LHC RunII Commissioning and HL-LHC Status

Similar documents
LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

Status and Outlook of the LHC

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

LHC status & 2009/2010 operations. Mike Lamont

THE HIGH LUMINOSITY LHC PROJECT 1

LHC commissioning. 22nd June Mike Lamont LHC commissioning - CMS 1

LHC Beam Operations: Past, Present and Future

Plans for 2016 and Run 2

The LHC Collider. STOA lecture, Brussels, 27 th November 2012 Steve Myers Director of Accelerators and Technology, CERN

LHC Run 2: Results and Challenges. Roderik Bruce on behalf of the CERN teams

Gianluigi Arduini CERN - Beams Dept. - Accelerator & Beam Physics Group

LHC Commissioning in 2008

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

LHC Commissioning The good, the bad the ugly

LHC. Construction Understanding first the commissioning. Prospects for

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

LHC Commissioning and First Operation

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

The Beam Instrumentation and Diagnostic Challenges for LHC Operation at High Energy

Status of the LHC Machine

STATUS OF LHC COMMISSIONING

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Main aim: Preparation for high bunch intensity operation with β*=3.5 m and crossing angle (-100 µrad in IR1 and +100 µrad in IR5)

LHC RUN 2: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

LHC Upgrades and Future Circular Colliders

LHC Status and CERN s future plans. Lyn Evans

The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN

Thanks to all Contributors

Overview of LHC Accelerator

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)149. LHC, HL-LHC and beyond. M. Lamont.

HL-LHC: parameter space, constraints & possible options

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

Preliminary design of the new HL-LHC beam screen for the low-β triplets

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

Luminosity for the 100 TeV collider

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Will LHCb be running during the HL-LHC era? Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration

PUBLICATION. Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

R&D ON FUTURE CIRCULAR COLLIDERS

Practical Lattice Design

BEAM DYNAMICS STUDIES FOR HILUMI LHC

FLUKA studies on the radiation in the Point 5 Q6-Q7 area: Roman Pots, TCL6 and RR

Commissioning of the LHC collimation system S. Redaelli, R. Assmann, C. Bracco, M. Jonker and G. Robert-Demolaize CERN, AB department

Plans for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade Summary of the CARE-HHHAPD-LUMI-05 workshop

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

Operational Experience with HERA

Status of the LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Chamonix XII: LHC Performance Workshop. Requirements from the experiments in Year 1*

Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?

Superconducting Magnets for Future Electron-Ion Collider. Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, USA

LHC Collimation and Loss Locations

Much of this material comes from lectures given by Philippe Lebrun (head of CERN's Accelerator Technology Department), at SUSSP, Aug

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Milestone Report. Cryogenic Scenarios for the Cold Powering System

LHC upgrade based on a high intensity high energy injector chain

FCC-hh Final-Focus for Flat-Beams: Parameters and Energy Deposition Studies

LHC Upgrade (accelerator)

Machine Protection Systems

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

The LHC accelerator: Technology and First Commissioning

Beam-induced heat loads on the beam screens of the inner triplets for the HL-LHC

HL-LHC OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS

COLLECTIVE EFFECTS IN THE LHC AND ITS INJECTORS

Early Physics with the CMS detector at LHC

CERN & the High Energy Frontier

Run II Status and Prospects

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Signaling the Arrival of the LHC Era December Current Status of the LHC. Albert De Roeck CERN Switzerland

Impact of the forces due to CLIQ discharges on the MQXF Beam Screen. Marco Morrone, Cedric Garion TE-VSC-DLM

Machine Protection Basics of Accelerator Science and Technology at CERN

HE-LHC Optics Development

Daniel Wollmann, CERN

LHC State of the Art and News

We acknowledge the support of the European Community-Research Infrastructure Activity under the FP6 "Structuring the European Research Area"

OTHER MEANS TO INCREASE THE SPS 25 ns PERFORMANCE TRANSVERSE PLANE

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

ERL FACILITY AT CERN FOR APPLICATIONS

Electron Cloud Studies made at CERN in the SPS

Results of UFO dynamics studies with beam in the LHC

Turn-around improvements

Tobias Baer February, 9 th 2012

LHC. LHC Crabs, Status. Brief Overview. Status of Technology R&D. Status of Simulations & Experiments. Rama Calaga RFTECH, Dec 2-3, 2010

Challenges and Plans for the Proton Injectors *

CesrTA Status Report Mark Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration March 4, 2009 ESR

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

TLEP White Paper : Executive Summary

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF SUPERCONDUCTING AND CRYOGENIC EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS FOR ACCELERATORS BY IHEP

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

The MD was done at 450GeV using beam 2 only. An MD focussing on injection of bunches with nominal emittance was done in parallel on beam 1.

