CHAPTER 7 EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC SYSTEMS. Base shear force in a linearly elastic system due to ground excitation is Vb

Similar documents
ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOFT SOIL INELASTIC DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRAS FOR THE CITY OF GUAYAQUIL, ECUADOR

Giacomo Boffi. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Ambientale e Territoriale Politecnico di Milano

Seismic Design of Bridges

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF ECCENTRIC BUILDING STRUCTURES BY MEANS OF A REFINED ONE STOREY MODEL

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR BIDIRECTIONAL GROUND MOTIONS

PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZING THE SEISMIC DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO EVALUATION

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Simulation of Nonlinear Behavior of Wall-Frame Structure during Earthquakes

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

SHAKING TABLE DEMONSTRATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BASE-ISOLATED BUILDINGS ***** Instructor Manual *****

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENT PREDICTION OF R/C BUILDING STRUCTURES USING EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRA

STUDY ON CHARACTERIZATION OF NON LINEAR RESPONSE OF SDOF MODEL CONSIDERING LARGE DEFORMATION BY P-DELTA EFFECT

EQ Ground Motions. Strong Ground Motion and Concept of Response Spectrum. March Sudhir K Jain, IIT Gandhinagar. Low Amplitude Vibrations

INVESTIGATION OF JACOBSEN'S EQUIVALENT VISCOUS DAMPING APPROACH AS APPLIED TO DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN

Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) and Response Spectrum

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems

Estimation Method of Seismic Response Based on Momentary Input Energy Considering Hysteresis Shapes of a Building Structure

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS DEGRADING SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS

Role of hysteretic damping in the earthquake response of ground

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

Issue Date

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES TO NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTION

Numerical Solution of Equation of Motion

BRB and viscous damper hybrid vibration mitigation structural system: seismic performance analysis method and case studies

Introduction to structural dynamics

3. MDOF Systems: Modal Spectral Analysis

Axial force-moment interaction in the LARSA hysteretic beam element

Direct Displacement-Based Design Using Inelastic Design Spectrum

A new seismic testing method E. Kausel Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts 7-277, OamWd^e, ^ 027 JP,

Evaluating a rigid-plastic method to estimate the earthquake ductility demand on structures

ENERGY AND DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS IMPOSED BY NEAR-SOURCE GROUND MOTIONS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ESTIMATION OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS BASED ON THE CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

Dynamics of Structures

Dynamic Loads CE 543. Examples. Harmonic Loads

Influence of Conditioning Period on the Displacement Response of Nonlinear Single- Degree-of-Freedom Structural Systems

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

SURFACE WAVES AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

VIBRATION AMPLIFICATION IN OSCILLATING SYSTEMS WITH DEGRADING CHARACTERISTICS *

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

DEGRADATION PARAMETERS FOR EQUIVALENT SDOF SYSTEMS OBTAINED FROM CYCLIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS AND PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

7 SEISMIC LOADS. 7.1 Estimation of Seismic Loads. 7.2 Calculation of Seismic Loads

A Guide to linear dynamic analysis with Damping

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

Influence of Time Duration between Successive Earthquakes on the Nonlinear Response of SDOF Structure

Second-Order Linear Differential Equations C 2

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

An Experimental Study of In-plane Oval Damper

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

Collapse modes of structures under strong motions of earthquake

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure


QUALITATIVE COMPARISON OF STATIC PUSHOVER VERSUS INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS CAPACITY CURVES

Dynamic Stress Analysis of a Bus Systems

Project: Local Degree of Freedom Ductility Demand Project Category: Physical Sciences / Simulation

Dynamics of structures

DETERMINATION OF PERFORMANCE POINT IN CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD

Geometric Stiffness Effects in 2D and 3D Frames

Structural Dynamics Lecture 7. Outline of Lecture 7. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.) System Reduction. Vibration due to Movable Supports.

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

Boundary Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING

Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient

midas Civil Dynamic Analysis

MODELING OF NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF RC SHEAR WALLS UNDER COMBINED AXIAL, SHEAR AND FLEXURAL LOADING

Evaluating the effects of near-field earthquakes on the behavior of moment resisting frames

A BETTER RIGID-PLASTIC ESTIMATE FOR EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED PLASTIC DISPLACEMENTS

Inclusion of a Sacrificial Fuse to Limit Peak Base-Shear Forces During Extreme Seismic Events in Structures with Viscous Damping

NONLINEAR SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE (SSI) ANALYSIS USING AN EFFICIENT COMPLEX FREQUENCY APPROACH

Laboratory notes. Torsional Vibration Absorber

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

A Visco-Elastic Model with Loading History Dependent Modulus and Damping for Seismic Response Analyses of Soils. Zhiliang Wang 1 and Fenggang Ma 2.

