arxiv:6.789v [math.ap] Aug 7 STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION WITH POTENTIALS V OF CRITICAL DECAY SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH Abstract. We study the Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Schrödinger euation in dimension n 3. More specifically, for all Schrödinger admissible pairs (r, ), we establish the estimate e ith f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r,,h f (R n ) when the operator H = A +V satisfies suitable conditions. In the purely electric case A, we extend the class of potentials V to the Fefferman- Phong class. In doing so, we apply a weighted estimate for the Schrödinger euation developed by Ruiz and Vega. Moreover, for the endpoint estimate of the magnetic case in R 3, we investigate an euivalence H 4f L r (R 3 ) C H,r ( ) 4f L r (R 3 ) and find sufficient conditions on H and r for which the euivalence holds.. Introduction Consider the Cauchy problem of the magnetic Schrödinger euation in R n+ (n 3): { i t u Hu =, (x,t) R n R, (.) u(x,) = f(x), f S. Here, S is the Schwartz class, and H is the electromagnetic Schrödinger operator H = A +V(x), A = ia(x), where A = (A,A,,A n ) : R n R n and V : R n R. The magnetic field B is defined by B = DA (DA) T M n n, where (DA) ij = xi A j, (DA) T denotes the transpose of DA, and M n n is the space of n n real matrices. In dimension n = 3, B is determined by the cross product with the vector field curla: Bv = curla v (v R 3 ). In this paper, we consider the Strichartz type estimate (.) u L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r,,h f L (R n ), where u = e ith f is the solution to problem (.) with solution operator e ith, and study some conditions on A, V and pairs (r,) for which the estimate holds. Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 35Q4, 46E35. Key words and phrases. Strichartz estimates, magnetic Schrödinger euation, Fefferman- Phong class.
SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH For the unperturbed case of (.) that A and V, Strichartz [33] proved the ineuality e it f L (n+) n (R n+ ) C n f L (R n ), where e it is the solution operator given by e it f(x) = (π) n R n e ix ξ+it ξ f(ξ)dξ. Later, Keel and Tao [3] generalized this ineuality to the following: (.3) e it f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r, f (R n ) holds if and only if (r,) is a Schrödinger admissible pair; that is, r,, (r,) (,) and n r + = n. In the purely electric case of (.) that A, the decay V(x) / x has been known to be critical for the validity of the Strichartz estimate. It was shown by Goldberg, Vega and Visciglia [] that for each ǫ >, there is a counterexample of V = V ǫ with V(x) x +ǫ for x such that the estimate fails to hold. In a postive direction, Rodnianski and Schlag [6] proved (.4) u L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r,,v f L (R n ) for non-endpoint admissible pairs (r, ) (i.e., > ) with almost critical decay V(x) /(+ x ) +ǫ. On the other hand, Bur, Planchon, Stalkerand Tahvildar- Zadeh [3] established (.4) for critical decay V(x) / x with some technical conditions on V but the endpoint case included. Other than these, there have been many related positive results; see, e.g., [], [8], [], [6] and []. In regard to the purely electric case, the following is the first main result of this paper whose proof is given in section. Theorem.. Let n 3 and A. Then there exists a constant c n >, depending only on n, such that for any V F p ( n < p < n ) satisfying (.5) V F p c n, estimate (.4) holds for all n r + = n and >. Moreover, if V L n in addition, then (.4) holds for the endpoint case (r,) = ( n n,). Here, F p is the Fefferman-Phong class with norm V F p = sup r ( r>,x R n r n V(x) p dx B r(x ) ) p <, whichisclosedundertranslation. FromthedefinitionofF p, wedirectlygetl n, F p forallp < n. ThustheclassFp (p < n )clearlycontainsthepotentialsofcritical decay V(x) / x. Moreover, F p (p < n ) is strictly larger than L n,. For instance, if the potential function (.6) V(x) = φ ( x ) x, φ L p (S n ), x n < p < n, then V need not belong to L n,, but V F p. According to Theorem., for the non-endpoint case, we do not need any other conditions on V but its uantitative bound (.5), so that we can extend and much simplify the known results for potentials V(x) / x (e.g., φ L (S n ) in (.6)), mentioned above. To prove this, we use a weighted estimate developed by
