Homework 7 Solution - AME 30315, Spring s 2 + 2s (s 2 + 2s + 4)(s + 20)

Similar documents
ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

Analysis of Stability &

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

Digital Control System

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

Module 4: Time Response of discrete time systems Lecture Note 1

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

Digital Control System

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

Homework #7 Solution. Solutions: ΔP L Δω. Fig. 1

1. /25 2. /30 3. /25 4. /20 Total /100

Function and Impulse Response

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 7. Steady-State Errors ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

Spring 2014 EE 445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Laboratory. Homework #0 Solutions on Review of Signals and Systems Material

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Control and Dynamical Systems

Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Lecture Notes II. As the reactor is well-mixed, the outlet stream concentration and temperature are identical with those in the tank.

1 Routh Array: 15 points

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Reduction of Multiple Subsystems

Question 1 Equivalent Circuits

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

6.447 rad/sec and ln (% OS /100) tan Thus pc. the testing point is s 3.33 j5.519

These are practice problems for the final exam. You should attempt all of them, but turn in only the even-numbered problems!

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

EE 4443/5329. LAB 3: Control of Industrial Systems. Simulation and Hardware Control (PID Design) The Inverted Pendulum. (ECP Systems-Model: 505)

SOLUTIONS FOR HOMEWORK SECTION 6.4 AND 6.5

EE 4343/ Control System Design Project

Solutions to homework #10

Chapter #4 EEE Automatic Control

Introduction to Laplace Transform Techniques in Circuit Analysis

Figure 1: Unity Feedback System

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 1 Solution (Fall 2010) Wenjie Chen and Jansen Sheng, UC Berkeley

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

Homework Assignment No. 3 - Solutions

Bogoliubov Transformation in Classical Mechanics

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

Automatic Control Systems. Part III: Root Locus Technique

online learning Unit Workbook 4 RLC Transients

Modeling in the Frequency Domain

CHAPTER 8 OBSERVER BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

Midterm Test Nov 10, 2010 Student Number:

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

Chapter 4 Interconnection of LTI Systems

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 2 : Block Diagram & Signal Flow Graphs GATE Objective & Numerical Type Questions

Time [seconds]

Figure 1 Siemens PSSE Web Site

Practice Problems - Week #7 Laplace - Step Functions, DE Solutions Solutions

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

What lies between Δx E, which represents the steam valve, and ΔP M, which is the mechanical power into the synchronous machine?

Pusan National University

Singular perturbation theory

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

Engineering gapplications. Applications of Laplace Transform

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

Finite Element Truss Problem

Chapter #4 EEE8013. Linear Controller Design and State Space Analysis. Design of control system in state space using Matlab

The state variable description of an LTI system is given by 3 1O. Statement for Linked Answer Questions 3 and 4 :

Main Topics: The Past, H(s): Poles, zeros, s-plane, and stability; Decomposition of the complete response.

Social Studies 201 Notes for March 18, 2005

CONTROL OF INTEGRATING PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING AUTO-TUNING APPROACH

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

e st t u(t 2) dt = lim t dt = T 2 2 e st = T e st lim + e st

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

Linear System Fundamentals

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Chapter 10. Closed-Loop Control Systems

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

The continuous time random walk (CTRW) was introduced by Montroll and Weiss 1.

EE Control Systems LECTURE 6

THE PARAMETERIZATION OF ALL TWO-DEGREES-OF-FREEDOM SEMISTRONGLY STABILIZING CONTROLLERS. Tatsuya Hoshikawa, Kou Yamada and Yuko Tatsumi

Social Studies 201 Notes for November 14, 2003

The Root Locus Method

FRTN10 Exercise 3. Specifications and Disturbance Models

Lecture 12: Examples of Root Locus Plots. Dr. Kalyana Veluvolu. Lecture 12: Examples of Root Locus Plots Dr. Kalyana Veluvolu

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

Properties of Z-transform Transform 1 Linearity a

LAPLACE TRANSFORM REVIEW SOLUTIONS

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 5 : Root Locus Diagram. GATE Objective & Numerical Type Solutions. The transfer function of a closed loop system is

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

Transcription:

