Precision Higgs physics at hadron colliders Claude Duhr in collaboration with C. Anastasiou, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos, B. Mistlberger RadCor/LoopFest 2015 UCLA, 16/06/2015
Higgs physics at the LHC Establishing whether the BEH mechanism and its boson is SM-like will be of outmost importance for the run of the LHC. Higgs-boson production modes at the LHC: Gluon fusion TTH Higgs strahlung VBF
Higgs physics at the LHC Establishing whether the BEH mechanism and its boson is SM-like will be of outmost importance for the run of the LHC. Higgs-boson production modes at the LHC: Dominant production mode at the LHC Gluon fusion TTH Higgs strahlung VBF We want to know the gluon-fusion cross section precisely
Higgs physics at the LHC µ AT LAS =1.18 +0.15 0.14 stat. = +0.10 0.10 sys. (inc. theo.) = +0.11 0.10 µ CMS =1.00 ± 0.14 theory = +0.08 0.07 [M. Dührssen @ Moriond EW 2015]
The gluon fusion cross section Known at NLO and NNLO, but plagued by large perturbative uncertainties. [Dawson; Djouadi, Spira, Zerwas; Harlander, Kilgore; Anastasiou, Melnikov; Ravindran, Smith, van Neerven] 50 LO NLO NNLO LHC @ 13TeV pp h+x gluon fusion MSTW08 68cl = R = F /pb 40 30 20 10 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 /m h
The gluon fusion cross section The dominant Higgs production mechanism at the LHC is gluon fusion. Loop-induced process. For a light Higgs boson, the dimension five operator describing a tree-level coupling of the gluons to the Higgs boson 1 L = L QCD,5 4v C 1 HG a µ G µ a Top-mass corrections known at NNLO. [Harlander, Ozeren; Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; Ball, Del Duca, Marzani, Forte, Vicini; Harlander, Mantler, Marzani, Ozeren] In the rest of the talk, I will only concentrate on the effective theory.
The gluon fusion cross section The gluon fusion cross section is given in perturbation theory by = X ij Z 1 dz z L ij( /z) ˆij(z) z 4 10 6 L gg ( /z) 3 10 6 z = m2 H ŝ = m2 H S ' 10 4 Main contribution from region where z ' 1 tttttttt. 2 10 6 1 10 6 L gu ( /z) L gd ( /z) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 z Physically: production at threshold + emission of soft partons.
Outline Goal: Compute cross section as a series around threshold Outline: The threshold expansion at N3LO. A first glimpse at Higgs phenomenology at N3LO. Details about the computational methods: Mistlberger (Wed). Furlan (Thu).
The threshold expansion at N3LO
The gluon fusion cross section At N3LO, there are five contributions: Triple virtual Real-virtual squared Double virtual real Double real virtual Triple real
Systematics of the expansion ˆij (z) z =ˆSV ig jg + 1X N=0 ˆ(N) ij (1 z) N Goal: Compute enough terms to establish convergence.
Systematics of the expansion ˆij (z) z =ˆSV ig jg + 1X N=0 ˆ(N) ij (1 z) N Goal: Compute enough terms to establish convergence. The coefficients in the expansion are not constants, but they are polynomials in. At N3LO: ˆ(N) ij = log(1 z) 5X k=0 c (N) ijk logk (1 z) Coefficients in this polynomial are zeta values.
