System models. We look at LTI systems for the time being Time domain models

Similar documents
Chapter 3 : Transfer Functions Block Diagrams Signal Flow Graphs

Key Mathematical Backgrounds

EE Control Systems LECTURE 6

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 2 : Block Diagram & Signal Flow Graphs GATE Objective & Numerical Type Questions

Digital Control System

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. R 4 := 100 kohm

Linear System Fundamentals

Mathematical modeling of control systems. Laith Batarseh. Mathematical modeling of control systems

The Laplace Transform

CHE302 LECTURE V LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

FRTN10 Exercise 3. Specifications and Disturbance Models

ANSWERS TO MA1506 TUTORIAL 7. Question 1. (a) We shall use the following s-shifting property: L(f(t)) = F (s) L(e ct f(t)) = F (s c)

Pusan National University

( ) ( ) ω = X x t e dt

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

6.003 Homework #7 Solutions

Chapter 4 Interconnection of LTI Systems

CHBE320 LECTURE V LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

LTV System Modelling

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

Identification Methods for Structural Systems

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Chapter 2 Sampling and Quantization. In order to investigate sampling and quantization, the difference between analog

R L R L L sl C L 1 sc

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

Function and Impulse Response

18.03SC Final Exam = x 2 y ( ) + x This problem concerns the differential equation. dy 2

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 1 Solution (Fall 2010) Wenjie Chen and Jansen Sheng, UC Berkeley

Notes on the Fourier Transform

55:041 Electronic Circuits

Differentiability, Computing Derivatives, Trig Review. Goals:

Control Systems. Frequency domain analysis. L. Lanari

Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

ECE-202 FINAL December 13, 2016 CIRCLE YOUR DIVISION

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014

Analysis of Step Response, Impulse and Ramp Response in the Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor System

CHAPTER 8 OBSERVER BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

ECSE 4440 Control System Engineering. Project 1. Controller Design of a Second Order System TA

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

EE 370L Controls Laboratory. Laboratory Exercise #7 Root Locus. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Nevada, at Las Vegas

Spring 2014 EE 445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Laboratory. Homework #0 Solutions on Review of Signals and Systems Material

Properties of Z-transform Transform 1 Linearity a

7 Minimal realization and coprime fraction

3.6. Implicit Differentiation. Implicitly Defined Functions

Midterm Test Nov 10, 2010 Student Number:

Math 180A. Lecture 16 Friday May 7 th. Expectation. Recall the three main probability density functions so far (1) Uniform (2) Exponential.

ELEC3114 Control Systems 1

Implicit Differentiation. Lecture 16.

Inverse Functions. Review from Last Time: The Derivative of y = ln x. [ln. Last time we saw that

Math 251 Notes. Part I.

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

DESIGN OF CONTROLLERS FOR STABLE AND UNSTABLE SYSTEMS WITH TIME DELAY

Bogoliubov Transformation in Classical Mechanics

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 6.3

Engineering gapplications. Applications of Laplace Transform

Module: 8 Lecture: 1

Exercises for lectures 19 Polynomial methods

6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN

Modeling in the Frequency Domain

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project

POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19

Unit #6 - Families of Functions, Taylor Polynomials, l Hopital s Rule

State Space: Observer Design Lecture 11

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

Laplace Transformation

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Sampling and the Discrete Fourier Transform

Summary: Differentiation

COMM 602: Digital Signal Processing. Lecture 8. Digital Filter Design

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

ECE Linear Circuit Analysis II

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

Control Systems. Laplace domain analysis

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 6: Steady-State Errors Prof. Joel L. Dawson S -

Chap 4. State-Space Solutions and

Behavioral thermal modeling for quad-core microprocessors

f sends 1 to 2, so f 1 sends 2 back to 1. f sends 2 to 4, so f 1 sends 4 back to 2. f 1 = { (2,1), (4,2), (6,3), (1,4), (3,5), (5,6) }.

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

Implicit Differentiation and Related Rates

Math 180, Exam 2, Fall 2012 Problem 1 Solution. (a) The derivative is computed using the Chain Rule twice. 1 2 x x

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Transcription:

Stem moel We look at LTI tem for the time being Time omain moel High orer orinar ifferential equation moel Contain onl input variable, output variable, their erivative, an contant parameter Proper: highet output erivative orer i greatet Highet orer erivative of output tem orer n t n a n b m m n t n a t m u b t u b 0u t a 0

Stem moel Time omain moel State pace moel: tate equation output equation State equation: a et of t orer iff eq on tate variable Output equation: output a function of tate an input! " Linear tem:! " f (,u g(,u A Bu C Du

u a t a t a t n n n n n 0 ODE moel to State pace moel Let,, 3,... Then, 3, 3 4,... t n! " $ % 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a a n! " $ % n! " $ % 0 0! " $ % u [ 0 0... 0] [0]u

u z a z t a z t a z t z b z t b z t b u b u t b u t b a t a t a t n n n n n m m m m m m n n n n n 0 0 0 0 Then : Let When : ODE moel to State pace moel m<n