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION 3 Ruiz and Vega [8]. We remark that our proof follows an approach different from those used in the previous works. Unfortunately, for the endpoint case, we need an additional condition that V L n. Although L n dose not contain the potentials of critical decay, it still includes those of almost critical decay V(x) φ( x x )min( x (+ǫ), x ( ǫ) ), φ L n (S n ). In case of dimension n = 3, we can find a specific bound for V, which plays the role of c n in Theorem.. We state this as the second result of the paper. Theorem.. If n = 3, A and V L 3/ < π /3, then estimate (.4) holds for all 3 r + = 3 and. To prove this, we use the best constant of the Stein-Tomas restriction theorem in R 3, obtained by Foschi [3], and apply it to an argument in Ruiz and Vega [8]. Next, we consider the general (magnetic) case that A or V can be different from zero. In this case, the Coulomb decay A(x) / x seems critical. (In [5], there is a counterexample for n 3. The case n = is still open.) In an early work of Stefanov [3], estimate (.) for n 3 was proved, that is, (.7) e ith f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r,,h f L (R n ) for all Schrödinger admissible pairs (r, ) under some smallness assumptions on the potentials A and V. Later, for potentials of almost critical decay A(x) / x +ǫ and V(x) / x +ǫ ( x ), D Ancona, Fanelli, Vega and Visciglia [7] established (.7) for all Schrödinger admissible pairs (r,) in n 3, except the endpoint case (n,r,) = (3,6,), under some technical conditions on A and V. Also, there have been many related positive results; see, e.g., [7], [], [6], [4], [], [9] and [4]. Despite all these results, there has been no known positive result on the estimate in case of potentials A of critical decay even in the case V. Regarding the general case, we state the last result of the paper whose proof is provided in section 4. Theorem.3. Let n 3, A,V Cloc (Rn \{}) and ǫ >. Assume that the operator A = ( ia) and H = A +V are self-adjoint and positive on and that (.8) V K = sup x R n V (y) πn/ x y n dy < Γ( n ). Assume also that there is a constant C ǫ > such that A and V satisfy the almost critical decay condition (.9) A(x) + V(x) C ǫ min ( x ǫ, x +ǫ ), and the Coulomb gauge condition (.) A =. Lastly, for the trapping component of B as B τ (x) = (x/ x ) B(x), assume that (.) sup x =r x 3 B τ (x) dr+ sup x =r x ( r V(x) ) dr < + M if n = 3,
4 SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH for some M >, and that (.) x B τ (x) + x 3( r V(x) ) L + < (n )(n 3) if n 4. L 3 Only for n = 3, we also assume the boundness of the imagnary power of H: (.3) H iy BMO BMOH C(+ y ) 3/. Then we have (.4) e ith f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r,,h,ǫ f L (R n ), n r + = n and. Note that this result covers the endpoint case (n,r,) = (3,6,); but the conclusions for the other cases are the same as in [7]. Here, V ± denote the positive and negative parts of V, respectively; that is, V + = max{v,} and V = max{ V,}. Also, we say that a function V is of Kato class if V K := sup x R n V(y) x y n dy <, and Γ in (.8) is the gamma function, defined by Γ(α) = x α e x dx. The last condition (.3) for n = 3 may seem a bit technical but not be artificial. For instance, by Lemma 6. in [8], we know that H iy L BMO H C( + y ) 3/ using only (.8). Also, there are many known sufficient conditions to extend such an estimate to BMO BMO, like the translation invariant operator (See [5]). For the definition and some basic properties of BMO H space, see section 3. