Indirect Dark Matter search in cosmic rays. F.S. Cafagna, INFN Bari

Similar documents
P A M E L A Payload for Antimatter / Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics

Cosmic Ray Studies with PAMELA Experiment

Antimatter in Space. Mirko Boezio INFN Trieste, Italy. PPC Torino July 14 th 2010

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

Results from the PAMELA Space Experiment

PAMELA: a Satellite Experiment for Antiparticles Measurement in Cosmic Rays

Antiparticle detection in space for dark matter search: the PAMELA experiment.

Introduction to Cosmic Rays Data Analysis Issues. Nicola De Simone INFN and University of Rome Tor Vergata

Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics. PAMELA MissioN 17 December 2010 Prepared by FatiH KAYA

Silicon Detectors for the Search of Cosmic Antimatter and Dark Matter

PAMELA Five Years of Cosmic Ray Observation from Space

Detection of Antimatter in our Galaxy

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

Search for dark matter particles in space: International experiments PAMELA and GAMMA-400

a Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light nuclei Astrophysics

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

PAMELA SPACE MISSION

The space mission PAMELA

Dark Matter Particle Explorer and Its First Results

1 The beginning of Cosmic Ray Physics, the balloons BACKGROUND REJECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS. Aldo Morselli a and Piergiorgio Picozza a.

Astrophysical issues in the cosmic ray e spectra: Have we seen dark matter annihilation?

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Dark Matter Models. Stephen West. and. Fellow\Lecturer. RHUL and RAL

Five Years of PAMELA in orbit

A-Exam: e + e Cosmic Rays and the Fermi Large Array Telescope

Antimatter and DM search in space with AMS Introduction. 2 Cosmology with Cosmic Rays

Monthly Proton Flux. Solar modulation with AMS. Veronica Bindi, AMS Collaboration

Experimental review of high-energy e e + and p p spectra

Indirect Search for Dark Matter with AMS-02

PoS(IDM2010)013. Antiproton and Electron Measurements and Dark Matter Searches in Cosmic Rays. Piergiorgio Picozza.

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Status and perspectives of PAMELA experiment for indirect dark matter search

Lomonosov Moscow State University. NUCLEON Chemical Composition and Energy Spectra of Cosmic Rays at TeV

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Time variations of proton flux in the Earth inner radiation belt for years based on the PAMELA and the ARINA data

Status of the PAMELA silicon tracker

Topics. 1. Towards a unified picture of CRs production and propagation: 2. AMS-02 good candidates for Dark Matter space search

Cosmic Ray Physics with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Implication of AMS-02 positron fraction measurement. Qiang Yuan

Antimatter and dark matter: lessons from ballooning.

Cosmic Ray Excess From Multi-Component Dark Matter

Gamma ray and antiparticles (e + and p) as tools to study the propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy

Current and Future balloon and space experiments L. Derome (LPSC Grenoble) Tango, May 4-6th, 2009

GeV to Multi-TeV Cosmic Rays: AMS-02 Status and Future Prospects

Subir Sarkar

DIETRICH MÜLLER University of Chicago SLAC SUMMER INSTITUTE 2011

High and low energy puzzles in the AMS-02 positron fraction results

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 2 Jul 2009

DARK MATTER SEARCHES WITH AMS-02 EXPERIMENT

PoS(ICRC2017)195. Measurements of electron and positron fluxes below the geomagnetic cutoff by the PAMELA magnetic spectrometer

Precision Cosmic Ray physics with space-born experiment

Testing a DM explanation of the positron excess with the Inverse Compton scattering

The High Energy cosmic-radiation Detection (HERD) Facility onboard China s Future Space Station

Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Cosmic Rays. TeVPA Aug. 7, Yuan-Hann Chang National Central University, Taiwan

First results on the high energy cosmic ray electron spectrum with the Fermi-LAT

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Primary Cosmic Rays : what are we learning from AMS

Cosmic ray electrons from here and there (the Galactic scale)

Dark Matter Particle Explorer: The First Chinese Cosmic Ray and Hard γ-ray Detector in Space

