Montana Mesonet: Progress Report

Similar documents
The Kentucky Mesonet: Entering a New Phase

Applications/Users for Improved S2S Forecasts

NJ Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network

Spatial Optimization of CoCoRAHS Network in Tennessee. Joanne Logan Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science University of Tennessee

The National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) Moving the Nation from Reactive to Proactive Drought Risk Management

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

Local Precipitation Variability

Weather versus Climate: What is the difference? Sources of Weather Information

What Can Citizen Scientists Tell Us about Drought?

Improving Understanding of Drought Impacts through Citizen Science

THE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE RAIN, HAIL AND SNOW NETWORK (COCORAHS) A GREAT WAY TO LEARN AND TEACH ABOUT OUR CLIMATE

Creating a WeatherSMART nation: SAWS drought related research, services and products

1 Introduction. Station Type No. Synoptic/GTS 17 Principal 172 Ordinary 546 Precipitation

The Colorado Agricultural no Meteorological Network (CoAgMet) and Crop ET Reports

The Delaware Environmental Monitoring & Analysis Center

The Climate of Payne County

Doug Kluck NOAA Kansas City, MO National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS)

Texas Statewide Mesonet Network (TexMesonet) Dr. Kantave Greene 11/15/17

COOP Modernization: NOAA s Environmental Real-time Observation Network in New England, the Southeast and Addressing NIDIS in the West

Climate Change and Arizona s Rangelands: Management Challenges and Opportunities

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

Understanding Weather and Climate Risk. Matthew Perry Sharing an Uncertain World Conference The Geological Society, 13 July 2017

The Climate of Grady County

Condition Monitoring: A New System for Drought Impacts Reporting through CoCoRaHS

COMMUNITY SERVICE AREA

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

AgWeatherNet A Tool for Making Decisions Based on Weather

The Climate of Kiowa County

A Regional Database Tracking Fire Footprint Each Year within the South Atlantic Region: Current Database Description and Future Directions

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Seminole County

Progress Report Year 2, NAG5-6003: The Dynamics of a Semi-Arid Region in Response to Climate and Water-Use Policy

The Climate of Bryan County

Progress on GCOS-China CMA IOS Development Plan ( ) PEI, Chong Department of Integrated Observation of CMA 09/25/2017 Hangzhou, China

Wind Resource Assessment Practical Guidance for Developing A Successful Wind Project

Citizen Science Networks

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

World Meteorological Organization

The U.S. National Integrated Drought Information System. Roger S. Pulwarty National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration USA

SOUTH MOUNTAIN WEATHER STATION: REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 (APRIL JUNE) 2011

Proper Data Management Responsibilities to Meet the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) Requirements

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Eric. W. Harmsen 1, John Mecikalski 2, Pedro Tosado Cruz 1 Ariel Mercado Vargas 1

The Climate of Murray County

The Climate of Haskell County

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

The Climate of Texas County

N ew York State Agricultural Experiment S tation vnrfx* NYSAES I Publications I Latest Press Releases

National Weather Service Greenville-Spartanburg, Forecast Office

What Can Citizen Scientists Tell Us about Drought?

DROUGHT ASSESSMENT USING SATELLITE DERIVED METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND NDVI IN POTOHAR REGION

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

Zachary Holden - US Forest Service Region 1, Missoula MT Alan Swanson University of Montana Dept. of Geography David Affleck University of Montana

The Climate of Pontotoc County

NOAA S2S Planning. Dave DeWitt Fred Toepfer

ZUMWALT WEATHER AND CLIMATE ANNUAL REPORT ( )

Water information system advances American River basin. Roger Bales, Martha Conklin, Steve Glaser, Bob Rice & collaborators UC: SNRI & CITRIS

The current status, functions, challenges and needs of South Sudan Meteorological Department (SSMD)

The North American Drought Monitor - The Canadian Perspective -

NYS Mesonet Data Access Policy

CoCoRaHS. Community Collaborative Rain, Hail, & Snow Network. Ashley Wolf Meteorologist NWS Green Bay Northeast Wisconsin CoCoRaHS Coordinator

Meteorological Data recorded at Armagh Observatory from 1795 to 2001: Volume I - Daily, Monthly and Annual Rainfall

KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Workshop on

Montana Drought & Climate

The TexasET Network and Website User s Manual

Improving Sub-Seasonal to Seasonal Prediction at NOAA

MSC Monitoring Renewal Project. CMOS 2012 Montreal, Quebec Thursday, May 31 Martin Elie on behalf of Dave Wartman

KEY WORDS: Palmer Meteorological Drought Index, SWAP, Kriging spatial analysis and Digital Map.

