On rps-separation axioms

Similar documents
Strongly g -Closed Sets in Topological Spaces

Contra-Pre-Semi-Continuous Functions

ISSN: Received: Year: 2018, Number: 20, Pages: Generalized Pre α Closed Sets in Topology

rgα-interior and rgα-closure in Topological Spaces

A Note on Modifications of rg-closed Sets in Topological Spaces

L. ELVINA MARY 1, E.L MARY TENCY 2 1. INTRODUCTION. 6. a generalized α-closed set (briefly gα - closed) if

g -Pre Regular and g -Pre Normal Spaces

Available at: pocetna.html ON A GENERALIZATION OF NORMAL, ALMOST NORMAL AND MILDLY NORMAL SPACES II

ON PRE GENERALIZED B-CLOSED SET IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. S. Sekar 1, R. Brindha 2

On Preclosed Sets and Their Generalizations

On bτ-closed sets. Maximilian Ganster and Markus Steiner

Contra Pre Generalized b - Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces

Applied Mathematics and Sciences: An International Journal (MathSJ ), Vol. 2, No. 1, March Tamil Nadu, India. Tamil Nadu, India.

REGULAR GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Recent Progress in the Theory of Generalized Closed Sets

[Selvi* et al., 5(8): August, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

Generalized Near Rough Connected Topologized Approximation Spaces

sb* - Separation axioms

On Generalized gp*- Closed Set. in Topological Spaces

w-preopen Sets and W -Precontinuity in Weak Spaces

PAijpam.eu REGULAR WEAKLY CLOSED SETS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Decomposition of continuity via b-open set. Contents. 1 introduction Decompositions of continuity 60

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

frg Connectedness in Fine- Topological Spaces

STRONGLY SEMI-PREIRRESOLUTENESS IN BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ON GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS

On z-θ-open Sets and Strongly θ-z-continuous Functions

On Decompositions of Continuity and α-continuity

S p -Separation Axioms

Slightly v-closed Mappings

ON STRONGLY PRE-OPEN SETS AND A DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY. Chandan Chattopadhyay

Maximilian GANSTER. appeared in: Soochow J. Math. 15 (1) (1989),

On Contra gγ-continuous Functions

g ωα-separation Axioms in Topological Spaces

A DECOMPOSITION OF CONTINUITY IN IDEAL BY USING SEMI-LOCAL FUNCTIONS

AND RELATION BETWEEN SOME WEAK AND STRONG FORMS OF Τ*-OPEN SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Some Stronger Forms of g µ b continuous Functions

On αrω separation axioms in topological spaces

P p -Open Sets and P p -Continuous Functions

On Topological g α--wg Quotient Mappings

A study on gr*-closed sets in Bitopological Spaces

N αc Open Sets and Their Basic Properties in Topological Spaces

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARDLY e-open FUNCTIONS

OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. Zbigniew Duszyński. 1. Preliminaries

On A Weaker Form Of Complete Irresoluteness. Key Words: irresolute function, δ-semiopen set, regular open set. Contents.

ON PC-COMPACT SPACES

M. Caldas and S. Jafari. ON SEMI δs-irresolute FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

Slightly γ-continuous Functions. Key words: clopen, γ-open, γ-continuity, slightly continuity, slightly γ-continuity. Contents

Notions via β*-continuous maps in topological spaces

ISSN: Page 202

On Semi*δ- Open Sets in Topological Spaces

M. Suraiya Begum, M. Sheik John IJSRE Volume 4 Issue 6 June 2016 Page 5466

ON µ-compact SETS IN µ-spaces

P.M. Thevar College Usilampatti, Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

