A monolithic fluid structure interaction solver Verification and Validation Application: venous valve motion

Similar documents
A monolithic FEM solver for fluid structure

Proposal for numerical benchmarking of fluid-structure interaction between an elastic object and laminar incompressible flow

An arbitrary lagrangian eulerian discontinuous galerkin approach to fluid-structure interaction and its application to cardiovascular problem

Constitutive models. Constitutive model: determines P in terms of deformation

LEAST-SQUARES FINITE ELEMENT MODELS

Deforming Composite Grids for Fluid Structure Interactions

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow

FVM for Fluid-Structure Interaction with Large Structural Displacements

Nonlinear elasticity and gels

FSI with Application in Hemodynamics Analysis and Simulation

A Harmonic Balance Approach for Large-Scale Problems in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT EINDHOVEN Department of Biomedical Engineering, section Cardiovascular Biomechanics

3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1

Conservation of Mass. Computational Fluid Dynamics. The Equations Governing Fluid Motion

Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

Sebastian Gjertsen Master s Thesis, Spring 2017

Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction: A comparison of different discretization and solution approaches

Large Scale Fluid-Structure Interaction by coupling OpenFOAM with external codes

Extrapolation methods for accelerating unsteady partitioned fluid-structure interaction simulations

Implementing a Partitioned Algorithm for Fluid-Structure Interaction of Flexible Flapping Wings within Overture

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 3 May 2018

Part II Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics By Munson, Young, and Okiishi

Fluid Mechanics II Viscosity and shear stresses

Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems using SU2 and External Finite-Element Solvers

MITOCW MITRES2_002S10nonlinear_lec15_300k-mp4

BME 419/519 Hernandez 2002

Fundamentals of Linear Elasticity

Chapter 9: Differential Analysis

R09. d water surface. Prove that the depth of pressure is equal to p +.

Continuum mechanics V. Constitutive equations. 1. Constitutive equation: definition and basic axioms

CENG 501 Examination Problem: Estimation of Viscosity with a Falling - Cylinder Viscometer

PREDICTION OF PULSATILE 3D FLOW IN ELASTIC TUBES USING STAR CCM+ CODE

1. The Properties of Fluids

A unifying model for fluid flow and elastic solid deformation: a novel approach for fluid-structure interaction and wave propagation

Contents. I Introduction 1. Preface. xiii

Soft Bodies. Good approximation for hard ones. approximation breaks when objects break, or deform. Generalization: soft (deformable) bodies

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 19 Dec 2013

Numerical methods for the Navier- Stokes equations

Instabilities and Dynamic Rupture in a Frictional Interface

An Added-Mass Partition Algorithm for Fluid-Structure Interactions of Compressible Fluids and Nonlinear Solids

2007 Problem Topic Comment 1 Kinematics Position-time equation Kinematics 7 2 Kinematics Velocity-time graph Dynamics 6 3 Kinematics Average velocity

Law of behavior very-rubber band: almost incompressible material

Coupling techniques for partitioned fluid structure interaction simulations with black box solvers

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FLUIDS:

Nonlinear Equations for Finite-Amplitude Wave Propagation in Fiber-Reinforced Hyperelastic Media

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

V (r,t) = i ˆ u( x, y,z,t) + ˆ j v( x, y,z,t) + k ˆ w( x, y, z,t)

arxiv: v2 [math.ap] 4 Mar 2016

Méthode de quasi-newton en interaction fluide-structure. J.-F. Gerbeau & M. Vidrascu

Fluid Mechanics. Jim Emery 9/3/ Bernoulli s Law 2. 2 Torricelli s Law 3. 3 Time to Empty a Tank 3. 4 Viscosity 4. 5 The Acceleration 5

Chapter 9: Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow

Fluid Dynamics Exercises and questions for the course

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Review of Fluid Mechanics

Navier-Stokes Flow in Cylindrical Elastic Tubes

Unified Lagrangian formulation for solid and fluid mechanics and FSI problems

Elmer :Heat transfert with phase change solid-solid in transient problem Application to silicon properties. SIF file : phasechange solid-solid

. D CR Nomenclature D 1

Measurement of deformation. Measurement of elastic force. Constitutive law. Finite element method

