MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS: A REWRITE OF ANDREWS CHAPTER 6

Similar documents
THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens

Dirichlet s Theorem In Arithmetic Progressions

18.781: Solution to Practice Questions for Final Exam

Some basic inequalities. Definition. Let V be a vector space over the complex numbers. An inner product is given by a function, V V C

Foundations of Arithmetic

Bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials

First day August 1, Problems and Solutions

This document has been downloaded from Tampub The Institutional Repository of University of Tampere. Publisher's version

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 8 Oct 2014

(2mn, m 2 n 2, m 2 + n 2 )

On quasiperfect numbers

Smarandache-Zero Divisors in Group Rings

Math 261 Exercise sheet 2

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Christian Aebi Collège Calvin, Geneva, Switzerland

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma 5.4. Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space Moreover the open sets

Multiplicative Functions and Möbius Inversion Formula

Canonical transformations

a b a In case b 0, a being divisible by b is the same as to say that

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

FINITELY-GENERATED MODULES OVER A PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN

More metrics on cartesian products

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Affine transformations and convexity

LECTURE V. 1. More on the Chinese Remainder Theorem We begin by recalling this theorem, proven in the preceeding lecture.

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space. Moreover the open sets

Example: (13320, 22140) =? Solution #1: The divisors of are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 27, 30, 36, 41,

Ballot Paths Avoiding Depth Zero Patterns

Self-complementing permutations of k-uniform hypergraphs

Beyond Zudilin s Conjectured q-analog of Schmidt s problem

a = mq + r where 0 r m 1.

Basic Number Theory. Instructor: Laszlo Babai Notes by Vincent Lucarelli and the instructor. Last revision: June 11, 2001

12 MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART C: MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. 4. Tensor product

Some Consequences. Example of Extended Euclidean Algorithm. The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, II. Characterizing the GCD and LCM

On the average number of divisors of the sum of digits of squares

Difference Equations

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Week 2. This week, we covered operations on sets and cardinality.

Restricted divisor sums

Polynomials. 1 What is a polynomial? John Stalker

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

A summation on Bernoulli numbers

The Chinese Remainder Theorem

arxiv: v6 [math.nt] 23 Aug 2016

Anti-van der Waerden numbers of 3-term arithmetic progressions.

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

Another converse of Jensen s inequality

Character Degrees of Extensions of PSL 2 (q) and SL 2 (q)

20. Mon, Oct. 13 What we have done so far corresponds roughly to Chapters 2 & 3 of Lee. Now we turn to Chapter 4. The first idea is connectedness.

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Errors for Linear Systems

A CHARACTERIZATION OF ADDITIVE DERIVATIONS ON VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

Affine and Riemannian Connections

5 The Rational Canonical Form

HMMT February 2016 February 20, 2016

Assortment Optimization under MNL

Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae

For now, let us focus on a specific model of neurons. These are simplified from reality but can achieve remarkable results.

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Chowla s Problem on the Non-Vanishing of Certain Infinite Series and Related Questions

Polynomials. 1 More properties of polynomials

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS BRIAN OSSERMAN

LECTURE 4: CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM AND MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS

Theory of Numbers Problems

Randić Energy and Randić Estrada Index of a Graph

On the partial orthogonality of faithful characters. Gregory M. Constantine 1,2

Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations

An Introduction to Morita Theory

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

k(k 1)(k 2)(p 2) 6(p d.

Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

Layer Potentials. Chapter Fundamental and Singular Solutions

Appendix B. Criterion of Riemann-Stieltjes Integrability

Perron Vectors of an Irreducible Nonnegative Interval Matrix

Chapter 2 Transformations and Expectations. , and define f

( 1) i [ d i ]. The claim is that this defines a chain complex. The signs have been inserted into the definition to make this work out.

