AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Similar documents
A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Example Stayed beam with two pylons

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Composite Beams DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II. Department of Earthquake and

DL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

Suspended Beam Roof with Pylons

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

Structural Specialization

Software Verification

Appendix K Design Examples

CHAPTER 3 VERIFICATION OF PROPOSED EQUATIONS FOR THE EFFECTIVE MOMENT OF INERTIA OF STEEL JOIST - CONCRETE SLAB SYSTEMS

Design 1 Calculations

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

Steel Design. Notation:

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Steel Design. Notation:

Beam Design and Deflections

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

Steel Design. Notation: a A A b A e

Moment Redistribution

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

4.3 Moment Magnification

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson


Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

DNV DESIGN. POU_Rect - Design Report Page 1 of 11

of I Section Members

BEAMS. By.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1

Support Reactions: a + M C = 0; 800(10) F DE(4) F DE(2) = 0. F DE = 2000 lb. + c F y = 0; (2000) - C y = 0 C y = 400 lb

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Introduction. ENCE 710 Design of Steel Structures IV. COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRET CONSTRUCTION. Effective Width. Composite Action

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please stand by.

SHEAR CONNECTION: DESIGN OF W-SHAPE BEAM TO RECTANGULAR/SQUARE HSS COLUMN SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

(Round up to the nearest inch.)

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

SHEAR CONNECTION: W BEAM WITH SHEAR PLATE ONE-WAY SHEAR CONNECTION TO W COLUMN WEB

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb.

Two Way Beam Supported Slab

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

Torsional Analysis of

Properties of Sections

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

Quizzam Module 1 : Statics

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12" top flange, therefore take 4" from CL Gird.

6.5 Cables: Concentrated Loads

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

The Influence of a Weld-Affected Zone on the Compressive and Flexural Strength of Aluminum Members

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.

APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

Transcription:

Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal deck [(3.25in)(1ft/12in) + (18.0in 2 /ft)(1ft 2 /12in 2 )](115 lb/ft 3 ) +3.0 psf = 48.52psf Imposed Dead Load: 25psf Imposed Live Load: 80psf Office Reducible Point Loads on Girder: Secondary beam size = W14x22 Self-wt = 22 lb/ft Secondary beam spacing = 9 o.c. Secondary beam length = 30 P Dead = [(48.52 psf + 25 psf)(9 )(30 /2) + (22 lb/ft)(30 /2)] (1 k / 1000 lb) = 10.255 k P Live = (80.0 psf)(9 )(30 /2) (1 k / 1000 lb) = 10.80 k Live Load Reduction (IBC 2006 Eq. 16-24): A T = 2(15 )(18 ) = 540 ft2 K LL = 2 L = L 0 (0.25 + 15/sqrt(2(540))) = 0.7064 % Reduction = 100% (1-0.7064) = 29.35% P PrecompDead = [(48.52 + 5 psf)(9 )(30 /2) + (22 lb/ft)(30 /2)] (1 k/1000 lb) = 7.555 k P PrecompLive = (20.0 psf)(9 )(30 /2) (1 k / 1000 lb) = 2.70 k Line Load on Girder: w Dead = 0.044 k/ft (W21x44) Shear: V Dead = (2)(10.255 k) + (0.044 k/ft)(27 )/2 = 21.104 k V Live = (2)(10.80 k)(0.7064) = 15.258 k Vu = 1.4(21.104 k) = 29.55 k, or = 1.2(21.104 k) + 1.6(15.258 k) = 49.74 k Controls Vn = 0.6FyA w C v Eq. G2-1 A w = (20.7 )(0.350 ) = 7.245 in 2 C v = 1.0 φ v = 1.00 φ v Vn = 1.00(0.6)(50 ksi)( 7.245 in 2 )(1.0) = 217.35 k Effective Flange Width: (Section I3.1) Span = 27 Distance to adjacent beams = 9.0 BBeffective = (27 )(12 /1 )/8 = 40.5 each side - Controls BBeffective = (9.0 )(12 /1 )/2 = 54.0 each side BBeffective = 2(40.5 ) = 81.0 RAM Structural System 1 Bentley Systems, Inc.