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

Transcription:

LHC RunII Commissioning and HL-LHC Status The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404. PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 1

LHC: big (27km), cold (1.8K), high energy (7 TeV on 7 TeV) Beam dumps Collimation Injection B2 2-in-1 magnet design p-p, Pb-Pb & p-pb collisions Injection B1 RF Collimation PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 1720 Power converters > 9000 magnetic elements 7568 Quench detection systems 1088 Beam position monitors 4000 Beam loss monitors 150 tonnes Helium, ~90 tonnes at 1.8 K 140 MJ stored beam energy in 2012 370 MJ design and > 500 MJ for HL-LHC! 830 MJ magnetic energy per sector at 6.5 TeV 10 GJ total @ 7 TeV 2

The LHC is NOT a Standalone Machine: TI2 Beam 1 Beam 2 TI8 LHC proton path Year Top energy Length [GeV] [ m ] Linac 1979 0.05 30 PSB 1972 1.4 157 PS 1959 26.0 628 SPS 1976 450.0 6 911 LHC 2008 7000.0 26 657 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

2008 Incident : Melted by arc Dipole busbar 23/04/10 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 4

Joint quality: During repair work in the damaged sector, inspection of the joints revealed systematic voids caused by the welding procedure. Solder No solder wedge bus U-profile bus Extensive simulations and measurements in the lab have show that there is potential for thermal run away in case of a bus-bar quench Decision to start operation of LHC RunI after the S34 repair work at lower beam energy (magnet current) in order to minimize damage in case of failure PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 5

RunI Operation with 50ns bunch spacing (2010-2012) x 15 2010: 0.04 fb -1 7 TeV CoM Commissioning 2011: 6.1 fb -1 7 TeV CoM Exploring the limits 2012: 23.3 fb -1 8 TeV CoM Production x 4 x 60 in 2 years! 75% of nominal L @ 60% energy and half intensity PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 7

2011: average 12 events/xing, with tails up to ~20 2012: ~30 events/xing at beginning of fill with tails up to ~ 40. Z μμ event from 2012 data with 25 reconstructed vertices Huge efforts Z over μμ last months to prepare for high lumi and pile-up expected in 2012: optimized trigger and offline algorithms (tracking, calo noise treatment, physics objects) mitigate impact of pile-up on CPU, rates, efficiency, identification, resolution The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European in spite of x2 larger CPU/event and event size we do not request additional computing Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404. resources (optimized computing model, increased fraction of fast simulation, etc.) PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

Long Shutdown I from 2013-2014: PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 9

«Old Splice» «Machined Splice» «Consolidated Splice» «Cables» Total interconnects in the LHC: 1,695 (10,170 high current splices) Number of splices redone: ~3,000 (~ 30%) Number of shunts applied: > 27,000 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 «New Splice» «Insulation box» 10

LHC RunII Goals and Plans for 2015 Target energy: 6.5 TeV looking good after a major effort (magnet detraining [up to 50 training quenches] & intermittent earth fault in B8R5 and other circuits) Bunch spacing: 25 ns strongly favored by experiments pile-up Requires careful conditioning (scrubbing) with beam (time) [e-cloud & UFO] β * in ATLAS and CMS: 80 [to 40 cm] Energy Lower quench margins Lower tolerance to beam loss Hardware closer to maximum (beam dumps, power converters etc.) 25 ns Electron-cloud UFOs More long range collisions Larger crossing angle higher β * Higher total beam current Higher intensity per injection PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 13

