Econ Macroeconomics I Optimizing Consumption with Uncertainty

Similar documents
Econ Slides from Lecture 10

How to Characterize Solutions to Constrained Optimization Problems

Fluctuations. Shocks, Uncertainty, and the Consumption/Saving Choice

Increasingly, economists are asked not just to study or explain or interpret markets, but to design them.

DYNAMIC LECTURE 5: DISCRETE TIME INTERTEMPORAL OPTIMIZATION

University of Pittsburgh Department of Economics Econ 1720: Advanced Macroeconomics Handout 3

HOMEWORK #3 This homework assignment is due at NOON on Friday, November 17 in Marnix Amand s mailbox.

Solution to Proof Questions from September 1st

ECON 186 Class Notes: Optimization Part 2

Mathematics Review Revised: January 9, 2008

Lecture 6: Discrete-Time Dynamic Optimization

Topic 2. Consumption/Saving and Productivity shocks

Sometimes the domains X and Z will be the same, so this might be written:

Quadratic Equations Part I

Lecture Notes: Math Refresher 1

Lesson 3-2: Solving Linear Systems Algebraically

Development Economics (PhD) Intertemporal Utility Maximiza

Chapter 1 Review of Equations and Inequalities

Graduate Macroeconomics 2 Problem set Solutions

UNDERSTANDING FUNCTIONS

In the Ramsey model we maximized the utility U = u[c(t)]e nt e t dt. Now

Econ Slides from Lecture 14

Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory Notes. David L. Kelly. Department of Economics University of Miami Box Coral Gables, FL

Problem Set # 2 Dynamic Part - Math Camp

Structural Analysis II Prof. P. Banerjee Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 38

The Envelope Theorem

FIN 550 Exam answers. A. Every unconstrained problem has at least one interior solution.

MA 3280 Lecture 05 - Generalized Echelon Form and Free Variables. Friday, January 31, 2014.

EconS Cost Structures

Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation

The Hansen Singleton analysis

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Neoclassical Business Cycle Model

Chapter 4. Applications/Variations

CIS 2033 Lecture 5, Fall

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MACROECONOMICS THEORY Preliminary Exam August 1, :00 am - 2:00 pm

QFT. Chapter 14: Loop Corrections to the Propagator

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice

Chapter 4. Solving Systems of Equations. Chapter 4

x 1 1 and p 1 1 Two points if you just talk about monotonicity (u (c) > 0).

Macroeconomic Theory and Analysis Suggested Solution for Midterm 1

Manipulating Equations

ECON 582: Dynamic Programming (Chapter 6, Acemoglu) Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Dynamic Problem Set 1 Solutions

POLI 8501 Introduction to Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Equilibrium in a Production Economy

September Math Course: First Order Derivative

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

The Kuhn-Tucker and Envelope Theorems

Distances in R 3. Last time we figured out the (parametric) equation of a line and the (scalar) equation of a plane:

N H 2 2 NH 3 and 2 NH 3 N H 2

INTRODUCTION TO SIGMA NOTATION

Notes on Winnie Choi s Paper (Draft: November 4, 2004; Revised: November 9, 2004)

Big-oh stuff. You should know this definition by heart and be able to give it,

base 2 4 The EXPONENT tells you how many times to write the base as a factor. Evaluate the following expressions in standard notation.

Dynamic Optimization Using Lagrange Multipliers

1 Implicit Differentiation

Hypothesis testing I. - In particular, we are talking about statistical hypotheses. [get everyone s finger length!] n =

Chapter 14. From Randomness to Probability. Copyright 2012, 2008, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture 2: Change of Basis

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7

Algebra 1B notes and problems March 12, 2009 Factoring page 1

Econ 101A Midterm 1 Th 29 September 2004.

Adding Production to the Theory

9.4 Radical Expressions

Consider this problem. A person s utility function depends on consumption and leisure. Of his market time (the complement to leisure), h t

Dynamic Optimization Problem. April 2, Graduate School of Economics, University of Tokyo. Math Camp Day 4. Daiki Kishishita.

