The high density ignition in FFHR helical reactor by NBI heating

Similar documents
Feedback control of the heating power to access the thermally unstable ignition regime in FFHR

High-Density, Low Temperature Ignited Operations in FFHR

Plasma and Fusion Research: Regular Articles Volume 10, (2015)

US-Japan workshop on Fusion Power Reactor Design and Related Advanced Technologies, March at UCSD.

Design window analysis of LHD-type Heliotron DEMO reactors

STELLARATOR REACTOR OPTIMIZATION AND ASSESSMENT

D- 3 He HA tokamak device for experiments and power generations

Overview of Pilot Plant Studies

Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type type fusion reactors

DT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift )

- Plasma Control - Stellarator-Heliotron Control

Physics & Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan. Supported by NSERC, CRC

Design Windows and Economic Aspect of Helical Reactor

Design concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket

Exhaust scenarios. Alberto Loarte. Plasma Operation Directorate ITER Organization. Route de Vinon sur Verdon, St Paul lez Durance, France

Design of structural components and radial-build for FFHR-d1

Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea (Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, 26-28

The Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth. S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Physics of fusion power. Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER

Study of High-energy Ion Tail Formation with Second Harmonic ICRF Heating and NBI in LHD

Fusion Energy: Pipe Dream or Panacea

Reduced-Size LHD-Type Fusion Reactor with D-Shaped Magnetic Surface )

Multifarious Physics Analyses of the Core Plasma Properties in a Helical DEMO Reactor FFHR-d1

Innovative fabrication method of superconducting magnets using high T c superconductors with joints

STEADY-STATE EXHAUST OF HELIUM ASH IN THE W-SHAPED DIVERTOR OF JT-60U

Recent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science

and expectations for the future

HIGH PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENTS IN JT-60U REVERSED SHEAR DISCHARGES

Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal Heat Loads in ARIES Power Plants

Extension of High-Beta Plasma Operation to Low Collisional Regime

Systems Code Status. J. F. Lyon, ORNL. ARIES Meeting April 26, 2006

Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors

Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U

Critical Physics Issues for DEMO

Development of Net-Current Free Heliotron Plasmas in the Large Helical Device

Studies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL)

Burn Stabilization of a Tokamak Power Plant with On-Line Estimations of Energy and Particle Confinement Times

Neutral beam plasma heating

Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions

Ion Heating Experiments Using Perpendicular Neutral Beam Injection in the Large Helical Device

HFS PELLET REFUELING FOR HIGH DENSITY TOKAMAK OPERATION

Recent Fusion Research in the National Institute for Fusion Science )

Status of Physics and Configuration Studies of ARIES-CS. T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego

Progressing Performance Tokamak Core Physics. Marco Wischmeier Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Garching marco.wischmeier at ipp.mpg.

Progress of Confinement Physics Study in Compact Helical System

Technological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion

Divertor Requirements and Performance in ITER

Magnetic Confinement Fusion-Status and Challenges

Joint ITER-IAEA-ICTP Advanced Workshop on Fusion and Plasma Physics October Introduction to Fusion Leading to ITER

- Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation -

Systems Code Analysis of HELIAS-type Fusion Reactor and Economic Comparison to Tokamaks

Utilization of ARIES Systems Code

Integrated Particle Transport Simulation of NBI Plasmas in LHD )

Compact, spheromak-based pilot plants for the demonstration of net-gain fusion power

Assessment on safety and security for fusion plant

Advanced Tokamak Research in JT-60U and JT-60SA

The GDT-based fusion neutron source as a driver of subcritical nuclear fuel systems

Provisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO

Dynamics of ion internal transport barrier in LHD heliotron and JT-60U tokamak plasmas

Fusion Nuclear Science - Pathway Assessment

Spherical Torus Fusion Contributions and Game-Changing Issues

Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Tokamaks Chijin Xiao Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan

INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION

Estimations of Beam-Beam Fusion Reaction Rates in the Deuterium Plasma Experiment on LHD )

Control of plasma stored energy for burn control using DIII-D in-vessel coils

PHYSICS OF CFETR. Baonian Wan for CFETR physics group Institute of Plasma Physcis, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China.