SCRUBBING FOR 25 ns PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 14

RunII: Operation with 50ns bunch spacing ULO: Unidentified Lying Object (ca. 3mm x 1mm) RCS78 fault & RB78 earth faults MKI vacuum issues limiting intensity (had to be re-conditioned due to vacuum opening B2) Optics measurements April morning Overall good startup and smooth performance with 50ns bunch spacing PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 15

ULO (Unidentified Lying Object) Aperture restriction in 15R8 Aperture restriction measured at injection and 6.5 TeV Presently running with orbit bumps -3 mm in H, +1 mm in V, to optimize available aperture Behavior with higher intensities looks OK D. Pascal, 27.4. LHC morning meeting PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 16

Optics measurements: New magnet transfer function commissioning to 6.5 TeV (from 4TeV in RunI) New machine cycle wrt RunI Measured optics on and off-momentum at 80cm, 70cm and 65 cm with collision tunes. global beta-beat < 10%, at IP1/5 < 5% R. Tomas - OMT, 20.5. LHC morning meeting PSI Seminar5 5 October 2015 2015 17

A nice day at the LHC: 50ns & low intensities 50 bunches @ 50ns per beam Two OP programmed dumps. About 20 hours in stable beams. PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 1

RunII Startup: 25ns bunch spacing RUNII issues with operation @ 25ns bunch spacing: QPS R2E problem UFO rate E-cloud scrubbing Cryo instability with 144+ bunch trains due to transients TDI problems (heating, deformation, coating) (CMS solenoid oil contamination of cooling circuit) PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 19

UFOs Unidentified Falling Objects: Sudden local loss Rise time of the order of 1 ms. Potential explanation: dust particles falling into beam creating scatter losses and showers propagating downstream R~10 µm Distributed around the ring arcs, inner triplets, IRs Even without quench, preventive dumps by QPS PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 20 20

UFOs RunI Observations: No. of UFO events have been seen to exceed 10+/hour with notable increases after long shutdowns (beam energy), decreasing bunch spacing, total current 16/hr No. Arc UFOs/hour Beam loss monitor thresholds have been set judiciously Essentially relying on conditioning BLM Dose in Arc, Jan 2011-Dec 2012. PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 21

RunII Startup: UFO rates (September) There are many UFOs, a significant number > 1% of threshold In 2 fills we observed UFOs > 90% of threshold! T. Baer, IPAC 2012 THPPP086 G. Papotti 25 ns PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 22

RunII Startup: UFO rates (September) Slight signs of conditioning when normalizing the rate by the total number of bunches T. Baer, IPAC 2012 THPPP086 G. Papotti 25 ns PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 23

Electron Cloud in the LHC: PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 # Heat load on the LHC beam screen # Beam instability via e-cloud coupling # No issue for 50ns bunch spacing # Sever problem for 25ns bunch spacing # Effect depends on SEY of surface # surfaces can be conditioned through e-cloud bombardment beam scrubbing Exploring The Physics Frontiers Oliver with Brüning, Circular CERN Colliders, Aspen, 24 26 January - 1 February 2015

Scrubbing with 25ns: Heat Load Evolution M. Giovannozzi @ LMC September 30 st Conditioning? Gianni Iadarola and e-cloud team Steady (slow) conditioning PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 25

Fault Time in 2015 up to 27 th September A. Apollonio, A. Niemi Total LHC Fault Time: 1394 h (~58 days) Not including pre-cycles in the fault time RCS.A78B2 Earth Fault in Others Cryo: ~ 95 h quench recovery ( child fault ) Over a period with approximately 150 days of scheduled operation ca. 38% fault time PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

Overall Machine Availability: Availability by Week up to 27 th September A. Apollonio, A. Niemi LHC Availability Cryo + LBDS ~ 62 % Linac2 HV cable Cryo CV + SPS magnet replacement QPS SEUs RCS.A78B2 earth faults TS1 Scrubbing 50 ns MDs Scrubbing 25 ns MDs TS2 Not including pre-cycles due to faults in the unavailability PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

HL-LHC Challenge: Machine Efficiency Nominal LHC Operation Cycle: Beam dump M. Lamont @ Evian LHC Operation workshop Squeeze Stable beams Collide Ramp down/precycle Ramp Ramp down Injection Ramp 35 mins ~30 mins 12 mins Injection Squeeze Collide 15 mins 5 mins Stable beams 0 30 hours Operational Turn around time of 2-3 hours Efficiency = time in physics / scheduled time PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 28

