Flooding in Dolgellau

Similar documents
6. Conclusions and Recommendations

The role of forestry in flood management in a Welsh upland catchment

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS MUSKEG RIVER BRIDGE

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Sediment erosion, transport and deposition during the July 2001 Mawddach extreme flood event

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Chapter 11. Rivers: Shaping our landscape

Natural hazards in Glenorchy Summary Report May 2010

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

IMPACTS OF SECONDARY FLOOD EMBANKMENTS ON THE WAIMAKARIRI FLOODPLAIN, NEW ZEALAND

Tarbela Dam in Pakistan. Case study of reservoir sedimentation

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

6.4 Sensitivity Tests

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

Project Proposal. Lyme Brook. Newcastle-under-Lyme. 3 rd July 2015

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Teacher s Pack Key Stage 3 GEOGRAPHY

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

A hydrological study of Waen y Griafolen blanket bog, North Wales

Page 1. Name:

High-Gradient Streams

Managing Floods at Boscastle. Learning Objective: Examine the benefits of managing floods

Grant 0299-NEP: Water Resources Project Preparatory Facility

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Hydro-engineers.ch HEC-RAS ANALAYSIS. River: L Aïre Mesfin Tewolde. Hydro-engineers.ch 23 oct. 2017

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Landscape Development

Altered morphodynamics in tidallyinfluenced rivers: re-thinking catchment management, flood risk & material fluxes

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011

Streams. Water. Hydrologic Cycle. Geol 104: Streams

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

WATERCOURSE HARNESSING BANK EROSION AND CONSOLIDATION

Modeling Great Britain s Flood Defenses. Flood Defense in Great Britain. By Dr. Yizhong Qu

River Nith restoration, cbec UK Ltd, October 2013 APPENDIX A

When Creek Meets Valley Wall: Prioritizing Erosion Mitigation alongside the Oshawa Landfill

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Countermeasure Calculations and Design

Flash flood disaster in Bayangol district, Ulaanbaatar

Degradation Concerns related to Bridge Structures in Alberta

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Section 5. Low-Gradient Streams. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

A3 RIVER BASIN AND RIVER CHANNEL

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

Flood and Stream Restoration

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

27. Running Water I (p ; )

Cattaraugus Creek: A Story of Flowing Water and the Geology of the Channel It Flows Through Presentation to West Valley Citizen Task Force 4/27/16

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Dolores River Watershed Study

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Pirai river (Bolivia)

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

LOCATIONS OF SELECTED MITIGATION SITES IN JAPAN

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY


An environmentally sensitive erosion control technique in the Mekong River Delta: 10 years on

Report and recommendations relating to the Severe Flood Event in Selly Park South on 6th September 2008

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Final Exam. Running Water Erosion and Deposition. Willamette Discharge. Running Water

Map 4: Cowal Peninsula: Cluniter to Ardyne Point Map Content Descriptions

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

Debris flow: categories, characteristics, hazard assessment, mitigation measures. Hariklia D. SKILODIMOU, George D. BATHRELLOS

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Sediment management plans in French mountainous catchments with illustrations from emblematic projects Dr. Benoit Terrier

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

EA SOUTH WEST. Hillfarrance. Flood defence scheme

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Teacher s Pack Key Stages 1 and 2 GEOGRAPHY

Lowland Glaciation North Wales

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Hydrologic hazards can be considered in three categories; An indication of flooding potential for areas located

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Report for Area Drainage Studies for 1320 MW (2x660 MW) THERMAL POWER PROJECT AT MIRZAPUR, U.P.

USING 3D GIS TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL FLOOD HAZARDS IN MINA

Assessment. Assessment

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

Track design and management

Texas A & M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory Model Description Form

Transcription:

Flooding in Dolgellau Graham Hall MMath, PhD University of Wales, Bangor

Background Flooding has historically been a cause for concern in Dolgellau. Following a serious flood in December 1964 when shops in Bridge street were inundated (illustrated above), a flood defence scheme was implimented by the local authority. The main feature of this scheme was the construction of masonary walls to a height of approximately 3m above river level along the stretch of river bank from the Arran confluence to the eastern end of the Marian Mawr fields. The scheme has been successful for over 40 years in preventing flooding of the town centre, but there is concern that the river wall at the Bont Fawr car park has come close to overtopping during recent major flood events. It is now considered necessary to re-examine flood defences for Dolgellau, and a proposal for a major new scheme by the Environment Agency has reached a consultation stage (Environment Agency, 2010). Some concern has been expressed locally that the Environment Agency scheme relies entirely on the construction of flood defence walls, set back from the current river banks. The proposed walls are considered by some residents to be intrusive and out of character with the historic town centre, and to be potentially disruptive to leisure and sporting activities on the Marian Mawr fields. A further concern is that the scheme takes no account of continuing gravel accumulation in the river, which is likely to increase the severity of overbank flooding in future years through raising river bed elevation. As a consequence, the effectivness of the new flood defence scheme may be reduced. Following a consultation meeting between representatives of the Environment Agency, Dolgellau Town Council, and local organisations who are users of the Mawr Mawr fields, I have been asked to comment on the proposed flood defence scheme and review possible alternative approaches.

Geomorphology The town centre of Dolgellau is constructed on a glacial/periglacial sand and gravel fan deposited by the Afon Arran (fig.1). Since deposition, the fan has been incised by the Arran stream, which now follows a noticeable valley between the Arran Road bridge and the Wnion confluence next to the Leisure Centre. There is evidence, however, that the stream formerly followed a more westerly course in a shallow valley along the present line of Bridge Street. The Afon Wnion descends by some 4 metres over its course through Dolgellau, but the river gradient is not constant along this section. Steeper gradients are observed at and downstream from the two main confluences at the Leisure Centre and Pandy r Odyn (fig.2). River bank characteristics A series of photographs were produced on 29 December 2010 to illustrate the changing characteristics of the riverbank through the Dolgellau section of the Afon Wnion (figs 3 10). At this time the river level was moderately high due to extensive snowmelt in the surrounding mountains. River level effectively remained constant during the period of photography, so it is possible to compare the relative heights of the banks at different points along the section. The following description refers only to the southern bank of the Afon Wnion, since no flood defence measures are planned for the north bank. At the upstream boundary of the town on Arran Road, glacial/periglacial deposits produce a natural rivercliff approximately 3m in height. The banks are relatively low along the reach between the rivercliff and the confluence with the Arran stream. The banks are semi-natural, built up in places with large rocks, but no systematic construction of flood defences has been attempted. This section of bank is overgrown in places and appears to be unused. The section between the Arran confluence and the Bont Fawr car park is the location of the masonary flood defence walls constructed in the 1960 s. These are in good condition, and extend to approximately 3.5m above river level. Alongside the Marian Mawr fields, the river bank is constructed from rockfilled gabions, with large rocks forming the bank further to the west.

5 6 7 8 9 10 contour heights in metres relict areas of glacial/periglacial sand and gravel deltaic fan current drainage route of the Afon Arran possible former drainage route of the Afon Arran sections of steeper gradient of the Afon Wnion Figure 1: Morphological map

Figure 2: River and river bank characteristics

Figure 3: Natural rivercliff in glacial/periglacial sands and gravels. Arran Road Figure 4: Downstream limit of the rivercliff feature. Arran Road

Figure 5: Semi-natural riverbank of rocks and pebbles, overgrown with scrub woodland in places. Arran Road Figure 6: Semi-natural riverbank of rocks and pebbles at the rear of the Fire Station. The bank is unused, and overgrown with scrub woodland. Arran Road

Figure 7: Confluence of the Arran stream, with the leisure centre building beyond. Downstream of the confluence are the substantial masonry walls of the 1960 s flood defence scheme. The ground above, now occupied by the park, appears to have been built up at the time of the wall construction. Figure 8: Gabion walls alongside the Marian Mawr fields. The walls extend to approximately 2m above the level of the fields. Their purpose may be to stabilise the river channel, realigned as part of the Dolgellau by-pass road scheme in the 1980 s, rather than to provide flood defence.

Figure 9: Boulder walls alongside the Marian Mawr fields. The banks alongside the downstream section of Marian Mawr are constructed of large loose boulders, piled in places onto a concrete footing. It is uncertain whether water is able to flow through this construction at high river levels. Figure 10: Confluence at Pandy r Odyn. Large loose boulders reinforce the river bank and have been placed to deflect the main channel flow at the confluence.