1 Homework 7 Solution - AME 30315, Spring 2015 Problem 1 [10/10 pt] Ue partial fraction expanion to compute x(t) when X 1 () = 4 2 + 2 + 4 Ue partial fraction expanion to compute x(t) when X 2 () = ( ) 1 4 20 ( 2 + 2 + 4)( + 20) ( ) 1 Plot the repone of each on the ame plot o that you can better explain the difference in the two plot. Comment on the effect of fat pole (LHP pole that are far from the imaginary axi, relative to LHP pole coniderably cloer to the imaginary axi) on ytem repone. Firt, X 1 () = 4 2 + 2 + 4 ( ) 1 We aume thi form, and A, B, C, are all unknown coefficient to be olved: ( ) 4 1 X 1 () = = A + B 2 + 2 + 4 2 + 2 + 4 + C Multiplying and equating numerator: 4 = (A + C) 2 + (B + 2C) + 4C Which yield three equation and three unknown: which yield [1 pt]: A + C = 0 ( 2 ) B + 2C = 0 ( 1 ) 4C = 4 ( 0 ) A = 1 B = 2 C = 1 The expanded fraction i now: X 1 () = 2 2 + 2 + 4 + 1

2 Which can be manipulated completing the quare in the denominator: X 1 () = 2 ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) 2 + 1 Which can again be plit into two fraction to correpond to Table 8.1 (Goodwine pg. 288): X 1 () = y 1 (t) = L 1 {X 1 ()} = L 1 { Yield: y 1 (t) = 1 ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) 1 3 2 3 ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) + 1 2 + 1 ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) 2 } { 1 } { } 3 1 L 1 3 ( + 1) 2 + ( +L 1 3) 2 ( e t co( 3t) 1 e t in( ) 3t) + 1 1(t) [2 pt] 3 Next, we will ue partial fraction expanion on X 2 (): X 2 () = 4 20 ( 2 + 2 + 4)( + 20) ( ) 1 We aume thi form, and A, B, C, D, are all unknown coefficient to be olved: ( ) 4 20 1 = A + B ( 2 + 2 + 4)( + 20) ( 2 + 2 + 4) + C ( + 20) + D Multiplying and equating numerator: 80 = (A + C + D) 3 + (20A + B + 2C + 22D) 2 + (20B + 4C + 44D) + (80D) Which yield four equation and four unknown: Solving yield [1 pt]: A + C + D = 0 ( 3 ) 20A + B + 2C + 22D = 0 ( 2 ) 20B + 4C + 44D = 0 ( 1 ) 80D = 80 ( 0 ) A = 90 91 B = 200 91

3 So, Or rewritten a: C = 1 91 D = 1 90 + 200 91 91 ( 2 + 2 + 4) + 1 91 ( + 20) + 1 90 200 (91)( 2 + 2 + 4) 1 (91)( + 20) + 1 Which need to be manipulated to match a form in Table 8.1 (Goodwine, pg. 288): Now, = 90 90 + 1 (91) ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) 110 3 2 3(91) ( + 1) 2 + ( 3) 1 1 2 (91) ( + 20) + 1 { } (91) L 1 +1 (+1) 2 +( 3) 2 y 2 (t) = L 1 {X 2 ()} { 110 3(91) L 1 } 3 (+1) 2 +( 1 3) 2 { (91) L 1 1 (+20) } + L { } 1 1 Which yield: ( y 2 (t) = 90 (91) e t co( 3t) 110 e t in( 3t) 1 ) 3(91) (91) e 20t + 1 1(t) [2 pt] Each i plotted in MATLAB [2 pt]: 1.2 y1(t) y2(t) 1 0.8 y(t) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 t (ec) Fig. 1. Plot of y 1(t) and y 2(t) in blue and red repectively. The inet highlight the difference in the graph. The original econd order ytem ha complex conjugate pole with a real part of -1.

4 For y 2 (t), we have added a real pole in the LHP at -20, which i far from the imaginary axi. Thi term decay rapidly and o ha little effect on the ytem repone [2 pt for comment]. 1 % AME30315 HW#7, Problem 1 2 clear 3 clc 4 5 t=linpace(0,8,1000); 6 7 a = ((3)ˆ0.5); 8 y1=-exp(-t).*(co(a.*t)+(1/a).*in(a.*t))+1; 9 10 plot(t,y1,'b','linewidth',1.5) 11 12 13 y2= - (90/91)*exp(-t).*co(a.*t)-(110/(a*91)).*exp(-t).*in(a.*t)... -(1/91)*exp(-20.*t) + 1; 14 15 hold on 16 plot(t,y2,'r','linewidth',1.5) 17 ylabel('y(t)','fontize',12) 18 xlabel('t (ec)','fontize',12) 19 legend('y1(t)','y2(t)') 20 vividoc(14,3) We can alo tudy the effect of adding pole near and far from the imaginary axi a hown in the plot below for a more general equation ( ) 4 r 1 X() = ( 2 + 2 + 4)( + r)

