendix B7 Kramer

Identification Methods for Structural Systems. Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi Lecture March, 2016

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS BASED ON THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

Seismic Design of Slender Structures Including Rotational Components of the Ground Acceleration Eurocode 8 Approach

COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON SEISMIC INCOHERENT SSI ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES

Pushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC ACTION IN SWEDEN USING THE EUROPEAN SEISMIC HAZARD MODEL. Structural Mechanics. Master s Dissertation

CE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A

NATURAL MODES OF VIBRATION OF BUILDING STRUCTURES CE 131 Matrix Structural Analysis Henri Gavin Fall, 2006

VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF THE OPTIMUM TORSION AXIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS USING DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

The Comparative Analysis of Methods for Calculation of Buildings With Rubber Bearings

SEISMIC RESPONSE EVALUATION OF AN RC BEARING WALL BY DISPLACEMENT-BASED APPROACH

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

APPLICATION OF RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD TO PASSIVELY DAMPED DOME STRUCTURE WITH HIGH DAMPING AND HIGH FREQUENCY MODES

Structural Dynamics A Graduate Course in Aerospace Engineering

Session 2: MDOF systems

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

A STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

SPECIAL DYNAMIC SOIL- STRUCTURE ANALYSIS PROCEDURES DEMONSTATED FOR TWO TOWER-LIKE STRUCTURES

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

Structural Matrices in MDOF Systems

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

A Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Procedure Consistent with New Zealand Standards

EQ Ground Motions. Strong Ground Motion and Concept of Response Spectrum. March Sudhir K Jain, IIT Gandhinagar. Low Amplitude Vibrations

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient

AA242B: MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS

NON-ITERATIVE EQUIVALENT LINEAR METHOD FOR DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN

SECANT MODES SUPERPOSITION: A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMES

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane

Transcription:

NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Basic principles Ioannis N. Psycharis Lecture 3

MDOF systems Equation of motion M u + C u + K u = M r x g(t) where: M = mass matrix C = damping matrix K = stiffness matrix r = earthquake direction vector

Natural modes Eigenfrequencies They are derived from the solution of the characteristic equation: K ω 2 M = 0 Eigenvectors They are derived from the solution of the system of equations: where: K ω 2 M φ i = 0 φ i = i th eigenvector φ ji = j th component of i th eigenvector

Properties Orthogonality φ Τ i M φ j = 0 for i j φ Τ i K φ j = 0 for i j Generalized mass m i = φ Τ i M φ i Generalized stiffness k i = φ Τ i K φ i It can be shown that k i = m i ω 2

Free vibrations For arbitrary initial displacements (From Chopra, AK, Dynamics of Structures, EERI)

Free vibrations For initial displacements according to 1 st mode (From Chopra, AK, Dynamics of Structures, EERI)

Free vibrations For initial displacements according to 2 nd mode (From Chopra, AK, Dynamics of Structures, EERI)

Free vibrations For initial displacements according to 3 rd mode (From Chopra, AK, Dynamics of Structures, EERI)

Modal analysis Displacement at the j th degree of freedom: u j (t) = N n=1 u jn (t) where u jn is the displacement of the j th degree of freedom that corresponds to the n th mode. Response of n th mode: u jn (t) = Y n t φ jn Yn + 2ζ n ω n Y n + ω n 2 Y n = Γ n x g where Γ n is the participation factor of the n th mode: Γ n = φ i Τ M r φ i Τ M φ i

Modal analysis x g(t) u jn (t) = Y n t φ jn Yn + 2ζ n ω n Y n + ω n 2 Y n = Γ n x g (From Chopra, AK, Dynamics of Structures, EERI)

Use of response spectra Maximum displacement of the n th mode at the j th degree of freedom: max u jn = Γ n S d T n, ζ n φ jn T n, ζ n is the spectral displacement that where S d corresponds to period T n and damping ζ n. Maximum seismic force of the n th mode at the j th degree of freedom: max F jn = Γ n S a,d T n, ζ n m j φ jn T n, ζ n is the design spectral acceleration where S a,d that corresponds to period T n and damping ζ n.

Combination of modal responses Significant modes k < N k n=1 M n 0.90 m tot where M n is the effective mass of the n th mode: M n = Γ n φ n Τ M r The effective mass of each mode depends on the direction of the seismic action.

Combination of modal responses Let A n, A m be the maximum value of a quantity A (internal force or displacement) of the n th and the m th mode respectively. SRSS k maxa = ± A n 2 CQC n=1 k k maxa = ± ε nm A n A m n=1 m=1 ε nm = 8 ζ 2 1+r r 3/2 1 r 2 2 +4 ζ 2 r 1+r 2 with r = T n T m

Simplified formulas For planar motion in the plane of the seismic action and for the n th mode: Γ n = N j=1 N j=1 m j φ jn 2 m j φ jn M n = Γ n N j=1 m j φ jn

Design procedure Define structural properties Compute mass and stiffness matrices M and K Estimate modal damping coefficients ζ n Solve the eigen-problem to determine the k lower natural frequencies ω n and modes φ n Compute the corresponding natural periods T n = 2π ω n For a given direction of the seismic action: Compute the participation factors Γ n Compute effective modal masses M n and check that their sum is larger than 90% of the total mass. If not, increase the value of k and repeat the procedure

Design procedure For a given direction of the seismic action, compute the maximum response for each mode n by repeating the following steps: On the design response spectrum read the spectral acceleration S a,d that corresponds to period T n and damping ζ n Compute the seismic force F j,n at each degree of freedom j Perform static analysis of the structure subjected to forces F j,n and determine internal forces and displacements Combine the modal responses using SRSS or CQC for each direction of the seismic action

Spatial combination Let A x, A y, A z be the estimated maximum values of a quantity A that correspond to two horizontal orthogonal directions x, y and the vertical direction z of the seismic action. The maximum value of A for simultaneous action of the earthquake in all directions x, y, z can be estimated as: 1 st Method A = ± A x 2 + A y 2 + A z 2 2 nd Method A = ±A x ± 0.3A y ± 0.3A z A = ±0.3A x ± A y ± 0.3A z or or A = ±0.3A x ± 0.3A y ± A z

Remarks For typical buildings, the vertical component of the seismic action can be neglected. Displacements If d E are the displacements from the above analysis, the actual displacements are calculated as d = q d E where q is the value of the behavior factor used in the design response spectrum. The elastic response of a structure to a specific earthquake can also be computed using the above procedure by substituting the design response spectrum with the elastic spectrum of the ground motion.