FINAL REVIEW FOR MATH The limit. a n. This definition is useful is when evaluating the limits; for instance, to show

Similar documents
MIDTERM REVIEW FOR MATH The limit

Solutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014

Advanced Calculus Math 127B, Winter 2005 Solutions: Final. nx2 1 + n 2 x, g n(x) = n2 x

Solutions Final Exam May. 14, 2014

Logical Connectives and Quantifiers

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 10: Continuity. Properties of continuous functions.

1 Definition of the Riemann integral

Power Series. Part 1. J. Gonzalez-Zugasti, University of Massachusetts - Lowell

Math 0230 Calculus 2 Lectures

MATH 131A: REAL ANALYSIS (BIG IDEAS)

converges as well if x < 1. 1 x n x n 1 1 = 2 a nx n

Entrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2017 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems

REAL VARIABLES: PROBLEM SET 1. = x limsup E k

Relationship Between Integration and Differentiation

Definitions & Theorems

Section 11.1 Sequences

A Short Journey Through the Riemann Integral

Introduction to Series and Sequences Math 121 Calculus II Spring 2015

SOME QUESTIONS FOR MATH 766, SPRING Question 1. Let C([0, 1]) be the set of all continuous functions on [0, 1] endowed with the norm

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 9: Limit supremum and infimum. Limits of functions.

Completion Date: Monday February 11, 2008

Math 117: Honours Calculus I Fall, 2002 List of Theorems. a n k b k. k. Theorem 2.1 (Convergent Bounded) A convergent sequence is bounded.

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering

Chapter 11 - Sequences and Series

Principle of Mathematical Induction

8.1 Sequences. Example: A sequence is a function f(n) whose domain is a subset of the integers. Notation: *Note: n = 0 vs. n = 1.

Limits and Continuity

10.1 Sequences. Example: A sequence is a function f(n) whose domain is a subset of the integers. Notation: *Note: n = 0 vs. n = 1.

M2PM1 Analysis II (2008) Dr M Ruzhansky List of definitions, statements and examples Preliminary version

Arkansas Tech University MATH 2924: Calculus II Dr. Marcel B. Finan

M2P1 Analysis II (2005) Dr M Ruzhansky List of definitions, statements and examples. Chapter 1: Limits and continuity.

Section 5.8. Taylor Series

Math Review for Exam Answer each of the following questions as either True or False. Circle the correct answer.

Power Series. Part 2 Differentiation & Integration; Multiplication of Power Series. J. Gonzalez-Zugasti, University of Massachusetts - Lowell

Classnotes - MA Series and Matrices

Topics Covered in Calculus BC

We have been going places in the car of calculus for years, but this analysis course is about how the car actually works.

Math 106 Fall 2014 Exam 2.1 October 31, ln(x) x 3 dx = 1. 2 x 2 ln(x) + = 1 2 x 2 ln(x) + 1. = 1 2 x 2 ln(x) 1 4 x 2 + C

MATH 104 : Final Exam

Introduction to Proofs in Analysis. updated December 5, By Edoh Y. Amiran Following the outline of notes by Donald Chalice INTRODUCTION

Week 2: Sequences and Series

d(x n, x) d(x n, x nk ) + d(x nk, x) where we chose any fixed k > N

Lecture 10. Riemann-Stieltjes Integration

Sequences and Series

CH 2: Limits and Derivatives

Section Taylor and Maclaurin Series

Bounded Derivatives Which Are Not Riemann Integrable. Elliot M. Granath. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

The integral test and estimates of sums

Advanced Calculus II Unit 7.3: 7.3.1a, 7.3.3a, 7.3.6b, 7.3.6f, 7.3.6h Unit 7.4: 7.4.1b, 7.4.1c, 7.4.2b, 7.4.3, 7.4.6, 7.4.7

Analysis/Calculus Review Day 2

MATH 2400: PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR EXAM 1

Mathematics 324 Riemann Zeta Function August 5, 2005

REAL ANALYSIS II: PROBLEM SET 2

Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set

MATH 18.01, FALL PROBLEM SET #5 SOLUTIONS (PART II)

AP Calculus BC Scope & Sequence

Math 320: Real Analysis MWF 1pm, Campion Hall 302 Homework 4 Solutions Please write neatly, and in complete sentences when possible.