Overall Stable Machine Beams Efficiency: (up to TS2) Turnaround Time, 43%, 440 h Stable Beams, 20%, 200 h Includes beam measurements and tests A. Apollonio Fault time, 38%, 391 h Total 43 days allocated for physics run End of RunI (50ns) : 36.5% (A. McPherson @ Evian 2012); HL-LHC: 50% PSI Seminar5 5 October 2015 2015

Overall Stable Machine Beams Efficiency (after TS2: TS2) A. Apollonio Slightly better after the removal of radiation sensitive QPS cards Good weeks of LHC operation feature up to 40% in Stable beams for physics PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

2015: ATLAS and CMS performance outlook Beta* = 80 cm, possible reduction later in year (count 4 days + ramp-up) Nominal bunch population Reasonable emittance into collisions Injection limit for 25 ns: max colliding bunches 2376 Moderate availability plus need for intensity ramp-up (UFOs!) Nc Beta * ppb EmitN Lumi [cm -2 s -1 ] Days (approx) Int lumi Pileup 50 ns 476 80 1.1e11 1.8 1.6e33 14 0.1 fb -1 27 2015.1 2376 80 1.2e11 3.1 7.0e33 33 ~3 fb -1 21 2015.2 2376 40 1.2e11 3.1 1.2e34 28 ~4 fb -1 35 Official luminosity target for the year was 10 fb -1 Now even 5 fb -1 seems to be on the challenging side (QPS, Cryo) PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 31

Intensity ramp up ATLAS Data PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 32

Intensity ramp up ATLAS Data PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 33

Intensity ramp up ATLAS Data ca. 0.1-0.2 fb -1 / day as of beginning of October (ca. 20 days left + performance ramp up [1440 ppb -> ca 2700 ppb]) plus ca. 4 fb -1? PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 34

Performance Projections up to HL-LHC: Run I Run II Run III Splices fixed Energy Injectors upgrade 300 fb -1 25 fb -1 e-cloud UFOs! LIU Technical limits (in experiments, too) like : Cryogenic limit & Radiation Damage of triplet magnets 0.75 10 34 cm -2 s -1 50 ns bunch high pile up 40 1.5 10 34 cm -2 s -1 25 ns bunch high pile up 40 1.5-2.2 10 34 cm -2 s -1 25 ns bunch very high pile up > 60 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 35

Goal of High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC): The main objective of HiLumi LHC Design Study is to determine a hardware configuration and a set of beam parameters that will allow the LHC to reach the following targets: Prepare machine for operation beyond 2025 and up to 2035 Devise beam parameters and operation scenarios for: # enabling at total integrated luminosity of 3000 fb -1 # implying an integrated luminosity of 250 fb -1 per year, # design oper. for µ < 140 ( peak luminosity of 5 10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) > Ten times the luminosity reach of first 10 years of LHC operation!! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 36

HL-LHC Challenge: Event Pileup Density Vertex Reconstruction for 0.7 10 34 cm -2 s -1 @ 50ns HL-LHC Performance Optimization: Z μμ Z μμ event from 2012 data with 25 reconstructed vertices Use leveling techniques for keeping average Pileup around 140 events per bunch crossing level luminosity at 5 10 34 cm -2 s -1 Extrapolating to 5 10 34 cm -2 s -1 implies: <µ> = 280; µ peak > 500 @ 50ns bunch spacing <µ> = 140; µ peak = 280 @ 25ns bunch spacing PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 37

LHC Upgrade Goals: Performance optimization Levelling: Luminosity limitation(s): Even Pileup in detectors Debris leaving the experiments and impacting in the machine (magnet quench protection) Triplet Heat Load PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 38

LHC Limitations and HL-LHC Challanges: Technical bottle necks (e.g. cryogenics) Insertion magnet lifetime and aperture: New insertion magnets and low-β with increased aperture Geometric Reduction Factor: SC Crab Cavities New technology and a first for a hadron storage ring! New addit. Equipment Performance Optimization: Pileup density luminosity levelling devise parameters for virtual luminosity >> target luminosity Beam power & losses additional DS (cold region) collimators Machine effciency and availability: # R2E removal of all electronics from tunnel region # e-cloud beam scrubbing (conditioning of surface) # UFOs beam scrubbing (conditioning of surface) PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 39