On a type of generalized open sets

Ideal - Weak Structure Space with Some Applications

PROPERTIES OF NANO GENERALIZED- SEMI CLOSED SETS IN NANO TOPOLOGICAL SPACE

Some results on g-regular and g-normal spaces

On supra b open sets and supra b-continuity on topological spaces

A Research on Characterizations of Semi-T 1/2 Spaces

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION & PRELIMINARIES

On Base for Generalized Topological Spaces

J. Sanabria, E. Acosta, M. Salas-Brown and O. García

On Generalized gp*- Closed Map. in Topological Spaces

Slightly gγ-continuous Functions

Remarks on Dense Set

Totally supra b continuous and slightly supra b continuous functions

1. Introduction. Murad Özkoç and Gülhan Aslım. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 40(6) (2011),

On Almost Continuity and Expansion of Open Sets

PREOPEN SETS AND RESOLVABLE SPACES

ON UPPER AND LOWER ALMOST CONTRA-ω-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

On Fuzzy Semi-Pre-Generalized Closed Sets

Contra Pre-I-Continuous Functions

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY

On β-i-open Sets and a Decomposition of Almost-I-continuity

Note on contra nano gb-closed maps

On Pre-γ-I-Open Sets In Ideal Topological Spaces

Supra g-closed Sets in Supra Bitopological Spaces

Role of Ψ Operator in Ideal Supra Topological Spaces

Generalized Form of Continuity by Using D β -Closed Set

On Bitopological (1, 2)*-Generalized. Homeomorphisms

Takashi Noiri, Ahmad Al-Omari, Mohd. Salmi Md. Noorani WEAK FORMS OF OPEN AND CLOSED FUNCTIONS

Upper and Lower α I Continuous Multifunctions

N. Karthikeyan 1, N. Rajesh 2. Jeppiaar Engineering College Chennai, , Tamilnadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Bc-Open Sets in Topological Spaces

Dimension and Continuity on T 0 -Alexandroff Spaces

Semi-Star-Alpha-Open Sets and Associated Functions

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 9(3), 2016, pp

Smarandachely Precontinuous maps. and Preopen Sets in Topological Vector Spaces

Generalized Star Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaces

On Almost Supra N-continuous Function

International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Science ISSN : Volume 1 Issue 4 (April 2012)

On I s g-continuous Functions in Ideal Topological Spaces

Characterisation of Nano generalized β closed sets in Nano topological spaces

- Generalized & - Separation Axioms for Topological Spaces

1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, E. Ekici 1, S. Jafari 2, M. Caldas 3 and T. Noiri 4

ON WEAK FORMS OF PREOPEN AND PRECLOSED FUNCTIONS

in Topological Spaces

SOME NEW SEPARATION AXIOMS. R. Balaji 1, N. Rajesh 2. Agni College of Technology Kancheepuram, , TamilNadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

On totally πg µ r-continuous function in supra topological spaces

Transcription:

On rps-separation axioms T.Shyla Isac Mary 1 and P. Thangavelu 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Martandam- 629165, TamilNadu, India. 2 Department of Mathematics, Karunya University, Coimbatore- 641114, TamilNadu, India. ABSTRACT The authors introduced rps-closed sets and rps-open sets in topological spaces and established their relationships with some generalized sets in topological spaces. The aim of this paper is to introduce rps-t ½, rps-t ⅓, rps-t b, rps-t ¾ spaces and characterize their basic properties. MSC 2010:54D10 Keywords: rps-t ½ spaces, rps-t ⅓ spaces, rps-t b spaces, rps-t ¾ spaces. 1. INTRODUCTION Separation axioms in topological spaces play a dominated role in analysis. Recently general topologists concentrate on separation axioms between T 0 and T 1. In this paper the concepts of rps-t ½, rps-t ⅓, rps-t b, rps-t ¾ spaces are introduced, characterized and studied their relationships with T ½ space[7], semi-t ½ space[3], pre-regular-t ½ space[5], semi-pre-t ½ space[4], pgpr-t ½ space[2], pre-semi-t b space[14], pre-semi-t ½ space[14], pre-semi-t ¾ space[14], that are respectively introduced by Levine, Bhattacharya, Gnanambal, Dontchev, Anitha, Veerakumar and their collaborators. 2. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper (X,τ) represents a topological space on which no separation axiom is assumed unless otherwise mentioned. For a subset A of a topological space X, cla and inta denote the closure of A and the interior of A respectively. X \ A denotes the complement of A in X. Throughout the paper indicates the end of the proof. We recall the following definitions and results. Definition 2.1 A subset A of a space (X,τ) is called (i) regular-open [13] if A = int cla and regular-closed if A = cl inta. (ii) semi-open [6] if A cl inta and semi-closed if int cla A. (iii) pre-open [9] if A int cla and pre-closed if cl inta A. (iv) semi-pre-open [1] if A cl int cla and semi-pre-closed if int cl inta A. Definition 2.2 A subset A of a space (X,τ) is called g-closed[7] (resp. rg-closed[10], resp. gsp-closed[4], resp. gpr-closed[5], resp. gp-closed[8], resp. pre-semiclosed[14], resp. pgpr-closed[2], resp. rps-closed[11], resp. sg-closed[3]) if cla U (resp. cla U, resp. spcla U, resp. pcla U, resp. pcla U, resp. spcla U, resp. pcla U, resp. spcla U, resp. scla U) whenever A U and U is open (resp. regular-open, resp. open, resp. regular-open, resp. open, resp. g-open, resp. rg-open, resp. rg-open, resp. semi-open). A subset B of a space X is called g-open if X \ B is g-closed. The concepts of rg-open, gsp-open, gpr-open, gp-open, pre-semiopen, pgpr-open, rps-open and sg-open sets can be analogously defined. Definition 2.3 A space (X,τ) is called a T ½ space[7] (resp. T * ½ space[10], resp. semi-t ½ space[3], resp. pre-regular-t ½ space[5], resp. semi-pre-t ½ space[4], resp. pre-semi-t ½ space[14], resp. pgpr-t ½ space[2], resp. pre-semi-t b space[14], resp. pre-semi-t ¾ space[14], resp. gpr-t ½ space[2]) if every g-closed (resp. rg-closed, resp. sg-closed, resp. gpr-closed, 683 P a g e

resp. gsp-closed, resp. pre-semiclosed, resp. pgpr-closed, resp. pre-semiclosed, resp. pre-semiclosed, resp. gprclosed) set is closed(resp. closed, resp. semi-closed, resp. pre-closed, resp. semi-pre-closed, resp. semi-pre-closed, resp. pre-closed, resp. semi-closed, resp. pre-closed, resp. pgpr-closed. Lemma 2.4 [11] If a set A is rps-closed then spcla \ A does not contain a non empty rg-closed set. Definition 2.5 [15] A space X is called extremally disconnected if the closure of each open subset of X is open. Lemma 2.6[5] Every pre-regular-t ½ space is semi-pre T ½. Definition 2.7 A function f: X Y is called (i) semi-continuous [9] if f -1 (V) is semi-closed in X for every closed set V in Y. (ii) pre-continuous [9] if f -1 (V) is pre-closed in X for every closed set V in Y. (iii) semi-pre-continuous [1] if f -1 (V) is semi-preclosed in X for every closed set V in Y. (iv) pre-semicontinuous [14] if f -1 (V) is pre-semiclosed in X for every closed set V in Y. (v) rps-continuous [12] if f -1 (V) is rps-closed in X for every closed set V in Y. Lemma 2.8[11] (i) Every rps-closed set is pre-semiclosed (ii) Every pgpr-closed set is rps-closed. (iii) Every semi-pre-closed set is rps-closed. (iv) Every rps-closed set is gsp-closed. Lemma 2.9 [2] In an extremally disconnected space, pcla = spcla. Lemma 2.10[2] Every pre-closed set is pgpr-closed. We use the following notations. RPSO(X, τ) - The collection of all rps-open sets in (X, τ). SPO(X, τ) - The collection of all semi-pre-open sets in (X, τ). SPC(X, τ) - The collection of all semi-pre-closed sets in (X, τ). RPSC(X, τ) - The collection of all rps-closed sets in (X, τ). 3. rps-t k spaces where k {b, ½, ⅓, ¾} As application of regular pre-semiclosed sets, four spaces namely, regular pre-semi-t ½ spaces, regular pre-semi-t ⅓ spaces, regular pre-semi-t b spaces and regular pre-semi-t ¾ spaces are introduced. The following implication diagram will be useful in this paper. Diagram 3.1 semi-closed semi-pre-closed rps-closed pre-semiclosed pre-closed Examples can be constructed to show that the reverse implications are not true. This motivates us to introduce the following spaces. 684 P a g e