Limits and continuity

Math 1b Sequences and series summary

Copyright c 2007 Jason Underdown Some rights reserved. statement. sentential connectives. negation. conjunction. disjunction

Representation of Functions as Power Series.

Section 4.1 Relative Extrema 3 Lectures. Dr. Abdulla Eid. College of Science. MATHS 101: Calculus I

Quick Tour of the Topology of R. Steven Hurder, Dave Marker, & John Wood 1

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 11: More on continuous functions.

van Rooij, Schikhof: A Second Course on Real Functions

Math 162: Calculus IIA

n=1 ( 2 3 )n (a n ) converges by direct comparison to

MATH 162. Midterm 2 ANSWERS November 18, 2005

1. Let A R be a nonempty set that is bounded from above, and let a be the least upper bound of A. Show that there exists a sequence {a n } n N

(b) Prove that the following function does not tend to a limit as x tends. is continuous at 1. [6] you use. (i) f(x) = x 4 4x+7, I = [1,2]

International Competition in Mathematics for Universtiy Students in Plovdiv, Bulgaria 1994

An idea how to solve some of the problems. diverges the same must hold for the original series. T 1 p T 1 p + 1 p 1 = 1. dt = lim

2.8 Linear Approximations and Differentials

Math 409 Final Exam Solutions May 9, 2005

AP Calculus BC Syllabus Course Overview

Foundations of Calculus. November 18, 2014

MATH 1207 R02 FINAL SOLUTION

Linearization and Extreme Values of Functions

Ma 530 Power Series II

Worksheet 7, Math 10560

Lemma 15.1 (Sign preservation Lemma). Suppose that f : E R is continuous at some a R.

LIMITS AT INFINITY MR. VELAZQUEZ AP CALCULUS

Solutions: Problem Set 4 Math 201B, Winter 2007

MATH NEW HOMEWORK AND SOLUTIONS TO PREVIOUS HOMEWORKS AND EXAMS

MATH 1231 MATHEMATICS 1B Calculus Section 4.4: Taylor & Power series.

MATH 5640: Fourier Series

Math 141: Lecture 19

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS

Induction, sequences, limits and continuity

Math 231E, Lecture 25. Integral Test and Estimating Sums

Math 1552: Integral Calculus Final Exam Study Guide, Spring 2018

(e) 2 (f) 2. (c) + (d). Limits at Infinity. 2.5) 9-14,25-34,41-43,46-47,56-57, (c) (d) 2

Numerical Hestock Integration-Lecture Note 1

Wed. Sept 28th: 1.3 New Functions from Old Functions: o vertical and horizontal shifts o vertical and horizontal stretching and reflecting o

Analysis Qualifying Exam

Absolute and Local Extrema

AP Calculus Chapter 9: Infinite Series

Chapter 8: Taylor s theorem and L Hospital s rule

10/9/10. The line x = a is a vertical asymptote of the graph of a function y = f(x) if either. Definitions and Theorems.

5.3 Definite Integrals and Antiderivatives

Transcription:

FINAL REVIEW FOR MATH 500 SHUANGLIN SHAO. The it Define a n = A: For any ε > 0, there exists N N such that for any n N, a n A < ε. This definition is useful is when evaluating the its; for instance, to show 2n 3n + = 2 3. One can also apply the it theorems to evaluate the it as follows. 2n 3n + = 2 3 + n = 2 3. We talk about the it theorem for its. If a n = A and b n = B, then a n ± b n = A ± B a nb n = AB a n = A, if B 0. b n B The proof of this theorem is by use of the definition of its. There is also another useful theorem for evaluating the its, the squeezing theorem : If a n b n c n and a n = c n = A, then b n = A. This theorem can be also proven by using the definition of its. A typical example is as follows. sin n 2 = 0 n Date: April 24, 202.