Dark Matter in the Universe

A New View of the High-Energy γ-ray Sky with the Fermi Telescope

Astrophysical issues in indirect DM detection

Detecting or Limiting Dark Matter through Gamma-Ray Telescopes

AMS-02 measurement of cosmic ray positrons and electrons

Evaluation of Galactic Cosmic Rays Models Using AMS2 Data. Francis F. Badavi 1. Christopher J. Mertens 2 Tony C. Slaba 2

Quest for New Physics

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

Gamma Ray Physics in the Fermi era. F.Longo University of Trieste and INFN

Astro2020 Science White Paper Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars

Nikolay Topchiev for the GAMMA-400 Collaboration High-energy gamma-ray studying with GAMMA-400

Evidence of Stochastic Acceleration of Secondary. Antiprotons by Supernova Remnants! Ilias Cholis, 08/09/2017

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Dr. John Kelley Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen

A new look at the cosmic ray positron fraction

Galactic cosmic rays phenomenology: nuclei, antimatter, dark matter

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

AMS-02 Antiprotons Reloaded

Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

Eun-Suk Seo Inst. for Phys. Sci. & Tech. and Department of Physics University of Maryland. Cosmic Rays Eun-Suk Seo

New results from the AMS experiment on the International Space Station. Henning Gast RWTH Aachen

Dark matter annihilations and decays after the AMS-02 positron measurements

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

Latest Results on Dark Matter and New Physics Searches with Fermi. Simona Murgia, SLAC-KIPAC on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon

Cosmic Ray Anomalies from the MSSM?

Indirect Dark Matter constraints with radio observations

University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

The Gamma Large Area Space Telescope: GLAST

Preliminary lecture programme:

GAMMA-400 SPACE OBSERVATORY

Supernova Remnants as Cosmic Ray Accelerants. By Jamie Overbeek Advised by Prof. J. Finley

The High-Energy Interstellar Medium

Physics Letters B 691 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Physics Letters B.

The NUCLEON Space Experiment Preliminary Results. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, , Russia

The LHAASO-KM2A detector array and physical expectations. Reporter:Sha Wu Mentor: Huihai He and Songzhan Chen

Dark matter searches with GLAST

Transcription:

Indirect Dark Matter search in cosmic rays F.S. Cafagna, INFN Bari

Indirect Dark Matter search in cosmic rays With PAMELA experiment An experimentalist point of view F.S. Cafagna, INFN Bari

Why Anti(particle)matter matters? Earth F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 3

Why Anti(particle)matter matters? Earth R.L. Golden F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 4

Why Anti(particle)matter matters? Earth F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 5

Why Anti(particle)matter matters? Earth F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 6

Why Anti(particle)matter matters? Earth F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 7

CR antimatter detector cookbook Charge identification Good ( 1TV) Maximum Detectable Rigidity (MDR) to defeat particle spillover (pbar) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 8

CR antimatter detector cookbook -1 Z +1 p p (+ e + ) e - (+ p-bar) spillover p p-bar Deflection: = 1/R 5 GV 1 GV R 100GV F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 9

CR antimatter detector cookbook Charge identification Good ( 1TV) Maximum Detectable Rigidity (MDR) to defeat particle spillover (pbar) Good ( e/h > 10-5 ) particle identification (positron) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 10

CR antimatter detector cookbook (Proton flux) x 0.01 Electron flux PDG (2010) Positron/Proton rejection factor > 10-5 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 11

CR antimatter detector cookbook Charge identification Good ( 1TV) Maximum Detectable Rigidity (MDR) to defeat particle spillover (pbar) Good ( e/h > 10-5 ) particle identification (positron) Redundancy to calculate efficiencies and systematic in flight (absolute fluxes) All other useful detectors Very low secondary background -> SPACE F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 12

Milky Way as seen by a CR physicist D. Maurin et al., arxiv:astro-ph/0212111 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 13

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 14

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 15

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 16

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 17

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 18

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 19

M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ Antimatter from DM calculation F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 20

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 21

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/ F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 22

Antimatter from DM calculation M. Cirelli, NOW 2010 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 23 http://www.ba.infn.it/~now/now2010/

Italy: PAMELA Collaboration Bari Florence Frascati Naples Rome Trieste CNR, Florence Germany: Siegen Sweden: Russia: KTH, Stockholm F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 24 Moscow / St. Petersburg

