PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Similar documents
MicroBooNE: PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University

Developing Zero-Suppression Schemes for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. Maggie Beheler-Amass August 4, 2017

Measurement of Muon Momentum Using Multiple Coulomb Scattering for the MicroBooNE Experiment

Neutrino Oscilla8ons

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part II

Understanding Misclassification in a Five Particle CNN Jonathan Karp 8/04/2016

The US Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) experiments

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part II

Double Chooz Sensitivity Analysis: Impact of the Reactor Model Uncertainty on Measurement of Sin 2 (2θ 13 )

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 17 Nov 2014

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 5 Nov 2015

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

Long Baseline Neutrinos

ICARUS T600 experiment: latest results and perspectives

Particle Physics Outline the concepts of particle production and annihilation and apply the conservation laws to these processes.

- ICARUS status and near future

MEASURING THE LIFETIME OF THE MUON

Neutrino Energy Reconstruction Methods Using Electron Scattering Data. Afroditi Papadopoulou Pre-conference, EINN /29/17

Observation of flavor swap process in supernova II neutrino spectra

Discovery of the Neutrino Mass-I. P1X* Frontiers of Physics Lectures October 2004 Dr Paul Soler University of Glasgow

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

An Introduction to Modern Particle Physics. Mark Thomson University of Cambridge

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part I

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Neutrinos From The Sky and Through the Earth

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

PoS(ICHEP2016)293. The LArIAT experiment and the charged pion total interaction cross section results on liquid argon. Animesh Chatterjee

Measuring Neutrino Proper0es with Liquid Argon TPCs

Y2 Neutrino Physics (spring term 2017)

Performance of the ICARUS T600 detector

Jonathan Asaadi Syracuse University

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Every atom has a nucleus which contains protons and neutrons (both these particles are known nucleons). Orbiting the nucleus, are electrons.

Developing and Testing a Convolutional Neural Network for Multi-Particle Neutrino Interaction Identification

Neutrinos and the Universe

6-8 February 2017 Hotel do Mar Sesimbra. Hands on Neutrinos

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

MiniBooNE, LSND, and Future Very-Short Baseline Experiments

DUNE detector design and lowenergy reconstruction capabilities. Inés Gil Botella

The Particle World. This talk: What is our Universe made of? Where does it come from? Why does it behave the way it does?

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

Physics Quarknet/Service Learning

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

Doojin Kim University of Wisconsin, WI November 14th, 2017

PHY 599: How it is usually done

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

The ICARUS Project FRONTIERS IN CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS II. Vanderbilt University, March 5-10, Sergio Navas (ETH Zürich) " Atmospheric neutrinos

Lecture 02. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part I The Particles

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

Liquid Argon TPCs for future neutrino oscillation experiments

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

Neutrino Oscillations

nerix PMT Calibration and Neutron Generator Simulation Haley Pawlow July 31, 2014 Columbia University REU, XENON

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Weak interactions. Chapter 7

Neutrino Scattering in Liquid Argon TPC Detectors

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

1 Neutrinos. 1.1 Introduction

Overview. The quest of Particle Physics research is to understand the fundamental particles of nature and their interactions.

Option 212: UNIT 2 Elementary Particles

Andrey Formozov The University of Milan INFN Milan

ω γ Neutral Current Single Photon Production (NCγ) Outline 1. Oscillation physics 2. NOMAD 3. T2K/MINERvA 4. MicroBooNE 5. MiniBooNE+ 6.

Review Chap. 18: Particle Physics

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

QUARKNET ANNUAL REPORT 2017 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE S. GOLLAPINNI, K. GUNTHOTI September 24, 2017

PHYS 3446 Lecture #12

Physics 661. Particle Physics Phenomenology. October 9, Physics 661, lecture 5 1

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

PoS(FPCP2017)024. The Hyper-Kamiokande Project. Justyna Lagoda

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 3 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

Low-Energy Neutrino-Argon Interactions: A Window into Stellar Collapse. Christopher Grant

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

Lecture 11. Weak interactions

Detector Basics III. Mark Messier Indiana University. Neutrino Summer School Fermilab July 9, 2008

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2009 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 11 : Neutrino Oscillations. Neutrino Experiments

Interactions/Weak Force/Leptons

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

Super-KamiokaNDE: Beyond Neutrino Oscillations. A. George University of Pittsburgh

Study of the Scintillation Detector Efficiency and Muon Flux

The Scale-Symmetric Theory as the Origin of the Standard Model

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Anomalies & CEνNS

Quantum Numbers. Elementary Particles Properties. F. Di Lodovico c 1 EPP, SPA6306. Queen Mary University of London. Quantum Numbers. F.

