Systems of seminorms and weak bounded approximation properties

Similar documents
Lifting of nest approximation properties and related principles of local reflexivity

MAT 578 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS EXERCISES

S. DUTTA AND T. S. S. R. K. RAO

THE DUAL FORM OF THE APPROXIMATION PROPERTY FOR A BANACH SPACE AND A SUBSPACE. In memory of A. Pe lczyński

RESTRICTED UNIFORM BOUNDEDNESS IN BANACH SPACES

Factorization of weakly compact operators between Banach spaces and Fréchet or (LB)-spaces

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 21 Mar 2000

LIPSCHITZ SLICES AND THE DAUGAVET EQUATION FOR LIPSCHITZ OPERATORS

Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies

APPROXIMATION OF INTEGRATION MAPS OF VECTOR MEASURES AND LIMIT REPRESENTATIONS OF BANACH FUNCTION SPACES

Polishness of Weak Topologies Generated by Gap and Excess Functionals

E.7 Alaoglu s Theorem

Five Mini-Courses on Analysis

Weak-Star Convergence of Convex Sets

1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d

Contents: 1. Minimization. 2. The theorem of Lions-Stampacchia for variational inequalities. 3. Γ -Convergence. 4. Duality mapping.

Extreme points of compact convex sets

FUNCTION BASES FOR TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES. Yılmaz Yılmaz

(c) For each α R \ {0}, the mapping x αx is a homeomorphism of X.

Plasticity of the unit ball and related problems

Functional Analysis I

2.2 Annihilators, complemented subspaces

Functional Analysis. Martin Brokate. 1 Normed Spaces 2. 2 Hilbert Spaces The Principle of Uniform Boundedness 32

Where is matrix multiplication locally open?

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: WEAK AND WEAK* CONVERGENCE

On metric characterizations of some classes of Banach spaces

Problem Set 6: Solutions Math 201A: Fall a n x n,

Extensions of Lipschitz functions and Grothendieck s bounded approximation property

Fragmentability and σ-fragmentability

ON THE REGULARITY OF ONE PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION GROUPS IN BARRELED LOCALLY CONVEX TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES

Chapter 14. Duality for Normed Linear Spaces

The local equicontinuity of a maximal monotone operator

ABELIAN SELF-COMMUTATORS IN FINITE FACTORS

Markov-Kakutani Theorem and Haar Measure

Introduction to Bases in Banach Spaces

Strictly convex norms and topology

DUNFORD-PETTIS OPERATORS ON BANACH LATTICES1

Biholomorphic functions on dual of Banach Space

Math 209B Homework 2

Ginés López 1, Miguel Martín 1 2, and Javier Merí 1

SOME PROPERTIES ON THE CLOSED SUBSETS IN BANACH SPACES

The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals

ON THE RANGE OF THE SUM OF MONOTONE OPERATORS IN GENERAL BANACH SPACES

Kirk s Fixed Point Theorem in Generating Spaces of Semi-Norm Family

(convex combination!). Use convexity of f and multiply by the common denominator to get. Interchanging the role of x and y, we obtain that f is ( 2M ε

Boundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP

FREE SPACES OVER SOME PROPER METRIC SPACES

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 2 Jan 2017

Cone-Constrained Linear Equations in Banach Spaces 1

Fredholm Theory. April 25, 2018

On intermediate value theorem in ordered Banach spaces for noncompact and discontinuous mappings

WEAKLY COMPACT WEDGE OPERATORS ON KÖTHE ECHELON SPACES

Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 1 Nov 2017

ON WEAK INTEGRABILITY AND BOUNDEDNESS IN BANACH SPACES

Non-linear factorization of linear operators

Notes for Functional Analysis

Iterative algorithms based on the hybrid steepest descent method for the split feasibility problem

On the topology of pointwise convergence on the boundaries of L 1 -preduals. Warren B. Moors

Leonhard Frerick and Alfredo Peris. Dedicated to the memory of Professor Klaus Floret

B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces

CLOSED RANGE POSITIVE OPERATORS ON BANACH SPACES

The best generalised inverse of the linear operator in normed linear space

Course Notes for Functional Analysis I, Math , Fall Th. Schlumprecht

Banach-Alaoglu, boundedness, weak-to-strong principles Paul Garrett 1. Banach-Alaoglu theorem

PCA sets and convexity

SOLUTIONS TO SOME PROBLEMS

A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO BANACH LATTICES AND

THE VERSION FOR COMPACT OPERATORS OF LINDENSTRAUSS PROPERTIES A AND B. Miguel Martín

Compactness in Product Spaces

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516

Sequential Pareto Subdifferential Sum Rule And Sequential Effi ciency

Product metrics and boundedness

Lemma 3. Suppose E, F X are closed subspaces with F finite dimensional.