ENERGY BALANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN METHOD OF RC STRUCTURES CONSIDERING CYCLIC BEHAVIOR UNDER EARTHQUAKE

A study on the correlation between dissipated hysteretic energy and seismic performance

SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES

DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC ISOLATION TABLE COMPOSED OF AN X-Y TABLE AND WIRE ROPE ISOLATORS

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

Effect of vertical ground motions on horizontal response of structures

Trusses - Method of Sections

Seismic Induced Global Collapse of Non-deteriorating Frame Structures

Vibrational Power Flow Considerations Arising From Multi-Dimensional Isolators. Abstract

ESTIMATING PARK-ANG DAMAGE INDEX USING EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS

Department of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, by Shunzo OKAMOTO, M. J. A., Sept.

Experimental Calibration and Head Loss Prediction of Tuned Liquid Column Damper

NON-ITERATIVE EQUIVALENT LINEAR METHOD FOR DISPLACEMENT-BASED DESIGN

Progressive wave: a new multisource vibration technique to assist forming processes - kinematic study, simulation results and design proposition

A Sloping Surface Roller Bearing and its lateral Stiffness Measurement

Transcription:

CHAPTER 7 EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC SYSTEMS Base shear force in a linearl elastic sstem due to ground excitation is Vb = ( A/ g) w where A is the pseudo-acceleration corresponding to natural period and damping ratio of the linear sstem. Most buildings are designed to remain elastic for much lower base shear. Therefore buildings designed to resist earthquake will still be damaged during a strong earthquake. However, the damage should be controlled to an acceptable level, e.g. no collapse of building. The response of structures deforming into their inelastic range is therefore of importance in earthquake engineering. 9-1

Force deformation relation Cclic tests to simulate inelastic condition under earthquake have been conducted. Results show that cclic force-deformation behavior depends on the structural materials and structural sstem. Plot of force versus deformation under cclic loading is called hsteresis loop showing inelastic behavior. The shape of these loops depends on structural materials and structural sstems. 9-2

Elastoplastic idealization For convenience, the force-deformation relation obtained from experiment testing is simplified b an elastic-perfectlplastic or elastoplastic relation. The idealization is such that the area under the approximate curve is the same as under the actual curve at a selected maximum displacement. On initial loading, this idealized sstem is linearl elastic with stiffness k as long as force does not exceed f, the ield strength. Yielding begins when force reaches f, at which deformation equal to ield deformation u. For elastoplastic sstem, the stiffness equal to zero while ielding occurs Unloading of a ielding sstem will follow a path with slope (or stiffness) equal to elastic stiffness of the initial loading branch. Maximum and minimum resisting force is f and f. Yielding can occur in both directions when force reaches ield strength. 9-3

For elastoplastic sstems after some ielding, the relation between force and deformation is no longer singled value as it depends on prior histor of motion and whether the deformation is currentl increasing (velocit>0) or decreasing (velocit<0). Corresponding linear sstem It is interesting to evaluate the peak response of an elastoplastic sstem due to ground excitation and compare to the peak of the corresponding linear sstem due to the same ground motion. Corresponding linear sstem is the linear sstem having stiffness equal to the stiffness of initial loading path of the elastoplastic sstem. Both sstems have the same mass and damping. Therefore, the natural vibration periods of both sstems are the same when the elastoplastic sstem oscillates with a small u < u. amplitude ( o ) 9-4

Normalized ield strength Normalized ield strength is defined as f f = = fo where f o and u o are the peak values of the earthquake-induced resisting force and deformation, respectivel, in the corresponding linear sstem. We ma interpret f o as strength required for the structure to remain elastic during ground excitation. For sstem that remains elastic ( f Yield strength reduction factor u u o > f ), f = 1 Yield strength reduction factor is defined b R fo uo 1 = = = f u f o R = 1 for linear sstem and is greater than 1 for sstems that deform into inelastic range. Ductilit factor is defined b µ = u u m where u m is the maximum deformation. Ductilit factor µ = 1 for linear sstem. The ratio between peak deformation of inelastic and um µ elastic sstem is = µ f = u o R 9-5

Equation of motion and controlling parameters The governing equation of motion is S (, ) ( ) mu + cu + f u u = mu t where the resisting force f (, ) as shown earlier. S g uu for an elastoplastic sstem is This equation has to be solved b numerical algorithm and we will use the average acceleration method for results presented in this chapter and t = 0.02 sec. Divide both sides of equation of motion b m where ω = n ( ) ( ) u + ζω u + ω u f u u = u t k m 2 2 n n S, g ζ c m = f ( u, u ) 2 ωn S = f S ( uu, ) f The natural frequenc and damping ratio is the same as for the corresponding linear sstem. For a given u ( t), () g u t depends on three sstem parameters: ω n, ζ, and u, as well as the form of force-deformation relation. Here, elastoplastic form will be used. 9-6

Effect of ielding To understand how the response of sdf sstem is affected b inelastic action or ielding, we compare response of an elastoplastic sstem to that of its corresponding linear sstem due to El Centro ground motion. Response histor First we compute the response of a linear sstem with T n =0.5 sec and no damping. The peak response of this linear sstem due to El Centro ground motion is u o=3.34 in. Then we analze another sstem, which is inelastic and has normalized ield strength f = 0.125 So, ( ) f = f f = 0.125 1.37w = 0.171w o The response of this inelastic sstem is plotted together with resisting force, time that ielding occurs and forcedeformation relation. 9-7