ODE moel to State pace moel Let z, z, 3 z,... We till have the ame tate equation:! $! 0 0 0 0 0 0 t " a n % " 0 a a a n But the output equation will be: m b m t z b m t z b z 0 b m m b b 0 [ b 0 b... b m 0... 0] [0]u $! % " n $! % " 0 0 $ u %

The eigenfunction φ k (t an their propertie (Focu on CT tem now, but reult appl to DT tem a well. eigenvalue eigenfunction Eigenfunction in ame function out with a gain From the uperpoition propert of LTI tem: Now the tak of fining repone of LTI tem i to etermine λ k. The olution i imple, general, an inightful. 6

that work for an an all Comple Eponential are the onl Eigenfunction of an LTI Stem eigenvalue eigenfunction eigenvalue eigenfunction

DT: 8

Tranfer Function 9

Tranfer Function Tranfer function from to i the gain from X( to Y(, that i, it i the ratio of Laplace tranform of to Laplace tranform of : [ ] Y ( X( L (t L (t [ ] Δ H(, or G(, Then: Y ( H(X(

Input Output Stem Input (t H( Output (t Y( H(X( If the input (t δ(t, the output i calle the impule repone. If the input (t u(t, the output i calle the tep repone. If the input (t Ain(ωt, an H( i table, output tea tate i A H(jω in(ωt H(jω Pole: value of at which TF à infinit Zero: value of at which TF 0

Eample: controller E( controller C( U( Proportional controller: C( K P cont Integral controller: C( K I / Derivative controller: C( K D PI controller: C( K P K I / PD controller: C( K P K D PID controller: C( K P K I / K D

State pace moel to TF ( ] ( [ ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( : take State pace moel: ( D U B A SI C Y BU A SI X BU X A SI DU CX Y BU AX X Du C Bu A H L A, B, C, D are matrice

Block iagram computaon - CONTROLLER CONTROLLED DEVICE FEEDBACK ELEMENT

A line i a ignal A block i a gain A circle i a um Block Diagram Due to h.f. noie, ue proper block: num eg en eg Tr to ue jut horizontal or vertical line Ue aitional Σ to help e.g. - G Σ - z z G z -

Serie: Block Diagram Algebra G G è G G Parallel: G G è G G

Feeback: Proof: G G G G G - b e G G G G G e e G G G G e e G G G G e G b b e (,, è

G G G G G - n n n n n

>> tf('' Tranfer function: >> G(/( Tranfer function: ----- >> G5/(5 Tranfer function: 5 ----- 5 >> GG*G Tranfer function: 5 5 -------------- ^ 7 0 >> HGG Tranfer function: ^ 5 --------------- ^ 7 0 >> HFfeeback(G, G Tranfer function: ^ 6 5 --------------- ^ 5

>> elatf(,,'inputela',0.05 Tranfer function: 0.9 ep(-0.05* * 0.8 Step Repone >> HHF*ela Tranfer function: ^ 6 5 ep(-0.05* * --------------- ^ 5 Amplitue 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 >> tepreph*/ Tranfer function: ^ 6 5 ep(-0.05* * ------------------- >> tep(h 0. 0. ^3 ^ 5 0 0 0.5.5.5 Time (ec

Quarter car upenion Serie R( b k - m R( - b k m Feeback R( b k m b k TF b k H( m b k

>> bm('b'; >> mm('m'; >> km('k'; >> m(''; >> Gb*k G b*k >> G/m*/*/ G /m/^ >> GG*G G (b*k/m/^ >> GclG/(G Gcl (b*k/m/^/((b*k/m/^ >> implif(gcl an (b*k/(m*^b*k

Move a block (G acro a into all touching line: If arrow irection change, invert block (/G If arrow irection remain, no change in block For eample: pick-up point ummation along arrow along arrow no change G G G G z G 3 no change G along arrow along arrow z G 3

againt, againt z G G 3 G againt along è z G G 3 G /G G G è G G 3 /G 3 G z G 3 z

I U - I - L R C V c L R R I L R U - - L R C V c L R R U C ( L R L R L R - R -

U L R C( L R L R - R L R U C ( L L R - R R ( L R U C ( L L R L R ( L R R R T. F. C( L R ( L R R L R L R

Fin TF from U to Y: 5 U - 00-0 ( 0 Y No pure erie/parallel/feeback Nee to move a block, but which one? Ke: move one block to create pure erie or parallel or feeback! 0 So move either left or right. ( 0

( 0 0 5 U - 00-0 ( 0 Y U - 00-0( ( ( 0 ( 0 5( 5 Y U - 00 0( ( ( 0 0( ( 0 5( 5 Y

Can ue uperpoition: Firt et D0, fin Y ue to R Then et R0, fin Y ue to D Finall, a the two component to get the overall Y

Firt et D0, fin Y ue to R Y GG ( R( GG H

Then et R0, fin Y ue to D G Y ( D( ( GG H G

Finall, a the two component to get the overall Y GG G Y R D GG H GG H ( ( (