RSC Publishing. Principles and Applications. In Silico Toxicology. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Edited by

Similar documents
Biological Read-Across: Species-Species and Endpoint- Endpoint Extrapolation

Grouping and Read-Across for Respiratory Sensitisation. Dr Steve Enoch School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences Liverpool John Moores University

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial on how to predict Skin sensitization potential taking into account alert performance

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Predicting skin sensitisation potential of a chemical using skin sensitization data extracted from ECHA CHEM database

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.0. Tutorial on how to predict Skin sensitization potential taking into account alert performance

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Step-by-step example for building QSAR model

Read-Across or QSARs?

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Step-by-step example for predicting skin sensitization accounting for abiotic activation of chemicals

User manual Strategies for grouping chemicals to fill data gaps to assess acute aquatic toxicity endpoints

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Step-by-step example of how to build a userdefined

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.2. Step-by-step example of how to build and evaluate a category based on mechanism of action with protein and DNA binding

Good Read-Across Practice 1: State of the Art of Read-Across for Toxicity Prediction. Mark Cronin Liverpool John Moores University England

Comparative study of mechanism of action of allyl alcohols for different endpoints

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Step-by-step example of how to build and evaluate a category based on mechanism of action with protein and DNA binding

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4. Step-by-step example of how to build and evaluate a category based on mechanism of action with protein and DNA binding

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.0

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Step-by-step example of how to categorize an inventory by mechanistic behaviour of the chemicals which it consists

Recent Advances in QSAR Studies

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Implementation AOP workflow in Toolbox: Skin Sensitization

BIOAUTOMATION, 2009, 13 (4),

OECD QSAR Toolbox v4.0 Simplifying the correct use of non-test methods

LIFE Project Acronym and Number ANTARES LIFE08 ENV/IT/ Deliverable Report. Deliverable Name and Number

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4. Example for predicting Repeated dose toxicity of 2,3-dimethylaniline

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1

Chemical Categories and Read Across Grace Patlewicz

Exploration of alternative methods for toxicity assessment of pesticide metabolites

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED SIMILAR OR MODIFIED IN VITRO SKIN SENSITISATION DPRA AND ADRA TEST METHODS

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial illustrating new options for grouping with metabolism

Human Health Models Skin sensitization

1.QSAR identifier 1.1.QSAR identifier (title): QSAR model for Toxicokinetics, Transfer Index (TI) 1.2.Other related models:

Screening and prioritisation of substances of concern: A regulators perspective within the JANUS project

Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships: An overview

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Predicting acute aquatic toxicity to fish of Dodecanenitrile (CAS ) taking into account tautomerism

List of Publications of Ralph Kühne

Arguments for Considering Uncertainty in QSAR Predictions in Hazard and Risk Assessments

QMRF identifier (JRC Inventory): QMRF Title: QSAR model for acute oral toxicity-in vitro method (IC50) Printing Date:

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial of how to use Automated workflow for ecotoxicological prediction

State-of-the-science in Metrology & Metrics for Nanomaterials Regulation

Priority Setting of Endocrine Disruptors Using QSARs

1.3.Software coding the model: QSARModel Molcode Ltd., Turu 2, Tartu, 51014, Estonia

MultiCASE CASE Ultra model for severe skin irritation in vivo

1.3.Software coding the model: QSARModel Molcode Ltd., Turu 2, Tartu, 51014, Estonia

Regulatory use of (Q)SARs under REACH

Canada s Experience with Chemicals Assessment and Management and its Application to Nanomaterials

QMRF# Title. number and title in JRC QSAR Model Data base 2.0 (new) number and title in JRC QSAR Model Data base 1.0

Data Bases and Data Modeling

Adverse Outcome Pathways in Ecotoxicology Research

QSAR Model for Eye irritation (Draize test)

1.QSAR identifier 1.1.QSAR identifier (title): Nonlinear QSAR: artificial neural network for acute oral toxicity (rat 1.2.Other related models:

The Guidelines for Hazard Identification of New Chemical Substances

OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters (as revised in 2012)

1.2.Other related models: Same endpoint and dataset as presented model in reference [1].