Radioactivity and Ionizing Radiation

PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH SCINTILLATION COUNTER

Why understanding neutrino interactions is important for oscillation physics

Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino Physics at MiniBooNE

Lecture PowerPoint. Chapter 32 Physics: Principles with Applications, 6 th edition Giancoli

Radio-chemical method

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 13 Sep 2010

Particle Physics. All science is either physics or stamp collecting and this from a 1908 Nobel laureate in Chemistry

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Transcription:

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011 1

The Standard Model The Standard Model is comprised of Fermions and Bosons. The Fermions are further grouped into Quarks and Leptons. The Leptons of interest to us are the 3 neutrinos. 2

Neutrinos in the Standard Model Neutrinos only interact via the weak force. This interaction is mediated by the exchange of W and Z bosons. W Bosons for Charged Current interactions. Z Bosons for Neutral Current interactions. According to the Standard Model: Neutrinos mass = 0. Only left-handed neutrinos exist. Mass states = flavor states. Neutrinos cannot change flavor. Reality: Neutrinos have mass. (Very tiny ones.) Mass states Flavor States. Neutrinos can change flavor. 3

Neutrino Oscillations: History The sun s reactions produce ν e s. The flux can be predicted and then calculated for confirmation through experimentation. Studies have shown that the flux at the sun flux at the detector. Solution: The missing neutrinos were ones of a different flavor. ν μ s to be specific. Conclusion: Neutrinos can in fact oscillate. The range of travel must be of a significant length for this to occur. 4

Neutrino Oscillations: The Mixing Matrix ν e ν μ ντ = U e1 U e2 U e3 U μ1 U μ2 U μ3 U τ1 U τ2 U τ3 ν 1 ν 2 ν 3 U = cos θ 12 sin θ 12 0 sin θ 12 cos θ 12 0 0 0 1 cos θ 13 0 e iδ CP sin θ 13 0 1 0 e iδ CP sin θ 13 0 cos θ 13 1 0 0 0 cos θ 23 sin θ 23 0 sin θ 23 cos θ 23 The solar mixing angle: θ 12 33 The currently unknown mixing angle: θ 13 =??? δ =??? The atmospheric mixing angle: θ 23 45 5

Neutrino Oscillations: Mass Hierarchy ν 1, ν 2, ν 3 = Mass eigenstates. The Oscillation probability is given by: P αβ t = sin 2 2θ sin 1.27 α, β = Neutrino flavor Δm 2 = m i 2 m j 2 θ is the mixing angle. L E Δm 2 Determines the strength of the oscillation. L is the length of travel. E is the energy. 6

MiniBooNE Low Energy Excess Experiment: MiniBooNE ran with a ν μ beam to look for ν μ ν e oscillations. Observation: Unexpected excess of events at energies lower than 0.475GeV. Cause: Unknown whether excess events were from photon or electron sources. This is because MiniBooNE cannot distinguish between electrons or photons. Conclusion: We need a new detector. Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 2009 Does not fit oscillation signature. 7

MicroBooNE: Overview MicroBooNE is a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC) filled with approximately 170 tons of liquid argon. Location: Along the Booster neutrino beam line at Fermilab. Highlight 1: The experiment will dig deeper into the unexpected excess of low energy neutrino events observed in MiniBooNE. Highlight 2: Ability to distinguish between electrons and photons. Highlight 3: MicroBooNE s sensitivity to ν e is about twice as good as MiniBooNE s. Highlight 4: Sensitivity to energies down to tens of MeV. MiniBooNE s ~200MeV. TPC 8

MicroBooNE: The TPC In the TPC: 70 tons of fiducial volume of LAr. Has three wire planes. ~2.6m drift with an electric field of 500 V/cm. What are the advantages of having LAr in the TPC? It measures the de/dx (ionization energy loss of each particle in the liquid argon) for each event. Basically, we map out the tracks. This allows us the ability to measure particle mass. Heavier/slower particles have larger de/dx. Ability to distinguish between electron-positron pairs and photons. How does it work? Interaction leaves a track. Track ionizes argon, producing a positive ion and an electron, argon emits light. Electrons drift towards anode, where they will hit the wires. From this plus other known quantities, we can easily calculate the length of travel of each electron. 9