Stud Capacity: (Section I3.2d(3)) Q = 0.5A f ' E R R A F (Eq I3-3) n sc c c g p sc u A sc = π (0.75) 2 /4 = 0.4418 in 2 f c = 3.0 ksi E c = 115 1.5 sqrt(3.0) = 2136.03 ksi R g = 1.0 (deck is parallel, wr/hr = 6 /3 = 2.0 > 1.5) R p = 0.75 F u = 65.0 ksi Qn = 0.5(0.4418)sqrt((3.0)( 2136.03)) = 17.68 k (1.0)(0.75)(0.4418)(65.0) = 21.54 k Horizontal Shear: (I3.2d(1)) V = 0.85f c Ac (Eq. I3-1a) Ac = (t c )( B effective ) = (3.25 )(81.0 ) = 263.25 in 2 V = 0.85(3.0)( 263.25) = 671.29 k, or V = AsFy (Eq. I3-1b) V = (13.0 in 2 )(50 ksi) = 650.0 k - Controls Maximum Composite Moment: M Dead = (2)(10.255k)(9 ) + (0.044 k/ft)(27 ) 2 /8 = 188.60 k-ft M Live = (2)(10.8k)(9 )(0.7064) = 137.32 k-ft Mu = 1.4(188.60 k-ft) = 264.0 k-ft, or Mu = 1.2(188.60 k-ft) + 1.6(137.32 k-ft) = 446.04 k-ft @ midspan = 13.5 Between the point of zero moment (the beam end for this beam) and the point of maximum moment (the midspan for this beam) there are 11 studs available (the stud at the midspan must be ignored since there is no horizontal shear at that point that stud is only there due to the maximum stud spacing requirements). Therefore, the shear carried by the studs is: V = (11 studs)(17.68 k/stud) = 194.5 kip (Eq. I3-1c) This also represents the compression in the concrete, C. Composite φmn at Maximum Moment: For this beam the plastic neutral axis is in the web: PNA (This form of the equation for calculating PNA considers the contribution of the area of steel within the fillets. It is calculated by setting the compression in the steel, which is onehalf of the total force in the steel and concrete, equal to Fy times one-half the steel area plus the additional area of web between the mid-depth and the PNA, then solving for PNA): 0.5(AsFy +C) = Fy[As/2 + tw(pna - Depth/2)] 0.5(650.0 k + 194.5 k) = (50 ksi)[13.0 in 2 /2 + (0.350 )(PNA 20.7 /2)] PNA = 15.91 ΣMoments about PNA: Mn = Fy [(tf)(bf)(pna-tf/2) bottom flange + (tw)(pna-tf)(pna-tf)/2 web below PNA + (tw)(d-tf-pna)(d-tf-pna)/2 web above PNA + (tf)(bf)(d-pna-tf/2) top flange + (A fillet )(arm fillet )(2pair)] fillets + C (d-pna+td+tc-a/2) concrete RAM Structural System 2 Bentley Systems, Inc.