Introduction to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)

Opportunities to Incorporate Toxicology into the Chemistry Curriculum Report from the Field

1.QSAR identifier 1.1.QSAR identifier (title): Nonlinear QSAR model for acute oral toxicity of rat 1.2.Other related models:

Nanomatevials. Towards Efficient Designing ofsafe. Innovative Merge of Computational Approaches. and Experimental Techniques.

In silico pharmacology for drug discovery

1.3.Software coding the model: QSARModel Turu 2, Tartu, 51014, Estonia

Exploring the black box: structural and functional interpretation of QSAR models.

How to decide whether a substance is a polymer or not and how to proceed with the relevant registration

Section II Assessing Polymers

Recent Advances in QSAR Studies

Structure-Activity Modeling - QSAR. Uwe Koch

Introduction to Chemoinformatics

Next Generation Computational Chemistry Tools to Predict Toxicity of CWAs

QSAR Modeling of ErbB1 Inhibitors Using Genetic Algorithm-Based Regression

The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Classification and Labelling. Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication

MS Program in Environmental and Green Chemistry at GWU

Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models

Molecular descriptors and chemometrics: a powerful combined tool for pharmaceutical, toxicological and environmental problems.

AOPs to support in silico predictions: the link from chemistry to adverse effects

Nanomaterials, REACH and CLP - what is going on at the regulatory front

Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment in Developmental Toxicology

Reaction mass of dimethyl adipate and dimethyl glutarate and dimethyl succinate

QSAR APPLICATION TOOLBOX ADVANCED TRAINING WORKSHOP. BARCELONA, SPAIN 3-4, June 2015 AGENDA

What is a Registered Substance Factsheet? May 2018

Global Harmonizing System GHS

RISKCYCLE (#226552) Deliverable 4.2. List of databases and meta-databases

Global Cooperation on Data Exchange on Hazardous Properties of Chemicals for GHS Classification

Peter Kearns, PhD OECD, ENV/EHS BIPM, April 2015

1.QSAR identifier 1.1.QSAR identifier (title): QSAR model for Bioaccumulation, BAF carp for PCBs 1.2.Other related models:

"GHS CONTAINER LABELING"

Validation of the GastroPlus TM Software Tool and Applications

Use of (Q)SAR and read across for assessment of genotoxicity of pesticides metabolites

1.3.Software coding the model: QSARModel Molcode Ltd., Turu 2, Tartu, 51014, Estonia

Environmental risk assessment of chemicals using QSAR methods

Announcement ECB-Workshop on Biology-Based Modelling

Basic Hazard Communication

Sensitizer potency prediction based on Key event Andreas Natsch, Givaudan Schweiz AG Presented by: David Basketter, DABMED consultancy

CDER Risk Assessment to Evaluate Potential Risks from the Use of Nanomaterials in Drug Products

Assessment and Regulation of Nanomaterials under the European Biocides Regulation Isabel Günther

QMRF identifier (ECB Inventory):To be entered by JRC QMRF Title: Nonlinear ANN QSAR model for Chronic toxicity LOAEL (rat) Printing Date:Oct 19, 2010

GHS Safety Data Sheets & Labeling System

Unilever s approach to assuring the safety of novel nanomaterials - supporting the risk assessment science

The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Classification and Labeling. Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication

Transcription:

In Silico Toxicology Principles and Applications Edited by Mark T. D. Cronin and Judith C. Madden Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK RSC Publishing

Contents Chapter 1 In Silico Toxicology An Introduction 1 M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Factors that Have Impacted on In Silico Toxicology: the Current State-of-the-Art 3 1.3 Types of In Silico Models 8 1.4 Uses of In Silico Models 8 1.5 How to Use this Book 8 1.6 Acknowledgements 9 References 9 Chapter 2 Introduction to QSAR and Other In Silico Methods to Predict Toxicity 11 J. C. Madden 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Building an In Silico Model 15 2.3 Assessing the Validity of the Model 23 2.4 Reviewing and Updating the Model 25 2.5 Using the Model 26 2.6 Consideration of Mitigating Factors 26 2.7 Documenting the Process 27 2.8 Pitfalls in Generating and Using QSAR Models 28 2.9 Conclusions 28 2.10 Acknowledgements 29 References 29 Issues in Toxicology No.7 In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications Edited by Mark T. D. Cronin and Judith C. Madden The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry, www.rsc.org