Definition 3.2 A space (X,τ) is called regular pre-semi-t ½ (briefly rps-t ½ ) if every rps-closed set is semi-pre-closed. Definition 3.3 A space (X,τ) is called regular pre-semi-t ⅓ (briefly rps-t ⅓ ) if every pre-semi-closed set is rps-closed. Definition 3.4 A space (X,τ) is called regular pre-semi-t b (briefly rps-t b ) if every rps-closed set is semi-closed. Definition 3.5 A space (X,τ) is called regular pre-semi-t ¾ (briefly rps-t ¾ ) if every rps-closed set is pre-closed. Theorem 3.6 (i) Every pre-semi-t ½ space is an rps-t ½ space. (ii) Every semi-pre-t ½ space is an rps-t ½ space. (iii) Every pre-regular-t ½ space is an rps-t ½ space. (iv) Every rps-t b space is an rps-t ½ space. : Suppose X is pre-semi-t ½. Let V be an rps-closed set in X. Using Lemma 2.8(i), V is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t ½, using Definition 2.3, V is semi-pre-closed. This proves (i). Suppose X is semi-pre-t ½. Let V be an rps-closed set in X. Using Lemma 2.8(iv), V is gsp-closed. Since X is semipre-t ½, using Definition 2.3, V is semi-pre-closed. This proves (ii). (iii) follows from (ii) and Lemma 2.6. (iv) follows from the fact that every semi-closed set is semi-pre-closed. The converses of Theorem 3.6 are not true as shown in Example 4.1 and Example 4.2. Theorem 3.7 (i) Every rps-t ¾ space is an rps-t ½ space. (ii) Every rps-t ¾ space is a pgpr-t ½ space. (iii) Every pre-semi-t ¾ space is an rps-t ⅓ space. (i) follows from the fact that every pre-closed set is semi-pre-closed. Suppose X is rps-t ¾. Let V be a pgpr-closed set in X. Using Lemma 2.8(ii), V is rps-closed. Since X is rps-t ¾, V is pre-closed. This proves (ii). Suppose X is pre-semi-t ¾. Let V be a pre-semiclosed set in X. Since X is pre-semi-t ¾, using Definition 2.3, V is pre-closed. Using Lemma 2.10 and Lemma 2.8(ii), V is rps-closed. This proves X is an rps-t ⅓ space. The converses of Theorem 3.7 are not true as shown in Example 4.3. Theorem 3.8 Every pre-semi-t b space is an rps-t b space. Suppose X is pre-semi-t b. Let V be an rps-closed set in X. Using Lemma 2.8(i), V is pre-semiclosed. Since X is presemi-t b, V is semi-closed. This proves the theorem. The converse of Theorem 3.8 is not true as shown in Example 4.1. The concepts of rps-t ½ and semi-t ½ are independent as shown in Example 4.2 and Example 4.4. The concepts of rps-t b and rps-t ⅓ are independent with the concept of rps-t ¾ as shown in Example 4.1, Example 4.2 and Example 4.3. From the above discussions and known results we have the following implication diagram. In this diagram by 685 P a g e