Superconducting Magnet Design and R&D with HTS Option for the Helical DEMO Reactor

A Hybrid Inductive Scenario for a Pulsed- Burn RFP Reactor with Quasi-Steady Current. John Sarff

INTRODUCTION TO BURNING PLASMA PHYSICS

Energetic Ion Confinement and Lost Ion Distribution in Heliotrons

Erosion and Confinement of Tungsten in ASDEX Upgrade

Chapter IX: Nuclear fusion

Experimental analysis and predictive simulation of heat transport using TASK3D code

FAST 1 : a Physics and Technology Experiment on the Fusion Road Map

Design Integration of the LHD-type Energy Reactor FFHR2 towards Demo

Wave Form of Current Quench during Disruptions in Tokamaks

Impact of High Field & High Confinement on L-mode-Edge Negative Triangularity Tokamak (NTT) Reactor

Edge and Internal Transport Barrier Formations in CHS. Identification of Zonal Flows in CHS and JIPPT-IIU

Experimental evaluation of nonlinear collision effect on the beam slowing-down process

The Dynomak Reactor System

19 th IAEA- Fusion Energy Conference FT/1-6

OPTIMIZATION OF STELLARATOR REACTOR PARAMETERS

Surface Wall Load due to Bremsstrahlung & Line Radiation

Nuclear Fusion and ITER

Consideration on Design Window for a DEMO Reactor

Development of Long Pulse Neutral Beam Injector on JT-60U for JT-60SA

Computational Study of Non-Inductive Current Buildup in Compact DEMO Plant with Slim Center Solenoid

Integrated discharge scenario for high-temperature helical plasma on LHD

IMPURITY ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF DIII-D RADIATIVE MANTLE DISCHARGES

A Method of Knock-on Tail Observation Accounting Temperature Fluctuation Using 6 Li+T/D+T Reaction in Deuterium Plasma

Characteristics of the H-mode H and Extrapolation to ITER

Comparison of Ion Internal Transport Barrier Formation between Hydrogen and Helium Dominated Plasmas )

Self-consistent modeling of ITER with BALDUR integrated predictive modeling code

GA A23168 TOKAMAK REACTOR DESIGNS AS A FUNCTION OF ASPECT RATIO

Evolution of Bootstrap-Sustained Discharge in JT-60U

Which Superconducting Magnets for DEMO and Future Fusion Reactors?

Two Conceptual Designs of Helical Fusion Reactor FFHR-d1A Based on ITER Technologies and Challenging Ideas

EF2200 Plasma Physics: Fusion plasma physics

Sawtooth mixing of alphas, knock on D, T ions and its influence on NPA spectra in ITER plasma

Introduction to Fusion Physics

Transcription:

The high density ignition in FFHR helical reactor by NBI heating Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies with participations of EU and Korea February -, at NIFS in Toki, JAPAN Osamu Mitarai Tokai University, Kumamoto, Japan In collaboration with A. Sagara, et al., NIFS, Japan

Contents. Introduction. NBI penetration length 3. -D equations, ignition control algorithm. The stable ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHRm 5. The high-density ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHRm 6. The stable ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHR-C (R=9m,.5m) 7. The high-density ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHR-C 8. Summary and further challenge

. Introduction A high-density and low temperature operation is advantageous to reduce the divertor heat flux via bremstrahlung radiations and to inject pellets in the FFHRm helical reactor, however [] The first issue: Thermal instability Stabilization of the thermal instability is possible by the PID control based on the fusion power. Solved!! [] The second issues: Heating of the high-density plasma. A very high energy NBI system with 5~6 MeV is required for full penetration into high-density plasmas, which might be impossible to construct. 3

In this work we propose a new operation scenario to use the NBI with the beam energy of ~.5 MeV for both high and low-density operation regimes in FFHR. @ In the thermally stable low density and high temperature operation, as the density is relatively as low as.9x m -3, NBI with ~.5 MeV can be used. @ On the other hand, as the high density inhibits the neutral beam penetration, the new operation scenario is required to access the high-density ignition regime by NBI heating with ~.5 MeV. The density is kept at the low value less than ~x m -3 to ensure the NBI penetration and the operating point passes near the saddle point on POPCON. Above the density, high-density ignition is accessed by alpha heating after turning off NBI using the proposed PID control.