MicroBooNE: The Cryostat and the PMTs There is a Photomultiplier tube (PMT) rack inside the cryostat, and it contains 30 8 PMTs which face the TPC. Because electrons take a long time to drift, we use an instantaneous light signal to tell whether an event has taken place. Each PMT has a signal cable ranging from 13-21m long, and exit the cryostat through Nozzle 16. Question: Does length cable matter? 10

What is a PMT? A PMT is a vacuum tube detector of light that provides extremely high sensitivity and very fast response. So how does it work? A high voltage is applied to the cathode, dynodes, and anode. This causes a potential ladder to be set up along the length of the system (cathode-dynode-anode). When light enters the photocathode, photoelectrons are emitted into the vacuum tube via the photoelectric effect. Due to the high voltage, the electron is directed and accelerated towards the first dynode. When it strikes that first dynode, secondary electrons are emitted and accelerated towards the next dynode, and so on, creating an electron cascade. At the anode, this cascade is collected to give a current, and thus can be analyzed. 11

PMT Setup at Nevis Varied length LED Brightness control 12

PMT Setup at Nevis 13

Signal Cable Tests Two cables tested, a short 1 meter, and a longer 16 meter one. Using an LED light source, I gave a small amount of light to the PMT. Using the short cable, I let it emit light for 5 minutes. I recorded the area of the raw signal of the PMT seen on the scope. I repeated this, using the longer cable. I then repeated this procedure for several voltage levels. So does the length variation change the signal readout? 14

Results Originally expected that IF variation was seen, then the shorter cable would have returned larger area. 15

Results This is the percentage difference between the two cables. Overall conclusion: The two cable lengths yield the same signal to within ~5%. 16

Simulation Studies: LArSoft I also did some software work using a simulation software package called LArSoft. What is LArSoft? It is a simulation framework for LArTPC detectors (such as MicroBooNE). Given some detector geometry, It allows us to simulate events as well as to study them. Goal: Overall help us learn as much as we can before MicroBooNE starts up in 2013. 17

A Little Background on Baryon Disappearance Ultimate goal: To study proton decay. This phenomenon has never yet been observed. Probably will not be observed for a long time (Most likely not with MicroBooNE). But we hope to see events that mimic these signals in MicroBooNE that will allow us to develop a better understanding of what to expect to see. Protons do not decay because they are the lightest baryon, therefore they have an extremely long lifetime (stable in the S.M.). Several modes of decay have been predicted by beyond S.M. theories, such as: p K + + νμ Another decay mode of interest: n oscillation into n. The n then will annihilate into a nearby nucleon, resulting in either: nn annihilation or np annihilation. In both decay modes, there is the similarity in that there is a disappearance of a baryon. So how can we study this with LArSoft? 18

Antiproton Generation Ideally, we want to generate an anti neutron and study its interaction in MicroBooNE. Instead: Antiproton events generated. Why? Data from CERN on pp Annihilation. This data is good for cross-checks. n event studies should be very similar. 19

LArSoft: Event Display Vertex This is an Antiproton event. (This is the vertical wire plane) It displays the tracks created by the particles that ionized the liquid argon. The colors seen is the amount of ionization energy that is deposited by the particles. The horizontal axis is the length of the detector, and each tick mark corresponds to each wire in the wire plane. The vertical axis are time ticks, so the lower the part of a track is, the closer the track is to the wire plane. 20

The Interaction The p is essentially at rest initially. It interacts with an Argon nucleus. It annihilates with a nucleon. The Argon nucleus becomes unstable. It breaks up, giving rise to many particles. Interested in studying this interaction. 21

Cross Checks Pion Multiplicity Momentum Conservation Energy Conservation 22

Cross Checks Crystal Barrel experiment at CERN: 5 pion daughters. 500 antiproton events using LArSoft: Mean of ~5 pion daughters. Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 70, No. 4, Oct. 1998 23

Cross Checks Pion Multiplicity Momentum Conservation Energy Conservation 24

Number of Cross Checks Momentum of p initially zero. Momentum summation of all daughters after interaction essentially zero. 25