To factor an expression means to write it as a product of factors instead of a sum of terms. The expression 3x

Preptests 59 Answers and Explanations (By Ivy Global) Section 1 Analytical Reasoning

Solutions for Homework #4

Session 4: Money. Jean Imbs. November 2010

Practice Problems 2 (Ozan Eksi) ( 1 + r )i E t y t+i + (1 + r)a t

MA Advanced Macroeconomics: 7. The Real Business Cycle Model

=.55 = = 5.05

Announcements. CS 188: Artificial Intelligence Fall Causality? Example: Traffic. Topology Limits Distributions. Example: Reverse Traffic

Constrained optimization.

In economics, the amount of a good x demanded is a function of the price of that good. In other words,

Let V be a vector space, and let X be a subset. We say X is a Basis if it is both linearly independent and a generating set.

Electric Power a learn.sparkfun.com tutorial

( )( b + c) = ab + ac, but it can also be ( )( a) = ba + ca. Let s use the distributive property on a couple of

Design and Analysis of Experiments Prof. Jhareshwar Maiti Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Intermediate Algebra. Gregg Waterman Oregon Institute of Technology

Simple Consumption / Savings Problems (based on Ljungqvist & Sargent, Ch 16, 17) Jonathan Heathcote. updated, March The household s problem X

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector

Econ Review Set 2 - Answers

Preface.

The Real Business Cycle Model

Conservation of Momentum

Answers in blue. If you have questions or spot an error, let me know. 1. Find all matrices that commute with A =. 4 3

Preptests 55 Answers and Explanations (By Ivy Global) Section 4 Logic Games

Revealed Preferences and Utility Functions

New Notes on the Solow Growth Model

Properties of Walrasian Demand

MI 4 Mathematical Induction Name. Mathematical Induction

No Solution Equations Let s look at the following equation: 2 +3=2 +7

Solutions. F x = 2x 3λ = 0 F y = 2y 5λ = 0. λ = 2x 3 = 2y 5 = x = 3y 5. 2y 1/3 z 1/6 x 1/2 = 5x1/2 z 1/6. 3y 2/3 = 10x1/2 y 1/3

4- Current Method of Explaining Business Cycles: DSGE Models. Basic Economic Models

1 A simple example. A short introduction to Bayesian statistics, part I Math 217 Probability and Statistics Prof. D.

Consumption. Consider a consumer with utility. v(c τ )e ρ(τ t) dτ.

Lesson 21 Not So Dramatic Quadratics

Transcription:

Econ 07 - Macroeconomics I Optimizing Consumption with Uncertainty Prof. David Weil September 16, 005 Overall, this is one of the most important sections of this course. The key to not getting lost is to understand that any consumption optimization is set up identically. Uncertainty only adds to how you form the utility function, and to how many budget constraints you must face. This handout is just designed to solve a few of these problems more formally, so that you can see how they fit in with the typical utility maximization. Also, this may give you a structure around which you can solve other problems with similar set-ups. 1 Uncertainty About Wages Given: You live two periods. You get a wage in period one that is fixed at W 1. In period two, you receive wage of W A with probability p, and wage W B with probability (1-p. You find out after period 1, and before period which wage you will receive. First note that you must consume the same amount in period 1 no matter which wage you might receive. But in period two, you can consume whatever your new wage is plus whatever you saved in period one. Your formal optimization is: max L = U(C 1 + pu C A + (1 p U C B + λ A (W 1 + W A C 1 C A + λ B (W 1 + W B C 1 C B You have an expected utility that you try to maximize. The probabilities are used to weight the 1

