NARROW-BAND PHOTOMETRY AND THE STELLAR POPULATIONS IN ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES*

Similar documents
Luminosity Functions of Planetary Nebulae & Globular Clusters. By Azmain Nisak ASTR 8400

Galaxies. Need a (physically) meaningful way of describing the relevant properties of a galaxy.

Chapter 10: Unresolved Stellar Populations

Lab Exercises for Low Mass Stars

Age Dating A SSP. Quick quiz: please write down a 3 sentence explanation of why these plots look like they do.

On the Red Edge of the δ Scuti Instability Strip

Relativity and Astrophysics Lecture 15 Terry Herter. RR Lyrae Variables Cepheids Variables Period-Luminosity Relation. A Stellar Properties 2

An analogy. "Galaxies" can be compared to "cities" What would you like to know about cities? What would you need to be able to answer these questions?

1. This question is about Hubble s law. The light received from many distant galaxies is red-shifted. (a) State the cause of this red-shift (1)

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Fundamental stellar parameters

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

Lecture Three: Stellar Populations. Stellar Properties: Stellar Populations = Stars in Galaxies. What defines luminous properties of galaxies

History of the a photometric system

Hubble Science Briefing: 25 Years of Seeing Stars with the Hubble Space Telescope. March 5, 2015 Dr. Rachel Osten Dr. Alex Fullerton Dr.

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Scale height and Luminosity

University of Naples Federico II, Academic Year Istituzioni di Astrofisica, read by prof. Massimo Capaccioli. Lecture 16

An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology. Jun 29, 2005 Chap.2.1~2.3

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 Oct 2002

Galaxies. Lecture Topics. Lecture 23. Discovering Galaxies. Galaxy properties. Local Group. History Cepheid variable stars. Classifying galaxies

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 24. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Globular Cluster Ages and Strömgren CCD Photometry

Chapter 7: From theory to observations

Characterisation of the open cluster M67

Dust [12.1] Star clusters. Absorb and scatter light Effect strongest in blue, less in red, zero in radio.

Photometric Observations of the δ Scuti Star UV Trianguli and its Evolutionary Status

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

Microvariability of Red Giant Stars

The HII Regions of Sextans A

Review of stellar evolution and color-magnitude diagrams

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANET-HOSTING STARS AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE EXTRASOLAR PLANET SEARCHES

OPTION E, ASTROPHYSICS TEST REVIEW

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 25 Apr 2000

Astr 323: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology. Spring Quarter 2014, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić. Lecture 1:

Chapter 8: Simple Stellar Populations

The Great Debate: The Size of the Universe (1920)

Unit 7 Review Guide: The Universe

Low Surface Brightness Galaxies Erwin de Blok. Encyclopedia of Astronomy & Astrophysics P. Murdin

OPTION E, ASTROPHYSICS TEST REVIEW

Introduction The Role of Astronomy p. 3 Astronomical Objects of Research p. 4 The Scale of the Universe p. 7 Spherical Astronomy Spherical

The Giant Branches of Open and Globular Clusters in the Infrared as Metallicity Indicators: A Comparison with Theory

Our Galaxy. Milky Way Galaxy = Sun + ~100 billion other stars + gas and dust. Held together by gravity! The Milky Way with the Naked Eye

STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF GALAXIES

Lecture 25: The Cosmic Distance Scale Sections 25-1, 26-4 and Box 26-1

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

The Composition of the Old, Metal-Rich Open Cluster, NGC 6791

Distance Measuring Techniques and The Milky Way Galaxy

Photometric systems for GAIA s Broad Band Photometer

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 2 Dec 2011

The Extragalactic Distance Scale

Infra-red imaging of perpendicular nested bars in spiral galaxies with the Infra-red Camera at the Carlos Sanchez Telescope

Where are We Going! How to Calculate Your Own Star!

Measurement of the stellar irradiance

Correlation Lengths of Red and Blue Galaxies: A New Cosmic Ruler

SDSS-IV MaStar: a Large, Comprehensive, and High Quality Empirical Stellar Library

Betelgeuse and Rigel are two super giants in the constellation of Orion. Constellation: Stellar cluster:...