Cross Checks Pion Multiplicity Momentum Conservation Energy Conservation 26

Cross Checks Total energy (minus mass of observer nucleons/ nuclear particles) before the interaction: 1876MeV. (Mass of p + p.) Total energy after: ~1717MeV. Missing energy: Binding energy of Argon - Energy is spent to break up the argon nucleus. *Note that there are never any events with an energy sum greater than 1876MeV. 27

Cross Checks Pion Multiplicity Momentum Conservation Energy Conservation 28

Background Neutrino Events It is essential that we try to study and understand background events, such as those from background neutrinos, so that we can learn how to reject them. Some of the neutral current neutrino events can mimic those of the antiproton ones. I generated 500 mono-energetic neutrino events to compare with the p events (about 150 of those events were NC) 29

LArSoft: Event Display Two Neutrino Events: Event display: Two neutral current neutrino events. First event: This is a common NC event with a recoil proton. These events can be easily rejected since we will never see this in an antiproton event. Second event: These events are what we have to worry about, they can mimic events we would expect to see due to an pp annihilation. 30

Key Differences: p vs. ν p is generated essentially at rest Momentum is zero. Momentum sum of all daughters should add up to zero. The center of gravity position should be close to the vertex. The neutrino has some incoming momentum. Momentum sum of all daughters zero. Center of gravity position should be displaced. 31

p vs ν: Momentum 32

p vs. ν: Center of Gravity - Vertex This seems like a good variable for differentiating p annihilations from NC neutrino events, assuming we can reconstruct the vertex of the event well enough. 33

p vs. ν: Center of Gravity - Vertex 34

Future Work Reconstruction of antiproton events. Study of antineutron events. Study of background neutrinos with the atmospheric spectrum 35

Acknowledgements Georgia Karagiorgi, my mentor. Leslie Camilleri Bill Seligman Mike Shaevitz John Parsons Everyone in the MicroBooNE collaboration Everyone one else at Nevis 36

37

Neutrino Oscillations: Mass Hierarchy Three neutrino mass states can exist. The squared mass difference between the lightest two mass states is the cause behind solar neutrino oscillation. The squared mass difference between the heavier two is the cause of atmospheric neutrino oscillation. The mixing between the heaviest mass state with the lightest is currently unknown. The Oscillation probability is given by: P αβ t = sin 2 2θ sin 1.27 α, β = Neutrino flavor Δm 2 = m i 2 m j 2 θ is the mixing angle. L E Δm 2 L is the difference between production and observation. E is the energy. 38

Neutrino Oscillations: CP Violation Looking back at our matrix equation: U = cos θ 12 sin θ 12 0 sin θ 12 cos θ 12 0 0 0 1 cos θ 13 0 e iδ CP sin θ 13 0 1 0 e iδ CP sin θ 13 0 cos θ 13 1 0 0 0 cos θ 23 sin θ 23 0 sin θ 23 cos θ 23 U is the product of three rotations corresponding to neutrino oscillations. δ is the phase. Take the complex conjugate of this matrix, get U. This is the equation of rotations for antineutrino oscillations. As long as δ 0,, then U U This implies that oscillation behavior for neutrinos vs. antineutrinos are not the same. This is CP violation, and it is the phase in the mixing matrix that causes this. 39

MicroBooNE: The TPC How does the TPC work? Interaction leaves a track. Track ionizes argon, producing a positive ion and an electron. Argon emits light. Light signal immediately picked up by PMTs. This is t 0. PMT records scintillation light emitted by the charged particles. Electrons from ionization drift towards anode, where they will hit the wires. This time is recorded, t ion Using t 0 and t ion, and the fact that we know drift speed, we can calculate the drift distance. (drift time = t ion = t 0 ). l = Δt v drift Length important because it can tell us if the track went in a straight line or if it was slanted. 40

PMT Setup at Nevis Using this setup, I have studied signal attenuation in the PMT signal cable. I tested two cable lengths. What was the purpose? To check if variation of the cable length affects the signal. Why do we need to worry about lengths? 30 PMTs, several cables, one exit. Goal: To confirm that the signal variation is either negligible or if it is well known so it can be corrected. 41

What is a Voxel? A voxel is a 3D pixel that contains the energy deposited by the particles that ionize the liquid argon. The voxels are what drift the electrons to the wires on each plane. 42