low turbidity high turbidity

Similar documents
Patrick Baskfield. Scott Matteson. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Minnesota State University Water Resource Center

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Minnesota River Turbidity Stakeholder Committee New Ulm Library, August 27, 20090

Modeling Upland and Channel Sources of Sediment in the Le Sueur River Watershed, Minnesota

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Watershed Conservation Management Planning Using the Integrated Field & Channel Technology of AnnAGNPS & CONCEPTS

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Laboratory Exercise #3 The Hydrologic Cycle and Running Water Processes

Science of Natural Disasters: RIVERS& FLOODS! 27 April 2016

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Quantifying River Bank Erosion with Scanning Laser Altimetry

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

the path to studying tile drainage

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

New Approaches to Restoring NH s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Chris Lenhart, John Nieber, Ann Lewandowski, Jason Ulrich TOOLS AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING CHANNEL EROSION IN MINNESOTA

Name: Date: Class: Louisiana: Our History, Our Home Chapter 1: Louisiana s Geography - Section 2: Natural Regions Guided Reading

Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

Earth processes are dynamic actions that occur both on

Monitoring of suspended sediment concentration in discharge from regulated lakes in glacial deposits

Chapter 11. Rivers: Shaping our landscape

In the space provided, write the letter of the description that best matches the term or phrase. a. any form of water that falls to Earth s

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

The Yellow River Initiative: The Birth of a System Approach to Challenges Facing the Everglades of the North

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

STREAM SEDIMENT MONITORING PROGRAM FOR ILLINOIS. Nani G. Bhowmik and J. Rodger Adams

SEDIMENT BENEFICIAL USE SUPPORT ASSESSMENT FOR OTTER CREEK

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Squaw Creek. General Information

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

From micro to macro scale the impact on the sediment discharge after construction of the Three Gorges Dam on Yangtze River (Changjiang)

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

Assessing Differences in Ravine Erosion in Seven Mile Creek Park and the Surrounding Area: Implications for Sediment in the Minnesota River

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Chapter 4 French Broad River Subbasin Including the: French Broad River, Little Ivy Creek (River), Ivy Creek, California Creek and Bull Creek

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Trap Efficiency of a Silted Prairie Reservoir: Rapidan Reservoir, Blue Earth County, Minnesota

Surface Water and Stream Development

Little Swan Lake. Dam Inspection & Siltation Study Prepared By: William Klingner, P.E., CFM October 28, 2018

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Nutrient and Sediment Cycling and Retention in Urban Floodplain Wetlands

Lidar data in water resources applications. Paola Passalacqua CE 374K Lecture, April 5 th, 2012

Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood:

Statement of Impact and Objectives. Watershed Impacts. Watershed. Floodplain. Tumblin Creek Floodplain:

Understanding the effects of roads in upland settings on hydrology, geomorphology and water quality

Application of an Enhanced, Fine-Scale SWAT Model to Target Land Management Practices for Maximizing Pollutant Reduction and Conservation Benefits

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Mississippi River Geomorphology and Potamology Program

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Dam Removal Analysis Guidelines for Sediment

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

What do you need for a Marathon?

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Sediment Distribution and Characteristics

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Module 4: Overview of the Fundamentals of Runoff and Erosion

Measuring Streambank Erosion Bank Profiles to more Robustly Estimate Recession Rates and Calibration of the AnnAGNPS-CEAP Model

Suspended sediment yields of rivers in Turkey

Weathering, Erosion, Deposition, and Landscape Development

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Geomorphic evolution of the Le Sueur River, Minnesota, USA, and implications for current sediment loading

Floods Lecture #21 20

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

Great Lakes Tributary Modeling: Canaseraga Creek Watershed

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Why Erosion and Sedimention Control is Important: A Fish s Point of View

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

Monitoring Headwater Streams for Landscape Response to

Assessment. Assessment

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Black Gore Creek Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Sorption Characteristics of Sediments in the Upper Mississippi River System Above Lake Pepin

Use of SWAT to Scale Sediment Delivery from Field to Watershed in an Agricultural Landscape with Depressions

Phase I System Characterization: Year 2 Study Plans

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Technical Appendix. Pallid Sturgeon

Year 6. Geography. Revision

Cattaraugus Creek: A Story of Flowing Water and the Geology of the Channel It Flows Through Presentation to West Valley Citizen Task Force 4/27/16

Transcription:

What is Turbidity? Turbidity refers to how clear the water is. The greater the amount of total suspended solids (TSS) in the water, the murkier it appears and the higher the measured turbidity. Excessive amounts of sediment degrade the ecological health and aesthetics of the Minnesota River and its tributaries. When suspended sediment, measured by TSS (total suspended solids), is elevated, turbidity increases, water clarity decreases, and light penetration is reduced. Reduced light penetration shifts stream productivity away from beneficial periphyton (mixture of algae, cyanobacteria, heterotrophic microbes, and detritus that is attached to submerged surfaces in most aquatic ecosystems) and favors undesirable floating algae. An overabundance of floating algae (phytoplankton) further increases turbidity, compounding the problem. Fine-grained sediments that settle on stream beds cover and degrade the desirable rock and gravel substrates that form essential habitats for invertebrates and fish. During periods of high turbidity, streams take on a murky brownish-green cast, greatly reducing their appeal to people who enjoy water-based recreational activities such as boating, fishing, or swimming. Pat Baskfield. MPCA low turbidity high turbidity The Blue Earth River at the Rapidan Dam is shown (above) during low and high turbidity. low turbidity high turbidity Chetomba Creek Hawk Creek Watershed Project The photos above show the dramatic increase in turbidity that often occurs when heavy rains fall on unprotected soils. Upon impact, raindrops dislodge soil particles while runoff waters easily transport fine particles of silt and clay across fields or through drainage systems to ditches and tributary streams throughout the Minnesota River Basin. Photo: Chetomba Creek, Hawk Creek Watershed. Note photos were taken only one day apart.

Excessive amounts of sediment degrade the ecological health and aesthetics of the Minnesota River and its tributaries. Turbidity refers to water clarity. The greater the amount of total suspended solids in the water, the murkier it appears and the higher the measured turbidity. This results in reduced light penetration that harms beneficial aquatic species and favors undesirable algae. An overabundance of algae further increases turbidity and compounds the problem. Fine-grained sediments that settle on stream beds cover desirable rock and gravel that form essential habitats for invertebrates and fish. During periods of high turbidity, streams take on a murky appearance, greatly reducing their appeal to people who enjoy boating, fishing, or swimming. Streambanks and gullies also contribute sediment to the streams and rivers.photo: Le Sueur River streambank Mississippi River Minnesota River The sediment laden Minnesota River flows into the Mississippi River. Sediment settles in Lake Pepin. Over 90 percent of Lake Pepin s sediment load is coming from the Minnesota River. The lake is filling in at 10 times its natural rate.

What are Total Suspended Solids? The transport of sediment is a natural function of rivers. Modification of the landscape has accelerated the rate of erosion of soil into waterways. Increased runoff has resulted in stream bank erosion. Elevated sediment (suspended soil particles) has many impacts. It makes rivers look muddy, affecting aesthetics and swimming. Sediment carries nutrients, pesticides, and other chemicals into the river that may impact fish and wildlife species. Sedimentation can restrict the areas where fish spawn, limit biological diversity, and keep river water cloudy, reducing the potential for growth of beneficial plant species. Primary Sources of Sediment Bluffs, ravines, gullies, streambanks, and upland runoff contribute sediment to the streams and rivers in the Minnesota River Basin. Urban stormwater and construction sites also contribute sediment. Primary sources of sediment illustrated on a digital elevation model of a portion of the Le Sueur River watershed. Source: Wilcock, 2009 Le Sueur River water quality samples (above) collected throughout the 2002 monitoring season. This illustrates the variability in turbidity throughout the year. Streambanks Ravines Uplands Bluffs like this one in the Le Sueur River Watershed contribute sediment to waterways in the Basin. Ravines are another source of sediment. Soil erosion in farm fields also contributes sediment to streams and rivers. Soils are most vulnerable during the post planting period when residue is minimal and crops have not formed a protective canopy.

Tributaries are displayed in downstream order from left to right (west to east) on Figure 1. The tributaries in the middle and downstream parts of the Minnesota River Basin have, in general, greater flow weighted mean concentrations (FWMC) and greater year-to-year variability than tributaries in the western, upstream, part of the basin. The horizontal line indicates threshold level (58 mg/l and 66 mg/l ) established by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for streams in the Western Corn Belt Plains and Glaciated Plains ecoregion (MPCA, 1993). The Total Suspended Solids (TSS) FWMC values are indicators of the condition of the tributary streams and are a measure of their potential to affect water quality in the Minnesota River (Fig 2). FWMC are calculated on a monitoring season basis (approximately April through September). Total Suspended Solids - Major Tributary Sites Flow Weighted Mean Concentrations at Major Minnesota River Tributary Sites (2000-2008) Fig 1 Boxplot showing the monitoring season (approximately April through September) total suspended solids FWMC for major Minnesota River tributary streams in the Minnesota River Basin. Total Suspended Solids - Mainstem Sites Flow Weighted Mean Concentrations at Minnesota River Mainstem Sites (2000-2008) Fig 2 Boxplot showing monitoring season total suspended solids FWMC for Minnesota River and Greater Blue Earth River samplingv sites. The median FWMC s clearly show a decrease in TSS from St. Peter to Jordan to Fort Snelling. After examining a sediment budget for the lower Minnesota reach, researchers hypothesize that deposition may account for the apparent sediment loss,especially in years that the River accesses its floodplain.