Problem Set 9 Solutions

Lecture 4: Universal Hash Functions/Streaming Cont d

The internal structure of natural numbers and one method for the definition of large prime numbers

Graph Reconstruction by Permutations

Lecture 21: Numerical methods for pricing American type derivatives

Maximizing the number of nonnegative subsets

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

9 Derivation of Rate Equations from Single-Cell Conductance (Hodgkin-Huxley-like) Equations

Lecture 10 Support Vector Machines II

BOUNDEDNESS OF THE RIESZ TRANSFORM WITH MATRIX A 2 WEIGHTS

Chapter Twelve. Integration. We now turn our attention to the idea of an integral in dimensions higher than one. Consider a real-valued function f : D

Advanced Algebraic Algorithms on Integers and Polynomials

and problem sheet 2

THERE ARE NO POINTS OF ORDER 11 ON ELLIPTIC CURVES OVER Q.

Kernel Methods and SVMs Extension

No-three-in-line problem on a torus: periodicity

Subset Topological Spaces and Kakutani s Theorem

Transcription:

MULTIPLICATIVE FUNCTIONS: A REWRITE OF ANDREWS CHAPTER 6 In these notes we offer a rewrte of Andrews Chapter 6. Our am s to replace some of the messer arguments n Andrews. To acheve ths, we need to change the order of presentaton of the materal. The man am s to study the three mportant functons: Euler s ph functon, ϕ(n); the number of dvsors of n, d(n); and the sum of the dvsors of n, σ(n). Each functon s multplcatve, n the sense defned below. Defnton A functon f : N R s completely multplcatve f f(mn) = f(m)f(n) (m, n N). An easy nductve argument shows that we have and so f(m 1 m 2... m s ) = f(m 1 )f(m 2 )... f(m s ) f(p α 1 1 p α 2 2... p αs s ) = f(p α 1 1 )... f(p αs s ) = (f(p 1 )) α 1... (f(p s )) αs ( ) Thus, a completely multplcatve functon s determned by ts values on the prme numbers. The smplest natural examples are gven by f(n) = n c. But the nterestng functons of number theory have only the weaker property that f(mn) = f(m)f(n) (m, n N, gcd(m, n) = 1). For such functons, only the frst equaton n ( ) holds true. Equvalently, a multplcatve functon s known when we know ts values on every power of each prme number. Recall that U k s the set of nvertble elements n Z k ; equvalently t s the set of all those elements x Z k whch are coprme to k. Euler s ph-functon s just the number of elements n U k. THEOREM 1. Euler s ph-functon s multplcatve. Proof. Let m, n be coprme. We are gong to show that the set U mn s n one-one correspondence wth the Cartesan product U m U n. Ths then gves mmedately that ϕ(mn) = ϕ(m)ϕ(n), as requred. Gven x U mn, reduce x modulo m and also modulo n. Thus we get a Z m, b Z n such that x a (mod m) and y b (mod n). Suppose that p a and p m. It 1

follows that p x, and also p mn. Snce x U mn, we must have p = 1 and so a U m. Smlarly, b U n. So we get a functon F : U mn U m U n defned by F (x) = (a, b). It remans to show that F s one-one and onto. To see that F s one-one, suppose that F (x) = F (y) wth x, y U mn. Then x a y (mod m), x b y (mod n). Ths gves m (x y) and n (x y). But m, n are coprme, and so mn (x y), that s, x = y. To see that F s onto, take any a U m and any b U n. By the Chnese Remander Theorem, there exsts x Z mn such that x a (mod m) and x b (mod n). To see that x U mn, suppose that a prme p dvdes both x and mn. But then p dvdes ether m or n, whch contradcts the fact that a U m and b U n. Thus x U mn and we have F (x) = (a, b). So F s onto, and the proof s complete. We can now get the formula for ϕ(n). For n = p α, we see that the only elements not coprme to n are 0, p, 2p,... p 2, p 2 + p,... p α p and so Snce ϕ s multplcatve, we get ( ) ϕ(n) = ϕ p α = ϕ(p α ) = p α p α 1. (p α p α 1 ) = n (1 1p ). The last product above gves the fracton of n for whch the numbers are coprme to n. When n s a large prme, ths fracton s very nearly 1. When n s the product of the frst k prmes, then the fracton goes to zero as k goes to nfnty. Ths last asserton s by no means obvous, but t corresponds to the fact (to be proved later) that the nfnte seres (1/p ) dverges. 2

