IE652 - Chapter 10. Assumptions. Single Machine Scheduling

Similar documents
SINGLE MACHINE SEQUENCING Part 2. ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling Fall semestre

Single Machine Problems Polynomial Cases

RCPSP Single Machine Problems

CHAPTER 16: SCHEDULING

Lecture 4 Scheduling 1

Simple Dispatch Rules

Single Machine Models

Bi-criteria Scheduling Problems on Parallel Machines

MINIMIZING TOTAL TARDINESS FOR SINGLE MACHINE SEQUENCING

Recoverable Robustness in Scheduling Problems

Dynamic Scheduling with Genetic Programming

Simulation. Stochastic scheduling example: Can we get the work done in time?

Scheduling Lecture 1: Scheduling on One Machine

Batch delivery scheduling with simple linear deterioration on a single machine 1

Econ 172A, Fall 2012: Final Examination Solutions (I) 1. The entries in the table below describe the costs associated with an assignment

Parallel machine scheduling with batch delivery costs

Combinatorial Structure of Single machine rescheduling problem

arxiv: v2 [cs.ds] 27 Nov 2014

Econ 172A, Fall 2012: Final Examination Solutions (II) 1. The entries in the table below describe the costs associated with an assignment

Single Machine Scheduling: Comparison of MIP Formulations and Heuristics for. Interfering Job Sets. Ketan Khowala

Part III: Traveling salesman problems

Techniques for Proving Approximation Ratios in Scheduling

Multi-Objective Scheduling Using Rule Based Approach

MVE165/MMG630, Applied Optimization Lecture 6 Integer linear programming: models and applications; complexity. Ann-Brith Strömberg

Introduction into Vehicle Routing Problems and other basic mixed-integer problems

Online Appendix for Coordination of Outsourced Operations at a Third-Party Facility Subject to Booking, Overtime, and Tardiness Costs

Part III: Traveling salesman problems

Coin Changing: Give change using the least number of coins. Greedy Method (Chapter 10.1) Attempt to construct an optimal solution in stages.

Scheduling Lecture 1: Scheduling on One Machine

Chapter 3: Discrete Optimization Integer Programming

Minimizing Mean Flowtime and Makespan on Master-Slave Systems

Scheduling with Advanced Process Control Constraints

Example: 1. In this chapter we will discuss the transportation and assignment problems which are two special kinds of linear programming.

Algorithm Design Strategies V

MODELING (Integer Programming Examples)

Bounds for the Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem with Exact Time Lags while Minimizing the Total Earliness and Tardiness

Proofs for all the results presented in the body of the article are presented below: ProofofLemma1:Consider a Nash schedule S where x O i > P i

Integrated Production Scheduling and Preventive Maintenance Planning for a Single Machine Under a Cumulative Damage Failure Process

FH2(P 2,P2) hybrid flow shop scheduling with recirculation of jobs

Flow Shop and Job Shop Models

The Traveling Salesman Problem: An Overview. David P. Williamson, Cornell University Ebay Research January 21, 2014

Minimizing the Number of Tardy Jobs

Advanced Modified Time Deviation Method for Job Sequencing

STABILITY OF JOHNSON S SCHEDULE WITH LIMITED MACHINE AVAILABILITY

Lower Bounds for Parallel Machine Scheduling Problems

Algorithm Design. Scheduling Algorithms. Part 2. Parallel machines. Open-shop Scheduling. Job-shop Scheduling.

Outline. Relaxation. Outline DMP204 SCHEDULING, TIMETABLING AND ROUTING. 1. Lagrangian Relaxation. Lecture 12 Single Machine Models, Column Generation

Scheduling Online Algorithms. Tim Nieberg

Using column generation to solve parallel machine scheduling problems with minmax objective functions

LPT rule: Whenever a machine becomes free for assignment, assign that job whose. processing time is the largest among those jobs not yet assigned.

Chapter 3: Discrete Optimization Integer Programming

Marjan van den Akker. Han Hoogeveen Jules van Kempen

Task Models and Scheduling

Scheduling jobs with agreeable processing times and due dates on a single batch processing machine

Research Article Minimizing the Number of Tardy Jobs on a Single Machine with an Availability Constraint

2WB05 Simulation Lecture 7: Output analysis

Deterministic Scheduling. Dr inż. Krzysztof Giaro Gdańsk University of Technology

Course 495: Advanced Statistical Machine Learning/Pattern Recognition

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

Robust optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling with uncertain activity durations

Extended Job Shop Scheduling by Object-Oriented. Optimization Technology

MTHSC 4420 Advanced Mathematical Programming Homework 2

Slides 12: Output Analysis for a Single Model

On bilevel machine scheduling problems

Using column generation to solve parallel machine scheduling problems with minmax objective functions

Polynomial time solutions for scheduling problems on a proportionate flowshop with two competing agents

Linear Equations and Matrix

Matrix Arithmetic. j=1

On the exact solution of a large class of parallel machine scheduling problems

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Deterministic Operations Research, ME 366Q and ORI 391 Chapter 2: Homework #2 Solutions