Yields, shown as pounds of sediment delivered per watershed acre, are indicators of the severity of erosion in each tributary watershed. Fig 3-4 show that sediment yields generally increase from west to east across the Minnesota River Basin and that watersheds in the eastern, downstream, part of the Basin have greater year-to year variability in sediment yield. Tributary streams that have greater yields and large watersheds like the Le Sueur have the greatest potential to affect water quality in the Minnesota River mainstem. Figure 3 illustrates four broad data categories across the basin: 1) <100 pounds per acre (western Basin), 2) 100-200 pounds per acre (middle Basin), 3) 400 pounds per acre (Blue Earth & Le Sueur sub-basin), and 4) 300 pounds per acre (lower basin). These results may reflect four combination sets of geomorphology, management practices, and climate variables that define water quality in each of the geographical areas. Total Suspended Solids - Yields at Major Tributary Sites Yields at Major Minnesota River Tributary Sites (2000-2008) Fig 3 Boxplot showing monitoring season TSS yields for major tributary streams in the Minnesota River Basin. Fig 4 displays the pattern of the nine year yields (2000-08) indicating the disproportionate contribution from the watersheds in the eastern part of the basin. Locations not colored did not have available information.

Sources Contributing to Yields Erosional processes in fields, streambanks, bluffs, and ravines all contribute to sediment yield. In the western part of the Minnesota River Basin, field erosion and streambanks are the predominant sediment sources. Further east in the Basin, the Minnesota River and its tributaries are more deeply incised resulting in steep bluff areas and ravines. Areas containing bluffs and ravines are located in the downstream reaches of the tributaries where the streams approach their confluence with the Minnesota River. The yields (fig. 3-4), were gathered from downstream monitoring stations near stream mouths, and thus reflect the influence of bluff and ravine erosion in those tributaries where incised terrain features are extensive. Paired monitoring stations, placed upstream and downstream of incised terrain in seven of the tributary watersheds, have clearly shown that sediment yield is greater in the incised areas of those watersheds. Wilcock (2009) summarized findings presented to the Minnesota River Sediment Colloquium concerning these and other sediment sources. Figure 5. Map of Minnesota River Basin showing annual TSS yield (lbs/acre). Total annual TSS load in kg is given in the inset table. Downstream Impacts Loads For a five year period starting in 2002, the TSS load was 1.8 million tons at Judson and 5.4 million tons at St. Peter, a 300% increase. Nearly all of the increased load can be attributed to the TSS supply from the Blue Earth and Le Sueur Rivers, which discharge into the Minnesota between the two gauges. The 2002-2006 TSS load of these rivers was measured as 3.2 million tons (Wilcock, 2009). Explore Minnesota Tourism Met Council Environmental Services Lake Pepin is a natural impoundment along the Upper Mississippi River just downstream of St. Paul. The Mississippi River carries sediment downstream and it settles in Lake Pepin. Most of Lake Pepin s sediment is coming from the Minnesota River. Recent studies have indicated an approximate ten fold increase in post-settlement sedimentation rates in Lake Pepin. The Minnesota River, while only accounting for 25% of the flow into the lake is responsible for 88% of the sediment load. The lake is filling in at 10 times its natural rate (Engstrom and Almendinger, (1997). The sediment laden Minnesota River (left) flows into the Mississippi River (right). When the Minnesota River meets the Mississippi River it carries elevated sediment and nutrient concentrations.

The Minnesota River Basin Turbidity-Impaired Streams map above shows assessed water bodies that do not meet Minnesota water quality standards for turbidity and are therefore listed on the Minnesota s Impaired Waters 303(d) List. Learn more about impaired waters on the MPCA website: http://www. pca.state.mn.us/water/tmdl/tmdl-303dlist.html Ask an Expert about the Minnesota River project profiles scientists and citizens answering questions about the health of the Minnesota River. More answers to questions about the Minnesota River can be found at: mrbdc.mnsu.edu/learn Funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) and the McKnight Foundation.