Systematics of the expansion ˆij (z) z =ˆSV ig jg + 1X N=0 ˆ(N) ij (1 z) N Goal: Compute enough terms to establish convergence. The coefficients in the expansion are not constants, but they are polynomials in. At N3LO: ˆ(N) ij = log(1 z) 5X k=0 c (N) ijk logk (1 z) Coefficients in this polynomial are zeta values. The first term is called the distribution-valued: soft-virtual At N3LO: ˆSV = a (1 z)+ 5X k=0 b k " term and is log k (1 z) 1 z # +
The soft-virtual contribution ˆij (z) z a (1 = + ˆSV ig jg z)+ 1X N=0 ˆ(N) ij (1 z) N Contributes to the gluon-channel only. Plus-distributions already known a decade ago. Soft gluon emissions. delta-function contribution computed last year. [Anastasiou, CD, Dulat, Furlan, Gehrmann, Herzog, Mistlberger] Later confirmed independently by[li, von Manteuffel, Schabinger, Zhu] Contains the complete three-loop corrections. 5X k=0 b k " log k (1 z) 1 z [Baikov, Chetyrkin, Smirnov 2, Steinhauser; Gehrmann, Glover, Huber, Ikizlerli, Studerus] See talk by Ravindran on thursday # + [Moch, Vogt; Laenen, Magnea]
The regular contributions ˆij (z) z = + ˆSV ig jg Describes subleading soft emissions. Single-emission contributions known exactly. [Anastasiou, CD, Dulat, Herzog, Mistlberger; Kilgore; Gehrmann, Glover, Jaquier, Koukoutsakis, CD, Gehrmann, Jaquier; Dulat, Mistlberger] 1X N=0 ˆ(N) ij = ˆ(N) ij (1 z) N 5X k=0 c (N) ijk logk (1 z) Double- and triple-emissions only known as an expansion around threshold. [Anastasiou, CD, Dulat, Herzog, Mistlberger] Exact result for qq channel was recently published. [Anzai, Hasselhuhn, Hoff, Höschele, Kilgore, Steinhauser, Ueda]
Threshold expansion 3.0 LHC @ 13TeV gg h+x subchannel MSTW08 68cl 2.5 = R = F =m h N3LO gg /pb 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 See talks by Furlan and Mistlberger for more detail on the expansion and its convergence. 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Truncation order
A first glimpse at Higgs phenomenology at N3LO
Scale variation 50 LO NLO NNLO NNNLO LHC @ 13TeV pp h+x gluon fusion MSTW08 68cl = R = F p S = 13TeV 40 /pb 30 20 10 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 /m h
Energy variation 50 LHC pp h+x gluon fusion MSTW08 68cl = R = F [m H /4,m H ] Central scale: = m H /2 LO NLO NNLO NNNLO 40 µ = µ R = µ F 2 [m H /4,m H ] /pb 30 20 10 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 s /TeV
Energy variation 50 LHC pp h+x gluon fusion MSTW08 68cl = R = F [m H /2,2 m H ] Central scale: = m H LO NLO NNLO NNNLO 40 µ = µ R = µ F 2 [m H /2, 2m H ] 30 /pb 20 10 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0-0.1-0.2 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S /TeV
Scale vs. PDF uncertainty [pb] σ pp H 50 45 ATLAS s -1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fb H γ γ H ZZ * 4l comb. data syst. unc. pp H, σ ggf m H + σ XH = 125.4 GeV σ XH = 3.0 ± 0.1 pb XH = VBF + VH + tth + bbh QCD scale uncertainty Total uncertainty (scale PDF+α s ) 40 35 30 25 20 15 NNLO+NNLL 3 N LO Data LHC-XS ADDFGHLM
Uncertainties Perturbative QCD uncertainties are drastically reduced at N3LO Scale uncertainty negligible compared to PDF + uncertainties at N3LO. Other sources of uncertainty could now be of the same size. Threshold resummation / missing higher orders. S Top-mass corrections. Electroweak corrections. Top-bottom interference.
Threshold resummation Soft gluon emissions exponentiate in Mellin space a (1 ˆresum gg z)+ " 5X b k k=0 = g 0 ( s )exp log k (1 z) 1 z " 1 2 s # + # 1X s k g k ( s log N) k=1 Resummation functions g i [Moch, Vermaseren, Vogt; Bonvini, Marzani; Catani, Cieri, de Florian, Ferrara, Grazzini] ã + 6X bk log k N k=1 [Catani, Trentadue; Sterman] known up to N3LL (k=4).