A B we mean A implies B but not conversely and A B means A and B are independent of each other. Diagram 3.9 T ½ pre-regular-t ½ semi-pre-t ½ pgpr-t ½ pre-semi-t ½ pre-semi-t ¾ rps-t ⅓ semi-t ½ rps-t ½ rps-t ¾ pre-semi-t b rps-t b Theorem 3.10 A space X is rps-t ½ if and only if every singleton set is rg-closed or semi-pre-open. Suppose X is rps-t ½. Fix x X. Suppose {x} is not rg-closed. Then X \ {x} is not rg-open. Then X is the only rgopen set containing X \ {x} and hence X \ {x} is trivially an rps-closed subset of (X,τ). Since X is rps-t ½, using Definition 3.2, X \ {x} is semi-pre-closed. Therefore {x} is semi-pre-open. Conversely suppose every singleton set is rg-closed or semi-pre-open. Let A be rps-closed in X. Since A is rps-closed, by using Lemma 2.4, spcla \ A does not contain a non empty rg-closed set. Let x spcla. By our assumption {x} is either rg-closed or semi-pre-open. Case (i) Suppose there is an element x spcla such that {x} is rg-closed. Since {x} is rg-closed, using Lemma 2.4, x spcla \ A that implies x A. Therefore A = spcla. Therefore A is semi-pre-closed. Case (ii) Suppose {x} is not rg-closed for all x spcla. x spcla {x} is semi-pre-open {x} A Ø x A A = spcla A is semi-pre-closed. From Case (i) and Case (ii), it follows from Definition 3.2 that X is rps-t ½. Theorem 3.11 Let X be an rps-t ⅓ space. Then (i) X is rps-t ½ if and only if it is pre-semi-t ½. (ii) X is rps-t b if and only if it is pre-semi-t b. (iii) X is rps-t ¾ if and only if it is pre-semi-t ¾. 686 P a g e

Suppose X is rps-t ½ and rps-t ⅓. Let A be pre-semiclosed in X. Using Definition 3.3, A is rps-closed. Since X is rps- T ½, by Definition 3.2, A is semi-pre-closed. Therefore X is pre-semi-t ½. Conversely we assume that X is pre-semi-t ½. Suppose A is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t ½, using Definition 2.3, A is semi-pre-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(iii), A is rps-closed. This proves that X is rps-t ⅓. Suppose B is rps-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(i), B is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t ½, using Definition 2.3, B is semi-pre-closed. Therefore X is rps-t ½. This proves (i). Suppose X is rps-t ⅓ and rps-t b. Let A be a pre-semi-closed set in X. Using Definition 3.3, A is rps-closed. Since X is rps-t b, by Definition 3.4, A is semi-closed. Therefore X is pre-semi-t b. Conversely we assume that X is pre-semi-t b. Suppose A is a pre-semiclosed subset of X. Since X is pre-semi-t b, A is semi-closed. Using Diagram 3.1, A is semi-pre-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(iii), A is rps-closed. This proves that X is rps-t ⅓. Suppose B is rps-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(i), B is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t b, B is semiclosed so that X is rps-t b. This proves (ii). Suppose X is rps-t ⅓ and rps-t ¾. Let A be a pre-semiclosed set in X. Using Definition 3.3, A is rps-closed. Since X is rps-t ¾, by using Definition 3.5, A is pre-closed. Therefore X is pre-semi-t ¾. Conversely we assume that X is pre-semi-t ¾. Suppose A is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t ¾, A is pre-closed. Using Diagram 3.1, A is semi-pre-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(iii), A is rps-closed. This proves that X is rps-t ⅓. Suppose B is rps-closed. Using Lemma 2.8(i), B is pre-semiclosed. Since X is pre-semi-t ¾, B is pre-closed so that X is rps-t ¾. This proves (iii). Theorem 3.12 (i) If (X,τ) is an rps-t ⅓ space then for each x X, {x} is either rg-closed or rps-open. (ii) If (X,τ) is an rps-t b space then for each x X, {x} is either rg-closed or semi-open. (iii) If (X,τ) is an rps-t ¾ space, then for each x X, {x} is either rg-closed or pre-open. proof Suppose {x} is not an rg-closed subset of an rps-t ⅓ space (X,τ). So {x} is not g-closed. Then X is the only g-open set containing X \ {x}. Therefore X \ {x} is pre-semiclosed since (X,τ) is rps-t ⅓, X \ {x} is rps-closed or equivalently {x} is rps-open. This proves (i). Suppose {x} is not an rg-closed subset of an rps-t b space (X,τ). Then X is the only rg-open set containing X \ {x} and hence X \ {x} is rps-closed. Since (X,τ) is rps-t b, X \ {x} is semi-closed or equivalently {x} is semi-open. Suppose {x} is not an rg-closed subset of an rps-t ¾ space (X,τ). Then X \ {x} is not rg-open. X is the only rg-open set containing X \ {x} and hence X \ {x} is trivially an rps-closed subset of (X,τ). Since (X,τ) is rps-t ¾, X \ {x} is pre-closed or equivalently {x} is pre-open. The converses of Theorem 3.12 are not true as shown in Example 4.2, Example 4.3 and Example 4.4. Theorem 3.13 A space (X,τ) is rps-t ½ if and only if SPC(X,τ) = RPSC(X,τ). A space (X,τ) is rps-t ½ if and only if SPO(X,τ) = RPSO(X,τ). From Diagram 3.1, SPC(X,τ) RPSC(X,τ). (X,τ) is rps-t ½ RPSC(X,τ) SPC(X,τ) SPC(X,τ) = RPSC(X,τ). Conversely suppose SPC(X,τ) = RPSC(X,τ) (X,τ) is rps-t ½. This proves (i). The result (ii) follows directly from result(i). Theorem 3.14 Let X be an extremally disconnected space. (i) If X is rps-t ½ and gpr-t ½, then it is pre-regular-t ½. (ii) If X is T * ½, then every gp-closed set is rps-closed. 687 P a g e