. NBI penetration length The NBI penetration e-folding length is calculated by!(n,t )[m] = % ' & $ # ( n(x)" Yan (n,t )dx* ) # where σ Yan is the cross section for the multi-step ionization for NBI [Yanev]. NBI penetration e-folding length for 5.7 m reactors (a=.5m)! [m] 5 3 E =.5 MeV, " =3 NBI n a E =.5 MeV, " =.5 NBI n E = MeV, " =3 NBI n a/ 6 8 n() [m -3 ] parabolic temperature profile α T =. peaked density profile with α n =3 square root of parabolic α n =.5 Half penetration is possible up to n()=3~x m -3, ensuring NBI heating 5

NBI penetration e-folding length for 9 m reactor (a=.5m) 5! [m] 3 E =. MeV, " =3 NBI n a E =. MeV, " = NBI n a/ 6 8 n() [m -3 ] parabolic temperature profile α T =. peaked density profile with α n =3 parabolic density profile with α n = Half penetration is possible up to n()=3~x m -3. 6

3. -D equations, and ignition control algorithm dn D () dt dn T () dt dn! () dt = ( +! n )S D ( t) " ( +! n )n D ( )n T ( )< #V > DT ( x) " n D ( ) = ( +! n )S T ( t) " ( +! n )n D ( )n T ( )< #V > DT ( x) " n T ( ) = ( +! n )n D ( )n T ( )< "V > DT ( x) # n! ( ) Charge neutrality condition: n e ( ) = n D ( ) + n T ( ) + n! ( ) $! * " 8 f o Combined particle balance equations dn e () dt + $ & = ( + "! 8 f n ) (t)! f + f D T * + f ( " & % * ) O '& # p # " *& n (). - e,- / $ D * $ T * df! dt = ( +! n )n e () f D f T "V DT (x) # f! $ # f! % dn e ()( *! n e () & ' dt ) * 7

Power balance equation d () dt +! = n +! T.5e( f D + f T + / " i + f! )n e () # %& { + P! } $ { P L + P B + P S }' ( $ () ( ) # $ 8 f O + " i $ f! f D + f T + / " i + f! ISS95 scaling %) /* & +, % -. n e () & / dn e () dt ' ( $ % df! () & / dt &(! E [s] = " ISS! ISS95 [s] = " LHD #.6! ISS95 [s] '! ISS95 [s] =.79$..5 )( /3 n9 [ 9 m %3 ]B.83 o [T ]a. [m]r.65 [m] / P.59 HT [MW ] '' ( ( External heating power (in thermally stable regime)! DLM n()[m "3 (* ] [W ] =! #$ % &,* a R [m] ) pr - +*! SUDO.5 '.* B o [T ] ' 6 " ( P / " P B " P S ) External heating power (in thermally unstable regime) Preprogramming now!! 8

Ignition control [] PID fueling control by the fusion power (in thermally stable regime) " (t) = # e DT (P f ) + $ t de DT (P f )% e T DT (P f )dt + T d int! & dt ' G fo(t) The error of the fusion power e DT (P f ) = +(! P f / P f ) nt the integration time, T d the derivative time. [] PID fueling control by the density (in thermally stable regime) (for testing control characteristics) " (t) = # e DT (n) + $ nt! t e DT (n)dt + T d de DT (n) dt % & G fo (t) ' The error of the density: e DT (n) = +(! n e (t) / n set ) [3] PID fueling control by the fusion power (in thermally unstable regime) The error of the fusion power e DT (P f ) =!(! P f / P f ) 9

Machine parameters [] Commercial reactor FFHRm: (Full blanket module) R=5.7m a=.5m, P f =3 GW, η α =.98 <B>=.5T τ α */τ E =,.5MeV NBI Thermally stable regime: α n =.5, α T =., γ ISS =.9.6 Thermally unstable regime: α n =3, α T =., γ ISS =.3.6 [] Experimental helical reactor FFHR-C, close to ARIES-CS. (For testing ignition. Partial blanket and shield: the blanket is only placed on the outboard side and the shield is placed in the inboard side). R=9m a=.5m, P f =. GW, η α =.98 <B>=7.T τ α */τ E =,.MeV NBI Thermally stable regime: α n =., α T =., γ ISS =.9.6 Thermally unstable regime: α n =3, α T =., γ ISS =..6