5 1.2 1 r=2.5 r=1.5 r=1 Step Repone Original Second Order Sytem w/ pole @ r=0.5 r=1 r=1.5 r=2.5 0.8 r=0.5 y(t) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 t (econd) Fig. 2. Plot of the original econd order ytem a well a with an added pole at r. Variou value for r have been plotted. Notice that a r increae, the plot approache the original econd order ytem repone. Thi plot wa not required for the homework. 1 % AME30315 HW#7, Problem 1 2 clear 3 clc 4 5 y1 = tf([4],[1,2,4]) 6 r = 0.5 7 y2 = tf([4*r],[1,2+r,2*r+4,4*r]) 8 tep(y1) 9 hold on 10 tep(y2) 11 12 hold on 13 r = 1 14 y3 = tf([4*r],[1,2+r,2*r+4,4*r]) 15 tep(y3) 16 17 hold on 18 r = 1.5 19 y3 = tf([4*r],[1,2+r,2*r+4,4*r]) 20 tep(y3) 21 22 hold on 23 r = 2.5 24 y3 = tf([4*r],[1,2+r,2*r+4,4*r]) 25 tep(y3) 26 27 ylabel('y(t)','fontize',12) 28 xlabel('t','fontize',12) 29 legend('original Second Order Sytem','w/ pole @ r=0.5',' r=1',' r=1.5',' r=2.5')

6 Problem 2 [6/6 pt: 0.5 pt for each anwer] Temperature Regulation human body = P 98.6 deg F = R body temperature = Y hypothalamu = H human brain = K activating weat gland = U Campaign Management The campaign manager and candidate = K platform, image, talking point, and propaganda = U public = P a high of poll number a poible = R poll = H public entiment = Y

7 Problem 3 [9/9 pt] xp x tr (Franklin, Powell, Emani-Naeini, 2015) Fig. 3. Sytem tep repone with peak diplacement, teady-tate diplacement, and rie time indicated. The equation of motion for the ma-pring-damper ytem i: where F = 21(t) N mẍ(t) + bẋ(t) + kx(t) = F (1) And aume that the unit for thi problem are SI unit. From the repone a a decaying ocillation, we can recognize that our ytem i underdamped (correpond to 0 < ζ < 1). Then the equation of motion can be rewritten a where ẍ(t) + 2ζω n ẋ(t) + ω 2 nx(t) = F m k 1 : ω n = m b 2 : ζ = 2 mk which are the natural frequency and damping ratio repectively (alo find thee on p. 355-356 of textbook).

8 Find ω n and ζ by looking at the performance characteritic of the repone. From the plot, we can determine the overhoot (O): O = x p x x = 0.115 0.1 0.1 = 0.15 Then uing the formula for OS on p. 360 of the textbook which i a function of ζ, we can olve for ζ: ( ) O = exp πζ 1 ζ 2 become [2 pt] ln 2 (O) ζ = π 2 + ln 2 (O) ln 2 (.15) = π 2 + ln 2 (.15) 0.52 We can alo ue the rie time approximation (Eq. 9.18, p. 363 text): t r 1.8 ω n repone plot, t r 1.4 econd. where from the Then, [2 pt] ω n = 1.8 t r = 1.3 rad/ We have 3 unknown (m, b, k), but only 2 equation 1 and 2. To find the third equation, conider the ytem repone at teady tate where ẋ(t) = ẍ(t) = 0 [2 pt]. Then the equation of motion i: So, And from 1, k = F x = 2 0.1 kx = F k = 20 N/m [1 pt] m = 12.1 kg [1 pt] And from 2, b = 2ζ mk = 16.1 N /m We can check that thee parameter uing Matlab: [1 pt] Firt, tranform the equation of motion into the frequency domain, auming zero initial

9 condition: Then, m 2 + b + k = F () X() F () = 1 m 2 + b + k And rewrite o that we can tudy the tep repone: X() = Which i implemented in the following code: 2 m 2 + b + k ( ) 1 1 % Check the calculated value of m, b, k 2 cloe all 3 clear all 4 5 x_p=0.115; 6 t_r=1.4; 7 x_=0.1; 8 10 9 F=2; 11 O=(x_p-x_)/x_; 12 zeta=qrt((log(o))ˆ2/(piˆ2+(log(o))ˆ2)); 13 omega_n=1.8/t_r; 14 15 k=f/x_; 16 m=k/(omega_n)ˆ2; 17 b=zeta*(2*qrt(m*k)); 18 19 num = 2; 20 den = [m, b, k]; 21 22 y=tf(num,den); 23 tep(y) % plot ytem tep repone

10 0.12 Step Repone 0.1 0.08 Amplitude 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (econd) Fig. 4. Repone for the approximate value of m, b, and k. Thi matche cloely with the given plot.