Development of Gamma-ray Monitor using CdZnTe Semiconductor Detector

Similar documents
In order to get the energy response of the CZT detector, the measurements were done using the mono-energetic X-ray beam sources from 10 to 40 kev and

RESPONSE CALCULATIONS OF THE CdZnTe DETECTOR USING EGS4. James C. Liu, W. R. Nelson and R. Seefred

MEASUREMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY SPECTRA USING CdZnTe DETECTOR

Efficiency and Attenuation in CdTe Detectors

Energy response for high-energy neutrons of multi-functional electronic personal dosemeter

V. 3. Development of an Accelerator Beam Loss Monitor Using an Optical Fiber

Final report on DOE project number DE-FG07-99ID High Pressure Xenon Gamma-Ray Spectrometers for Field Use

THE spectroscopic performance of large volume CdZnTe

ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

Slides by: Prof. Abeer Alharbi

Quality Assurance. Purity control. Polycrystalline Ingots

Measurement of material uniformity using 3-D position sensitive CdZnTe gamma-ray spectrometers

SIMPLE USE OF EGS4 BY EXCEL MACRO FILE

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF CZT DETECTORS BY LINE ELECTRODE GEOMETRY

Stability and Characteristics of Large CZT Coplanar Electrode Detectors

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

CADMIUM telluride (CdTe) and cadmium zinc telluride

Spatial resolved efficiency determination of CdZnTe semiconductor detectors with a collimated gamma-ray source for the C0BRA experiment

Detection and measurement of gamma-radiation by gammaspectroscopy

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Radiation Detection and Measurement

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 21 (11/29/06) Detection of Nuclear Radiation: Pulse Height Spectra

Gamma-ray spectroscopy with the scintillator/photomultiplierand with the high purity Ge detector: Compton scattering, photoeffect, and pair production

Application Note ANCZT-2 Rev. 3 Charge Trapping in XR-100T-CdTe and -CZT Detectors

Photon and primary electron arithmetics in photoconductors for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies

EE 5344 Introduction to MEMS CHAPTER 5 Radiation Sensors

Determination of the shielding power of different materials against gamma radiation

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Characterization and Monte Carlo simulations for a CLYC detector

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Gamma-ray spectroscopy with the scintillator/photomultiplierand with the high purity Ge detector: Compton scattering, photoeffect, and pair production

Development and characterization of 3D semiconductor X-rays detectors for medical imaging

Development of High-Z Semiconductor Detectors and Their Applications to X-ray/gamma-ray Astronomy

Position Sensitive Germanium Detectors for the Advanced Compton Telescope

Semiconductor Detectors

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Chapter Seven (Nuclear Detectors)

Analysis of γ spectrum

Maximum-Likelihood Deconvolution in the Spatial and Spatial-Energy Domain for Events With Any Number of Interactions

New trends in CdTe detectors for X and γ-ray applications

Advantages / Disadvantages of semiconductor detectors

Scintillation Detector

ORTEC. Review of the Physics of Semiconductor Detectors. Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Semiconductor Detectors. Heavy Charged Particles

(a) Mono-absorber. (b) 4-segmented absorbers. (c) 64-segmented absorbers

Estimate of Large CZT Detector Absolute Efficiency

Radiation (Particle) Detection and Measurement

Recent Activities on Neutron Standardization at the Electrotechnical Laboratory

Beta Spectroscopy. Glenn F. Knoll Radiation Detection and Measurements, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2000

Gamma Spectroscopy. References: Objectives:

Results of a Si/CdTe Compton Telescope

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE THE TRANSPORT PROPERTIES OF CdZnTe DETECTORS USING ALPHA PARTICLES AND LOW-ENERGY GAMMA-RAYS

A Radiation Monitoring System With Capability of Gamma Imaging and Estimation of Exposure Dose Rate

Semiconductor Detectors

He-3 Neutron Detectors

Hard X- and g-ray measurements with a large volume coplanar grid CdZnTe detector

The Best Gamma-Ray Detector

Gamma and X-Ray Detection

POSITRON AND POSITRONIUM INTERACTIONS WITH CONDENSED MATTER. Paul Coleman University of Bath

CHAPTER 5 EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER OF SELECTED POLYMERS BY GAMMA BACKSCATTERING TECHNIQUE

MEASUREMENT AND DETECTION OF RADIATION

Chem 481 Lecture Material 3/20/09

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

Development of a Dosimetric System using Spectrometric Technique suitable for Operational Radiation Dose Measurements and Evaluation

Effect of the time characteristics of the Compton camera on its performance

Investigation of the Asymmetric Characteristics and Temperature Effects of CdZnTe Detectors

Neutron Detection. n interactions with matter n detection High/low energy n detectors

Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy. Chemistry 311: Instrumentation Analysis Topic 2: Atomic Spectroscopy

Figure 1. Decay Scheme for 60Co

A CdTe detector with a Gd converter for thermal neutron detection

Chapter 4 Scintillation Detectors

MINIATURE CdZnTe DETECTORS FOR APPLICATION IN HIGH INTENSITY RADIATION FIELDS

Compton Camera. Compton Camera

InAs avalanche photodiodes as X-ray detectors

Experiments and Monte Carlo modeling of a higher resolution Cadmium Zinc Telluride detector for safeguards applications

Development of a Spectral Model Based on Charge Transport for the Swift/BAT 32K CdZnTe Detector Array

High-Resolution Gamma-Ray and Neutron Detectors For Nuclear Spectroscopy

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

τ lepton mass measurement at BESIII

Alpha-particle Stopping Powers in Air and Argon

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

PHOTOELECTRON COLLECTION EFFICIENCY AT HIGH PRESSURE FOR A GAMMA DETECTOR ENVISAGING MEDICAL IMAGING

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 3, March-2014 ISSN

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Mar 2001

SEM. Chemical Analysis in the. Elastic and Inelastic scattering. Chemical analysis in the SEM. Chemical analysis in the SEM

Week 7: Ch. 10 Spec. w/ Scintillation Ctrs. Photomultiplier Devices

DESIGN OF NEUTRON DOSE RATE METER FOR RADIATION PROTECTION IN THE EQUIVALENT DOSE

XENON Dark Matter Search. Juliette Alimena Columbia University REU August 2 nd 2007

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Chemical Engineering 412

Comparison of the Photo-peak Efficiencies between the Experimental Data of 137 Cs Radioactive Source with Monte Carlo (MC) Simulation Data

Introduction to Radiological Sciences Neutron Detectors. Theory of operation. Types of detectors Source calibration Survey for Dose

Quantitative Assessment of Scattering Contributions in MeV-Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography

Non-radioactive radiation sources. Lesson FYSKJM4710 Eirik Malinen

Mass of the electron m 0

A new neutron monitor for pulsed fields at high-energy accelerators

Design, Construction, Operation, and Simulation of a Radioactivity Assay Chamber

The Ones That Got Away: Neutron Leakage Spectra

Neutron Metrology Activities at CIAE (2009~2010)

High Purity Germanium Detector Calibration at ISOLDE

Radiation Detection. 15 th Annual OSC Readiness Training Program.

Transcription:

Development of Gamma-ray Monitor using CdZnTe Semiconductor Detector A. H. D. Rasolonjatovo 1, T. Shiomi 1, T. Nakamura 1 Y. Tsudaka 2, H. Fujiwara 2, H. Araki 2, K. Matsuo 2, H. Nishizawa 2 1 Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Tohoku University, 980-8578 JAPAN 2 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, JAPAN INTRODUCTION These days the CdZnTe (CZT) semiconductor detector is preferably used for X-ray and gamma-ray detection, because of its high efficiency and good energy resolution in use at room and higher temperatures. In this study, we aim to develop a new gamma-ray monitor using a Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 Te semiconductor detector. Nowadays, the silicon semiconductor detector is widely used as a sensor of the gamma-ray monitor, but the silicon detector has lower sensitivity to high energy gamma rays due to lower atomic number (Z=14) compared to the CZT detector (Z= 48 for Cd, 30 for Zn and 52 for Te) and decreases the sensitivity with the temperature above about 60 C. We therefore tried to get the gamma-ray monitor with higher sensitivity even in higher temperature which is realized in the power reactor core, for example, and at the same time to have a flat energy response within ±10% difference over the photon energy region from 10keV to 7MeV. At first, the photon energy response and the angular dependence of this monitor were studied by measurements and by calculations. EXPERIMENTS As a sensor, we used a Cd 0.5 Zn 0.5 Te detector having 10mm x 10mm size by 2mm thickness (Fig.1). Fig.1. 10 x10 x2 mm 3 CZT detector The detector was directly coupled to the low noise preamplifier (Model 850) fabricated by Clear-Pulse Co.Ltd. The bias voltage of +24 V to the detector was supplied from the regulated power supply PR 36-1.2 A fabricated by Kenwood. The preamplifier was connected to a linear amplifier ORTEC 571 with a 2µs shaping time. The detector and the preamplifier were covered with an Al foil of 0.015 mm thickness to decrease the electromagnetic noise. In order to get the energy response of the CZT detector, the measurements were done using the monoenergetic X-ray beam sources from 10 to 40 kev and the radioactive photon sources of 241 Am (368 kbq), 57 Co (96 kbq), 137 Cs (418 kbq), 60 Co (372 kbq) and 88 Y (439 kbq) having photon energies of 59.541 kev to 1836.01 kev. The experiments using X-ray beam sources were performed at a beam line of the Photon Factory of High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan. The X-ray energy spectra and the absolute values of the X-ray fluence were measured respectively with the HP Ge detector and the free-air ionization chamber. In order to investigate the variation of the detection efficiency with the filters, we also measured the pulse height distributions of the CZT detector covered with the Al, Cu, Cd and Pb filters of various thicknesses. Figure 2 shows the schematic view of the experimental arrangement at a beam line of the Photon Factory at KEK. 1