TABLE I: Plasma parameters at the stable and unstable operating points in FFHRm

. Thermally stable ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHRm During the access to the thermally stable low density and high temperature operation regime, NBI heating has not any problems due to the relatively low-density. n() (m -3 ) f alpha 5 3.!/a (MW).8.6...8.6.. 5 NE NELMT PF PF PRATIO PEXT (a) (b) (c) (d) T FALPHA BETAA 3 5 Time (s) SSDT 5 5 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. 5 9 <"> (m -3 /s) n() e (m -3 ) Heating power MW, γ ISS =.9 (γ LHD =.) n()~.83x m -3, T()~7.8 kev, Γ n ~.5 MW/m. <β>~.9 %, Beam penetration length! / a ~.7. 6 5 3 (e) 8 6 P f =3.GW x <!>=.73 % MW.5 x Sudo density limit Operating point at the stable boundary 5 5 5 ()(kev)

5. The high-density ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHRm Density control for NBI : The density linearly increases from n()=. x to 3.x m -3 by the density control algorothm. γ ISS =.3, B=.5T, α n =3, α T =. τ E =.3 s, E=.5 MeV TanNBI n()=8.37x m -3, T()=7. kev, <β>=.9 %, P div =.MW/m 9 Δ=. n() (m -3 ) f alpha 8 6..8.6..!/a (MW).8.6.. 5 (a) (b) (d) (c) n-control NE NELMT PF PF PRATIO PEXT PEXTC Pf-control FALPHA T BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary P =3.GW f NBI heating off MW Switching time to the fusion power control <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 3

Sudden increase in the confinement factor near the saddle point brings the operation into a dangerous situation when the density control is used. After 3 s (which is 5 s before the switching to the fusion power control), the confinement factor is artificially increased by a step manner from.3 to.6. n() (m -3 ) f alpha! ISS 8 6. (MW).8.6...5.5 5 n-control NE NELMT PF PF (b) (c) PEXT PEXTC (d) (a) Pf-control GHH T FALPHA BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 5 5 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) Fusion power surge to 3.5 GW Unlimited fueling in the Pf-control phase quenches the ignition. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 Operating point at the unstable boundary MW x P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev)

Sudden increase in the confinement factor near the saddle point brings the operation into a dangerous situation when the density control is used. n() (m -3 ) f alpha! ISS 8 6. (MW).8.6...5.5 5 n-control NE NELMT PF PF (b) (c) PEXT PEXTC GHH (d) (a) Pf-control T FALPHA BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 8 6 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) Limited fueling < x 9 m -3 /s in the Pf-control phase leads to the excessive fusion power such as ~8 GW. (Thermal runaway) n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 Operating point at the unstable boundary MW x P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 5

On the other hand, when the confinement factor is suddenly decreased by a step manner from.3 to.3 (3-35s) near the saddle point during the density control, the discharge terminates. n() (m -3 ) f alpha! ISS (MW) 8 6..8.6...5.5 5 n-control NE NELMT PF PF GHH PEXT PEXTC (b) (c) (d) (a) Pf-control FALPHA 6 8 Time (s) T BETAA SSDT 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) safe shutdown. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary MW P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 6

The fusion power control should be employed from the initial phase to avoid this dangerous situation (thermal runaway). γ ISS =.3, B=.5T, α n =3, α T =. E=.5MeV TanNBI n()=8.x m -3, T()=7. kev, <β>=.5 %, P div =.MW/m 9 Δ=. n() (m -3 ) f alpha 8 6!/a (MW) n-control..8.6...8.6.. 5 NE NELMT PF PF (c) (b) PRATIO PEXT PEXTC (a) (d) Pf-control T FALPHA BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) Fusion power is carefully controlled to keep the density at the low around 3 m -3 to ensure the NBI penetration. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary MW P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 7

This unstable control algorithm is robust to the confinement factor disturbance. [] Even when the confinement factor is increased from γ ISS =.3 to.6 during to 6 s, the fusion power is well controlled. γ ISS =.3,.6 (-6s), B=.5T, α =3, α T =. E=.5MeV TanNBI n() (m -3 ) f alpha! ISS (MW) n-control 8 6..8.6...5.5 5 (c) NE NELMT PF PF (b) GHH PEXT PEXTC(d) (a) Pf-control T FALPHA BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) Sudden increase in the confinement factor stable operation. Density increases due to the too much heating power. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary MW P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 8