PAMELA detectors Main requirements high-sensitivity antiparticle identification and precise momentum measure GF: 21.5 cm 2 sr Mass: 470 kg Size: 130x70x70 cm 3 Power Budget: 360W F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 25

PAMELA detectors Main requirements high-sensitivity antiparticle identification and precise momentum measure Time-Of-Flight plastic scintillators + PMT -Trigger; -Albedo rejection; -Mass identification up to 1 GeV; -Charge identification from de/dx. + - GF: 21.5 cm 2 sr Mass: 470 kg Size: 130x70x70 cm 3 Power Budget: 360W Electromagnetic calorimeter W/Si sampling (16.3 X 0, 0.6 I ) Discrimination e + / p, pbar/e - (shower topology) Direct E measurement for e - Neutron detector & Shower-tail catcher (S4): -High-energy e/h discrimination Spectrometer microstrip silicon tracking system+permanent magnet Magnetic rigidity (R = pc/ze) Charge sign Charge value from de/dx F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 26

Design Performance Antiprotons Positrons Electrons Protons Electrons+positrons Light Nuclei (He/Be/C) 80 MeV - 150 GeV 50 MeV 270 GeV up to 400 GeV up to 700 GeV up to 2 TeV (calorimeter alone) up to 200 GeV/n AntiNuclei search sensitivity of 3x10-8 in He/He Simultaneous measurement of many cosmic-ray species New energy range Unprecedented statistics F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 27

PAMELA: the integration F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 28

The Resurs DK-1 spacecraft Mass: 6.7 tons Height: 7.4 m Solar array area: 36 m 2 PAMELA inside a pressurized container Moved from parking to data-taking position few times/year Multi-spectral remote sensing of earth s surface near-real-time high-quality images Built by the Space factory TsSKB Progress in Samara (Russia) Operational orbit parameters: inclination ~70 o altitude ~ 360-600 km (elliptical) Active life >3 years Data transmitted via Very highspeed Radio Link (VRL) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 29

PAMELA: in the satellite & launch Launch from Baikonur: June 15th 2006, 0800 UTC. Power On: June 21 st 2006, 0300 UTC. Detectors operated as expected after launch PAMELA in continuous data-taking mode since commissioning phase ended on July 11 th 2006 ~1200 days of data taking (~73% livetime) ~14 TByte of raw data downlinked >1.4x10 9 triggers recorded and under analysis F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 30

TOF & Spectrometer Antiproton Selection e - e + p p TOF & Spectrometer & Charge GV -1 e - e + TOF & Spectrometer & Charge & Calo p p GV -1 p p F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 31 GV -1

High-energy antiproton selection Preliminary R < MDR/10 p-bar spillover p p MDR = 1/s h (evaluated event-by-event by the fitting routine) 10 GV 50 GV MDR depends on: number and distribution of fitted points along the trajectory spatial resolution of the single position measurements magnetic field intensity along the trajectory F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 32

Antiproton to Proton Ratio Adriani et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 121101 (Published September 13, 2010) Stat. & Sys. Errors plotted F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 33

Antiproton Flux Stat. & Sys. Errors plotted Adriani et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 121101 (Published September 13, 2010) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 34

Positron selection with calorimeter 51 GV Positron 80GV Proton Fraction of charge released along the calorimeter track Energy (calo) Momentum (spectrometer) match plan es LEFT HIT RIGHT strips e - e + 0.6 R M p p, d F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 35

The pre-sampler method The electromagnetic calorimeter Characteristics: 44 Si layers (X/Y) +22 W planes 16.3 X o / 0.6 l 0 4224 channels Dynamic range 1400 mip Self-trigger mode (> 300 GeV GF~600 cm 2 sr) PROTON SELECTION 2 W planes: 1.5 X 0 20 W planes: 15 X 0 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 36

The pre-sampler method The electromagnetic calorimeter Characteristics: 44 Si layers (X/Y) +22 W planes 16.3 X o / 0.6 l 0 4224 channels Dynamic range 1400 mip Self-trigger mode (> 300 GeV GF~600 cm 2 sr) POSITRON SELECTION 20 W planes: 15 X 0 2 W planes: 1.5 X 0 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 37

e + background estimation from data Fraction of charge released along the calorimeter track Constrains on: Energy momentum match Shower starting-point presampler p e - p e + Rigidity: 20-28 GV F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 38