We are now gong to see how to buld a new multplcatve functon from an old one. As an mmedate corollary we shall see that our other two functons d(n) and σ(n) are also multplcatve. THEOREM 2. Let f be multplcatve and let F (n) = k n f(k). Then F s multplcatve. Proof. Let m, n be coprme, and let k mn. By the Fundamental Theorem of Arthmetc, k = ab where a m, b n and a, b are coprme. Conversely, each such choce of a, b gves a product ab whch s a factor of mn. Hence, F (mn) = f(k) = f(ab) = f(a)f(b) = f(a) f(b) = F (m)f (n). k mn a m,b n a m,b n a m b n Take f(n) = 1 (whch s completely multplcatve) and we see that d(n) s multplcatve. Take f(n) = n (whch s also completely multplcatve) and we see that σ(n) s also multplcatve. To get the formulas for d(n) and σ(n), we just have to calculate that and d(p α ) = α + 1 σ(p α ) = 1 + p + p 2 + + p α = pα+1) 1 p 1. As another applcaton of Theorem 2, take f = ϕ and we clam that the assocated functon F s gven by F (n) = n. To get ths, we just have to show that F (p α ) = p α. But F (p α ) = ϕ(1)+ϕ(p)+ϕ(p 2 )+ +ϕ(p α ) = 1+(p 1)+(p 2 p)+ +(p α p α 1 = p α as requred. We fnd below another way to get the same result. Our fnal specal functon s a very curous one, called the Möbus functon, denoted by µ(n). We let µ(1) = 1, µ(p 1 p 2... p s ) = ( 1) s, and µ(n) = 0 otherwse, that s, f n has at least one repeated prme factor. It s routne by 3

case-checkng to see that µ(n) s also multplcatve. Apply Theorem 2 wth f = µ to get assocated multplcatve functon M(n). Clearly M(1) = 1 and M(p α ) = µ(1) + µ(p) + µ(p 2 ) + + µ(p α ) = 1 1 + 0 + + 0 = 0. It follows that M(n) = 0 whenever n > 1, n other words, µ(k) = 0 (n > 1). k n The next theorem s called the Möbus Inverson Theorem. Snce summaton corresponds to ntegraton and dfferences (here wth spacng h = 1) correspond to dervatves, you may thnk of the theorem as a dscrete verson of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. THEOREM 3. Let f, g be any (real) functons on N. Then f(n) = k n g(k) (n N) ( ) f and only f g(n) = k n µ(k)f(n/k) (n N) ( ). Proof. Suppose that ( ) holds. Then µ(k)f(n/k) = µ(k) g(e) = µ(k)g(e) = g(e) e k j e k n kk =n keh=n ee =n µ(j). From above, the nner summaton n the last equaton s zero except when e = 1 and so e = n. Thus the sum s f(n), as requred. The other half of the proof s smlar. A par of functons (f, g) satsfyng ether of the equvalent condtons ( ) or ( ) s called a Möbus par. Thus (n, ϕ), (d, 1), (σ, n) are all Möbus pars. So also s (µ, δ), where δ s the Drac delta functon whch s 1 at 1 and zero elsewhere. Our fnal theorem s about the multplcatve propertes of a Möbus par. We have already proved one half of t. The other half s smlar and s left to the reader. 4

THEOREM 4. Let (f, g) be a Möbus par. Then f s multplcatve f and only f g s multplcatve. When we nvert the Möbus par (n, ϕ), we get the formula ϕ(n) = k n µ(k) n k. Of course ths s easy to check when n = p α. It s temptng to thnk that we now have a quck proof that ϕ s multplcatve. Unfortunately ths s not the case, snce we would need to check that one of the Möbus par equatons holds for all n. Remark. In combnatorcs, the Möbus Inverson Theorem has been generalzed by replacng N by certan partally ordered spaces. 5