[] When the confinement factor is decreased by a step manner from.3 to.3 during and 6 s, the fusion power decreases and then the discharge terminates, leading to the safe shutdown. Proper feedback control method of heating power should be developed γ ISS =.3.3 (-5s), B=.5T, α =3, α T =. E=.5MeV TanNBI n-control Pf-control n() (m -3 ) f alpha! ISS (MW) 8 6..8.6...5.5 5 (c) NE NELMT PF PF (b) GHH PEXT PEXTC(d) (a) T FALPHA BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary MW P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev) 9

n() (m -3 ) f alpha E=. MeV NBI can also be used in 5.7 m reactor. γ ISS =.3, B=.5T, α n =3, α T =. E=. MeV TanNBI n()=8.x m -3, T()=7. kev, <β>=.5 %, P div =.MW/m 9 Δ=. n-control Pf-control!/a (MW) 8 6..8.6...8.6.. 5 NE NELMT PF PF (b) PRATIO PEXT PEXTC (a) (c) (d) FALPHA T BETAA SSDT 6 8 Time (s) 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) By careful preprogramming, MeV NBI can be used to access the highdensity operation. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 x Operating point at the unstable boundary MW P f =3.GW <!>=.9 % 5 5 5 ()(kev)

6. The stable ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHR-C (R=9m,.5m) α n = α T =, γ ISS =.8, τ * α /τ E = P f =. GW P n =.55 MW/m, τ E =.7 s, MeV TanNBI n()=3.56x m -3, T()=3.5 kev <β>=.6 %, P div =5. MW/m (9 Δ=. m), <B>=7 T n() (m -3 ) f alpha!/a (MW) 8 6...8.6.. 5 NE NELMT PF PF PRATIO PEXT (a) (b) (c) (d) T FALPHA BETAA 8 6 Time (s) SSDT 3 () (kev) P f (GW)..8.6.. <"> (m -3 /s) Reaching ignition is possible but the magnetic field of 7 T (the volume averaged ) is needed. MeV NBI is enough for heating for the low density and high temperature operation. n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 8 6 MW P f =.GW <!>=.5 % Operating point near the stable boundary 5 5 5 ()(kev)

7. The high-density ignition regime accessed by NBI in FFHR-C(R=9m,.5m) α n =3 α T =, γ ISS =., τ α * /τ E = P f =. GW (P n =.55 MW/m ), τ E =.6 s, MeV TanNBI n()=9.3x m -3, T()=7.95 kev <β>=.3 %, P div =. MW/m (9 Δ=. m), <B>=7 T n() (m -3 ) f alpha n-control Pf-control MeV NBI is enough for high- density ignition access. 8 6!/a (MW).5. NE NELMT PF PF (b) (a) T 5 5.5.5.5 FALPHA..8.8 PRATIO.6 (c) BETAA.6.... 5 PEXT (d) SSDT PEXTC 3 5 6 Time (s) 8 () (kev) P f (GW) <"> (m -3 /s) n() e (m -3 ). 8 6 (e) 6 Operating point at the unstable boundary <!>=.3 % x NBI turn off time MW P f =.GW 5 5 5 ()(kev)

8. Summary and further challenge: We have studied how to use NBI heating in FFHR helical reactors. [] From a safe operating point view, the density control should not be used especially near the saddle point on POPCON. It can be used only in the initial phase far from the saddle point. [] Fusion power control is important to stabilize the thermal instability, and it should be used before over-passing the saddle point. It should be also carefully preprogrammed to have a low density for NBI penetration. After over-passing the saddle point on POPCON, NBI heating power can be switched off, leading to ignition by alpha heating power. It is also robust to the parameter changes. But the feedback control of the heating power is desirable. [3] As the NBI energy less than.5 MeV would also bring high-density ignition in the FFHR fusion ignition experimental (FFHR-C) and commercial reactor (FFHRm), the near term NBI technology could be utilized for proposed helical reactors. Further big challenge: To overcome the parameter changes during the ignition access, feedback control of the heating power should be invented. 3