Banach Spaces II: Elementary Banach Space Theory

MAA6617 COURSE NOTES SPRING 2014

THE GEOMETRY OF CONVEX TRANSITIVE BANACH SPACES

Hilbert Space Methods Used in a First Course in Quantum Mechanics A Recap WHY ARE WE HERE? QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA

A NOTE ON FRÉCHET-MONTEL SPACES

The Bishop-Phelps-Bollobás Property and Asplund Operators

Notes for Functional Analysis

Extension of vector-valued integral polynomials

s P = f(ξ n )(x i x i 1 ). i=1

Some Properties of Closed Range Operators

The Bounded Approximation Property for the Weighted (LB)-Spaces of Holomorphic Mappings on Banach Spaces

RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENTS OPERATORS ON FUNCTION SPACES

BANACH SPACES WHOSE BOUNDED SETS ARE BOUNDING IN THE BIDUAL

16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices

UNIFORM INTEGRABILITY AND THE POINTWTSE ERGODIC THEOREM

Math Solutions to homework 5

CHAPTER V DUAL SPACES

Factorization of p-dominated Polynomials through L p -Spaces

Geometry of Banach spaces with an octahedral norm

Homework Assignment #5 Due Wednesday, March 3rd.

SOME REMARKS ON THE SPACE OF DIFFERENCES OF SUBLINEAR FUNCTIONS

Robust Farkas Lemma for Uncertain Linear Systems with Applications

Convergence of Banach valued stochastic processes of Pettis and McShane integrable functions

Transcription:

Systems of seminorms and weak bounded approximation properties Aleksei Lissitsin University of Tartu NoLiFA Valencia 19.10.2017

Notation X, Y, Z - Banach spaces, A - an operator ideal, F, K - ideals of finite-rank and compact operators, respectively, L, X, W - ideals of all, separable and reflexive Banach spaces, respectively, τ s, τ c - topologies of pointwise convergence and uniform convergence on compact sets, respectively. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 2 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: approximation property (AP) if I X F(X) τc metric AP (MAP) if I X {S F(X) : S 1} τc MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak MAP if MAP for K. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 3 / 19

Old open problem: X AP X MAP? Classical partial solution with many different proofs: Yes, if X or X has Radon Nikodým property (RNP). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 4 / 19

Old open problem: X AP X MAP? Classical partial solution with many different proofs: Yes, if X or X has Radon Nikodým property (RNP). Proof of Oja, 2006: X has AP X has MAP X has weak MAP norms RNP X has MAP norms Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 4 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: approximation property (AP) if I X F(X) τc metric AP (MAP) if I X {S F(X) : S 1} τc MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak MAP if MAP for K. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: approximation property (AP) if I X F(X) τc metric AP (MAP) if I X {S F(X) : S 1} τc MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak MAP if MAP for K. weak MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: approximation property (AP) if I X F(X) τc metric AP (MAP) if I X {S F(X) : S 1} τc MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak MAP if MAP for K. weak MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs MAP for L MAP, Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: approximation property (AP) if I X F(X) τc metric AP (MAP) if I X {S F(X) : S 1} τc MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak MAP if MAP for K. weak MAP for A if I X {S F(X) : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs MAP for L MAP, weak MAP MAP for K(L, X W) MAP for W MAP for RN dual Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: A-approximation property (A-AP) if I X A τc metric A-AP (A-MAP) if I X {S A : S 1} τc A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak A-MAP if A-MAP for K weak A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs where A L(X) is convex and contains 0. A-MAP for L A-MAP, weak A-MAP A-MAP for K(L, X W) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: A-approximation property (A-AP) if I X A τc metric A-AP (A-MAP) if I X {S A : S 1} τc A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak A-MAP if A-MAP for K weak A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs where A L(X) is convex and contains 0. A-MAP for L A-MAP, weak A-MAP A-MAP for K(L, X W) A-MAP for W A-MAP for RN dual (if A K(X)) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Old open problem: X AP X MAP? Classical partial solution with many different proofs: Yes, if X or X has Radon Nikodým property (RNP). Proof of Oja, 2006: X has AP X has MAP X has weak MAP norms RNP X has MAP norms Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Approximation properties A Banach space X has: A-approximation property (A-AP) if I X A τc metric A-AP (A-MAP) if I X {S A : S 1} τc A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τc weak A-MAP if A-MAP for K weak A-MAP for A if I X {S A : Y T A(X, Y ) T S T } τs where A L(X) is convex and contains 0. A-MAP for L A-MAP, weak A-MAP A-MAP for K(L, X W) A-MAP for W A-MAP for RN dual (if A K(X)) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 5 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q := {x A : q(x) 1}. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. If V is a TVS and (0, 1) A A, then A q/µ = A q/λ, λ > 0. µ>λ Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. If V is a TVS and (0, 1) A A, then A q/µ = A q/λ, λ > 0. µ>λ Let λ > 0, let Q be a system of seminorms on V, and let τ be a linear topology on V. Denote (λ, Q, τ) -bap(a) := {x V : x τ A q/µ q Q}. µ>λq(x) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. If V is a TVS and (0, 1) A A, then A q/µ = A q/λ, λ > 0. µ>λ Let λ > 0, let Q be a system of seminorms on V, and let τ be a linear topology on V. Denote (λ, Q, τ) -bap(a) := {x V : x A q/λq(x) τ q Q}. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. If V is a TVS and (0, 1) A A, then A q/µ = A q/λ, λ > 0. µ>λ Let λ > 0, let Q be a system of seminorms on V, and let τ be a linear topology on V. Denote (λ, Q, τ) -bap(a) := {x V : x {y A : q(y) λq(x)} τ q Q}. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