Free air ionization chamber X-ray beam CZT (10 x10 x 2) mm 3 PRE- AMPLIFI ER AMPLIFI ER MCA 40 cm Be target 17 mm Fig.2. Experimental set-up at a beam line of the Photon Factory at KEK The measurements using point sources were carried out at the Hot Laboratory of the Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center (CYRIC), Tohoku University, Japan. By setting a lead shadow bar of 80 mm long and 40mm diameter between the source and the detector, the contribution of the room-scattered photons was subtracted from the measured results. The fraction of backscattered photons was about 2%. The measurements using point sources were performed only for the non-filtered CZT, but in the directions of 0 to 90 by rotating the CZT detector in order to get its angular dependence. The 137 Cs source was covered with a 1mm thick Al foil to absorb the 661.65 kev conversion electrons from the electron capture reaction. CALCULATIONS The calculations of the pulse height spectra of the detector were performed with the electron-photon cascade Monte Carlo code EGS4 (1) with taking into account the carrier trapping effect (2). The charge collection of a detector is proportional to the product of the mobility and lifetime for electrons and holes; for the case of our detector the product µτ for electron is 3x10-3 cm 2.V -1, and for hole 2x10-5 cm 2.V -1. The energy needed to create an electron-hole pair is 4.43 ev (3). Three cases have been considered (2): energy absorption only; the drift distance of the carrier is constant; the drift distance of the carrier has an exponential distribution (2). The induced charge is calculated as follows: If λ > d, λ > d, e h If λ > d, λ < d, e h If λ e < d, λ h > d, E Q( x) = e ε E d x λh Q( x) = e ε d d Where λ e is the mean free path of the electron, λ h the mean free path of the hole, d the thickness of the detector, x the distance from the cathode to the interaction point, E the deposited energy and ε the energy needed to create an electron-hole pair. From the comparison of the three cases with the experimental results, the exponential distribution of the drift distance of carriers was considered. When a trapping of electron-hole pair occurs, the full energy peak moves to lower energy (4). The shift in energy was about 20%. E λe Q( x) = e ε d x d 2

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 1.Pulse height spectra The output pulse height spectra were measured with the multi-channel analyzer. The noise level of the system was about 6 kev. The responses of the two photon energies of 1332.5 kev and 1173.24 kev for 60 Co and of 1836.01 kev and 898.02 kev for 88 Y, were calculated separately and were then added taking into account the branching ratio of each energy. For the case of 57 Co and 241 Am, only the respective 122.06 kev and the 59.541 kev photon energies have been considered in the calculations. Figure 3 shows the comparison of measured and calculated pulse height spectra of 10, 20 and 40 kev X-ray beams, 241 Am (59.541 kev), 57 Co (14.41, 122.06 and 136.47 kev), 137 Cs (30 and 661.65 kev), 60 Co (1173.24 and 1332.5 kev) and 88 Y (898.02 and 1836.01 kev). For 10, 20 and 40 kev, there can be seen single sharp photopeak. The full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the 10 kev photopeak is 4.4 kev, that of the 20 kev photopeak is 3.8 kev and that of the 40 kev photopeak is 4.3 kev. The measured pulse height distribution of the 40 kev X-ray presents two escape peaks at 10 kev from K α X-ray of Te and at 14 kev from K α X-ray of Cd. The lower energy peaks in the measured 241 Am spectrum result from the KX-rays at energies of 14 kev, 17.6 kev and 21.14 kev and the gamma-ray energy of 26.35 kev. These peaks do not appear therefore in the calculated response of the 59.54 kev gamma-ray. The peaks at 32 kev and at 36 kev are the escape peaks of K α X-ray of Te and K α X-ray of Cd, respectively. The FWHM of 59.54 kev peak is 5.8 kev. For 57 Co, three photopeaks of 14, 122 and 136 kev can be seen in the measured spectra. The photopeaks of 122 and 136 kev are much broader than that of 14 kev. For 137 Cs, the K α1 -X-ray peak at 30 kev can be seen. For higher energy of 662 kev, the photopeak becomes very low. For 1173 and 1333 kev photons of 60 Co and 898 and 1836 kev photons of 88 Y, no photopeaks can be seen in Fig.3. This is because the charge collection efficiency degrades and the energy loss in the detector is dominated by the Compton scattering with the increase of photon energy. One can also notice that the increasingly high counts at low energy can be seen in the measured pulse height spectra of 60 Co. The agreement between the measured and calculated pulse height spectra is very good in general (a) 10 kev X-ray (b) 20 kev X-ray (c) 40 kev X-ray (d) 241 Am photon source 3