The Old Stellar Population Studies with Subaru Young-Wook Lee Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea

M31 Color Mag Diagram Brown et al 592:L17-L20!

The BRITE satellite and Delta Scuti Stars: The Magnificent Seven

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Glos. Glossary. of Astronomy. Terms. Related to Galaxies

The effective temperature scale of giant stars (F0 K5)

The Extragalactic Distance Scale

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 15 Jul 2004

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Review of stellar evolution and color-magnitude diagrams

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra. Galaxies AS

Building the cosmic distance scale: from Hipparcos to Gaia

This Week in Astronomy

Galaxies. The majority of known galaxies fall into one of three major classes: spirals (78 %), ellipticals (18 %) and irregulars (4 %).

THE AGES OF DWARF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES

Chapter 25: Galaxy Clusters and the Structure of the Universe

Photometry of a Globular Cluster

Galaxy classification

Automated Classification of HETDEX Spectra. Ted von Hippel (U Texas, Siena, ERAU)

Photometric and spectroscopic observations of the outburst of the symbiotic star AG Draconis between March and June 2016

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Surface Photometry Quantitative description of galaxy morphology. Hubble Sequence Qualitative description of galaxy morphology

A Calibration Method for Wide Field Multicolor. Photometric System 1

The effective temperature scale of giant stars (F0 K5)

Practice Problem!! Assuming a uniform protogalactic (H and He only) cloud with a virial temperature of 10 6 K and a density of 0.

STRUCTURE OF GALAXIES

24.1 Hubble s Galaxy Classification

Characterizing Stars

Lab Exercises for Low Mass Stars

Characterizing Stars. Guiding Questions. Parallax. Careful measurements of the parallaxes of stars reveal their distances

Laboratory: Milky Way

Mapping the oxygen abundance in an elliptical galaxy (NGC 5128)

Classical Methods for Determining Stellar Masses, Temperatures, and Radii

Survey of Astrophysics A110

The HST Set of Absolute Standards for the 0.12 µm to 2.5 µm Spectral Range

Energy Sources of the Far IR Emission of M33

Stellar Population Synthesis: The Role of Adaptive Optics

High quality seeing V, I and Gunn z imaging of Terzan 4: a blue horizontal branch bulge globular cluster

Chapter 15 2/19/2014. Lecture Outline Hubble s Galaxy Classification. Normal and Active Galaxies Hubble s Galaxy Classification

Universe. Tenth Edition. The Nature of the Stars. Parallax. CHAPTER 17 The Nature of Stars

Pulsation of AGB stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC 419

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 10 Apr 2001

Transcription:

NARROW-BAND PHOTOMETRY AND THE STELLAR POPULATIONS IN ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES* KARL D. RAKOS Institute for Astronomy, University of Vienna, Austria TOBIAS J. KREIDL Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona, U.S.A. and JAMES M. SCHOMBERT Dept. of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A. Abstract. The modified Strrmgren uvby filter system, which has been used to investigate the spectrophotometric evolution of elliptical galaxies, is also found to be a powerful tool for the determination of stellar parameters in elliptical galaxies, especially metal content and the stellar type of the dominant population. We present an introduction to the behaviour of the filter system based on comparison to stellar libraries and then explore the results with respect to composite systems: globular clusters, spirals, and ellipticals. 1. Introduction In the last three papers (Fiala et al., 1986; Rakos et al., 1988, 1989), we have presented the details of our modified StrOmgren filter system (called uz, vz, bz, yz), developed methods of discriminating between stars and PeCuliar objects, developed methods of identifying cluster membership and Hubble-type and discussed interpretation of our results with respect to colour evolution in distant clusters. Comparison to spectro-evolution models suggested a blueward shift in colours as a function of redshift to the degree not expected from residual star formation, yet not predicted by the models. Since the models are produced from single metallicity populations, the possibility was considered that the deviant colours are due to changes in the global metallicity values with time (i.e., chemical evolution). In Paper III, we presented an introduction to the use of the narrow-band system as a metallicity probe and delivered the equations relinking our uz, vz, bz, yz system to the original StrOmgren system in order to investigate the observed metallicities and stellar content indices of ellipticals as compared to model atmospheres, metallicity standards and galactic globulars. In this paper, we will expand on these correlations and demonstrate their applicability with respect to a few specific examples from data in the literature. * Paper presented at the 1 lth European Regional Astronomical Meetings of the IAU on 'New Windows to the Universe', held 3-8 July, 1989, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Astrophysics and Space Science 170: 239-244, 1990. 9 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgqum.