because 0 sin n 2 n n, 0 = n = 0. 2. The monotone convergence theorem and the sequence The monotone convergence theorem says that, if a sequence {a n } is either monotone increasing and bounded above, or monotone decreasing and bounded below, then {a n } converges. We give an example to show how to apply this theorem. Question. Determine whether the sequence {a n }: a 0 = and a n+ = 3 + 2an converges or not. If it converges, then find the it. Proof. We first show that it is monotone increasing. I have seen two ways: the first way is by using the mathematics induction. Since a 0 =, then a = 3 + 2a 0 = 5. So a 0 a. We assume that a n a n. Then 3 + 2an 3 + 2a n. Then a n a n+. The second way I talked about it in class. We look at a n+ a n = 3 + 2a n 3 + 2a n = 2(a n a n ) 3 + 2an + 3 + 2a n. The denominator is always positive. We see that the sign of a n+ a n is determined by the previous difference, a n a n. Inductively, we see that it is determined by a a 0, which is positive. So a n+ a n, for all n. We then show that it is bounded. We guess the bound is 3. We also prove it by mathematics induction. a 0 = 3. We assume that a n 3. Then a n+ = 3 + 2a n 3 + 2 3 = 3. 2

So a n 3 for all n. Then we apply the it theorems to get the it. A = 3 + 2A, i.e., A 2 2A 3 = 0. Then But A > 0, so A = 3 or A =. A = 3. 3. Series The convergence of a series k= a k is determined by its partial sum, n S n = a k = a + a 2 + a n. k= If {S n } converges, then a k converges and S n = a k. Otherwise, we say that the series diverges. The definition often provides a way to tell whether a series converges or diverges. There are several well-known examples of convergent or divergent examples: the following series, n=, p >, and np n=2 n(ln n) p, p >. They are convergent by comparing to the integrals, both of which are finite because p >. n= x dx and p On the other hand, the following series are divergent,, 0 < p, and np n(ln n) p, 0 < p. n=2 They are divergent by comparing to the integrals, both of which are infinity because 0 < p. The geometric series is convergent. r n for r <. n= 3 x dx and p x(ln x) p dx, x(ln x) p dx,

We can prove this by setting Then S n = n r k. k= ( r)s n = (r + r 2 + r n ) (r 2 + + r n + r n+ ) = r r n+. Since r <, S n = r rn+ r S n = r r n+ r = r r. We know that the harmonic series n= n is divergent. However if we add signs to each term ( )n n to turn it into n, then the series ( ) n n= n is convergent. In this regard, there is a general theorem: Suppose the sequence {a n } satisfying a a 2 a n 0 and n 0 a n = 0, then the series n= ( )n a n is convergent. A consequence that n= a n is convergent is that the tail terms go to zero as n goes to infinity, i.e., () a n = 0. This is a necessary not sufficient condition for a convergent series, for example, for n= n, n = 0 but the series n= n is divergent. However the equation () can be used as a criterion to tell whether a series converges or not: for n= a n, if a n 0, then n= a n is divergent. An example is, n= 2n is divergent because 2 n =. Another example n= ( + n ) is divergent because + n = 0. 4. series of functions In the previous section, we talk about several theorems about the series n= a n. By adding a variable x, the series of functions n= a nx n is also a kind of series with terms a n x n. Obviously it is convergent if x = 0. In general, there is a quantity associated to each series of functions, the radius of convergence ρ, such that, for x < ρ, the series is absolutely convergent; for x > ρ, it is divergent. However, for x = ρ, we need to study it case by case. We use the ratio test to find ρ. For example, for which values of x, does the series x n n converge? Proof. For this example, a n = n. 4