potential amount of utility you get in your life. The probabilities are NOT used to weight the budget constraints. You have two budget constraints. There are two unique constraints that your life must satisfy when you plan consumption, even though you ll end up actually only facing one. In these kinds of problems, you generally will have multiple budget constraints. We don t always see them explicitly, because we embed them directly in the expected utility equation. Solve this over all choice variables ( C 1, C A, CB. The FOC are: U (C 1 λ A λ B = 0 (1 pu ( C A (1 pu ( C B λ A = 0 ( λ B = 0 (3 W 1 + W A C 1 C A = 0 (4 W 1 + W B C 1 C B = 0 (5 Notice that we can solve the final two FOC for C A = W 1 + W A C 1 (6 C B = W 1 + W B C 1 (7 Now utilizing the second and third FOC: pu W 1 + W A C 1 = λ A (1 p U W 1 + W B C 1 = λ B (8 Putting this all into the first FOC: U (C 1 pu ( W 1 + W A C 1 (1 p U ( W 1 + W B C 1 = 0 Which we can now solve out for C 1. Notice that this is exactly what we would have gotten if we had embedded the budget constraints in the expected utility form and then taken a derivative with respect to C 1

E [U] = U (C 1 + pu (W 1 + W A C 1 + (1 p U (W 1 + W B C 1 Notice that once we ve chosen C 1, we ve effectively chosen both C A actual choice to make is first period consumption. and CB. In essence, our only Uncertainty about Lifespan Given: You have a wage in period one of W 1. You get no other wages. You live for two periods at least, and live for a third period with probability p.(call this case A. You therefore only live for two periods with probability (1-p. (Call this case B You find out after the first period how long you ll live. What is your optimal consumption choice? [ ] max L = U(C 1 + p U C A + U C3 A + (1 p U C B + +λ A (W 1 C 1 C A C A 3 + λ B (W 1 C 1 C B Again notice we have multiple budget constraints. Also note that there are two distinct choices for C. That is because you find out after period one how long you ll live, and you ll have different options for C then. Take FOC: U (C 1 λ A λ B = 0 (9 pu ( C A (1 p U ( C B pu ( C A 3 λ A = 0 (10 λ B = 0 (11 λ A = 0 (1 W 1 C 1 C A C A 3 = 0 (13 W 1 C 1 C B = 0 (14 3

Solve the nd and 4th together: pu C A = pu C3 A U C A = U C3 A (15 (16 C A = C A 3 = C A (17 This simplifies the budget constraints: C A = W 1 C 1 (18 C B = W 1 C 1 (19 Plug these into the 3rd and nd FOC: pu W1 C 1 = λ A (0 (1 p U (W 1 C 1 = λ B (1 Put in all in the first FOC: U (C 1 pu W1 C 1 (1 p U (W 1 C 1 = 0 Which we can again solve for optimal C 1 and which again is exactly what we get if we take shortcuts right to the expected utility function. 3 What if you find out how long you live after the nd period? In this case you have two periods of consumption to choose, and then you find out how long you ll live. max L = U(C 1 +U (C +pu C3 A +(1 pu C3 B +λ A (W 1 C 1 C C3 A +λ B (W 1 C 1 C C3 B 4

But notice that C B 3 = 0, so max L = U(C 1 + U (C + pu C3 A + (1 pu (0 + λ A (W 1 C 1 C C3 A + λ B (W 1 C 1 C FOC: U (C 1 λ A λ B = 0 ( U (C λ A λ B = 0 (3 pu ( C A 3 λ A = 0 (4 (1 pu (0 λ B = 0 (5 W 1 C 1 C A C A 3 = 0 (6 W 1 C 1 C = 0 (7 Notice that the fourth FOC involves the term U (0. What is this equal to? U (0 = 0. If there is no consumption, there is no marginal utility. This implies that λ B = 0. In other words, the multiplier on the second budget constraint is zero, which implies that the second budget constraint doesn t bind, so that W 1 C 1 C > 0. Think about this. It means that if you die after the second period, you won t have spent all your wealth. Why not? You will have saved some for the third period just in case. But once you find out you will die, it s too late to change your decision. The first two FOC imply: C 1 = C = C So from the budget constraint: C A 3 = W 1 C The third FOC and first FOC imply U ( C pu ( W 1 C = 0 5