Gravel accumulation A significant geomorphological feature of the Afon Wnion is the erosion, transport and deposition of large amounts of coarse gravel during flood events. This gravel raises the elevation of the river bed through the town of Dolgellau, contributing to the severity of flooding. Gravel is derived from easily eroded glacial and periglacial deposits which infill the valleys of the upper Wnion catchment, particularly on the slopes of Rhobell Fawr and the Aran mountains. There is evidence that the rate of deposition of gravel along the Dolgellau reach has increased over the past 100 years, and is continuing to increase. This is due largely to a change in land use, which has removed broad leaf woodland from river banks in the upper catchment. This woodland stabilised and protected river banks. A contributory factor in the increased gravel erosion is climate change. There is strong evidence that a change in rainfall patterns is occurring, with heavier frontal rainfall during winter months and the risk of more violent summer thunderstorms. This change is increasing the severity of flood events on the Afon Wnion. Gravel transported downstream past Dolgellau accumulates at the tidal limit of the estuary, beyond which it is unable to move due to insufficient water flow velocity. This deposition is raising the river bed elevation, both at the tidal limit and upstream towards Dolgellau. Computer modelling and field observations have been carried out (Hall, 2008) to estimate the amounts of gravel transport during individual flood events. Major floods in June 2001 and February 2004 were analysed in detail. Gravel trains released by bank erosion moved downstream along the river bed, progressing by approximately 1km during each major flood event. It is predicted that large volumes of gravel will be added to the Dolgellau reach over the next 10 years, leading to a raising of the river bed by between 0.5m and 1.0m through the town. This deposition will reduce the effective height of existing or proposed flood defences by an equivalent amount. Gravel deposition is greatest in the sections of the Afon Wnion with lowest gradient, notably on the eastern outskirts of the town at Arran Road, and along the reach between Bont Fawr and the western end of the Marian Mawr fields (figs 11 and 12).

Figure 11: Recent sediment accumulation downstream from Bont Fawr Figure 12: Sediment accumulation alongside the Marian Mawr fields

Overbank flooding Overbank flooding is controlled strongly by river gradient and relative bank elevation. Flooding is seen to occur particularly where water flow is reduced in low gradient sections of the channel and water depth correspondingly increases to maintain constant discharge. Overbank flooding occurs most readily where the bank height is low and the land beyond has a gentle crossfloodplain gradient. A small number of points of vulnerability to overbank flooding can be identified in the Dolgellau section (fig. 14): A: Waterflows over the shallow banks in the Arran Road area, causing risk to the Fire Station, Leisure Centre and residential properties. B: Flooding by overtopping of defences in the Bont Fawr car park. Water will initially flow downslope onto the Marian Mawr fields, but may make an incursion into Bridge Street along the former route of the Arran stream. C: The current normal route for flooding of the Marian Mawr fields is through overtopping of low banks around the Pandy r Odyn confluence. D: Flood waters from the Marian Mawr fields may impinge on buildings of the Marian Industrial Estate.

F B E C D H A G Figure 14: Overbank flooding

The following flow routes (fig. 14) are not considered to constitute a flood risk: E: The Park. Land has been built up to an elevation of more than 3m above typical river level and is well protected by the very substantial masonry flood wall. At this point, water flows are fast due to the river gradient, and flood water depth is consequently reduced. F: Marian Mawr. The current gabion and rock walls, backed by earth embankments to a height of 3m have come nowhere near to overtopping during any recent flood. G: Afon Arran. Computer modelling (Hall, 2008) indicates that there is no conceivable rainfall event which could cause overtopping of the banks of the Afon Arran and flooding of Dolgellau town centre under current channel conditions. However, gravel transport on the Aran is considerable, and the clearance below the Aran Bridge is being progressively reduced. This could cause a local obstruction to flow which might result in flooding at some future date if left unchecked. H: Upper Marian Mawr. It is not considered feasible for the town centre of Dolgellau to be flooded by water flowing eastwards from the Marian Mawr fields. This is due to blocking by the low spur of land running from the Church towards Bont Fawr. The Marian Mawr fields appear to have a neutral role in respect to flooding in Dolgellau. They lie downstream and at a generally lower elevation than the town centre, so cannot provide any useful flood water interception capacity to reduce the effects of flooding in the town.