Let X be an extremally disconnected space. Suppose X is rps-t ½ and gpr-t ½. Let A be gpr-closed in X. Since X is gpr-t ½, using Definition 2.3, A is pgpr-closed. Again using Lemma 2.8(ii), A is rps-closed. Since X is rps-t ½, using Definition 2.2, A is semi-pre-closed. Again using Definition 2.1(iv), int cl inta A. Since X is extremally disconnected, it follows that cl inta A. Therefore A is pre-closed that implies X is pre-regular-t 1/2. This proves (i). Suppose X is T * ½, Let A U, U be rg-open and A be gp-closed. Since X is T * ½, by Definition 2.3, U is open. Since A is gp-closed, by Definition 2.2, pcla U. Since X is extremally disconnected, using Lemma 2.9, spcla = pcla U. Therefore A is rps-closed. This proves (ii). Theorem 3.15 Let X be T * ½ space. Then every gsp-closed set is rps-closed. Suppose A is gsp-closed in X. Let A U and U be rg-open. Since X is T * ½, by Definition 2.3, U is open and since A is gsp-closed, by Definition 2.2, spcla U. Again using Definition 2.2, A is rps-closed. Theorem 3.16 (i) If X is rps-t ½ then every rps-continuous function is semi-pre-continuous. (ii) If X is rps-t ⅓ then every pre-semicontinuous function is rps-continuous. (iii) If X is rps-t b then every rps-continuous function is semi-continuous. (iv) If X is rps-t ¾ then every rps-continuous function is pre-continuous. Suppose X is rps-t ½. Let A be closed in Y and f: X Y be rps-continuous. Since f is rps-continuous, using Definition 2.7(v), f -1 (A) is rps-closed. Since X is rps-t ½, using Definition 3.2, f -1 (A) is semi-pre-closed. This proves that f is semi-pre-continuous. Suppose X is rps-t ⅓. Let A be closed in Y and f be pre-semicontinuous. Since f is pre-semicontinuous, using Definition 2.7(iv), f -1 (A) is pre-semiclosed. Since X is rps-t ⅓, Definition 3.3, f -1 (A) is rps-closed. This proves that f is rps-continuous. Suppose X is rps-t ⅓. Let A be closed in Y and f be rps-continuous. Since f is rps-continuous, using Definition 2.7(v), f -1 (A) is rps-closed in X. Since X is rps-t b, using Definition 3.4, f -1 (A) is semi-closed. Therefore f is semi-continuous. Suppose X is rps-t ¾. Let A be closed in Y and f be rps-continuous. Since f is rps-continuous, using Definition 2.7(v), f -1 (A) is rps-closed in X. Since X is rps-t ¾, using Definition 3.5, f -1 (A) is pre-closed. Therefore f is pre-continuous. Theorem 3.17 If X is pre-semi-t ½ and if f: X Y then the following are equivalent. (i) f is semi-pre-continuous. (ii) f is pre-semicontinuous. (iii) f is rps-continuous. Suppose f is semi-pre-continuous. Let A Y be closed. Since f is semi-pre-continuous, f -1 (A) is semi-pre-closed in X. Using Diagram 3.1, f -1 (A) is pre-semiclosed. Therefore f is pre-semicontinuous. This proves (i) (ii). Suppose f is pre-semicontinuos. Let A Y be closed. Since f is pre-semicontinuous, f -1 (A) is pre-semiclosed. By Theorem 3.11(i), X is rps-t ⅓. Therefore f -1 (A) is rps-closed. This proves (ii) (iii). Suppose f is rps-continuous. Let A Y be closed. Since f is rps-continuous, f -1 (A) is rps-closed. By Theorem 3.11(i), X is rps-t ½. Therefore f -1 (A) is semi-pre-closed. This proves (iii) (i). 688 P a g e