240 K, D. RAKOS ET AL. 2. Calibration of Two-Colour Diagrams We have shown in Paper III that the position of stellar system in the two-colour (vz- yz), (bz- yz) diagram is directly dependent on the mean metal content of the system and independent of the mean surface gravity due to the low-temperature stellar range dominant in ellipticals. We have also derived a relationship between [FeH], the metallicity colour (vz - yz) and the continuum colour (bz - yz) of the form [FeH] = 0.334 + 2. l(vz - yz) - 5.651(bz - yz) 0.157 + 0.311(fiz -yz) for the range - 2.1 < [FeH] < 0 and (bz - yz) > 0.14. This relationship also holds for composite stellar systems with a single type of colour distribution of stars within a magnitude in colour difference. On the other hand, a bimodal distribution of colours would mimic lower metallicity, e.g., the presence of significant number of blue horizontal branch stars. The next step in the application of the narrow-band photometry to the elliptical galaxies is the estimation of the dominant population in the bandpass of observations (in this case near-uv and blue luminosities). For this reason, we have examined two possible colour-colour diagrams, namely (uz- yz) vs (vz- yz) and (uz- vz) vs (vz - bz). It can be shown that for the range (bz - yz) > 0.14, there are well-defined relations for Main Sequence and giant stellar tracks. For 45 Main-Sequence stars compiled from Crawford and Barnes (1970) and Hauck and Mermilliod (1980) with [FeH] = 0 we obtain (uz - yz) = 0.352 + 1.320(vz - yz) (MS stars, [FeH] = 0), (uz - vz) = 0.275 + 0.529(vz - bz) (MS stars, [FeH] = 0), with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.98. For 32 Main-Sequence stars of extreme Population II with a mean value of [FeH]--- -1.5, compiled from Olsen (1983), Francois (1986), Magain (1987), and Toukin et al (1985), there is a fair relationship (uz - yz) = 0.329 + 1.294(vz - yz) (MS stars, [FeH] = - 1.5), (uz - vz) = 0.373 + 0.490(vz - bz) (MS stars, [FeH] = - 1.5), with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.87. A similar procedure for giants of the solar metal content, totalling 30 stars from Jacoby et al (1984) and Crawford and Barnes (1970) delivers (uz - yz) = 0.634 + 1.310(vz - yz) (giant stars, [FeH] = 0), (uz - vz) = 0.673 + 0.481(vz - bz) (giant stars, [FeH] = 0), with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.96. For 47 giants with a mean value of [FeH] = - 2.1 compiled from Luck and Bond (1985) and Gratton and Sneden (1988) we have (uz - yz) = - 0.217 + 1.651(vz - yz) (giant stars, [FeH] = - 2),