Positron to All Electron Fraction Adriani et al., Astropart. Phys. 34 (2010) 1 - arxiv:1001.3522 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 39

DM? PAMELA ability of measuring both proton and electron charge ration, make it possible to put several constrains to the models M. Cirelli, M. Kadastik, M. Raidal, A. Strumia arxiv:0809.2409v3 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 40

Leptophilic DM DM only annihilates into charged leptons. DM masses between 0.4 and 2 TeV, but boost factors on the order of 10 2. D. Grasso et al. Astrop. Phys. 32 (2009), arxiv: 0905.0636v3 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 41

I. Cholis et al. arxiv:0811.3641v1 I. Cholis et al. arxiv:0811.3641v1 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., SeeSep. Neal 2010 Weiner s talk 42

F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 43

Gamma constrains Fermi HESS Bertone, Cirelli, Strumia, Taoso 0811.3744 Cirelli, Panci, Serpico 0912.0663 Decaying DM excluded, leptonic annihilation with fine-tuned parameter F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 44

Wino Dark Matter in a non-thermal Universe G. Kane, R. Lu, and S. Watson arxiv:0906.4765v3 [astro-ph] F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 45

Astrophysical Explanation Pulsars S. Profumo Astro-ph 0812-4457 Mechanism: : the spinning B of the pulsar strips e - that accelerated at the polar cap or at the outer gap emit that make production of e ± that are trapped in the cloud, further accelerated and later released at τ ~ 10 5 years. Young (T ~10 5 years) ) and nearby (< 1kpc) If not: too much diffusion,, low energy, too low flux. Geminga: : 157 parsecs from Earth and 370,000 years old B0656+14: 290 parsecs from Earth and 110,000 years old Many others after Fermi/GLAST Diffuse mature pulsars F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 46

Positrons from Pulsar H. Yüksak et al., arxiv:0810.2784v2 Contributions of e- & e+ from Geminga assuming different distance, age and energetic of the pulsar Diffuse mature & nearby young pulsars Hooper, Blasi, and Serpico arxiv:0810.1527 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 47

Astrophysical Explanation: Pulsars Young, nearby pulsars Geminga pulsar Not a new idea: Boulares, ApJ 342 (1989), Atoyan et al (1995) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 48 48

Astrophysical Explanation: Pulsars contribution of all nearby pulsars in the ATNF catalogue (~150 pulsars) with d < 3 kpc with age 5 104 < T < 107 yr D. Grasso et al. Astrop. Phys. 32 (2009), arxiv: 0905.0636v3 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 49 A. Bruno Vulcano Workshop, 24-29 May 2010 49

Antiprotons & positrons from old SNR s P.Blasi Astro-ph.HE 0904.0871 P. Blasi 0903.2794 Antiproton Positrons positrons created as secondary products of hadronic interactions inside the sources secondary production takes place in the same region where cosmic rays are being accelerated Antiproton/proton and B/C increase for E> 100GeV F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 50

Antiprotons & positrons from old SNR s Adriani et a., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 121101 (Published September 13, 2010) F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 51

Antiprotons & positrons from old SNR s Increase for E > 100 GeV/n? Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 52

Positron Fraction Theoretical Uncertainties Less significant Most significant γ = 3.54 γ = 3.34 T. Delahaye et al., arxiv: 0809.5268v3 F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 53

Electron Flux Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 54

Electron flux (calorimeter based) Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 55

Electron Flux Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 56

Electron flux Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 57

Galactic H & He Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 59

Galactic H & He Preliminary F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 60

Conclusions We are entered in the new era of precision measurements of (anti)particle fluxes in CR. This opens new scenarios in indirect detection of DM but force us to improve our knowledge of the background investigating standard astrophysics. PAMELA data show anomalies only in the positron sector favoring a lepthophilic DM but combined analysis of PAMELA, FERMI and HESS put strong constraints on that DM model. The knowledge of background and particle fluxes must be improved, stay tuned for new PAMELA data on e ±, p & He, B & C fluxes! THANKS!!!! F.S. Cafagna, ERICE 32nd Course: Particle and Nuclear Astroph., Sep. 2010 61