(e) 57 Co photon source (f) 137 Cs photon source (g) 60 Co photon source (h) 88 Y photon source Fig.3. Comparison of measured and calculated pulse height spectra 2.Energy response The efficiency of the 10 x 10x 2mm 3 CZT detector for photon energy range from 10 kev to 1836.01 kev is shown in Fig.4. For the conversion of fluence to dose equivalent, the conversion factor given by ICRP Publ.51 (5) is used. The measured and calculated efficiencies were obtained by summing the measured and Fig.4. Efficiency of the CZT detector for a cut-off energy of 6 kev calculated pulse height spectra by fixing the cut-off energy at 6 kev. But for 241 Am the subsidiary peaks from X- 4

ray and the 26.35 kev gamma ray were not considered and the peaks of 14 and 136 kev gamma rays of 57 Co and 30 kev X-ray of 137 Cs were also excluded from the measured results in the efficiency estimation. The agreement between experiment and calculation is generally good, but for 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma rays the measured results are 32 and 51% higher than the calculated results. This difference results from the fact that the counts in the experiment are very high at low energy around the cut-off energy fixed to 6 kev. The efficiency is high for 10 kev and rather flat from 20 kev to 120 kev, and rapidly decreases with energy. 3. Angular dependence of the 10 x10 x 2 mm3 CZT detector Figure 5 shows the angular dependence of the efficiency of the CZT detector using radioactive photon sources for 6 kev cut-off energy. Solid lines represent the measured results and the dotted lines are the calculated Fig.5. Angular distribution of the 10 x 10x 2mm 3 CZT detector efficiency from experiments and calculations results. The angular distribution of the efficiency is almost constant for 137 Cs, 60 Co and 88 Y in the directions of 0 to 90, but for lower energy photons of 241 Am and 57 Co, the efficiency decreases beyond 60. The difference between experiment and calculation is about 9% for 241 Am, about 20% for 57 Co, about 32% for 137 Cs, about 41% for 88 Y and about 51% for 60 Co. This difference may come from the inclusion of noise counts due to low cut-off energy of 6 kev as described before. These results revealed that this CZT detector has an almost isotropic efficiency in the forward hemisphere. 4. Effect of various filters Figure 6 shows the variation of the efficiencies for 10, 20 and 40 kev X-rays with various thickness (in mm) of the filters of Al, Cu, Cd and Pb. The cut-off energy was also fixed at 6 kev. The variation of the pulseheight is significant at 10 kev but is scarce at 40 kev when using an Al filter. To realize a flat response between 10 to 40 kev it is better to use an Al filter of 0.2 to 0.5 mm thickness. For Cu filter the thickness of 0.01 mm to 0.05 mm is recommended to have the flat energy response. Cd filter is quite interesting because the efficiency varies constantly at 20 and 40 kev whatever the thickness of the filter is. Lead is too much absorbent to be used at these low energies. 5

Fig.6. Variation of the efficiency with filters for 10 kev, 20 kev and 40 kev X rays by measurements CONCLUSION In this study, the pulse height spectra and the efficiencies of the CZT detector are given by experiment and calculation. The agreement between the experiment and the calculation is rather good. The variation of the detector response with the cut-of energy and with various filters was also obtained. We are now investigating to get the flat energy response in the energy range of 10 kev to 7MeV by combing these results. REFERENCES 1. H. Hirayama, EGS4, KEK Internal 97-5- 97-10 (1997). 2. H. Nishizawa, K. Ikegami, K. Takashima, T. Usami, T. Hayakawa, T. Yamamoto, Development of Multilayered CdTe Semiconductor Detectors, Radiation journal Vol.22, No.3 (1996). 3. Y.X. Dardenne, T.F. Wang, A.D. Lavietes, G.J. Mauger, W.D. Ruhter, S.A. Kreek, Cadmium Zinc Telluride Spectral modeling. NIMPH A 422, 159-163 (1999). 4. Y. Eisen, Y. Horovitz, Correction of incomplete charge collection in CdTe detectors. NIMPH A 353, 60-66 (1994). 5. Data for Use in Protection Against External Radiation, Annals of the ICRP Vol.17, No 2/3 (1987) 6