Abstract definition Let V be a vector space, let q be a seminorm on V, and let A V. Denote A q/λ := {x A : q(x) λ}, λ > 0. If V is a TVS and (0, 1) A A, then A q/µ = A q/λ, λ > 0. µ>λ Let λ > 0, let Q be a system of seminorms on V, and let τ be a linear topology on V. Denote (λ, Q, τ) -bap(a) := {x V : x τ A q/µ q Q}. µ>λq(x) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 6 / 19

BAP closure of A Let λ > 0, let Q be a system of seminorms on V, and let τ be a linear topology on V. Denote (λ, Q, τ) -bap(a) := {x V : x τ A q/µ q Q} µ>λq(x) and (Q, τ) -map(a) := (1, Q, τ) -bap(a). Omit Q if V is a normed space and Q consists of its norm. For example, X has MAP I X τ c -map(f(x)). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 7 / 19

Obvious case of AP = MAP Let τ(q) denote the linear topology induced by Q. Proposition 1. If τ(q) τ, then A τ = (Q, τ) -map(a). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 8 / 19

Obvious case of AP = MAP Let τ(q) denote the linear topology induced by Q. Proposition 1. If τ(q) τ, then A τ = (Q, τ) -map(a). Proof. Take x A τ and q Q. We want x τ A q/µ. µ>q(x) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 8 / 19

Obvious case of AP = MAP Let τ(q) denote the linear topology induced by Q. Proposition 1. If τ(q) τ, then A τ = (Q, τ) -map(a). Proof. Take x A τ and q Q. We want x τ A q/µ. µ>q(x) There is a net (x α ) A such that x α τ x. Then q(x α ) q(x). Hence, for any µ > q(x) there is some α such that q(x β ) µ for all β α. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 8 / 19

Obvious case of AP = MAP Let τ(q) denote the linear topology induced by Q. Proposition 1. If τ(q) τ, then A τ = (Q, τ) -map(a). Proof. Take x A τ and q Q. We want x τ A q/µ. µ>q(x) There is a net (x α ) A such that x α τ x. Then q(x α ) q(x). Hence, for any µ > q(x) there is some α such that q(x β ) µ for all β α. Actually, A (Q, τ) -map(a) is always a closure operator of some topology but it is probably almost never linear. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 8 / 19

Equivalence of seminorm systems Define Q 1 Q 2 by: Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 9 / 19

Equivalence of seminorm systems Define Q 1 Q 2 by: x V and q 1 Q 1 q 2 Q 2 and c > 0 such that q 1 cq 2 and q 1 (x) = cq 2 (x). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 9 / 19

Equivalence of seminorm systems Define Q 1 Q 2 by: x V and q 1 Q 1 q 2 Q 2 and c > 0 such that q 1 cq 2 and q 1 (x) = cq 2 (x). Q 1 Q 2 Q 1 Q 2 and Q 2 Q 1. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 9 / 19

Equivalence of seminorm systems Define Q 1 Q 2 by: x V and q 1 Q 1 q 2 Q 2 and c > 0 such that q 1 cq 2 and q 1 (x) = cq 2 (x). Q 1 Q 2 Q 1 Q 2 and Q 2 Q 1. Note that if Q 1 Q 2, then (λ, Q 2, τ) -bap(a) (λ, Q 1, τ) -bap(a) Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 9 / 19