where: A 4fillets = 13.0in 2 (0.350 )(20.7 2(0.450 )) 2(0.450 )(6.50 ) = 0.220 in 2 A fillet = (0.220 in 2 ) / 4 = 0.055 in 2 / fillet r fillet = fillet radius = k tf = 0.950 0.450 = 0.5 arm fillet = moment arm between centroids of fillets = d 2(tf) 2(0.2)(r fillet ) = 20.7 2(0.450 ) 2(0.2)(0.5 ) = 19.60 a = C / (0.85f cb effective ) = (194.5k) / [(0.85)(3ksi)(81.0 )] = 0.942 Mn = 50 [ (0.450 )(6.50 )(15.91-0.450 /2) bottom flange + (0.350 )( 15.91-0.450 )(15.91-0.450 )/2 web below PNA + (0.350 )(20.7-0.450-15.91 )(20.7-0.450-15.91 )/2 web above PNA + (0.450 )(6.50 )(20.7-15.91-0.450 /2) top flange + (0.055 in 2 )(19.60 )(2) ] fillets + (194.5 k )(20.7-15.91 +3.0 +3.25-0.942 /2) concrete = 7380.6 k-in = 615.1 k-ft (the report shows 615.41 k-ft, the difference is due to roundoff here) φmn = 0.9(615.41 k-ft ) = 553.6 k-ft Composite Moment at Location of Point Loads: The capacity and moments at the location of Point loads must also be investigated. Note that although the program checked this condition it is not listed on the report because it is not the controlling design condition. If it had been the controlling design condition it would have been shown on the reports. M Dead = (2)(10.255k)(9 ) + (0.044 k/ft)(9 )(27-9 )/2 = 188.15 k-ft M Live = (2)(10.8k)(9 )(0.7064) = 137.32 k-ft Mu = 1.4(188.15 k-ft) = 263.4 k-ft, or Mu = 1.2(188.15 k-ft) + 1.6(137.32 k-ft) = 445.5 k-ft @ 9 Between the point of zero moment (the beam end for this beam) and the location of the point load there are 10 studs available. Therefore, the shear carried by the studs is: V = (10 studs)(17.68 k/stud) = 176.8 kip (Eq. I3-1c) This also represents the compression in the concrete, C, at that point. Composite φmn at Location of Point Loads: Use the same procedure as for the Maximum moment. For this beam the plastic neutral axis is in the web: PNA: 0.5(650.0 k + 176.8 k) = (50ksi)[13.0 in 2 /2 + 0.350 (PNA 20.7 /2)] PNA = 15.40 a = (176.8 k) / [(0.85)(3ksi)(81.0 )] = 0.856 ΣMoments about PNA: Mn = 50 [ (0.450 )(6.50 )(15.40-0.450 /2) bottom flange + (0.350 )( 15.40-0.450 )(15.40-0.450 )/2 web below PNA + (0.350 )(20.7-0.450-15.40 )(20.7-0.450-15.40 )/2 web above PNA + (0.450 )(6.50 )(20.7-15.40-0.450 /2) top flange + (0.055 in 2 )(19.60 )(2) ] fillets + (176.8 k) (20.7-15.40 +3.0 +3.25-0.856 /2) concrete = 7196.7 k-in = 599.7 k-ft RAM Structural System 3 Bentley Systems, Inc.