NWSEO CALLS FOR NATIONAL CLIMATE SERVICE TO BE MADE PART OF THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

US Drought Status. Droughts 1/17/2013. Percent land area affected by Drought across US ( ) Dev Niyogi Associate Professor Dept of Agronomy

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System September 4, 2018

Quenching the Valley s thirst: The connection between Sierra Nevada snowpack & regional water supply

Observation (EO) & Geomatics in Canada

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System May 23, 2017

Commercialisation. Lessons learned from Dutch weather market

The National Weather Service of the Future: Building a Weather-Ready Nation

Montana. Drought Climate. Drought& &

Use of satellite information in research and operational activities at NIMH of Bulgaria

Spatial Data Availability Energizes Florida s Citizens

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Climate Information for Managing Risk. Victor Murphy NWS Southern Region Climate Service Program Mgr. June 12, 2008

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

USGS National Geospatial Program Understanding User Needs. Dick Vraga National Map Liaison for Federal Agencies July 2015

Community Collaborative RAin, Hail and Snow network. CoCoRaHS.

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION BY MEANS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

North Carolina Climate Variations

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

Public Disclosure Copy. Implementation Status & Results Report Emergency Agricultural Livelihoods and Climate Resilience Project (P166328)

Geostatistical Analysis of Rainfall Temperature and Evaporation Data of Owerri for Ten Years

The use of satellite images to forecast agricultural production

NOAA Surface Weather Program

Meteorological alert system in NMS of Mongolia

The Oklahoma Mesonet: Why We Did It & Lessons Learned (Its Value to the Citizens of Oklahoma)

JOINT BRIEFING TO THE MEMBERS. El Niño 2018/19 Likelihood and potential impact

13.2 USING VIRTUAL GLOBES TO IMPROVE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS IN THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

A Century of Meteorological Observations at Fort Valley Experimental Forest: A Cooperative Observer Program Success Story

Transcription:

Montana Mesonet: Progress Report June 2017 Mesonet Coordinator: kevin.hyde@umontana.edu Montana Climate Office Director: kelsey.jencso@umontana.edu climate.umt.edu Highlights The Montana Mesonet is a high density climate and soil moisture monitoring network Mesonet data support management of agricultural lands, rangelands, and natural ecosystems to build resilient and sustainable systems and to support MT drought response Initiated in August 2016, the system includes 13 active stations with 22 more funded Officially recognized by NOAA as part of the National Mesonet System Data collection at 11 of 13 stations nearly 100% reliable; corrections at other two implemented Executive Summary The Montana Mesonet, implemented by the Montana Climate Office, is under development as a high density climate and soil moisture monitoring network. The purpose of the Mesonet is to support adaptive management of agricultural lands, rangelands, and natural ecosystems with the aim of building resilient and sustainable economic and ecological systems. Installation of the Montana Mesonet system was initiated in August of 2016 and a dedicated Mesonet Coordinator was hired in September. The network now includes thirteen active stations across the state. An additional 22 funded stations will be installed in 2017. Twenty-one more are pending funding or actively proposed. Near real-time communication via cellular networks transmit data to the MCO that are reported through the Mesonet web site, providing current weather and soil moisture conditions. Data collection across the network has been very good to excellent with 11 of the 13 stations functioning at or near 100 percent reliability. Plots of station data provide insight into the variability of climate and soil conditions across the state (Fig 4). The Mesonet stations are equipped with moderately priced, cutting-edge technology. The manufacturer, the METER Group, has been highly proactive at evaluating system performance, correcting technology issues, and planning with Montanans needs in mind. Limits to system performance have been or are being corrected. All staff members of the MCO actively engage in network development through outreach to and by invitation and support from community groups, non-governmental organizations, the private sector, and multiple state and federal agencies. 1 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

What is the Montana Mesonet? The Montana Mesonet will be a network of closely spaced stations that measure weather and soil moisture. The data are transmitted via cellular signals and can be viewed on the Montana Climate Office (MCO) web site. The Mesonet supports adaptive management of agricultural lands, rangelands, and natural ecosystems with the aim of building resilient and sustainable economic and ecological systems. Data will also support the Montana drought response. Figure 1: Standard Mesonet Station set-up using METER equipment with sensor configuration and soil and atmospheric metrics recorded. Figure 2: Mesonet station in the Upper Lolo Valley Each Montana Mesonet station is configured with a surface weather package, a solar-powered data logger/transmitter unit (Figs. 1 and 2), and a soil moisture array (Fig. 3). The soil probe array is a critical component of each system. Volumetric water content monitors soil response to precipitation and vegetation, soil temperature monitors subsurface response to surface temperature trends, and electrical conductivity is sensitive to agricultural inputs and changes to soil processes. The vertical soil sensor array monitors trends with depth and potential recharge. Soil data support decisions about crop timing, stocking levels, available water, irrigation efficiency, and drought potential. The optional normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) sensors monitor relative vegetation greenness, a commonly used indicator of plant productivity. The local NVDI values provide means for future calibration of broad-scale satellite images of vegetation response and water stress. Figure 3: Soil pit at Kalispell Station with soil water content sensors at 8, 20, and 36. Surface sensor not shown. 2 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