A monolithic approach to fluid-composite structure interaction

The Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics

Nonlinear Modeling of Fiber-Reinforced Elastomers and the Response of a Rubber Muscle Actuator

Computational Astrophysics

Introduction to Marine Hydrodynamics

The Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Non-Linear and Dynamic Systems: Thermomechanics

Exercise 5: Exact Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations I

202 Index. failure, 26 field equation, 122 force, 1

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 3 Nov 2017

Part IV: Numerical schemes for the phase-filed model

Continuum Mechanics and the Finite Element Method

This introductory chapter presents some basic concepts of continuum mechanics, symbols and notations for future reference.

Continuum Mechanics. Continuum Mechanics and Constitutive Equations

Optimized Surface Acoustic Waves Devices With FreeFem++ Using an Original FEM/BEM Numerical Model

A modular, operator splitting scheme for fluid-structure interaction problems with thick structures

Macroscopic theory Rock as 'elastic continuum'

The Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Non-Linear and Dynamic Systems. Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi Lecture ST1-19 November, 2015

Homework 4 in 5C1212; Part A: Incompressible Navier- Stokes, Finite Volume Methods

Numerical Simulation of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Flows in Bypass

NONLINEAR CONTINUUM FORMULATIONS CONTENTS

Discrete Projection Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow Problems and Application to a Fluid-Structure Interaction

Multiplicative Jacobian Energy Decomposition Method for Fast Porous Visco-Hyperelastic Soft Tissue Model

Fluid Mechanics. Spring 2009

A MULTIPHASE FLUID-SOLID MODEL BASED ON THE LEVEL SET METHOD

1. Introduction, fluid properties (1.1, 2.8, 4.1, and handouts)

Fluid Dynamics: Theory, Computation, and Numerical Simulation Second Edition

Stress-Strain Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Wall: A Case of 3D Geometry Simulation

Deformation of bovine eye fluid structure interaction between viscoelastic vitreous, non-linear elastic lens and sclera

Inverse Design (and a lightweight introduction to the Finite Element Method) Stelian Coros

DEFORMATION AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF ELASTIC SOLIDS BASED ON A PARTICLE METHOD

1. Introduction, tensors, kinematics

Detailed Outline, M E 320 Fluid Flow, Spring Semester 2015

A numerical study of vortex-induced vibrations (viv) in an elastic cantilever

NDT&E Methods: UT. VJ Technologies CAVITY INSPECTION. Nondestructive Testing & Evaluation TPU Lecture Course 2015/16.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A WESTFALL 2800 MIXER, BETA = 0.8 GFS R1. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE. Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Exam paper: Biomechanics

2. FLUID-FLOW EQUATIONS SPRING 2019

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

An Operator Splitting Approach to the Solution of Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems in Hemodynamics

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

Traction on the Retina Induced by Saccadic Eye Movements in the Presence of Posterior Vitreous Detachment

Transcription:

1 / 41 A monolithic fluid structure interaction solver Verification and Validation Application: venous valve motion Chen-Yu CHIANG O. Pironneau, T.W.H. Sheu, M. Thiriet Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions (LJLL), Sorbonne U. Scientific Computing and Cardiovascular Simulation (SCCS) Lab, NTU FreeFem++ days 2017

2 / 41 Outline 1 2 3 4

Formulation of coupled system A general fluid-structure coupled system General Laws of Continuum Mechanics ( ) u ρ t + u ( u) = (σ) + f (1) For Newtonian incompressible fluid : σ f = p f I + µd For hyperelastic incompressible material : σ s = p s I + F ΨF T For hyperelastic compressible material : σ s = J 1 F Ψ F T D = ( u + u ) T X: Ω 0 (0, T ) Ω t : X ( x 0, t ) : Lagrangian position at t of x 0 d = X ( x 0, t ) x 0 : displacement F i,j = x 0 j X i ; x 0 j : original position J = det F, the Jacobian of the deformation 3 / 41