φmn = 0.9(599.7 k-ft) = 539.7 k-ft % Composite: There is no longer a Specification requirement that composite beams be at least 25% composite. However, the Commentary indicates that this is good practice. See Commentary I3.1.3. Also, the Commentary indicates that Eq C-I3-3 which is used to calculate I eff is invalid if the percent composite is less than 25%. Therefore, the program enforces that lower limit. Based on the degree of composite at the point of maximum moment: % Composite = V Actual / V Full = 194.5 k / 650.0 k = 29.92% Although not explicitly indicated in the Specification, a similar check should be performed at the location of point loads. This is good practice, to ensure that there is at least a minimum degree of composite action available at those locations. The program performs this calculation: % Composite = (V Actual / V Full )( M Max / M AtPointLoad ) = (176.8k / 650.0k) (446.04k-ft / 445.5k-ft) = 27.24% Stud Spacing: Minimum Stud Spacing = 4 x Stud Diameter = (4)(0.75 ) = 3 o.c. Maximum Stud Spacing = 8 x Slab Thickness = (8)(3 +3.25 ) = 50 o.c., or = 36 o.c. Controls Actual Stud Spacing: In 1 st and 3 rd Segment: Spacing = 9 / 10 Studs = 0.9 / stud = 10.8 per stud. OK In 2 nd Segment: Spacing = 9 / 3 Studs = 3 / stud = 36 per stud. OK Note that the number of studs in the 2 nd Segment was controlled by maximum spacing req ts. Also note that for this beam, since the deck is parallel to the beam, the spacing of 10.8 can be achieved; if the deck was perpendicular (or at an angle) to the beam, the spacing of the deck ribs would have controlled the spacing of the studs and would have impacted the number of rows of studs. The program checks this condition and designs accordingly. Precomposite Design: For this beam there are three unbraced segments, each 9 long. The program checks each segment per Chapter F. For this beam the middle segment controls; only the calculations for that segment are shown. M Dead = (2)(7.555 k)(9 ) + (0.044 k/ft)(27 ) 2 /8 = 140.00 k-ft M Live = (2)(2.70 k)(9 ) = 48.6 k-ft Initial Dead Load Mu = 1.4(140.00 k-ft) = 196.0 k-ft Precomposite Pos Mu = 1.2(140.00 k-ft) + 1.6(48.6 k-ft) = 245.8 k-ft Controls @ midspan = 13.5 Web and Flange are compact. L b = 9 = 108 (Deck parallel to beam doesn t brace top flange). Cb = 1.00038 φmn = 281 k-ft See Table 3-10 (p 3-123) of the AISC manual. RAM Structural System 4 Bentley Systems, Inc.

Note that the program rigorously checks the requirements given in Chapter F. Rather than reproducing all of those calculations here, the capacity given in Table 3-10 is listed here, corroborating the value given by the program. Ieff: I eff = I + ΣQ / C )( I I ) (C-I3-3) x ( n f tr x n = E/Ec = 29000000/[33.0(115) 1.5 sqrt(3000)] = 13.010 A c = (3.25 )(81.0 ) / 13.010 = 20.23 in 2 y c = 3.25 /2 + 3.0 + 20.7 = 25.325 y s = 20.7 /2 = 10.35 Ybar = [(20.23 in 2 )( 25.325 ) + (13.0 in 2 )( 10.35 )] / (20.23 in 2 + 13.0 in 2 ) = 19.467 Itr = 843 in 4 + (13.0 in 2 )( 19.467-10.35 ) 2 + (20.23 in 2 )( 25.325-19.467 ) 2 + [(81 )(3.25 ) 3 /12] / 13.010 = 2635.6 in 4 Ieff = 843 in 4 + sqrt(194.5 k / 650.0 k)( 2635.6 in 4 843 in 4 ) = 1823.6 in 3 Deflections: Initial Load: Δ = (2)(7.555 k)(108 )[(3)(324 ) 2 (4)(108) 2 ] / [(24)(29000)(843 in 4 )] + (5)(.044 k/ft)(1 ft /12 in)(324 ) 4 / [(384)(29000)(843 in 4 )] = 0.7677 = L / 422.1 Camber: 0.8 (0.768 ) = 0.614 < 0.75 Do not camber Live Load: Δ = (2)(10.80 k)(0.7064)(108 )[(3)(324 ) 2 (4)(108) 2 ] / [(24)(29000)(1823.6 in 4 )] = 0.3483 = L / 930.2 Post Composite Dead Load: Δ = (2)(10.255 k 7.555) (108 )[(3)(324 ) 2 (4)(108) 2 ] / [(24)(29000)(1823.6 in 4 )] = 0.1233 Post Composite Load: Δ = 0.3483 + 0.1233 = 0.4716 = L / 687.1 Net Total Load: Δ = 0.7677 + 0.4716 0 camber = 1.239 = L / 261.4 RAM Structural System 5 Bentley Systems, Inc.

RAM Structural System 6 Bentley Systems, Inc.

RAM Structural System 7 Bentley Systems, Inc. A. Adams 2/22/08