Access and Use of Mesonet Data Near real-time communication via cellular networks transmit data to the MCO that are reported through the Mesonet web site, providing current weather and soil moisture conditions. Current reporting format (Fig. 4) lists the current value all variables recorded at each station and the value 24 hours ago. Clicking on the variable name pops-up a chart of the values over the last seven days. Figure 4: Screen captures of smartphone display of Mesonet data from the Moccasin station at 1300h on 31 May 2107. Active station data can be accessed at http://climate.umt.edu/mesonet/stations/default.php As part of the national Mesonet system, the Montana Mesonet will build-out a system of over 150 strategically placed stations representing the range of environments and land uses across Montana. The vision for the MT Mesonet goes beyond stations. The MCO seeks to: serve landowners and agencies with data and analysis needed to support daily management decisions and longrange drought monitoring and management plans; develop user-guided applications and webinterfaces to share data and products; conduct research into applications of integrated soil moisture data; use Mesonet data to verify and improve satellite data use in Montana; and integrate Mesonet data with broader weather data to support emergency management, public health, disaster response and recovery, and other emerging needs. 3 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

Mesonet Station Distribution Current and Planned Figure 5: Status of Montana Mesonet stations as of 19 May 2017 with 13 active stations, 22 funded and to be installed, 4 pending funding approval, and 17 directly proposed. Modem technology currently used in MT Mesonet requires AT&T (GSM-3G) cellular coverage. AT&T signal overlay shows untapped potential for station placement as well as limitations. Broader signal access and satellite communication options are under development. Data are summarized and recorded every thirty minutes at all stations. Eleven of the 13 active stations report in via cellular connection every hour. Two stations are currently out of range of AT&T (GSM) coverage and are downloaded manually. The 13 active stations include 10 funded through the Montana Research and Economic Development Initiative (MREDI), in cooperation of Montana State University, one station in partnership with the Crow Tribe of Montana and MSU, and two stations in cooperation with the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG). The 22 newly funded stations are paid for by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM 16), additional MREDI funds (5), and the National Center for Landscape Fire Analysis (1) at the W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation at the University of Montana. Four pending stations are under consideration by the BLM. Additional stations are under review through proposals submitted with Trout Unlimited and The Blackfoot Challenge, and through co-sponsored proposals with the MCO. 4 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

Siting Strategy for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) The MCO has entered into a five-year agreement to install and support a network of Mesonet stations representing to over 25,000 km 2 lands under BLM jurisdiction across Montana. While location of the 13 active stations has been largely opportunistic, we completed an assessment of landscape characteristics to guide the placement of the BLM-sponsored stations. Three factors contribute to this assessment: climatic water deficit, a measure of observed unmet water demand or relative aridity; the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), a measure of vegetation structure and relative greenness; and the percent sand in the top meter of soil, indicating water holding capacity. The BLM Mesonet stations will support assessment of rangeland health and productivity and sage grouse management planning. The spatial distribution of the BLM stations will also directly benefit adjacent private landowners and other public management jurisdictions. Figure 5: Example of biophysical assessment map produced to support siting of Mesonet stations across BLM jurisdictions. Summary of Data from Active Mesonet Stations Data collection across the network has been very good to excellent with 11 of the 13 stations functioning at or near 100 percent reliability (Table 1). The equipment manufacturer identified and corrected, or is in the process of correcting, several factors contributing to data loss. They redesigned the surface environmental monitoring unit to address intermittent wind errors and excess power consumption. They are replacing these units at no charge. The next generation of data loggers will include cable restraints to prevent loose plug connections. In the meantime we have modified installation procedures to improve cable stability. Solutions are pending to 5 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