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In section, we prove Theorems. and.. An euivalence of norms regarding H and in R 3 is investigated in section 3. Lastly, in section 4, Theorem.3 is proved.. The case A : Proof of Theorem. and. In this section, the proof of Theorems. and. is provided. Let n 3, and consider the purely electric Schrödinger euation in R n+ : { i t u+ u = V(x)u, (x,t) R n R, (.) u(x,) = f(x), f S. By Duhamel s principle, we have a formal solution to problem (.) given by u(x,t) = e ith f(x) = e it f(x) i t e i(t s) V(x)e ish fds. From the standard Strichartz estimate (.3), there holds t e ith f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C n,r, f (R n ) + e i(t s) V(x)e ish fds R L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) for all Schrödinger admissible pairs (r,). Thus it is enough to show that t (.) e i(t s) V(x)e ish fds C L n,r,,v f L (R n ). t (R;Lr x (Rn )) for all Schrödinger admissible pairs (r, ). By the duality argument, estimate (.) is euivalent to t e i(t s) ( V(x)e ish f ),G(,t) dsdt C f L (R n ) G L. t (R;Lr x (Rn )) x
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION 5 Now, we consider the left-hand side of this ineuality. Commuting the operator and integration, we have t e i(t s) ( V(x)e ish f ),G(,t) dsdt R = = R R t By Hölder s ineuality, we have V(x)e ish f, R x V(x)e ish f,e i(t s) G(,t) V(x)e ish f, e ish f x,s ( V ) s s x e i(t s) G(,t)dt e i(t s) G(,t)dt s x ds dsdt x ds. e i(t s) G(,t)dt. x,s ( V ) Thanks to [8, Theorem 3], for any n < p < n, we have (.3) e ith f x,t ( V ) C n V F p f (R n ) if condition (.5) holds for some suitable constant c n. More specifically, by Propositions.3 and 4. in [8], we have e ith f e it f t + x,t ( V ) e i(t s) V(x)e ish fds x,t ( V ) x,t ( V ) C V F p f +C V F pv(x)e ith f x,t ( V ) = C V F p f +C V F p e ith f x,t ( V ). Thus, if V F p /(C ) =: c n, we get e ith f x,t ( V ) C V F p f + eith f x,t ( V ), and this implies (.3) by setting C n = C. As a result, we can reduce (.) to (.4) e i(t s) G(,s)ds C n,r,,v G x,t ( V ) L t. t (R;Lr x (Rn )) It now remains to establish(.4). First, from[8, Proposition.3] and the duality of Keel-Tao s result (.3), we know e i(t s) e G(,s)ds = it e is G(,s)ds R x,t ( V ) R x,t ( V ) (.5) C n V F p e is G(,s)ds C n,r, V F p G L t Lr x for all Schrödinger admissible pair (r, ). In turn, (.5) implies t (.6) e i(t s) G(,s)ds C n,r, V F p G x,t ( V ) L R x t (R;Lr x (Rn ))
6 SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH by the Christ-Kiselev lemma [5] for >. Combining (.5) with (.6), we directly get (.4) for >. Next, for the endpoint case (r,) = ( n n,), we have (.7) t t e i(t s) G(,s)ds V e i(t s) G(,s)ds x,t ( V ) L n n x t (R;L n C n V L n x G n t (R;L n+ x (R n )) x (R n )) from Hölder s ineuality in x with the inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates by Keel- Tao. Observenowthat (.7) implies (.4) when = with the assumption V L n x. The proof of Theorem. is now complete. Now, we will find a suitable constant in Theorem.. For this, we refine estimate (.3) based on an argument in [8]. We recall the Fourier transform in R n, defined by f(ξ) = e ix ξ f(x)dx, R n and its basic properties f(x) = (π) n e ix ξ f(ξ)dξ and f (R n ) = f L R n (π) n (R n ). Thus, we can express e it f using the polar coordinates with r = λ as follows: e it f = (π) n e itr e ix ξ f(ξ)dσr (ξ)dr Take F as = (π) n e itλ S n r e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ λ (ξ)λ dλ. S n λ F(λ) = e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ λ (ξ)λ S n λ if λ and F(λ) = if λ <. Then, by Plancherel s theorem in t, we get e it f π ( ) = x,t ( V ) 4(π) n F(λ) dλ V(x) dx R n R π ( = (π) n e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ λ (ξ) ) λ dλ V(x) dx R n S n λ = π ( (π) n e ix ξ f(ξ)dσr (ξ) ) V(x) dx r dr. R n S n r Now, we consider the n = 3 case and apply the result on the best constant of the Stein-Tomas restriction theorem in R 3 obtained by Foschi [3]. That is, fdσ L4 (R 3 ) π f (S ) where fdσ(x) = e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ(ξ). S n Interpolating this with a trivial estimate fdσ L (R 3 ) f L (S ) 4π f (S ),
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION 7 we get fdσ L 6 (R 3 ) /6 (π) 5/6 f (S ). By Hölder s ineuality, we have ( e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ(ξ) ) V(x) dx e ix ξ f(ξ)dσ(ξ) R 3 S S L 6 V L 3/ So we get /3 (π) 5/3 V L 3/ f (S ). e it f x,t ( V ) π (π) 6/3 (π) 5/3 V L 3/ f = π /3 V L 3/ f. By the argument as in the proof of Theorem., we have e ith f x,t ( V ) e it f t x,t ( V ) + e i(t s) V(x)e ish fds = x,t ( V ) V f π /6 L 3/ + π /3 V L V(x)e ith f 3/ x,t ( V ) V f π /6 L 3/ + π /3 V L 3/ eith f x,t ( V ). Thus, if V L 3/ < π /3, then (.8) e ith f C x,t ( V ) V f. Using (.8) instead of (.3) in that argument, the proof of Theorem. is complete. 3. The euivalence of two norms involving H and in R 3 In this section, we investigate some conditions on H and p with which the euivalence H 4 f L p (R 3 ) C H,p ( ) 4 f Lp (R 3 ) holds. This euivalence was studied in [7] and [4] that are of independent interest. We now introduce such an euivalence in a form for n = 3, which enables us to include the endpoint estimate also for that dimension. Proposition 3.. Given A loc (R3 ;R 3 ) and V : R 3 R measurable, assume that the operators A = ( ia) and H = A +V are self-adjoint and positive on and that (.3) holds. Moreover, assume that V + is of Kato class and that A and V satisfy (.8) and ( (3.) A(x) ) + A(x) + V(x) C min x ǫ, x +ǫ for some < ǫ and C >. Then the following estimates hold: (3.) H 4 f L p C ǫ,p C ( ) 4 f L p, < p 6, (3.3) H 4 f L p C p ( ) 4 f L p, 4 3 < p < 4.
8 SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH In showing this, we only prove (3.) as estimate (3.3) is the same as [7, Theorem.]. When < p < 6, estimate (3.) easily follows from the Sobolev embedding theorem. However, in order to extend the range of p up to 6, we need a precise estimate which depends on ǫ in(3.). Towards this, we introduce a weighted Sobolev ineuality as below. Lemma 3.. (Theorem (B) in [9]). Suppose < α < n, < p < < and v (x) and v (x) are nonnegative measurable functions on R n. Let v (x) and v (x) p satisfy the reverse doubling condition: there exist δ,ǫ (,) such that v (x) ǫ v (x)dx for all cubes Q R n. δq Then the ineuality ( f(x) v (x)dx R n holds if and only if Q α n ( Qv (x)dx ) ( Q Q ) C ( R n ( ) α/ f(x) p v (x)dx ) p ) v (x) p p dx C for all cubes Q R n. From Lemma 3., we obtain a weighted estimate as follows. Lemma 3.3. Let f be a C (R3 ) function, and suppose that a nonnegative weight function w satisfies ( ) (3.4) w(x) min x ǫ, x +ǫ for some < ǫ. Then, for any < p 3, we have fw L p C ǫ,p f L p. Proof. For all < p < 3, we directly get (3.5) x f L p C x L 3 f, 3p C f L 3 p,p L p from Hölder s ineuality in Lorentz spaces and the Sobolev embedding theorem. For p = 3, by Hölder s ineuality, we get ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 f(x) 3 3 3 w(x) dx f(x) w(x) ( θ) dx w(x) 3 3 θ 3 dx R 3 R 3 R3 for any 3 3 < < and < θ <. Taking θ =, we have ( ) f(x) 3 3 (R3 ) 3 w(x) dx Cǫ, f(x) w(x) 3 dx R 3 because of (3.4). Thus, using Lemma 3. with α =, (p,) = ( 3,), v (x) = w(x) 3 and v (x), we have ( ) (3.6) f(x) 3 3 (R3 ) 3 w(x) dx Cǫ, f(x) 3 3 3 w(x) dx. R 3 Combining (3.5) and (3.6), the proof is complete.