HL-LHC Interaction Region: Crossing Angle Insertion Layout: ca.130m Parasitic bunch encounters: ca.50m Operation with ca. 2800 bunches @ 25ns spacing approximately 30 unwanted collision per Interaction Region (IR). Operation requires crossing angle Increases with decreasing β non-linear fields from long-range beam-beam interaction: efficient operation requires large beam separation at unwanted collision points Separation of 10-12 σ large triplet apertures for HL-LHC upgrade!! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 40

HL-LHC technical bottleneck: Radiation damage to triplet magnets at 300 fb -1 Q2 27 MGy Cold bore insulation 35 MGy MCBX3 20 MGy PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 41

HL-LHC technical bottleneck: Radiation damage to triplet magnets Need to replace existing triplet magnets with radiation hard system (shielding!) such that the new magnet coils receive a similar radiation dose @ 10 times higher integrated luminosity!!!!! Upgraded Cryogenics for Cooling Requires larger aperture! Tungsten blocks Capillaries New magnet technology to reach gradient @ higher aperture PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 42

HL-LHC Upgrade Ingredients: Triplet Magnets Nominal LHC triplet: 210 T/m, 70 mm coil aperture ca. 8 T @ coil 1.8 K cooling with superfluid He (thermal conductivity) current density of 2.75 ka / mm 2 At the limit of NbTi technology (HERA & Tevatron ca. 5 T @ 2kA/mm 2 )!!! Critical Surface for NbTi LHC Production in collaboration with USA and KEK PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 43

HL-LHC Magnets: LHC triplet: 210 T/m, 70 mm bore aperture 8 T @ coil (limit of NbTi tech.) HL-LHC triplet: 150 mm coil aperture 140 T/m, (shielding, β * and crossing angle) ca. 12 T @ coil 30% longer Requires Nb 3 Sn technology brittle material (fragile) ca. 25 year development for this new magnet technology! US-LARP CERN collaboration 1.8K US-LARP MQXF magnet design Based on Nb 3 Sn technology PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 44

New Interaction Region lay out Longer Quads; Shorter D1 (thanks to SC) ATLAS CMS Q1 MCBX Q2a MCBX Q2b Q3 MCBX DFB D1 Q: 200 T/m MCBX: 3.3 T 1.5 T m D1: 1.8 T 26 T m LHC 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 distance to IP (m) ATLAS CMS Q1 MCBX Q2a Q2b 4.0 4.0 1.2 6.8 6.8 1.2 4.0 4.0 2.2 6.7 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 distance to IP (m) MCBX Q3 MCBX CP D1 SM Q: 140 T/m MCBX: 2.1 T 2.5/4.5 T m D1: 5.2 T 35 T m Thick boxes are magnetic lengths -- Thin boxes are cryostats HL LHC PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 45

LHC Challenges: Crossing Angle II geometric luminosity reduction factor: effective cross section large crossing angle: reduction of long range beam-beam interactions reduction of beam-beam tune spread and resonances reduction of the mechanical aperture increase of effective beam cross section at IP reduction of luminous region reduction of instantaneous luminosity inefficient use of beam current! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 46

HL-LHC Upgrade Ingredients: Crab Cavities Geometric Crab Cavities: Luminosity Reduction Factor: Reduces the effect of geometrical reduction factor Independent for each IP effective cross section Noise from cavities to beam?!? Challenging space constraints: requires novel compact cavity design HL-LHC PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 47

Latest cavity designs toward accelerator 3 Advanced Design Studies with Different Coupler concepts RF Dipole: Waveguide or waveguide-coax couplers Double ¼-wave: Coaxial couplers with hook-type antenna Concentrate on two designs in order to be ready for test installation in SPS in 2016/2017 TS 4-rod: Coaxial couplers with different antenna Present types baseline: 4 cavity/cryomod TEST in SPS under preparation for 2017 / 2018 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 48