4 / 41 Hyperelastic material model Mooney Rivlin model Ψ(F) = c 1 tr F T F + c 2 ( ) tr (F T F) tr 2 2 F T F F ΨF T = (2c 1 4c 2 tr B ) B + 4c 2 B 2, where B = FF T. (2) S t Venant Kirchhoff model Ψ (F) = λ s 2 tr2 E + µ s tr E 2, E = 1 ( F T F I ) 2 [ ( F ΨF T trb = λ s 2 3 ) ] µ s B + µ s B 2 (3) 2

5 / 41 Lagrangian points ( x 0, t ) to Eulerian points (x, t) F T ( = x 0X = x 0 d + x 0 ) = x 0d + I = F T d + I F = (I d) T C = I B = Dd d T d Cayley Hamilton theorem For a general n n invertible matrix A, i.e., one with nonzero determinant, A 1 can thus be written as a n th order polynomial expression in A n = 3, A 3 tr A A 2 + 1 2 (tr2 A tr A 2)A det A I = 0 n=3 B = tr B I 1 ( ) tr 2 2 B tr B 2 B 1 + J 2 B 2, B 2 = 1 [ ( ) tr 2 2 B + tr B 2 I + J 2 1 ( ) ] (4) tr 3 2 B tr B tr B 2 B 1 + tr B J 2 B 2

Stress tensor for hyperelastic models (n=3) Mooney Rivlin model F ΨF T = 2c 1 ( Dd d T d ) 2 + 2c3 ( Dd d T d ) + αi (5) c 3 := c 1 2 S t Venant Kirchhoff model ( tr 2 B tr B 2 4 ) 2c 2 F ΨF T = αi + β ( Dd d T d ) + γ ( Dd d T d ) 2 (6) { α = λ s 4 (tr B 3) ( 2tr B tr 2 B + tr B 2 + 2J 2) + µs 2 tr ( B 2trB + tr B 2 tr 2 B 2 + 2J 2) β = λs 4 (tr B 3) ( tr 2 B tr B 2 4J 2) ( + µs 2 tr 3 B tr B tr B 2 tr 2 B + tr B 2 + 2J 2 4tr B J 2) γ = λs 2 (tr B 3) J 2 + µ s (tr B 1) J 2 6 / 41

7 / 41 Variational formulation (n=3) (ρ f D tu û + µ ) 2 Du: Dû p û ˆp u Ω t f + + β 2 For simplicity, Ω t s [ ρ sd tu û + γ ( 2 Dd d d) T : Dû 2 ( ) Dd d T d ] : Dû + α û = (7) f û Ω t D td = u, (8) homogeneous boundary conditions on Γ Ω homogeneous Neumann conditions on Ω t \ Γ. So, given Ω 0 f, Ω0 s, d, and u at t = 0, we must find ( ) u, p, d, Ω t f, Ωt s with u Γ = 0 and equation (7) and (8)

8 / 41 A first order in time consistent approximation Find Ω n+1, u n+1 H 1 0(Ω n+1 ), p n+1 L 2 0(Ω n+1 ) such that for all û n+1 H 1 0(Ω n+1 ), ˆp n+1 L 2 0(Ω n+1 ), n+1 u u n Y n+1 ρn+1 Ωn+1 δt + δt Ω n+1 s û + Ω n+1 f ( p n+1 û ˆp u µ ) 2 Dun+1 : Dû [γ n+1 ( Du n+1 u n+1 T dn dn T u n+1 ) ( D d n d n T dn ) + βn+1 ( Du n+1 u n+1 T T n+1 )] dn dn u : Dû 2 [ γ n+1 + (D d n Ω n+1 d n T ) 2 β n+1 ( dn : Dû + D d n d n T ) dn : Dû s 2 2 +α n+1 ] û = f û Ω n+1 (9) where d n stands for d n (Y n+1 ) and where d n is updated by d n+1 = d n Y n+1 + δtu n+1 (10)

Solution algorithm Fixed point iteration 1 Set ρ = ρ n, α = α n, β = β n, γ = γ n, Ω = Ω n, u = u n h, Y (x) = x uδt, 2 Solve equation (9), 3 Set u = u n+1 h, Y (x) = x uδt, Ω r = Y 1 (Ω n r ), r = s, f, update α, β, γ and ρ. 4 If not converged return to step 2. 9 / 41