When deformation reaches ield deformation, ielding occurs. During ielding, deformation ma increase while resisting force is constant and equal to ield strength. When the velocit becomes zero and deformation begins to decrease, unloading occurs and ielding stops. The forcedeformation relation during unloading is parallel to initial loading branch. The sstem vibrates about a new static equilibrium position, which is permanent deformation after vibration stops. Yielding ma occur in the negative direction in a similar manner. 9-8

When time histor of man inelastic sstems with different values of f are plotted and compared. Peak deformations depend on normalized ield strength. Sstems having lower normalized ield strengths ield more often and for longer duration. The peak deformation of inelastic sstem can be smaller or larger than its corresponding elastic sstem. 9-9

Ductilit demand, peak deformation and normalized ield strength The peak deformation normalized b PGD (peak ground displacement) um/ u go for different value of normalized ield strength are plotted versus period. Peak deformation of elastic sstem u / u is also included. o go The normalized ield strength f has little influence in the velocit and displacement-sensitive spectral regions (medium and long period range). It has great effect on short period sstems. Smaller normalized ield strength leads to significant increase in peak deformation. 9-10

In the velocit and displacement-sensitive region, peak deformation u m of inelastic sstems can be larger or smaller than that of its corresponding elastic sstem u o. For ver long period region, sstem is ver flexible. The mass stas still while the ground is shaking. Whether the sstem ields or not, peak deformation equals to peak ground displacement regardless of strength of the sstem. This is known as the equal displacement rule. When the ratio between peak deformation of inelastic and corresponding elastic sstem um/ u o are plotted, it shows the effect of inelastic action. As observed previousl, inelastic sstem with normalized ield strength less than 1 has significantl larger deformation. 9-11

Next, ductilit factor µ = = ( )( ) = ( ) is plotted versus period. u / u u / u u / u u / u / f m m o o m o 1 Note that R =. Sstems with larger R has larger ductilit f factor µ. And for ver long period sstem, µ = R because u / u = 1. m o 9-12

Response spectrum for ield deformation and ield strength Define D 2 = u V = ωnu A = ωnu Note that D is the ield deformation of the sstem, not the maximum deformation. A plot of D against T n for fixed values of ductilit factor µ is called the (constant-ductilit) ield-deformation response spectrum and plots of V and A are called (constant-ductilit) pseudo-velocit and pseudo-acceleration response spectra, respectivel. These quantities are related in a similar wa as D V and A. Yield strength of an elastoplastic sstem is f = The peak force in its corresponding linear sstem (or the strength required for the sstem to remain elastic) is f o A g w A = w g 9-13

Yield strength for specified ductilit In the analsis to determine deformation response of an inelastic sstem due to a ground motion, numerical procedure is implemented to obtain the response time histor. The ield deformation u (ield strength), damping ratio, and ground motion are assumed to be known, then the maximum deformation u m is obtained from the procedure and ductilit factor µ can be calculated ( µ = u / u ). m Based on this approach, given a ductilit factor, we can not know u directl. Therefore, iteration must be done b assuming a ield strength value, and determining the response of inelastic sstem and then ductilit factor. 9-14

Construction of constant-ductilit response spectrum To plot a spectrum, such iteration must be done for each value of period. When a ductilit factor corresponds to more than one values of ield strength, the largest ield strength should be used for plotting response spectrum. Once ield strength D is determined, pseudo-velocit and pseudo-acceleration can be calculated and plotted for use in structural design. Yield strength of an elastoplastic sstem is f A = g w 9-15

Constant-ductilit response spectrum for D, V, and A can be plotted in the four-wa logarithmic form as the elastic response spectrum The maximum deformation of inelastic sstem can also be determined from such spectrum as u m = µ u 9-16

Relationship between ield strength and ductilit A structure is usuall not designed to have ield strength f o enough to remain elastic during an earthquake because that would be prohibitivel expensive. If we allow it to damage or ield and deform into inelastic range with a certain level of ductilit factor, the ield strength required to limit the ductilit demand of the sstem can be much lower than f o. In the building code, the reduction from elastic strength demand f o to required ield strength f is specified b ield strength reduction factor R. 9-17

R is equal to the ductilit factor in the ver long period range but is smaller and close to 1 in the short period range. The more ductile the structure is, the more reduction factor we can use. Relative effect of ielding and damping We plot the constant-ductilit ield strength spectrum for man damping values together. The curve for µ = 1 is the elastic response spectrum. Effect of damping is significant onl in the velocit-sensitive spectral region (medium period range) for both elastic and inelastic sstems. We can observe that effect of damping is less for inelastic sstem ( µ > 1) compared to elastic sstem ( µ = 1). 9-18

Inelastic design spectrum Simplified values of f or R have been proposed for use to construct a ield-strength design spectrum. where u = f u = o u R o 9-19

or The constant-ductilit ield strength spectrum is obtained b dividing the elastic design spectrum b the ield-strength reduction factor R. 9-20

9-21

9-22

9-23

Maximum inelastic deformation spectrum can be obtained b multipling the elastic response spectrum b um/ u o ratio which is equal to µ / R. 9-24

9-25

9-26

9-27