And excellent first results: RF Dipole Recent results from Measurements @ CERN 3.5 Initial goal was 3.5 MV however V > 5-6 MV would ease integration PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 49

And excellent first results: DQW Recent results from Measurements @ CERN 3.5 DQWR prototype (17- Jan-2013) [BNL] PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 50

SPS beam test: a critical step for Crab Cavities (profiting of the End of year stop 2016-2017): PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 51

LHC Challenges: Beam Power Unprecedented beam power: Worry about beam losses: potential equipment damage in case of failures during operation Failure Scenarios Local beam Impact In case of failure the beam must never reach sensitive equipment! Equipment damage Machine Protection Lifetime & Loss Spikes Distributed losses Magnet Quench Stored Beam power: HL-LHC > 500 MJ R2E / and SEU beam Machine efficiency PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 52

HL-LHC Challenge: Machine Efficiency Integrated Luminosity Operation experience in 2011 and 2012: o 2015 data J. (week Wenninger 38) @ consistent Evian LHC Operation with workshop RunI experience: average of ca. 6.5 h Only ~30% of the fills are dumped by operation. B. Auchmann @ LMC 23. 9. 2015 2011 2012 corresponds to ca. 40% machine efficiency (time actually spend in physics divided by scheduled time for physics operation) 3000 fb -1 for HL-LHC will require significantly better machine efficiency!!! and average fill length above 6 hours (ca. 10 hours)! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 53

Efficiency for Ldt: All assumptions are based on forecast for the operation cycle: η 50% High reliability and availbility are key goals PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 55

R2E SEU Failure Analysis - Actions ~400 h Downtime ~250 h Downtime Relocation & Shielding Equipment Upgrades 2008-2011 Analyze and mitigate all safety relevant cases and limit global impact 2011-2012 Focus on equipment with long downtimes; provide shielding LS1 (2013/2014) Relocation of power converters LS1 LS2: Equipment Upgrades LS3 -> HL-LHC Remove all sensitive equipment from underground installations PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 56

IR1 & IR5 Underground Civil Engineering: P. Fessia, HL-LHC TDR PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 57

Performance Projections up to HL-LHC: Run I Run II Run III Splices fixed Energy Injectors upgrade 300 fb -1 25 fb -1 e-cloud UFOs! LIU Tight timeline requires potentially Civil Engineering work near the LHC tunnel during LHC RunIII! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 58

Vibrations and Earthquake detections LHC radial orbit change between 01:45 and 02:15 (23:45-24:15 UTC). LHC at injection energy. Radial amplitude is large (3 times larger than Costa Rica event, 200 microns). Earthquakes at the LHC Roughly 1 hour after the 8.3M quake, which roughly fits a simple estimate based on a distance of 12 000 km at a speed of 4 km/s. Period is ~ 25 seconds. Peak excursions of +/- 200µm J. Wenninger 22/10/2015 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 59

New Schedule: HL-LHC CE during LS2 Plus a Crab Cavity installation in 2 phases during LS3 and LS4 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015

Performance Projections for HL-LHC: 25 fb -1 1000 fb -1 3000 fb -1 Run I Run II Run III Splices fixed e-cloud UFOs! Injectors upgrade New Low-β* quads Crab Cavity Phase2 Energy 6.5TeV LIU Intensity Upgrade 300 fb -1 Technical limits (in experiments, too) like : Preparing the path for high intensity operation via scrubbing Cryogenic limit, Radiation & Damage of triplet magnets 5 10 34 cm -2 s -1 levelled 25 ns bunch very high pile up 140 PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 61

The critical zones around IP1 and IP5 ATLAS 3. For collimation we also need to change the DS in the continuous cryostat: 11T Nb 3 Sn dipole 2. We also need to modify a large part of the matching section e.g. Crab Cavities & D1, D2, Q4 & corrector More than 1.2 km of LHC!! Plus technical infrastructure (e.g. Cryo and Powering)!! CMS 1. New triplet Nb 3 Sn required due to: -Radiation damage -Need for more aperture Changing the triplet region is not enough for reaching the HL-LHC goal! PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 62

Reserve Transparencies PSI Seminar 5 October 2015 64