NARROW-BAND PHOTOMETRY OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES 241 (uz - vz) -- 0.366 + i. 122(vz - bz) (giant stars, [FeH] = -2), with a correlation coefficient ofr = 0.99. All these relations are based on reddening-free stars and are shown in Figurs 1 and 2. Reddening vectors for both diagrams can be also drawn with the relations E(uz - yz) = 1.52E(vz - yz), E(uz- ~z)= 1.29E(vz- bz), derived in Paper III. Unfortunately, there are no model atmospheres calculated for late spectral types to test these equations on theoretical stellar models. However, for the limited accuracy of narrow-band photometry of elliptical galaxies in distant clusters (typical errors of a = 0.05 mag), our equations are more than adequate. 1"6 I I I I I 1 I I t I I I Ii I I I I I I I,'2 l, lain Sequence FeH=O # I l----~'~176 "I':~ ~ i ~' t...,ai,nt, reh=-2 t - I"-,," ~.4 I-- ".r ~'t,~'' k," ~ M:sz' : 7 1-2 I "1~ i. ', "-" I- J I.8 9 I.ii ' [ 63r:~d".'.. 67799 ~)9 I I 1 ) I I I I i I I I t 1.2.4.6.8 1 (vz-yz) Fig. 1. The (uz - yz), (vz - yz) diagram. The solid line represents the Main-Sequence [FeH] = 0 stars; the dotted line represents Main-Sequence extreme Population II stars. The broken line shows the position of giants with [FeH] = 0 and the line containing dashes and dots indicates the position of metal-poor ([FeH] = -2.1) giants. Also plotted are objects of interest. The objects labeled with 1, 2, 3... 6 are elliptical galaxies in clusters with increasing redshift as stated in Paper III.

242 K.D. RAKOS ET AL. :t! ' ' ' I ' ' ' I ' I ' I + ' I... I I - - Main Sequence Fetl=0..9 ---- ~ - -- 9... Main Sequence extreme Pop. II 7 # I lq -- --- Giants PcH=0 -- --.--, Giants FeII=-2.1 " -.8 - M31 9.7 - --,+..,,,, _. a,+ _.6. ]','I3,~..,... -- 9.~ -- 67791.,..", 6356" ",,.,. -- i' ". '+ -. S+ -: 9 _- Fig. 2..3 t T i i J,,l,,,i,,,Im -.2 0.2.4.6 (vz-bz) The (uz - vz), (vz - bz) diagram. Lines and symbols are the same as in Figure 1. Examination of Figures 1 and 2 shows the difficulty in deriving population parameters free of metallicity effects. Basically, as outlined in Paper III, the bz and yz filters form a metal and surface gravity free index of continuum colours. The vz filter samples a metal line region of the spectrum and, thus, the (vz - yz), (bz - yz) diagram is a populationtype independent measure of [FeH]. The uz samples the region dominated by surface gravity effects and, therefore, a measure of the integrated population type (dwarfvs giant stars); however, by definition, this region is also sensitive to metallicity and this produces a coupling in any uz colour vs continuum colour diagram between [FeH] and population type. The soiution is to use a population plus metallicity colour vs a metailicity colour of which the two examined above and shown in Figure 1 and 2 are (uz - yz), (vz - yz) and (uz - vz), (vz - bz). The main advantage to the (uz - yz), (vz - yz) diagram is that the reddening vector is parallel to the tracks and, therefore, the effects of gas and dust on the indices is minimal. However, the tracks are strongly coupled when the uz and vz filters are used in opposition. The (uz - vz), (vz - bz) is more strongly effected by reddening, but the population tracks are less coupled and the dominant population