Column Generation. ORLAB - Operations Research Laboratory. Stefano Gualandi. June 14, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Introduction to integer programming III:

Neville s Method. MATH 375 Numerical Analysis. J. Robert Buchanan. Fall Department of Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan Neville s Method

Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem (ATSP): Models

Solving Linear Systems Using Gaussian Elimination. How can we solve

MATH 445/545 Test 1 Spring 2016

MATH 56A: STOCHASTIC PROCESSES CHAPTER 1

arxiv: v1 [cs.ds] 11 Dec 2013

An exact approach to early/tardy scheduling with release dates

Solving a Production Scheduling Problem as a Time-Dependent Traveling Salesman Problem

Totally unimodular matrices. Introduction to integer programming III: Network Flow, Interval Scheduling, and Vehicle Routing Problems

Welcome to CPSC 4850/ OR Algorithms

The polynomial solvability of selected bicriteria scheduling problems on parallel machines with equal length jobs and release dates

Minimizing the weighted completion time on a single machine with periodic maintenance

Omega 38 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Omega. journal homepage:

Single machine scheduling with forbidden start times

International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations

Lecture #8: We now take up the concept of dynamic programming again using examples.

Computer Science, Informatik 4 Communication and Distributed Systems. Simulation. Discrete-Event System Simulation. Dr.

The Assignment Problem

Scheduling with Constraint Programming. Job Shop Cumulative Job Shop

On-Line Algorithms for Due Date Quotation with Lateness Penalties

1 Multiply Eq. E i by λ 0: (λe i ) (E i ) 2 Multiply Eq. E j by λ and add to Eq. E i : (E i + λe j ) (E i )

Design of Manufacturing Systems Manufacturing Cells

Lower Bounds for Parallel Machine Scheduling Problems

A comparison of sequencing formulations in a constraint generation procedure for avionics scheduling

Definition. A matrix is a rectangular array of numbers enclosed by brackets (plural: matrices).

A new ILS algorithm for parallel machine scheduling problems

The CON Job Scheduling Problem on a Single and Parallel Machines

Transcription:

IE652 - Chapter 10 Single Machine Scheduling 1 Assumptions All jobs are processed on a single machine Release time of each job is 0 Processing times are known with certainty Scheduling Sequencing in this case 2

Performance Measures for Single Machine Scheduling C max is not the measure of performance, because all sequences of jobs gives the same result for this criterion. Common measures for single machine problems: Minimizing the mean flow time ( F ), the maximum tardiness (T max ), the number of tardy jobs (n T ) 3 Minimizing The Mean Flowtime To minimize the mean flow time place the job with the shortest processing time in the first position, because it is counted n times in the calculation of total flow time (P ) + (P1 + P2 ) + (P1 + P2 + P3 ) +... + (P1 + P2 + P3 +... F = n Therefore; SPT (shortest processing time) rule gives the best sequence for the minimum mean flow time 1 + P n 4 )

SPT (shortest processing time) 5 SPT - Example Consider the following 7 jobs and their processing times. J i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 P i 6 4 8 3 2 7 1 a) Evaluate the sequence of J1, J2, J3, J4, J5, J6, J7. b) Use SPT rule. Discuss which measures will be affected by the change in the sequence. 6

Sequence : J1(6), J2(4), J3(8), J4(3), J5(2), J6(7), J7(1) J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J6 J7 0 6 10 18 21 23 30 31 6 + 10 + 18+ 21+ 23+ 30 + 31 139 F = = = 19.86 7 7 7 SPT Sequence : J7(1), J5(2), J4(3), J2(4), J1(6), J6(7), J3(8) J7 J5 J4 J2 J1 J6 J3 0 1 3 6 10 16 23 31 1+ 3+ 6 + 10 + 16 + 23+ 31 90 F = = = 12.86 7 7 8

Minimizing The Mean Weighted Flow Time In many situations, all jobs are not equally important. WIP inventory values may be different, when jobs have different importance (value). Then, we can assign importance weight or value to each job. 9 Minimizing The Mean Weighted Flow Time Sequence the jobs so as to minimize WSPT (Weighted Shortest Processing Time) rule can establish this objective n 1 Fv = vi F i(k) n k = 1 F v 10

WSPT (Weighted Shortest Processing Time) 11 WSPT Example A company has a production line that can produce six parts (coded as JAxx). The time required to produce each part, and their per unit material costs are given in the following table. How would you schedule these parts through the line to minimize the inventory cost of work-inprocess? Assume inventory holding cost is 40% per year, and each week contains 40 hours. Part, i JA01 JA02 JA03 JA04 JA05 JA06 P i (minutes) 2.5 5 3.2 4 7 3 Q i (units) 100 50 10 60 50 100 c i,unit cost ($) 5 20 1 40 100 4 12