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION 9 Finally, we prove Proposition 3.. We use Stein s interpolation theorem to the analytic family of operators T z = H z ( ) z, where H z and ( ) z are defined by the spectral theory. Denoting z = x+iy, we can decompose T z = T x+iy = H iy H x ( ) x ( ) iy. In fact, the operators H iy and ( ) iy are bounded according to the following result. Lemma 3.4. (Proposition. in [7]). Consider the self-adjoint and positive operators A and H = A +V on. Assume that A loc (R3 ;R 3 ) and that the positive and negative parts V ± of V satisfy: V + is of Kato class and V K < π3/ Γ(/). Then for all y R, the imaginary powers H iy satisfy the (,) weak type estimate H iy L L, C(+ y )3. Lemma 3.4 follows from the pointwise estimate for the heat kernel p t (x,y) of the operator e th as p t (x,y) (t) 3/ e x y π 3/ 8t. Γ(/) V K Regarding this estimate, one may refer to some references [3, 3, 4, 9]. By Lemma 3.4, we get (3.7) T iy f p C(+ y ) 3 f p for all < p <. Then by (.3), we have (3.8) T iy f BMOH := M # H( H iy ( ) iy f ) L C(+ y ) 3 ( ) iy f BMO C(+ y ) 3 f L, where M # Hf(x) := sup r> B(x, r) Next, consider the operator T +iy. If B(x,r) f(y) e r H f(y) dy <. (3.9) H( ) f L p C f L p for all < p 3, then by (3.7), we get (3.) T +iy f L p C f L p for all < p 3. Taking T z f := M # H( Tz f ) and applying (3.) with a basic property : (3.) M # H f L p C f Lp for all < p, we have (3.) T +iy f L p C f L p for all < p 3. So, applying Stein s interpolation theorem to (3.8) and (3.), we obtain T /4 f L p C f L p for all < p 6, Some properties of the BMOL space can be found in [].
SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH and using (3.) again, we have H /4 f L p C ( ) /4 f L p for all < p 6. Now, we handle the remaining part (3.9); that is, we wish to establish the estimate For a Schwartz function f, we can write Hf L p C f L p. (3.3) Hf = f +ia f +( A +i A+V)f. From Hölder s ineuality in Lorentz spaces and the Sobolev embedding theorem, we get A f L r C A L 3, f L 3r 3 r,r C A L 3, f L r for all < r < 3. On the other hand, applying Lemma 3.3 to (3.), we get ( A +i A+V)f L r CC f L r for all < r 3. Thus we have and this implies Proposition 3.. Hf L r C f L r for all < r 3, 4. Proof of Theorem.3 In this final section, we prove Theorem.3. This part follows an argument in [7]. Let u be a solution to problem (.) of the magnetic Schrödinger euation in R n+. By (3.3), we can expand H in (.): H = +ia + A +i A+V. Thus, by Duhamel s principle and the Coulomb gauge condition (.), we have a formal solution to (.) given by (4.) u(x,t) = e ith f(x) = e it f(x) i where t R(x, ) = ia A A +V. e i(t s) R(x, )e ish fds, From [7] and [] (see also (3.4) in [7]), it follows that for every admissible pair (r,), t (4.) e i(t s) F(,s)ds C n,r, j/ χ Cj F x,t, L t Lr x where C j = {x : j x j+ } and χ Cj is the characteristic function of the set C j. Then, from (4.), (.3) and (4.), we know ul e it f t t Lr x L + e i(t s) R(x, )e ish fds t Lr x L t Lr x C n,r, / f +C n,r, j/ χcj R(x, )e ith f. x x,t j Z j Z