Threshold resummation Soft gluon emissions exponentiate in Mellin space a (1 ˆresum gg z)+ " 5X b k k=0 = g 0 ( s )exp log k (1 z) 1 z " 1 2 s # + # 1X s k g k ( s log N) k=1 Resummation functions g i [Moch, Vermaseren, Vogt; Bonvini, Marzani; Catani, Cieri, de Florian, Ferrara, Grazzini] ã + 6X bk log k N k=1 known up to N3LL (k=4). N3LL resummation needs 4-loop cusp anomalous dimension. Only known via Pade approximation, assuming Casimir scaling. [Catani, Trentadue; Sterman] [Moch, Vermaseren, Vogt] Casimiar scaling assumption likely to fail at four loops. Numerical impact small
N3LL threshold resummation 60 LO NLO NNLO NNNLO LHC @ 13TeV pp h+x gluon fusion MSTW08 68cl = R = F LO+N3LL NLO+N3LL NNLO+N3LL N3LO+N3LL 50 /pb 40 30 20 PRELIMINARY 10 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 /m H
Scale uncertainty µ = m H /2 seems to be a good scale choice. Reduced scale uncertainty compared to. Series seems to converge. µ = m H Negligible impact of soft-gluon resummation. Current recommendation of HXSWG: µ = m H. Scale uncertainty negligible compared to PDF + uncertainties at N3LO. S We are reaching the point where we should critically assess our method of estimating the uncertainty by scale variation
Other sources of uncertainties Finite top-mass effects: [Harlander, Ozeren; Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; Ball, Del Duca, Marzani, Forte, Vicini; Harlander, Mantler, Marzani, Ozeren] Gives tiny contributions at NNLO.
Other sources of uncertainties Finite top-mass effects: [Harlander, Ozeren; Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; Ball, Del Duca, Marzani, Forte, Vicini; Harlander, Mantler, Marzani, Ozeren] Gives tiny contributions at NNLO. Electroweak corrections: Two-loop corrections partially known. [Djouadi, Gambino, Kniehl; Aglietti, Bonciani, Degrassi; Degrassi, Maltoni; Anastasiou, Boughezal, Petriello; Actis, Passarino, Sturm, Uccirati] Leads to a shift in the cross section by a few percent.
Other sources of uncertainties Finite top-mass effects: [Harlander, Ozeren; Pak, Rogal, Steinhauser; Ball, Del Duca, Marzani, Forte, Vicini; Harlander, Mantler, Marzani, Ozeren] Gives tiny contributions at NNLO. Electroweak corrections: Two-loop corrections partially known. [Djouadi, Gambino, Kniehl; Aglietti, Bonciani, Degrassi; Degrassi, Maltoni; Anastasiou, Boughezal, Petriello; Actis, Passarino, Sturm, Uccirati] Leads to a shift in the cross section by a few percent. Top-bottom interference: Currently unknown beyond NLO, but could give rise to a few percent.
Conclusion The era of QCD Higgs phenomenology at N3LO has started QCD scale uncertainty immensely reduced It is time to think about other effects that give rise to similar uncertainties: Threshold resummation / missing higher orders. Electroweak corrections. Top-mass corrections. Top-bottom interference. PDF + S uncertainties.
Backup slides
NNLO vs. N3LO PDFs? 25 20 σ [pb] 15 10 Fixed PDF LO 5 Fixed PDF NLO 0 Fixed PDF NNLO LO NLO NNLO N 3 LO XS order [Plot from Forte, Isgrò, Vita; N3LO is approximate]
Comparison to Approximate N3LO [Plot from HXSWG]
Comparison to Approximate N3LO mh/2 : 47.03 mh : 46.10
Comparison to Approximate N3LO mh : 8.9% mh/2 : 2%