10 / 41 Outline A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin 1 2 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed in a flowing fluid A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowing fluid 3

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed in a flowing fluid Table: Material parameters [ ρ f g cm 3] [ ν f g cm 1 s 1] ρ s [g cm 3] E [g cm 1 s 2] U in [cm s 1] 1.18 10 3 1.82 10 4 2 2 10 6 31.5 u=uin v=0 v=0 u y=0 1 1 4 u x=0 0.06 v x=0 12 v=0 u y=0 6.5 14.5 11 / 41

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed in a flowing fluid Author present, hmin = 0.02 present, hmin = 0.015 Hubner (a) magnitude 1.85 1.94 2.0 frequency 1.2 1.2 0.8 (b) Figure: Contours of velocity magnitude at (a) t = 12.5 and (b) t = 13.0. 12 / 41

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowing fluid Poiseuille profile inflow U (y) = 1.5U in y(h y) (0.5H) 2 and H = 0.41 For fluid, ρ f = 1000 and ν f = 0.001 Two steady cases, g s = 2, 4 and U in = 0 (structure ρ s = 1000 and E = 5 10 5 ) FSI1, U in = 1, ρ s = 1000 and E = 5 10 5 FSI2 U in = 2, ρ s = 10000 and E = 2 10 5 u=u(y) v=0 0.2 u=v=0 0.1 0.35 u=v=0 2.3 σ n=0 0.02 0.41 13 / 41

14 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin g s=2 g s=4 d x d y d x d y Present h min = 0.008 7.179 65.82 24.84 120.82 Dunne [?] 7.187 66.10 - - Hron and Turek [?] 7.187 66.10 - - Richter [?] 7.149 66.07 25.10 122.16 Wick [?] 7.150 64.90 25.33 122.30 (a) (b) Figure: (a) displacement on x and y with respect to time, (b) centerlines position.

15 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin

16 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin FSI2 FSI3 amplitude frequency amplitude frequency Present h min = 0.004 7.61 10 2 2.03 s 1 2.80 10 2 5.15 s 1 Present h min = 0.002 7.75 10 2 2.03 s 1 3.01 10 2 5.18 s 1 Turek [?] 8.06 10 2-3.44 10 2 - Dune [?] 8.00 10 2 1.953 s 1 3.00 10 2 5.04 s 1 Thomas [?] 8.06 10 2 1.93 s 1 - -

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin U in = 1.07 Whole solid system flaps due to instability of wake region. Front cylinder rotates at frequency of 6.38 Hz and 7.35 Hz, experimentally and numerically determined value. u=uin v=0 0.022 u=v=0 0.05 0.01 σ n=0 0.00004 0.004 0.24 Origin of coordinate is placed at center of cylinder. Measure points A and B locate at (0.082, 0) and (0.082, 0.04). 0.155 u=v=0 0.593 17 / 41

18 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin

19 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin

20 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin Relatively good agreement in displacement, frequency and velocity at measure points. 30000 elements (P1b,P1), and first order in time.

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin [ ] [ ] An elastic plate h 2, h b 2 2, b [0, L] 2 is clamped to a rectangular tube [ 5b, 16b] [ 8b, 8b] [0, 17b] h/b = 0.2 and L/b = 5 A constant inflow U in = 1 along x direction at Γ in Re = U inb ν = 1600 and ρ f = 1 ρ s = 0.678, E = 19054.9, and ν s = 0.4 z x Buoyancy force of solid f b = 0.2465 17b Γ in Γ out h L 5b 16b 21 / 41

22 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin (a) (b) Figure:. (a) Experimental results [?], (b) computational results.

23 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin C D D x /b D z /b Present 1.03 2.13 0.54 Luhar and Nepf [?] 1.15 (with 10% error) 2.14 0.59 Tian and Dai etc [?] 1.03 2.12 0.54 Table: Comparison of drag coefficient C D and deflection in x and z direction with respect to referenced data.