Chapter 3 Finding the Data to Develop and Evaluate (Q)SARs and Populate Categories for Toxicity Prediction 31 M. T. D. Cronin 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Which Data Can be Used for In Silico Modelling? 31 3.3 Uses of Data 32 3.4 How Many Data are Required? 33 3.5 Sources of Data 35 3.6 Retrieving Publicly Available Toxicity Data and Information for In Silico Modelling 37 3.7 Ongoing Data Compilation Activities 48 3.8 Ensuring Success in Using Toxicity Data in In Silico Models: Hierarchy of Data Consistency and Quality 50 3.9 Case Studies 51 3.10 Conclusions and Recommendations 55 3.11 Acknowledgements 56 References 56 Chapter 4 Data Quality Assessment for In Silico Methods: A Survey of Approaches and Needs 59 M. Nendza, T. Aldenberg, E. Benfenati, R. Benigni, M.T.D. Cronin, S. Escher, A. Fernandez, S. Gabbert, F. Giralt, M. Hewitt, M. Hrovat, S. Jeram, D. Kroese, J. C. Madden, I. Mangelsdorf, R. Rallo, A. Roncaglioni, E. Rorije, H. Segner, B. Simon-Hettich and T. Vermeire 4.1 Introduction 59 4.2 Principles of Data Quality Assessment 60 4.3 Biological Data Variability 74 4.4 Checklist Approach 75 4.5 Endpoint-Specific Considerations of Inherent Data Variability 77 4.6 Integration of Data with Distinct Degrees of Reliability 96 4.7 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tests and Testing Systems 108 4.8 Acknowledgements 111 References 111 Chapter 5 Calculation of Physico-Chemical and Environmental Fate Properties 118 T. H. Webb and L. A. Morlacci 5.1 Introduction 118 5.2 Getting the Most Out of Estimation Methods 119

5.3 Selected Software for the Estimation of Physico-Chemical and Environmental Fate Properties 122 5.4 Physico-Chemical Property Estimations 124 5.5 Environmental Fate Properties 136 5.6 Conclusions 143 References 144 Chapter 6 Molecular Descriptors from Two-Dimensional Chemical Structure 148 U. Maran, S. Sild, I. Tulp, K. Takkis and M. Moosus 6.1 Introduction 148 6.2 Mathematical Foundation of 2-D Descriptors 151 6.3 Navigation Among 2-D Descriptors 153 6.4 Examples of Use 166 6.5 Interpretation of 2-D Descriptors 180 6.6 Sources for the Calculation of 2-D Descriptors 184 6.7 Conclusions 186 6.8 Literature for In-Depth Reading 187 6.9 Acknowledgements 188 References 189 Chapter 7 The Use of Frontier Molecular Orbital Calculations in Predictive Reactive Toxicology 193 S. J. Enoch 7.1 Introduction 193 7.2 Mechanistic Chemistry 194 7.3 Commonly Utilised Quantum Mechanical Descriptors and Levels of Computational Theory 195 7.4 Descriptors Derived from Frontier Molecular Orbitals 196 7.5 Isomers and Conformers 205 7.6 Chemical Category Formation and Read-Across 206 7.7 Quantum Chemical Calculations 206 7.8 Conclusions 207 7.9 Acknowledgements 207 References 207 Chapter 8 Three-Dimensional Molecular Modelling of Receptor-Based Mechanisms in Toxicology 210 J. C. Madden and M. T. D. Cronin 8.1 Introduction 210 8.2 Background to 3-D Approaches 211 8.3 Modelling Approaches for Receptor-Mediated Toxicity 213