WSPT Example Part, i JA01 JA02 JA03 JA04 JA05 JA06 P i (minutes) 2.5 5 3.2 4 7 3 Q i (units) 100 50 10 60 50 100 c i,unit cost ($) 5 20 1 40 100 4 ratio P i / c i 0.5 0.25 3.2 0.1 0.07 0.75 Sequence: JA05 JA04 JA02 JA01 JA06 JA03 F5[1] = 7 F4[2] = 7 + 4 = 11 F2[3] = 11 + 5 = 16 F v = 277.2 F1[4] = 16 + 2.5 = 18.5 F6[5] = 18.5 + 3 = 21.5 F3[6] = 21.5 + 3.2 = 24.7 (not real C max ) 13 Minimizing The Maximum Tardiness 14

EDD (Earliest Due Date) 15 EDD Example F F Job, i 1 2 3 4 5 6 P i 1 1.5 2 4 0.5 3 d i 7 3 8 12 9 3 16

SPT sequence (solution to a) Job, i 5 1 2 3 6 4 P i 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 4 d i 9 7 3 8 3 12 C i 0.5 1.5 3 5 8 12 L i -8.5-5.5 0-3 5 0 T i 0 0 0 0 5 0 E i 8.5 5.5 0 3 0 0 17 EDD sequence (solution to b) Job, i 2 6 1 3 5 4 P i 1.5 3 1 2 0.5 4 d i 3 3 7 8 9 12 C i 1.5 4.5 5.5 7.5 8 12 L i -1.5 1.5-1.5-0.5-1 0 T i 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 E i 1.5 0 1.5 0.5 1 0 18

Minimizing The Number of Tardy Jobs 19 Moore Hodgson Algorithm 20

Moore Hodgson Algorithm 21 Moore Hodgson Algorithm Example Consider the following jobs, and find a sequence to minimize the number of tardy jobs. Job, i 1 2 3 4 5 6 P i 10 3 4 8 10 6 d i 15 6 9 23 20 30 22

EDD sequence: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 1 10 15 17 2 2 5 10 20 27 7 7 4 8 23 35 12 12 6 6 30 41 11 11 23 Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 1: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 1 10 15 17 2 2 5 4 6 Tardiness occurs 24

Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 2: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 1 10 15 17 2 2 5 4 6 25 Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 3: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 1 10 15 17 2 2 5 4 6 Remove job 1 from the sequence 26

Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 1: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 5 10 20 17-3 0 4 8 23 25 2 2 6 Tardiness occurs 27 Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 2: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 5 10 20 17-3 0 4 8 23 25 2 2 6 28

Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 3: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 5 10 20 17-3 0 4 8 23 25 2 2 6 Remove job 5 from the sequence 29 Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 1: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 4 8 23 15-8 0 6 6 30 21-11 0 NO Tardiness occurs 30

Moore Hodgson Algorithm Step 4: Ji Pi di Ci Li Ti 2 3 6 3-3 0 3 4 9 7-2 0 4 8 23 15-8 0 6 6 30 21-11 0 1 10 15 31 16 16 5 10 20 41 21 21 31 Sequence Dependent Setup Times If the setup times are sequence independent, then they are included in P i (processing time). Example for dependent setup time: Color changes in glass industry: Normal colored changeover (setup time) is short, Colored normal changeover (setup time) is long, This is known as the problem of sequence dependent setup times. 32

Sequence Dependent Setup Times Performance measure: C max C max is a function of the order in which jobs are processed. C max = F max = F n [ n] = S[ k-1],[ k] + Pi [ k] i k = 1 n k = 1 Where; S [k-1],[k] = The time to changeover from the job in position [k-1] to the job in position [k]. 33 Regret based algorithm Step 1: Reduce the matrix by row: minimum element in each row is subtracted from every element of that row Step 2: Reduce the matrix by column: minimum element in each column is subtracted from every element of that column Step 3: Calculate the regret value for every zero element in the matrix: the smallest elements in the column and row corresponding to the zero element are summed Step 4: Choose the zero element with largest regret: Select i*, j* with R i*j* = max{r ij }, i=1..n ; j=1..n Assign job pair in sequence as i* j* Step 5: Prohibit a subtour by setting p j*k* =, (k* is the first job of the subtour) remove row i* and column j* from the matrix, go to step 1 34

Regret based algorithm- Example 35 Steps 1 and 2: Matrix reduction C max = 19 36

Steps 3 and 4: Calculate regret values and assign job pair in sequence as i*,j* with largest regret value Subtours after iteration 1 = (5,2) 37 Step 5: set p 2,5 =, remove the row 5 and column 2 from the matrix Go to step 1 38

Steps 1 and 2: Matrix reduction C max = 19+5 = 24 39 Steps 3 and 4: Calculate regret values and assign job pair in sequence as i*,j* with largest regret value Subtours after iteration 2 = (5,2), (3,1) 40

Step 5: set p 1,3 =, remove the row 3 and column 1 from the matrix, go to step 1 for the third iteration as follows: C max = 24 Subtours after iteration 3 = (5,2), (3,1,4) 41 set p 4,3 =, remove the row 1 and column 4 from the matrix, go to step 1 for the next iteration as follows: C max = 24 Complete tour after iteration 4 = (5,2,3,1,4,5) 42