Flood reduction strategy Taking into account the evidence presented above, an integrated flood strategy is proposed for Dolgellau. This involves several elements, summarised in fig. 15: Interception of gravel before this enters the Dolgellau reach, in order to prevent further increase in bed elevation. Removal of gravel over an extended section of the river, to enhance the effectiveness of existing flood defences. Rebuilding of the identified vulnerable sections of the current river banks, notably: the Arran Road area, the Bont Fawr car park, and the Pandy r Odyn confluence. Reinforcement of existing sections of river wall alongside the Marian Mawr fields. Enhancement of the flood interception capacity of the fields between the eastern boundary of the town and the by-pass viaduct.

Earth or concrete embankment connecting existing Marian flood defences to the footbridge ramp, and beyond alongside the stream to its junction with the road Current river bed level at Bont Fawr is approximately 2m higher than when the bridge was constructed. Site investigation of bridge pier foundations, and reduction of bed level through the main arches by 1m if considered safe to do so Reduction of river bed level by 1m between the town eastern boundary and Bont Fawr by removal of gravel Enhancement of the flood interception capacity of the fields between the eastern boundary of the town and the by-pass viaduct. Western limit of flood protection scheme. River conditions downstream of this point have negligible influence on flooding within the town Reduction of river bed level by 1m at Bont Fawr, increasing progressively to 2m near the college, by removal of gravel Earth embankment alongside the Marian raised by 0.5m Figure 15: Flood reduction strategy Construction of water tight flood wall alongside the car park, to link effectively to existing earth flood embankment Earth or concrete embankment constructed to protect properties in the Aran Road area

Gravel interception It is recommended that the supply of gravel to the Dolgellau reach of the Afon Wnion is reduced or eliminated by the construction of gravel interception weirs upstream in the area of Dolserau. Impounded gravel should be periodically removed to an area safe from river erosion. Weirs should be of stone or concrete construction at a shallow angle, similar to that at Dolserau Bridge (fig. 13), to reduce any obstruction to fish migration. Figure 16: Weir at Dolserau Bridge Flood interception basin During flood conditions, low lying fields to the east of Dolgellau are susceptible to flooding. The value of this land in reducing peak flood discharge can be enhanced by introduction of a side-weir in the river bank to direct flood waters into the basin under flood conditions. The outlet from the basin may use controlled drainage through pipes to allow emptying over the 24 hour period following the flood peak. This should not interfere unduly with normal agricultural activities on the land. Similar strategies have been adopted by the Environment Agency in Northern England (personal communication) as an effective addition to hard engineering solutions.

controlled release of impounded flood water over a 24 hour period side weir allows flow into the interception basin Figure 17: Proposed flood interception basin east of Dolgellau

Computer modelling Computer modelling has been carried out using RIVER-2D software: for current river conditions, for conditions after construction of the river bank defences, implementation of enhanced flow into the interception basin, and removal of river bed gravel proposed in fig. 16. A peak flood discharge of 600m 3 s -1 was chosen, as exceeding a predicted 100 year flood maximum for the Afon Wnion in Dolgellau. Results for maximum flood extent are shown in figs. 18 and 19. Comparison of the models shows: Flooding of the Marian Mawr fields and incursion into the Industrial Estate would occur under current river conditions. Enhancement of defences around the Marian Mawr fields and gravel removal reduces flooding substantially, and no incursion into the Industrial Estate is predicted. The flood interception basin appears to operate as planned in providing temporary storage and reducing peak flood level by a small amount - perhaps 20cm. This may be significant in reducing overtopping of flood defences in critical areas. Within the limit of resolution of the model, it appears that encroachment by flood waters into the Arran Road properties will be reduced. This modelling exercise should be treated as a first feasibility study, and more detailed work would be needed to investigate particular small sections of the river bank under flood conditions.

Figure 18: Peak flood model under current river conditions

Figure 19: Peak flood model after gravel management and riverbank enhancement

References Environment Agency (2010) Dolgellau Flood Alleviation Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Consultation Document. Environment Agency. Available on-line at: http://www.environment-agency.co.uk/static/documents/ Leisure/01-06-10_Dolgellau_Scoping_ Consultation_Document_Final.pdf Hall, G. (2008) An Integrated Meteorological /Hydrological Model for the Mawddach Catchment, North Wales. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales, Bangor. Available on-line at: www.grahamhall.org/mawddach