WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT: WESP-AC FORM SCORES

Similar documents
Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Ecology 2. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Community and Population Ecology Populations & Communities Species Diversity Sustainability and Environmental Change Richness and Sustainability

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

ANIMAL ECOLOGY (A ECL)

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

AP Biology. Environmental factors. Earth s biomes. Marine. Tropical rainforest. Savanna. Desert. Abiotic factors. Biotic factors

An introduction to thee Urban Oases Site Selection Tool:

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Bright blue marble floating in space. Biomes & Ecology

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNED INSTRUCTION. Course Title: Wildlife Studies Length of Course: 30 Cycles

Unit 8: Ecology Guided Reading Questions (60 pts total)

Ecosystems and Communities

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

How do abiotic and biotic factors shape ecosystems?

Community Structure. Community An assemblage of all the populations interacting in an area

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Goals: Be able to. Basic conflict: Economic opportunity vs. Environmental quality. Human population is growing exponentially

Taxonomy and Systematics: a broader classification system that also shows evolutionary relationships

COMMON CORE Lessons & Activities

Framework for the Basin-Wide Socio-Economic Analysis of Four Proposed Sediment Diversions. August 4, 2015

YEAR 5- Natural Sciences PROGRAMACION 2017/18

Manitoba Curriculum Framework of Outcomes Grades K-3

Willow Pond Introduction

Natural Resource Management. Northern Tasmania. Strategy. Appendix 2

Bob Van Dolah. Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

George Host and Tom Hollenhorst Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota Duluth

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

2015 Environmental Science Unit #4 Quiz 2 EQs 1-5 Week of December 2015

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS FOR: Grade

BIO B.4 Ecology You should be able to: Keystone Vocabulary:

1) Give detailed notes on classification of the Phylum Porifera up to orders.

Patterns of impact of three invasive plant species on freshwater ecosystems

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

WE LIVE in a complex world. Many

Ch20_Ecology, community & ecosystems

Seeded Lower Grasslands

Environmental Toxicology of 2,4-D

Earth s Major Terrerstrial Biomes. *Wetlands (found all over Earth)

Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project

Ecology. Part 4. Populations Part 5. Communities Part 6. Biodiversity and Conservation

UNIT 5: ECOLOGY Chapter 15: The Biosphere

Principles of Ecology

Honors Biology Ecology Concept List

Treasure Coast Science Scope and Sequence

Sediment Distribution and Characteristics

Marine Ecology Pacing Guide

Sunset Harbour / Huntington Harbour Maintenance Dredging and Waterline Installation Project. CMANC 21 January 2016

Unit B: Diversity of Living Things

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

Fact sheet: Glacial rivers (all Europe)

In 1749 Linneaus sent a colleague to North America to collect plants

Chapter 8: Biogeography. Biotic Provinces. Biotic Provinces. Biotic Provinces 10/4/2012

GIS and Coastal Nutrients Luke Cole

Michigan Curriculum Framework

About me (why am I giving this talk) Dr. Bruce A. Snyder

UNIVERSITY OF YORK BIOLOGY. Animal and Plant Biology Part II

3.3 TXT + WKBK answers.docx Page 1 of 5

Bright blue marble floating in space. Ecology. AP Biology

TUNKHANNOCK AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT SCIENCE CURRIULUM GRADE 2

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Population Ecology and the Distribution of Organisms. Essential Knowledge Objectives 2.D.1 (a-c), 4.A.5 (c), 4.A.6 (e)

EFFECTS OF TAXONOMIC GROUPS AND GEOGRAPHIC SCALE ON PATTERNS OF NESTEDNESS

Biosphere Biome Ecosystem Community Population Organism

ANIMAL ECOLOGY. Curriculum in Animal Ecology. Total Degree Requirement: 128 cr.

Ecology - the study of how living things interact with each other and their environment

Fig 1. Steps in the EcoValue Project

Environmental Management 123 West Indiana Ave., Room 202 DeLand, FL (386) Environmental Management Outdoor Education

BELL RINGER QUICK REVIEW. What is the difference between an autotroph and heterotroph? List 4 abiotic factors in plant growth.

Unit 2: Ecology. 3.1 What is Ecology?

Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

POPULATIONS and COMMUNITIES

A national islands database and assessment of conservation value

Quantifying and Valuing Floodplain Nutrient and Sediment Retention

Brief Intro on Sea Plants

Ecology. Science Matters Chapter 16

1. What makes plants different than animals?

Automated GIS routine for Strategic Environmental Assessment: a spatiotemporal analysis of urban and wetland change

Fifth Grade: Science: Earth and Space Science

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Ecological Succession

Alligator mississippiensis.

Cannon River Watershed 2017 Zonation Update Clarification

Chapter 4: Ecosystems and Communities Section 4.1 Climate

Life Science Curriculum Sixth Grade

Fish and Fish Habitat Follow-up Program. Scotian Basin Exploration Project

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Australia/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Florida.