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION For the second term in the far right-hand side, we get χ Cj R(x, )e ith f x,t χ Cj A A e ith ( f + χ Cj A + V ) e ith f. x,t x,t Next, we will use a known result in [6], which is a smoothing estimate for the magnetic Schrödinger euation. Lemma 4.. (Theorems.9 and. in [6]). Assume n 3, A and V satisfy conditions (.), (.) and (.). Then, for any solution u to (.) with f and A f, the following estimate holds: sup R> R x R C A ( A ) 4 f. A u dxdt + sup R> R From (.9) with Lemma 4., we have j/ χcj A A e ith f j Z j Z j( sup x C j A ( j Z )( x,t j+ )( j sup A sup x C j R> R x R x =R u dσ(x)dt ) A u dxdt x j+ ) A u dxdt C A,ǫ ( A ) 4 f L x and j/ χcj ( A + V ) e ith f j Z j Z x,t r j j Z j/( ( sup A + V ))( j+ x C j ( j ( sup A + V ))( sup x C j R> R C A,V,ǫ ( A ) 4 f L x. ) r u dσ r (x)dtdr x =r x =R u dσ R (x)dt That is, e ith f L C n,r, / f t Lr x +C ( A n,r,,a,v,ǫ ) 4 f. x x First, consider the case n = 3. By (.9), estimate (3.) in Proposition 3. holds for all < p 6. (Here, H = A +V.) Then by (3.3) in Proposition 3., we get H 4 e ith f L t (R;Lr x (R3 )) C e ith f L t (R;Lr x (R3 )) (4.3) ) C f L x (R 3 ) +C ( A ) 4 f L x (R 3 ) C H 4 f L x (R 3 )
SEONGHAK KIM AND YOUNGWOO KOH for all admissible pairs (r, ). (It clearly includes the endpoint case (n, r, ) = (3,6,).) Next, for the case n 4, we already know that (3.) holds for < p < n and that (3.3) is valid for 4 3 < p < 4 under the same conditions on A and V (see [7, Theorem.]). Thus we can easily get the same bound as (4.3) for all admissible pairs (r, ). Since the operators H 4 and e ith commutes, we get e ith f L t (R;Lr x (Rn )) C f x (R n ) from (4.3), and this completes the proof. Acknowledgment Y. Koh was partially supported by NRF Grant 6RDAB39349(Republic of Korea). The authors thank the referee for careful reading of the manuscript and many invaluable comments. References [] Barceló, J.A., Ruiz, A., Vega, L. (6). Some dispersive estimates for Schrödinger euations with repulsive potentials. J. Funct. Anal. 36:-4. [] Beceanu, M., Goldberg, M. (). Schrödinger dispersive estimates for a scaling-critical class of potentials. Commun. Math. Phys. 34:47-48. [3] Bur, N., Planchon, F., Stalker, J., Tahvildar-Zadeh, S. (4). Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schrödinger euations with potentials of critical decay. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 53, no.6:665-68. [4] Cacciafesta, F., D Ancona, P. (). Weighted L p estimates for powers of selfadjoint operators. Adv. Math. 9, no.:5-53. [5] Christ, M., Kiselev, A. (). Maximal operators associated to filtrations. J. Funct. Anal. 79:49-45. [6] D Ancona, P., Fanelli, L. (8). Strichartz and smoothing estimates for dispersive euations with magnetic potentials. Comm. Partial Differential Euations 33:8-. [7] D Ancona, P., Fanelli, L., Vega, L., Visciglia, N. (). Endpoint Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Schrödinger euation. J. Funct. Anal. 58:37-34. [8] Duong, X.T., Duong, X.T., Sikora, A., Yan, L. (8). Comparison of the classical BMO with the BMO spaces associated with operaotrs and applications Rev. Math. Iberoam. 4, no.:67-96. [9] Duong, X.T., Sikora, A., Yan, L. (). Weighted norm ineualities, Gaussian bounds and sharp spectral multipliers. J. Funct. Anal. 6:6-3. [] Duong, X.T., Yan, L. (5). New function spaces of BMO type, the John-Nirenberg ineuality, interpolation, and applications. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58:375-4. [] Erdogan, M.B., Goldberg, M., Schlag, W. (9). Strichartz and smoothing estimates for Schrödinger operators with almost critical magnetic potentials in three and higher dimensions. Forum Math. :687-7. [] Erdogan, M.B., Goldberg, M., Schlag, W. (8). Strichartz and smoothing estimates for Schrödinger operators with large magnetic potentials in R 3. J. Eur. Math. Soc. :57-53. [3] Foschi, D. (5). Global maximizers for the sphere adjoint Fourier restriction ineuality. J. Funct. Anal. 68:69-7. [4] Fanelli, L., Felli, V., Fontelos, M.A., Primo, A. (3). Time decay of scaling critical electromagnetic Scrödinger flows. Commun. Math. Phys. 34:33-67. [5] Fanelli, L., Garcia, A. (). Counterexamples to Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Scrödinger euation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 3, no.:3-34. [6] Fanelli, L., Vega, L. (9). Magnetic virial identities, weak dispersion and Strichartz ineualities. Math. Ann. 344:49-78. [7] Georgiev, V., Stefanov, A., Tarulli, M. (7). Smoothing - Strichartz estimates for the Schrödinger euation with small magnetic potential. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 7:77-786.
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE MAGNETIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION 3 [8] Goldberg, M. (6). Dispersive estimates for the three-dimensional Schrödinger euation with rough potential. Amer. J. Math. 8:73-75. [9] Goldberg, M. (). Strichartz estimates for Schrödinger operators with a non-smooth magnetic potential. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 3:9-8. [] Goldberg M., Schlag, W. (4). Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators in dimensions one and three. Comm. Math. Phys. 5:57-78. [] Goldberg, M., Vega, L., Visciglia, N. (6). Counterexamples of Strichartz ineualities for Schrödinger euations with repulsive potentials. Int. Math. Res. Not. 6, article ID 397. [] Ionescu, A.D., Kenig, C. (5). Well-posedness and local smoothing of solutions of Schrödinger euations. Math. Res. Lett. :93-5. [3] Keel, M., Tao, T. (998). Endpoint Strichartz estimates. Amer. J. Math., no.5:955-98. [4] Marzuola, J., Metcalfe, J., Tataru, D. (8). Strichartz estimates and local smooting estimates for asymptotically flat Schrödinger euation. J. Funct. Anal. 55:497-553. [5] Peetre, J. (966). On convolution operators leaving L p,λ spaces invariant. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 7:95-34. [6] Rodnianski, I., Schlag, W. (4). Time decay for solutions of Schrödinger euations with rough and time-dependent potentials. Invent. Math. 55, no.3:45-53. [7] Ruiz, A., Vega, L. (993). On local regularity of Schrödinger euations. Int. Math. Res. Not. 993 no.:3-7. [8] Ruiz, A., Vega, L. (994). Local regularity of solutions to wave euations with time-dependent potentials. Duke Math. J. 76, no.3:93-94. [9] Sawyer, E., Wheeden, R.L. (99). Weighted ineualities for fractional integrals on Euclidean and homogeneous spaces. Amer. J. Math. 44, no.4:83-874. [3] Sikora, A., Wright, J. (). Imaginary powers of Laplace operators. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9:745-754. [3] Simon, B. (98). Schrödinger semigroups. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 7:447-56. [3] Stefanov, A. (7). Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Schrödinger euation. Adv. Math. :46-33. [33] Strichartz, R.S. (977). Restriction of Fourier transforms to uadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave euations. Duke Math. J. 44, no.3:75-74. Department of Mathematics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 4566, Republic of Korea E-mail address: kimseo4@gmail.com Department of Mathematics Education, Kongju National University, Kongju 3588, Republic of Korea E-mail address: ywkoh@kongju.ac.kr