Which can be solved for the optimal consumption in the first two periods. If you set up a problem like this and find that you have an extra multiplier floating around like λ B, set it to zero and see if things work out. Or add in a dummy term like (1 pu (0 to help you keep track of what is happening, and then see that λ B = 0 4 What if I m uncertain about two things? Given: A wage in period one. A wage in period two. After the first period, you find out if you live for two periods or three periods with probabilities p and (1-p. If you live for three periods, then after the second period, you find out whether your wage in period 3 will be either W H 3 probabilities q and (1-q. So how in the world do we set this up? or W L 3, with Lets map out our possible worlds first World A: I live for two periods only. P(A=p World B: I live for three periods and get the high wage. P(B=(1-pq World C: I live for three periods and get the low wage. P(C=(1-p(1-q max L = U(C 1 +pu [ ( C A +(1 p q U C BC ] [ ( + U C3 B +(1 p(1 q U C BC ] + U C3 C + +λ A (W 1 +W C 1 C A +λ B (W 1 +W +W H 3 C 1 C BC C B 3 +λ C (W 1 +W +W L 3 C 1 C BC C C 3 Where C BC is the amount I consume in period if I know I ll live for three periods, but I don t know yet what my wage in period three will be. FOC are many: (1 p qu C BC U (C 1 λ A λ B λ C = 0 (8 λ A = 0 (9 ( pu C A + (1 p(1 qu C BC λ B λ C = 0 (30 (1 p qu C3 B λ B = 0 (31 6

(1 p(1 qu C3 C λ C = 0 (3 W 1 + W C 1 C A = 0 (33 W 1 + W + W H 3 C 1 C BC C B 3 = 0 (34 W 1 + W + W L 3 C 1 C BC C C 3 = 0 (35 When solving this, notice that I really only have two choice variables. C 1 and C BC. All the other consumption amounts will be fixed by picking those two. It s a very ugly representation with all these FOC, but it can be solved. It s more important to pick up on how to set up the initial maximization and find the FOC themselves. You can work these out into two equations in two unknowns. U (C 1 pu (W 1 + W C 1 (1 p qu ( W 1 + W + W H 3 (1 p(1 qu W 1 + W + W3 L C 1 C BC = 0 C 1 C BC And (1 p qu C BC ( + (1 p(1 qu C BC (1 p qu W 1 + W + W3 H (1 p(1 qu W 1 + W + W3 L C 1 C BC = 0 C 1 C BC 5 What about time discounting and the interest rate? You can obviously think of extending these problems to include those factors. They will complicate the notation, but won t make any serious difference. Take the first example given in this handout. Let s assume they have some discount rate and some interest rate, both of which are positive. max L = U(C 1 + p U C A + (1 p U C B + λ A (W 1 + W A 1 + r C 1 CA + 1 + r The FOC will look similar to before: ( +λ B W 1 + W B 1 + r C 1 CB 1 + r 7

d dc B d L = U (C 1 λ A λ B = 0 (36 dc 1 d L = p U C A λ A 1 + r = 0 (37 dc A ( L = (1 p U C B λ B 1 + r = 0 (38 d dλ A L = W 1 + W A 1 + r C 1 CA 1 + r = 0 (39 d dλ B L = W 1 + W B 1 + r C 1 CB 1 + r = 0 (40 Put the first three together: U (C 1 p U C A (1 + r (1 p U C B (1 + r = 0 Use the budget conditions: C A = (1 + r W 1 + W A (1 + r C 1 (41 C B = (1 + r W 1 + W B (1 + r C 1 (4 So we have: U (C 1 p U (1 + r W 1 + W A (1 + r C 1 (1 + r [ ] (1 p U (1 + r W 1 + W B (1 + r C 1 (1 + r = 0 We can solve this for the optimal value of first period consumption. It looks more complicated, but it ll just end up depending on the interest rate and discount rate as well as the probabilities and the wages. 8