Relatively little hard substrate occurs naturally in the

Grade 2 Pebble Go Correlations!

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Science Programme of study Key Stage 1

Ecology! the study of the relationship between organisms and their environment

Transcription:

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT: WESP-AC FORM SCORES

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.1 al Assessment s for Wetland 01 Kent Hills 3 WL01 Date: 6/22/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.7547, -64.9487 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Surface Water Storage (WS) 1.20 Lower 5.00 Higher 2.46 3.75 Stream Flow Support (SFS) 6.77 Higher 9.71 Higher 3.61 7.31 Water Cooling (WC) 4.25 Moderate 7.08 Higher 2.83 4.57 Sediment Retention & Stabilization (SR) 3.13 Moderate 1.76 Lower 5.15 1.07 Phosphorus Retention (PR) 5.62 Higher 4.55 Moderate 7.10 4.44 Nitrate Removal & Retention (NR) 2.77 Lower 6.25 Higher 5.00 7.50 Carbon Sequestration (CS) 5.23 Moderate 6.75 Organic Nutrient Export (OE) 8.80 Higher 6.98 Anadromous Fish Habitat (FA) 6.06 Moderate 3.57 Moderate 3.89 2.64 Resident Fish Habitat (FR) 5.77 Moderate 3.72 Moderate 4.01 2.64 Aquatic Invertebrate Habitat (INV) 6.54 Higher 7.25 Higher 5.94 5.17 Amphibian & Turtle Habitat (AM) 5.32 Moderate 10.00 Higher 6.29 5.32 Water bird Feeding Habitat (WBF) 6.48 Higher 5.19 Water bird Nesting Habitat (WBN) 4.08 Moderate 3.40 Songbird, Raptor, & Mammal Habitat (SBM) 9.97 Higher 8.25 Pollinator Habitat (POL) 9.45 Higher 7.61 Native Plant Habitat (PH) 7.08 Higher 9.30 Higher 6.36 5.29 Public Use & Recognition (PU) 4.06 Moderate 2.92

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.1 al Assessment s for Wetland 01 Kent Hills 3 WL01 Date: 6/22/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.7547, -64.9487 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Wetland Sensitivity (Sens) 8.40 Higher 4.91 Wetland Ecological Condition (EC) 8.62 Higher 9.17 Wetland Stressors (STR) (higher score means more) Summary s for Grouped s: 10.00 Higher 6.03 HYDROLOGIC Group (WS) 1.20 Lower 5.00 Higher 2.46 3.75 WATER QUALITY SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SR, PR, NR, CS) AQUATIC SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SFS, INV, OE, WC) AQUATIC HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of FA, FR, AM, WBF, WBN) TRANSITION HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of SBM, PH, POL) 3.53 0.00 6.71 Higher 6.55 5.92 8.08 0.00 9.59 Higher 5.91 6.50 6.21 0.00 7.23 Higher 5.43 4.42 8.93 0.00 10.00 Higher 7.83 5.29 WETLAND CONDITION (EC) 8.62 Higher 9.17 WETLAND RISK (average of Sensitivity & Stressors) 10.00 Higher 4.70 NOTE: A score of 0 does not mean the function or benefit is absent from the wetland. It means only that this wetland has a capacity that is equal or less than the lowest-scoring one, for that function or benefit, from among the 98 NB calibration wetlands that were assessed previously.

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.2 al Assessment s for Wetland 02 Kent Hills 3 WL02 (T7 turbine) Date: 6/22/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.7516, -64.9582 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Surface Water Storage (WS) 3.04 Moderate 2.86 Moderate 3.93 2.50 Stream Flow Support (SFS) 5.00 Moderate 7.61 Higher 2.67 5.72 Water Cooling (WC) 1.88 Lower 1.24 Lower 1.25 0.80 Sediment Retention & Stabilization (SR) 2.07 Moderate 0.76 Lower 4.40 0.46 Phosphorus Retention (PR) 3.03 Moderate 0.00 Lower 5.39 0.33 Nitrate Removal & Retention (NR) 0.58 Lower 0.00 Lower 4.32 3.33 Carbon Sequestration (CS) 4.52 Moderate 6.43 Organic Nutrient Export (OE) 8.38 Higher 6.65 Anadromous Fish Habitat (FA) 0.00 Lower 0.00 Lower 0.00 0.00 Resident Fish Habitat (FR) 0.00 Lower 0.00 Lower 0.00 0.00 Aquatic Invertebrate Habitat (INV) 2.77 Lower 4.41 Moderate 4.34 3.70 Amphibian & Turtle Habitat (AM) 6.10 Moderate 8.87 Higher 6.69 4.72 Water bird Feeding Habitat (WBF) 4.99 Moderate 4.00 Water bird Nesting Habitat (WBN) 4.60 Moderate 3.83 Songbird, Raptor, & Mammal Habitat (SBM) 9.25 Higher 7.65 Pollinator Habitat (POL) 7.92 Higher 6.38 Native Plant Habitat (PH) 4.01 Moderate 8.22 Higher 5.06 4.68 Public Use & Recognition (PU) 2.86 Moderate 2.10