Equivalence of seminorm systems Define Q 1 Q 2 by: x V and q 1 Q 1 q 2 Q 2 and c > 0 such that q 1 cq 2 and q 1 (x) = cq 2 (x). Q 1 Q 2 Q 1 Q 2 and Q 2 Q 1. Note that if Q 1 Q 2, then (λ, Q 2, τ) -bap(a) (λ, Q 1, τ) -bap(a) and, of course, τ(q 1 ) τ(q 2 ). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 9 / 19

Seminorms on operator spaces For T L(X, Y ) and a Banach space Z define seminorms r T [Z](S) := ST and l T [Z](S) := T S on L(Y, Z) and L(Z, X), respectively. Put r A := {r T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }, l A := {l T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }. Then r A and l A are classes of seminorms defined on all operator spaces L(X, Y ). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 10 / 19

Seminorms on operator spaces For T L(X, Y ) and a Banach space Z define seminorms r T [Z](S) := ST and l T [Z](S) := T S on L(Y, Z) and L(Z, X), respectively. Put r A := {r T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }, l A := {l T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }. Then r A and l A are classes of seminorms defined on all operator spaces L(X, Y ). For example, X has MAP for A I X (l A, τ c ) -map(f(x)). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 10 / 19

Seminorms on operator spaces For T L(X, Y ) and a Banach space Z define seminorms r T [Z](S) := ST and l T [Z](S) := T S on L(Y, Z) and L(Z, X), respectively. Put r A := {r T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }, l A := {l T [Z] : T A, Z is a Banach space }. Then r A and l A are classes of seminorms defined on all operator spaces L(X, Y ). For example, X has MAP for A I X (l A, τ c ) -map(f(x)). Note that τ c = τ(r K ). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 10 / 19

Abuse the notation: A(X, Y ) := L(X, Y ) A, A(A, B) := {T A(V, W ) : V A, W B}, A dual := {T L : T A}, A a := {T : T A}. Proposition 2. Let A be an operator ideal, A a space ideal. If A = A Op(A), then r A r A(A,L). If A = Op(A) A, then l A l A(L,A). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 11 / 19

Abuse the notation: A(X, Y ) := L(X, Y ) A, A(A, B) := {T A(V, W ) : V A, W B}, A dual := {T L : T A}, A a := {T : T A}. Proposition 2. Let A be an operator ideal, A a space ideal. If A = A Op(A), then r A r A(A,L). If A = Op(A) A, then l A l A(L,A). Reason (e.g., Heinrich, 1980): If T factors through some space Z as T = T 1 T 2, then you can pick an equivalent norm on Z such that T = T 1 T 2. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 11 / 19

Adjoint systems A seminorm q on L(Y, X ) induces a seminorm q on L(X, Y ) via the natural inclusion L(X, Y ) L(Y, X ), i.e., q (S) := q(s ) for S L(X, Y ). Put Q = {q : q Q}. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 12 / 19

Adjoint systems A seminorm q on L(Y, X ) induces a seminorm q on L(X, Y ) via the natural inclusion L(X, Y ) L(Y, X ), i.e., q (S) := q(s ) for S L(X, Y ). Put Clearly, Q 1 Q 2 if Q 1 Q 2. Q = {q : q Q}. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 12 / 19

Adjoint systems A seminorm q on L(Y, X ) induces a seminorm q on L(X, Y ) via the natural inclusion L(X, Y ) L(Y, X ), i.e., q (S) := q(s ) for S L(X, Y ). Put Clearly, Q 1 Q 2 if Q 1 Q 2. Q = {q : q Q}. Similarly, define τ for a system of topologies τ. Note that τ(q ) = τ(q). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 12 / 19

Adjoint systems A seminorm q on L(Y, X ) induces a seminorm q on L(X, Y ) via the natural inclusion L(X, Y ) L(Y, X ), i.e., q (S) := q(s ) for S L(X, Y ). Put Clearly, Q 1 Q 2 if Q 1 Q 2. Q = {q : q Q}. Similarly, define τ for a system of topologies τ. Note that τ(q ) = τ(q). Observe that by definition r A = l A a and l A = r A a. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 12 / 19

Observe that by definition r A = l A a and l A = r A a. Proposition 2. Let A be an operator ideal, and let A be a space ideal. If A = A Op(A), then r A r A(A,L). If A = Op(A) A, then l A l A(L,A). W - weakly compact operators, W - reflexive spaces, W = Op(W): Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 13 / 19