8.4 Ligand-Based Approaches 217 8.5 Receptor-Based approaches 221 8.6 Examples of the Application of 3-D Approaches in Predicting Receptor-Mediated Toxicity 222 8.7 Advantages and Disadvantages of 3-D Methods 225 8.8 Conclusions and Future Outlook 225 8.9 Acknowledgements 226 References 226 Chapter 9 Statistical Methods for Continuous Measured Endpoints in In Silico Toxicology 228 P. H. Rowe 9.1 Continuous Measured Endpoints (Interval Scale Data) 228 9.2 Regression Analysis Models in QSAR 228 9.3 Principal Components Regression (PCR) 244 9.4 Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression 248 9.5 Conclusions 250 References 250 Chapter 10 Statistical Methods for Categorised Endpoints in In Silico Toxicology 252 P. H. Rowe 10.1 Ordinal and Nominal Scale Endpoints and Illustrative Data 252 10.2 Discriminant Analysis 253 10.3 Logistic Regression 262 10.4 k-nearest-neighbour(s) 271 10.5 Choice of Method for Categorised Data 272 10.6 Conclusions 273 References 273 Chapter 11 Characterisation, Evaluation and Possible Validation of In Silico Models for Toxicity: Determining if a Prediction is Valid 275 M. T. D. Cronin 11.1 Introduction 275 11.2 A Very Brief History 276 11.3 OECD and European Chemicals Agency Documents and Further Background Papers and Sources of Information 277 11.4 Definition of Terms 277 11.5 OECD Principles for the Validation of (Q)SARs 283

11.6 Examples of Validation of (Q)SARs from the Literature 287 11.7 Describing a QSAR: Use of the QSAR Model Reporting Format 287 11.8 Case Studies: Application of the OECD Principles 288 11.9 Is the Prediction Valid? 296 11.10 Conclusions and Recommendations 298 11.11 Acknowledgements 298 References 299 Chapter 12 Developing the Applicability Domain of In Silico Models: Relevance, Importance and Methods 301 M. Hewitt and C. M. Ellison 12.1 Introduction 301 12.2 Regulatory Context 302 12.3 Applicability Domain Definition 303 12.4 Case Study 316 12.5 Recommendations 329 12.6 Acknowledgements 330 References 330 Chapter 13 Mechanisms of Toxic Action in In Silico Toxicology 334 D. W. Roberts 13.1 Introduction 334 13.2 Modes and Mechanisms 335 13.3 Reaction Mechanistic Domains 338 13.4 Mechanism-Based Reactivity Parameters for Electrophilic Toxicity 339 13.5 Role of Hydrophobicity in Modelling Electrophilic Toxicity 342 13.6 Conclusions 343 13.7 Acknowledgements 344 References 344 Chapter 14 Adverse Outcome Pathways: A Way of Linking Chemical Structure to In Vivo Toxicological Hazards 346 T. W. Schultz 14.1 Categories in Hazard Assessment 346 14.2 Filling Data Gaps in a Category 348 14.3 Mechanism of Toxic Action 349 14.4 Toxicologically Meaningful Categories (TMCs) 350 14.5 The Concept of the Adverse Outcome Pathway 352 14.6 Weak Acid Respiratory Uncoupling 354

14.7 Respiratory Irritation 355 14.8 Skin Sensitisation 357 14.9 Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition 359 14.10 Receptor Binding Pathways for Phenolic Oestrogen Mimics 360 14.11 Using Pathways to Form TMCs and Reduce Testing 361 14.12 Hazards with Elaborate Datasets 363 14.13 Pathways for Elaborate Hazard Endpoints 364 14.14 Positive Attributes of the Adverse Outcome Pathway Approach 366 14.15 Conclusions: Basic Elements in Developing a Pathway 367 References 368 Chapter 15 An Introduction to Read-Across for the Prediction of the Effects of Chemicals 372 S. Dimitrov and O. Mekenyan 15.1 Read-Across 372 15.2 Basis of Performing Read-Across 372 15.3 Practical Aspects of Read-Across 374 15.4 Example: Read-Across for the Prediction of the Toxicity of 4-Ethylphenol to Tetrahymenapyriformis 379 15.5 Conclusions 383 References 383 Chapter 16 Tools for Category Formation and Read-Across: Overview of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox 385 R. Diderich 16.1 The OECD (Q)SAR Project: From Validation Principles to an Application Toolbox 385 16.2 Workflow of the Toolbox 387 16.3 Example Use Scenarios for Regulatory Application 391 16.4 Conclusions and Outlook 404 References 405 Chapter 17 Open Source Tools for Read-Across and Category Formation 408 N. Jeliazkova, J. Jaworska and A. P. Worth 17.1 Introduction 408 17.2 Open Source, Open Data and Open Standards in Chemoinformatics 412 17.3 Descriptions of the Tools Suitable for Category Formation and Read-Across 417