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.2 al Assessment s for Wetland 02 Kent Hills 3 WL02 (T7 turbine) Date: 6/22/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.7516, -64.9582 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Wetland Sensitivity (Sens) 2.26 Lower 2.91 Wetland Ecological Condition (EC) 3.56 Moderate 6.11 Wetland Stressors (STR) (higher score means more) Summary s for Grouped s: 8.45 Higher 4.26 HYDROLOGIC Group (WS) 3.04 Moderate 2.86 Moderate 3.93 2.50 WATER QUALITY SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SR, PR, NR, CS) AQUATIC SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SFS, INV, OE, WC) AQUATIC HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of FA, FR, AM, WBF, WBN) TRANSITION HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of SBM, PH, POL) 1.93 0.00 2.13 Lower 5.78 2.35 6.33 0.00 6.23 Moderate 5.19 4.56 4.95 0.00 4.70 Higher 4.80 3.15 6.98 0.00 9.49 Higher 7.01 4.68 WETLAND CONDITION (EC) 3.56 Moderate 6.11 WETLAND RISK (average of Sensitivity & Stressors) 5.39 Moderate 3.59 NOTE: A score of 0 does not mean the function or benefit is absent from the wetland. It means only that this wetland has a capacity that is equal or less than the lowest-scoring one, for that function or benefit, from among the 98 NB calibration wetlands that were assessed previously.

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.3 al Assessment s for Wetland 03 Kent Hills 3 WL03 (T8 turbine) Date: 6/23/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.8169, -64.8861 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Surface Water Storage (WS) 0.68 Lower 2.86 Moderate 2.05 2.50 Stream Flow Support (SFS) 6.25 Moderate 7.53 Higher 3.33 5.67 Water Cooling (WC) 1.20 Lower 0.00 Lower 0.80 0.00 Sediment Retention & Stabilization (SR) 0.00 Lower 1.11 Lower 2.90 0.67 Phosphorus Retention (PR) 4.70 Higher 0.48 Lower 6.49 0.76 Nitrate Removal & Retention (NR) 1.91 Lower 0.00 Lower 4.73 3.19 Carbon Sequestration (CS) 5.30 Moderate 6.78 Organic Nutrient Export (OE) 6.28 Higher 4.99 Anadromous Fish Habitat (FA) 0.00 Lower 0.00 Lower 0.00 0.00 Resident Fish Habitat (FR) 0.00 Lower 0.00 Lower 0.00 0.00 Aquatic Invertebrate Habitat (INV) 1.96 Lower 3.24 Moderate 3.99 3.09 Amphibian & Turtle Habitat (AM) 3.34 Moderate 10.00 Higher 5.28 6.86 Water bird Feeding Habitat (WBF) 5.07 Moderate 4.06 Water bird Nesting Habitat (WBN) 3.22 Moderate 2.68 Songbird, Raptor, & Mammal Habitat (SBM) 7.86 Higher 6.50 Pollinator Habitat (POL) 9.87 Higher 7.95 Native Plant Habitat (PH) 5.38 Higher 8.47 Higher 5.64 4.82

Appendix H Wetland al Assessment: WESP-AC Form s Table H.3 al Assessment s for Wetland 03 Kent Hills 3 WL03 (T8 turbine) Date: 6/23/2017 Latitude & Longitude: 45.8169, -64.8861 Wetland s or Other Attributes: Public Use & Recognition (PU) 2.16 Lower 1.63 Wetland Sensitivity (Sens) 6.96 Higher 4.44 Wetland Ecological Condition (EC) 8.62 Higher 9.17 Wetland Stressors (STR) (higher score means more) Summary s for Grouped s: 7.96 Higher 4.07 HYDROLOGIC Group (WS) 0.68 Lower 2.86 Moderate 2.05 2.50 WATER QUALITY SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SR, PR, NR, CS) AQUATIC SUPPORT Group (max+avg/2 of SFS, INV, OE, WC) AQUATIC HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of FA, FR, AM, WBF, WBN) TRANSITION HABITAT Group (max+avg/2 of SBM, PH, POL) 2.39 0.00 2.15 Lower 6.00 2.37 3.78 0.00 5.75 Moderate 4.13 4.29 3.04 0.00 7.52 Higher 3.84 4.57 7.72 0.00 9.78 Higher 7.32 4.82 WETLAND CONDITION (EC) 8.62 Higher 9.17 WETLAND RISK (average of Sensitivity & Stressors) 8.47 Higher 4.25 NOTE: A score of 0 does not mean the function or benefit is absent from the wetland. It means only that this wetland has a capacity that is equal or less than the lowest-scoring one, for that function or benefit, from among the 98 NB calibration wetlands that were assessed previously.