address drops in cellular connection that occurred with several of the Mesonet logger units. Two stations are installed where no AT&T (GSM) are currently available, requiring manual data downloading at these sites. Broader signal access and satellite communication options are under development. Table 1: Summary of data completeness and error analysis for the 13 active Mesonet stations, referenced by Map Key in Fig. 4. The comments column describes and enumerates data errors. Wind and precipitation errors are associated with the Atmos41 surface environmental monitoring unit. Soil errors are associated with the GS3 soil probes. Web v direct download indicates unit conversion uncertainty with some of the available data; resolution pending. Station ARC Conrad ARC Corvallis ARC Havre ARC Huntley ARC Kalispell ARC Moccasin ARC Sidney Map Key 6 3 9 10 4 8 13 Clearwater 5 Coffee Creek Crow Agency 7 11 **Ingomar 12 MBMG Lower Lolo **MBMG Upper Lolo 2 1 From 21 Oct 30 Sep 21 Oct 27 Oct 29 Sep 28 Oct 25 Oct 21 Nov 08 Nov 19 Apr 27 Oct 22 Sep 31 Oct Period of Record To 22 Apr 3 Jun Total Obs. Missing Obs. % Obs. Complete Total Data Points * Missing Data % Values Complete 10034 0 100% 220748 45 99.98% wind errors 11030 0 100% 242660 3 100.00% wind errors 10026 0 100% 220572 12 99.99% wind errors 9739 0 100% 214258 226 99.90% 11063 0 100% 243386 6120 97.49% 9691 0 100% 213202 0 100.00% - 9850 3267 67% 144826 23096 84.05% Comments wind errors (222), precip errors (4) wind errors (159), surface soil initial install (5142), loose connection plugs (819) loose connection plug (3318); data conversion, web v direct download (19778) 8543 0 100% 187946 306 99.84% loose connection plugs (306) 9035 2208 76% 198770 249 99.87% 1392 0 100% 30624 0 100.00% - 8466 0 100% 186252 45 99.98% wind errors 11402 0 100% 250844 0 100.00% - 9082 0 100% 199804 1012 99.49% Atmos41 errors (174), GS3 errors (73) - surface sensor pulled loose errors on 8" GS3, EC only - unknown cause - surface sensor pulled loose * Total possible equals 22 Variables @ 30 minute observation interval over period of record. Data point count includes only recorded observations. ** Period of record differs as no cell signal is available and data are available by manual download only 6 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

Montana CoCoRaHS Network The MCO has partnered with the four Montana National Weather Service Offices to coordinate the Montana CoCoRaHS Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network. CoCoRaHS is a unique, nonprofit, community-based network of volunteers of all ages and backgrounds working together to measure and map precipitation (rain, hail, and snow). Each time a rain, hail, or snow storm crosses an area, volunteers take measurements of precipitation from as many locations as possible (Fig. 6). These precipitation reports are then recorded on the web at www.cocorahs.org. The goals of the MT CoCoRaHs are to: 1) provide accurate high-quality precipitation data for end-users on a timely basis; 2) increase the density of precipitation data available throughout the country by encouraging volunteer weather observing; 3) encouraging citizens to have fun participating in meteorological science and heightening their awareness about weather; 4) providing enrichment activities in water and weather resources for teachers, educators and the community at large. Figure 6: Map of precipitation observations collected by CoCoRaHS volunteers across Montana on June 2, 2017. 7 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

Plots of Soils Data from Active Stations Each Mesonet station produces a lot of data every day. We are working towards user based tools to better interpret the raw data.. In the spirit of exploring possibilities, the following section presents plots of data collected from all 13 active stations, with photographs of the site locations. Each plot presents the same layout using air temperature, precipitation, and the three soil measurements (Fig 1) soil temperature ( 0 C), volumetric water content (m3/m3), and electrical conductivity (ms/cm) at each of the four recording depths surface, 8 (20cm), 20 (51cm), and 36 (91cm). The period of record varies by station installation date and data access.each plot includes the station name and Map Key to locate the station on the Montana Mesonet map (Fig 4). The plots are divided into three sections: top soil temperatures relative to air temperature; center soil volumetric water content relative to precipitation events (vertical gray lines); and bottom electrical conductivity. The temperature plots reveal information about the timing of snow cover, frost depth and duration; subsurface response to deep freeze; snowmelt timing when overnight temperatures consistently exceed 0 0 C, and deviations between soil surface temperature and air temperature. The plots of volumetric water relative to precipitation events and temperatures from the top plot provide insight into the infiltration timing and depth of snow melt pulses, the infiltration of rainfall relative to antecedent moisture. The electrical conductivity plots indicate shifts in solutes as snow melt and rainwater moves downward into the soil profile.. Annotations are included in most plots to guide interpretations. We look forward to working with all our partners to explore the full range of surface and subsurface data available from each station. We expect invaluable lessons will emerge to guide better understanding of climate and water dynamics over time. This work all goes to discovering how this information may best be used to support adaptive management of agricultural lands, rangelands, and natural ecosystems throughout Montana. 8 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

9 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

10 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

11 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

12 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

13 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

14 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

15 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

16 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

17 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

18 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

19 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

20 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report

21 - Montana Mesonet Progress Report