Then a n+ a n n = =, i.e., q =. (n + ) Hence the radius of convergence ρ = q =. That is to say, for x <, the series n= a nx n is absolutely convergent. For x >, the series n= a nx n is divergent. For x =, x = or x =. For x =, the series becomes n, which diverges. However for x =, the series becomes ( ) n n= n, which is convergent because it is a series of alternating terms. To conclude, the series is convergent on [, ), and divergent for x > and x =. 5. Limits of functions, continuity and uniform continuity Let f : D R, and a R. We say that x a f(x) = A, if for every sequence {x n } D satisfying x n a, f(x n) = A. Note that the point a may not be in the domain D. If there exists two sequences {x n } and {y n } both converging to a, and its n a f(x n ) and f(y n ) are not equal, then x a f(x) does not exist. This is a typical way to show that a it does not exist. An example, f(x) = x : R \ {0} R, in this case, f(x) does not exist. x x 0 The continuity of functions can be defined in a similar way. We say that f is continuous at x = a, if for every sequence {x n } D satisfying x n a, f(x n) = f(a). Note that a is in the domain D. If f is continuous at every point of D, then f is continuous on D. We have learned two theorems about continuous functions. One is the intermediate value theorem, and the other is the maximum principle. In the final, you are not required to know the proofs of these two theorems, but you need to know how to apply them to solve the problems. There is another way to phrase the continuity of functions, which we call the ɛ δ formulation of continuity of functions. We say that f is continuous 5

at x = a: for any ɛ > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that for x a < δ, Here δ may depend on ɛ and a. f(x) f(a) < ɛ. The second definition has the advantage of generalizing to uniform continuity of functions. We say that f is uniformly continuous on D: for any ɛ > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that for x y < δ, f(x) f(y) < ɛ. In general, the uniform continuity of functions implies the continuity of functions, but the converse is not true. For instance, f(x) = x 2 : R R is continuous on R but not uniformly continuous. However on a closed interval, say [a, b], they are equivalent. 6. differentiability Having seen continuity of functions, we talk about another property of functions, differentiability. We say that f is differentiable at a point a, if the following it exists, If the it exists, we denote h 0 f(a + h) f(a). h f f(a + h) f(a) (a) =. h 0 h The definition is important when we want to say whether a function is differentiable at a point; also it will gives the formula of the derivatives. For instance, f(x) = x n with n, is differentiable at every point x and f (x) = nx n. Another example is, for f(x) = sin x, f (x) = cos x. The most common example of non-differentiable functions is f(x) = x ; for this function, although it is continuous at x = 0, we know that it is not differentiable at x = 0. Related to differentiability, there are two important theorems, Rolle s theorem and the mean value theorem. The proof of Rolle s theorem makes use of the maximum principle we just mentioned. Roughly speaking, for continuous functions over [a, b], there exists c and d in [a, b] such that f(c) = max a x b f(x), f(d) = min f(x). a x b At these points, one can show that f = 0. The Rolle Theorem can be used to prove the mean value theorem. 6

7. integrability Let f be a bounded real function. We say that f is Riemann integrable on [a, b], if L(f) = U(f), where, L(f) = sup{l P (f)}, U(f) = inf {U P (f)}. P P Here P is a partition of [a, b]. We have shown that continuous functions or monotone functions over [a, b] are integrable. The Dirichlet function f is not Riemann integrable, where {, for irrational x; f(x) = 0, for rational x. Related to Riemann integrals, the fundamental theorem of calculus is important. Let f be a continuous function on [a, b]. Then is differentiable at x (a, b) and F (x) = F (x) = f(x), and b a x a f(t)dt f(t)dt = F (b) F (a). Note that F is called the anti-derivative of f. The last equation in the Fundament Theorem of Calculus tells a way to compute integrals b a f(t)dt: we just need to find what are the antiderivative of f. For example, π 0 sin xdx = ( cos π) + cos 0 = 2. This is because the antiderivative of sin x is cos x. Department of Mathematics, KU, Lawrence, KS 66045 E-mail address: slshao@math.ku.edu 7