17.4 Summary and Conclusions 442 17.5 Acknowledgements 442 References 443 Chapter 18 Biological Read-Across: Mechanistically-Based Species-Species and Endpoint-Endpoint Extrapolations 446 M. T. D. Cronin 18.1 Introduction 446 18.2 Extrapolation of Toxicological Information from One Species to Another 447 18.3 Prediction Models 449 18.4 Examples of Extrapolation of Toxicity Between Species: Acute Aquatic Toxicity 449 18.5 Endpoint-to-Endpoint Read-Down of Toxicity: Extrapolation of Toxicity Between Effects 470 18.6 US Environmental Protection Agency Web-Based Inter-species Correlation Estimation (Web-ICE) Application 472 18.7 Recent Developments 473 18.8 Conclusions 473 18.9 Acknowledgments 474 References 474 Chapter 19 Expert Systems for Toxicity Prediction 478 /. C. Dearden 19.1 Introduction 478 19.2 Available Expert Systems 481 19.3 Independent Comparative Assessment of Software Performance 495 19.4 Consensus Modelling 497 19.5 Software Performance with Tetrahymena pyriformis Test Set 498 19.6 Software Performance with Skin Sensitisation Test Set 500 19.7 Conclusions 501 19.8 Acknowledgments 502 References 502 Chapter 20 Exposure Modelling for Risk Assessment 508 J. Marquart 20.1 Introduction: Hazard, Exposure, Risk 508 20.2 Types of Exposure Estimates used in Risk Characterisation in REACH 510

20.3 Methods for Exposure Assessment in Regulatory Processes 512 Models 512 20.4 Types of Human Exposure 20.5 Detailed Description of the Models 515 20.6 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Models 524 20.7 Conclusions 528 References 528 Chapter 21 Toxicokinetic Considerations in Predicting Toxicity 531 /. C. Madden 21.1 Introduction 531 21.2 Internal Exposure 532 21.3 Predicting ADME Parameters 540 21.4 Physiologically-Based Toxicokinetic Modelling 547 21.5 Conclusions and Outlook 553 21.6 Acknowledgements 554 References 554 Chapter 22 Multiple Test In Silico Weight-of-Evidence for Toxicological Endpoints 558 T. Aldenberg and J. S. Jaw orska 22.1 Introduction 558 22.2 Two-Test Training Dataset 559 22.3 One-Test Bayesian Inference 560 22.4 Two-Test Battery Bayesian Inference 566 22.5 Two-Test Data Fitting and Model Selection 574 22.6 Conclusions 580 References 581 Chapter 23 Integrated Testing Strategies and the Prediction of Toxic Hazard 584 M. Balls 23.1 Introduction 584 23.2 Essential Nature and Uses of ITS 585 23.3 Historical Development of the Concept of ITS 586 23.4 ITS and Risk Assessment 592 23.5 In Vitro Methods for Use in ITS 596 23.6 Evaluation and Application of ITS 597 23.7 Securing the Regulatory Acceptance of ITS 600 References 603

Chapter 24 Using In Silico Toxicity Predictions: Case Studies for Skin Sensitisation 606 M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden 24.1 Introduction 606 24.2 Forming a Consensus: Integrating Predictions 607 24.3. Choice of Chemicals for Analysis 608 24.4. In Silico Prediction Methods and In Chemico Data 608 24.5 Existing Data, In Silico Predictions and In Chemico Data for 4-Amino-2-Nitrophenol 610 24.6 In Silico Predictions and In Chemico Data for 1,14-Tetradecanediol 616 24.7 Conclusions and Recommendations 620 24.8 Acknowledgements 620 References 621 Appendix 1 624 Appendix 2 645 Subject Index 659