NARROW-BAND PHOTOMETRY OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES 243 type is more easily discernable. This diagram is the tool of choice for ellipticals, which are free of gas and dust. 3. Application to the Elliptical Galaxies In order to demonstrate the usefulness of Figures 1 and 2 for the estimation of the dominant stellar population, we have convolved the Str0mgren or narrow-band colours from Faber (1973) and Hunter (1982) to our system (see Tables 2, 4, and 14 from Paper III) and are plotted in Figures 1 and 2. In general, the globular clusters are characterized by metal-poor giant stars, confirming what has been known for years in integrated light and spectroscopic studies. The galaxies M32 (a compact elliptical), M31 and NGC 7331 (Sb spirals) are shown. Also shown are the elliptical tracks from Paper III with point 1 being the mean colours of present-day ellipticals. These examples are discussed below. - The two very distinctive globular clusters are NGC 6365, a metal-rich cluster with [FeH] =-0.62 and NGC6779, a metal-poor cluster with [FeH] =- 1.94. NGC 6365 is located in Figure 1 near the lines for the Main-Sequence stars and low-metal content giants. Because the cluster is metal-rich, it cannot have a large number of giants (of low-metal content). In Figure 2, we see that the cluster has many more Main-Sequence stars than the other globular clusters in the diagram, especially NGC 6779. NGC 6779 seems to be composed almost entirely from low-metal content giants. If one assumed that NGC 6779 were additionally reddened, than a Population II Main-Sequence stars should be added. - M32 is a E2 galaxy of solar metallicity type. Figure 1 predicts about 90~o of light is radiated from Main-Sequence stars. In Figure 2, the Main Sequence contributes only 60 ~o of the light. The difference is primarily due to the internal errors in the data and the accuracy of the method used. - NGC 7331 is a Sb I-II metal-poor galaxy with [FeH] = - 1.39. In Figures 1 and 2, we would estimate that the flux from the galaxy mainly belongs to the Main- Sequence extreme Population II stars. Internal reddening is always an unknown for optical colours of spirals; however, the integrated light from this galaxy is primarily from the bulge which is dust free. This is confirmed by the similar positions in both Figures 1 and 2. - M31 a Sb I-II galaxy with solar metal content shows in both figures about 50~o light from the Main Sequence and 50~o from giants. Again the light is based on aperture values which are bulge dominated and little effected by reddening. The mean value of field elliptical galaxies (labeled as 1 in Figures 1 and 2) is very similar to that of M31. For ellipticals with increasing redshift (represented by the numbered sequence), we see an increasing contribution of Main-Sequence low-metal population stars. For z = 0.39, nearly all stars belong to the Main Sequence. A similar change between giants and Main Sequence has been proposed in the spectrophotometric evolution of galaxies by Guiderdoni and Rocca-Volmerange (1987) in their Figures 6(a) and 6(b). The time-scale of the calculated change in the luminosity fraction of giants and

244 K.D. RAKOS ET AL, Main-Sequence stars seems to be in disagreement with our results, but to resolve this problem, we require a statistically significant number of observations, as well as better theoretical models which include changing metallicity as a function of time. 4. Conclusions Narrow-band photometry allows one to follow the change of the mean metallicity and the luminosity fraction of giants vs Main Sequence for large redshifts up to about z = 0.8 or into the past nearly as far as the half age of the Universe. In agreement with Rose (1985), we find a strong dwarf dominance in the integrated light of galaxies determined from blue optical colours. Unlike optical to IR colours, the small mixture of ages within a galaxy has little effect on our filters since the close spacing of the bandpasses emphasizes the turnoffpoint and base of the giant branch rather than the tip of the giant branch. Uniqueness problems to the stellar populations can be iterated with a statistically significant number of high-quality observations combined with an improved theory and models for the spectral evolution of galaxies. Acknowledgement We gratefully acknowledge the financial support F6rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forsehung'. from the Austrian 'Fonds zur References Crawford, D. L. and Barnes, J. V.: 1970, Astron. J. 75, 978. Faber, S. M.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 731. Fiala, N., Rakos, K., and Stockton, A.: 1986, PubL Astron. Soc. Pacific 98, 70. Francois, P.: 1986, Astron. Astrophys. 160, 264. Gratton, R. G. and Sneden, C.: 1988, Astron. Astrophys. 204, 193. Guiderdoni, B. and Rocca-Volmerange, B.: 1987, Astron. Astrophys. 186, 1. Hauck, B. and Mermilliod, M.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 40, 1. Hunter, D. A., Gallagher, J. P., and Rautenkranz, D.: 1982, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 49, 53. Jacoby, G. H., Hunter, D. A., and Christian, C. A,: 1984, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 56, 257. Luck, R. E. and Bond, H. E.: 1985, Astrophys. J. 292, 559. Magain, P.: 1987, Astron. Astrophys. 179, 176. Olsen, H.: 1983, Astron. Astrophys. SuppL 54, 55. Rakos, K. D., Fiaia, N., and Schombert, J. M.: 1988, Astrophys. or. 328, 463. Rakos, K. D., Schombert, J. M., and Kreidl, T. J.: 1989, Astrophys. or. (submitted). Rose, J. A.: 1985, Astron. J. 90, 1927. Toukin, J., Lambert, D. L., and Balachandran, S.: 1985, Astrophys. a r. 290, 289.