4. Examples Example 4.1 Let X = {a,b,c} with τ = {Ø,X,{a},{a,c}}.Then (X,τ) is rps-t ½, rps-t b and rps-t ¾ but not pre-semi-t ½, not semi-pre- T ½, not pre-regular-t ½, not pre-semi-t b and not rps-t ⅓. Example 4.2 Let X = {a,b,c} with τ = {Ø,{a,b},X}. Then (X,τ) is rps-t ½ and rps-t ¾ but not rps-t b and not semi-t ½. Example 4.3 Let X = {a,b,c} and τ = {Ø,{a},{b},{a,b},X}. Then (X,τ) is rps-t ⅓, rps-t b, rps-t ½ and pgpr-t ½ but not pre-semi-t ¾ and not rps-t ¾. Example 4.4 Let X = {a,b,c,d} with τ = {Ø, {a},{b},{a,b},{b,c},{a,b,c},x}. Then (X,τ) is semi-t ½ but not rps-t ½ and not rps-t ⅓. References [1] D. Andrijevic, Semi-pre-open sets, Mat. Vesnik, 38(1986), 24-32. [2] M. Anitha and P. Thangavelu, On pre-generalized pre-regular-closed sets, Acta Ciencia Indica 31M(4)(2005), 1035-1040. [3] P. Bhattacharya and B.K.Lahiri, Semi-generalized closed sets in topology, Indian J.Math., 29(3)(1987), 375-382. [4] J. Dontchev, On generalized semi-pre-open sets, Mem.Fac.Sci. Kochi Univ.ser. A Math., 16(1995), 35-48. [5] Y.Gnanambal, On generalized pre-regular closed sets in topological spaces, Indian J.Pure Appl. Math., 28(3)(1997), 351-360. [6] N.Levine, Semi-open sets and semi continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly, 70(1963), 36-41. [7] N.Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 19(2)(1970), 89-96. [8] H.Maki, J. Umehara and T. Noiri, Every topological space is pre-t ½, Mem.Fac.Sci.Kochi Univ.Ser. A. Math.,17(1996), 33-42. [9] A.S.Mashhour, M.E Abd El-Monsef and S.N El-Deeb, On pre-continuous and weak pre-continuous functions, Proc. Math. Phys. Soc., Egypt, 53(1982), 47-53. [10] N.Palaniappan and K.C Rao, Regular generalized closed sets, Kyungpook Math. J., 33(1993), 211-219. [11] T.Shyla Isac Mary and P.Thangavelu, On regular pre-semiclosed sets in topological spaces, KBM Journal of Math. Sciences & Comp.Applications, 1(1)(2010), 9-17. [12] T.Shyla Isac Mary and P.Thangavelu, On rps-continuous and rps-irresolute functions, International Journal of Mathematical Archive, 2(1)(2011), 159-162. [13] M.Stone, Application of the theory of Boolean rings to general topology, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 41(1937), 375-481. [14] M.K.R.S.Veerakumar, Pre-semiclosed sets, Indian J.Math., 44(2)(2002),165-181. [15] Willard, General topology, Addison Wesley (1970). 689 P a g e