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin A cylindrical chamber with r 2 = 76.2 and length of 200 Two inlet pipes with r 1 = 21.0 and length of 20 A silicon filament with h = 2 thick, b = 11 wide, and l = 65 long ρ f = 1.1633 10 3 and ν f = 12.5 10 3 ρ s = 1.0583 10 3, Young s modulus E s = 216260, and Poisson ratioν s = 0.315 Gravity g = 9810 along y direction r 1 r 1 r 2 b (0,0,0) h l h y r 2 r 1 y r 1 z x 24 / 41

Initial configuration due to buoyancy force A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin Figure: Initial deflection of silicone filament because of buoyancy force. 25 / 41

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin Case I : steady deformation Inlet velocity are Poiseuille profile with peak velocityof 630 and 615 for upper and lower inlet respectively. (a) (b) Figure: Computational results for phase I (a) position of center line along z direction, (b) velocity profiles at symmetric plane x = 0. 26 / 41

27 / 41 Case II : starting flow A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin n 1 n 2 n 3 d 0 b 1 b 2 b 3 b 4 Î k ˆv x -11.37-28.99 7.73 1.38 0.24 3.59-3.14 1 [0, 4.07] ˆv y 14.95 11.88-2.17 2.06-2.0 4.95-3.50 1 [0, 5.51] ˆv z 367.10 363.40-62.24 1.21-0.38 3.76-3.19 1 [0, 5.27] Table: For case II, curve fitting coefficients of inlet peak velocity for ˆv k (t) = Σ 3 i=1 n it i /Σ 4 j=0 b j t j with ˆv k = 0 for t I\I k. Note, that flow in y direction is applied only in the upper inlet.

A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure: Deflection of the silicone filament in phase II (a) t = 0.073, (b) t = 0.721, (c) t = 1.153, (d) t = 1.585, (e) t = 2.017, (f) t = 4.781. 28 / 41

29 / 41 A thin elastic plate clamped into a small rigid square body immersed A thin elastic plate clamped into a rigid cylinder immersed in a flowin (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure: At midplane x = 0 mm, flow velocity component u z at (a) z 0.20l, (b) z 0.51l, (c) z 0.82l, (d) z 1.12l ( l = 65 mm, length of the silicon filament ).

30 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins Outline 1 2 3 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins 4

31 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins Variational inequality/constrain for contact A (u, v) + Λ (u, v) = b (v) where Λ is a variational constrain for contact { λ (x, t) 0, x, Λ (u, v) = λn v, Ω t d S t (x) λ (x, t) = 0, S t i i To each simply onnected disjointed part Si t, i = 1 ns is associated a signed distance function x d S t measuring distance of x to S t i i. d S t i d S t i d S t i < 0, structure region = 0, contact point/line/surface > 0, fluid region for some x Ω/S t i

32 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins Semi Smooth Newton Method In k th iteration for each time step n + 1 ( λ n+1,k+1 min {0, λ n+1,k + c 0 d S x + δtu n+1,k)}. x S ti n+1 i Original equations can be recast into G ( u n+1,k+1, v ) = ns A ( u n+1,k+1, v ) + τ ck G ( u n+1,k+1, v ) = b (v) i=1 S i n+1 {x : λ n+1,k +c 0 d S i n+1 (x+δtu n+1,k ) } g ( u n+1,k+1, v ) where function f is associated to rebound velocity and variant with different model.

Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins Rebound velocity For example g ( u n+1,k+1) = u n+1,k+1 f ( u n+1,k n ) n f(u n )=-βu n, 0<β f(u n )=ε closer away 33 / 41

34 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins Free falling ball hit a slope

35 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins d h w=d/20 h T=0.92d w=0.625d h B=0.58d L v 0.8d h v=0.01d (a) (b) Figure: Shape and size of one valved vein

36 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins

37 / 41 Variational inequality/constrain for contact Valved veins

38 / 41 Outline 1 2 3 4

Modeling In/out-let boundary conditions of blood vessels Anisotropic hyperelastic material model for vascular walls and valves Model for agregation and deformation of red blood capsules Simulation Parallize whole computational process with domain decomposition method Vascular model and simulation in 3D Comparison with experimental data 39 / 41

40 / 41 Thanks for your listening.

41 / 41 Flow rate and volume (a) (b)