Observe that by definition r A = l A a and l A = r A a. Proposition 2. Let A be an operator ideal, and let A be a space ideal. If A = A Op(A), then r A r A(A,L). If A = Op(A) A, then l A l A(L,A). W - weakly compact operators, W - reflexive spaces, W = Op(W): Proposition 3. Let A = A W. Then l A dual r A. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 13 / 19

Observe that by definition r A = l A a and l A = r A a. Proposition 2. Let A be an operator ideal, and let A be a space ideal. If A = A Op(A), then r A r A(A,L). If A = Op(A) A, then l A l A(L,A). W - weakly compact operators, W - reflexive spaces, W = Op(W): Proposition 3. Let A = A W. Then l A dual r A. In particular, l K r K and l W r W. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 13 / 19

Oja s RNP impact lemma Let A L(X) be convex, λ 1, τ be a locally convex topology on L(X), I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), T L(X, Y ) be such that {T S : S A} K(X, Y ), X or Y have RNP. Then I X (λ, {l T }, τ) -bap(a). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 14 / 19

Oja s RNP impact lemma Let A L(X) be convex, was A = F(X), λ 1, τ be a locally convex topology on L(X), was τ = τ c, I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), T L(X, Y ) be such that {T S : S A} K(X, Y ), X or Y have RNP. Then I X (λ, {l T }, τ) -bap(a). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 14 / 19

In the case, when A K(X) and X or X have the RNP, we can replace the seminorm systems with the norm. Theorem Let X be a Banach space such that X or X has the RNP. Let A K(X) be convex, let λ 1, and let τ be a locally convex topology on L(X) or on L(X ). 1. If I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a), 2. if I X (λ, r K, τ) -bap(a a ), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a a ), 3. if I X A τ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a), 4. if I X A aτ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a a ). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 15 / 19

Proof of theorem 1. If I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a): Take T = I X in Oja s lemma, then l T =. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 16 / 19

Proof of theorem 1. If I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a): Take T = I X in Oja s lemma, then l T =. 2. if I X (λ, r K, τ) -bap(a a ), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a a ): Since r K l K, we get that I X (λ, l K, τ ) -bap(a). Then I X (λ, τ ) -bap(a), which is equivalent to the claim. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 16 / 19

Proof of theorem 1. If I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a): Take T = I X in Oja s lemma, then l T =. 2. if I X (λ, r K, τ) -bap(a a ), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a a ): Since r K l K, we get that I X (λ, l K, τ ) -bap(a). Then I X (λ, τ ) -bap(a), which is equivalent to the claim. 3. if I X A τ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a): Note that τ c = τ(r K ) = τ(r K ) = τ(l K). So Proposition 1 yields that I X (l K, τ) -map(a), and the claim follows from 1. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 16 / 19

Proof of theorem 1. If I X (λ, l K, τ) -bap(a), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a): Take T = I X in Oja s lemma, then l T =. 2. if I X (λ, r K, τ) -bap(a a ), then I X (λ, τ) -bap(a a ): Since r K l K, we get that I X (λ, l K, τ ) -bap(a). Then I X (λ, τ ) -bap(a), which is equivalent to the claim. 3. if I X A τ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a): Note that τ c = τ(r K ) = τ(r K ) = τ(l K). So Proposition 1 yields that I X (l K, τ) -map(a), and the claim follows from 1. 4. if I X A aτ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a a ): This is immediate from 3. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 16 / 19

Theorem... 3. if I X A τ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a), 4. if I X A aτ and τ τ c, then I X τ -map(a a ). Oja used the lemma for τ c to go from weak MAP of X to MAP of X. If we use the lemma for τ c, we go directly: X has AP RNP X has MAP. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 17 / 19

Another application - weakly compact AP Let X be a Banach space such that X has the RNP. Then I X W(X) aτ(r W ) I X (l V, τ(r W ) ) -map(w(x)). Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 18 / 19

Papers S. Heinrich, Closed operator ideals and interpolation, J. Funct. Anal. 35 (1980) 397 411. Å. Lima and E. Oja, The weak metric approximation property, Math. Ann. 333 (2005) 471 484. E. Oja, The impact of the Radon-Nikodým property on the weak bounded approximation property, Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. 100 (2006) 325 331. A. L., Impact of the Radon Nikodým property on convex approximation properties, Archiv der Math. 105(2) (2015) 163 171. Aleksei Lissitsin Seminorm systems and weak BAPs 19 / 19