PRM on Johan Sverdrup - an unique Opportunity. Force seminar 2017 Stavanger, Maximilian Schuberth

Similar documents
F003 Geomodel Update Using 4-D Petrophysical Seismic Inversion on the Troll West Field

Heriot-Watt University

A021 Petrophysical Seismic Inversion for Porosity and 4D Calibration on the Troll Field

Kondal Reddy*, Kausik Saikia, Susanta Mishra, Challapalli Rao, Vivek Shankar and Arvind Kumar

Integrated Reservoir Study for Designing CO 2 -Foam EOR Field Pilot

The GIG consortium Geophysical Inversion to Geology Per Røe, Ragnar Hauge, Petter Abrahamsen FORCE, Stavanger

Upper Jurassic tectono-stratigraphic concept for King Lear (block 2/4): an old discovery and an eye-opener for Norwegian Central Graben

Current challenges at CO 2 Sites

A E. SEG/San Antonio 2007 Annual Meeting. exp. a V. a V. Summary

4D stress sensitivity of dry rock frame moduli: constraints from geomechanical integration

Reservoir Modeling for Wabamun Area CO2 Sequestration Project (WASP) Davood Nowroozi

SRC software. Rock physics modelling tools for analyzing and predicting geophysical reservoir properties

SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION

Uncertainties in rock pore compressibility and effects on time lapse seismic modeling An application to Norne field

Opportunities in Oil and Gas Fields Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

Multi-scale multi-phase flow upscaling

Main Challenges and Uncertainties for Oil Production from Turbidite Reservoirs in Deep Water Campos Basin, Brazil*

Calibration of the petro-elastic model (PEM) for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel

Know Before You Go. Steve O Connor. Bryony Youngs. How GeoPrediction helps with Production Optimization and Assessing the Size of the Prize

Integrating reservoir flow simulation with time-lapse seismic inversion in a heavy oil case study

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

Use of Seismic Inversion Attributes In Field Development Planning

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Risk Factors in Reservoir Simulation

COPYRIGHT. Optimization During the Reservoir Life Cycle. Case Study: San Andres Reservoirs Permian Basin, USA

Fr Reservoir Monitoring in Oil Sands Using a Permanent Cross-well System: Status and Results after 18 Months of Production

C002 Petrophysical Seismic Inversion over an Offshore Carbonate Field

We G Quantification of Residual Oil Saturation Using 4D Seismic Data

P.1619 License Relinquishment Report

Th LHR2 08 Towards an Effective Petroelastic Model for Simulator to Seismic Studies

Storage: Deep Monitoring and Verification

Towed Streamer EM Integrated interpretation for accurate characterization of the sub-surface. PETEX, Tuesday 15th of November 2016

Time-lapse seismic monitoring and inversion in a heavy oilfield. By: Naimeh Riazi PhD Student, Geophysics

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

Seismic applications in coalbed methane exploration and development

Th LHR2 04 Quantification of Reservoir Pressure-sensitivity Using Multiple Monitor 4D Seismic Data

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

Quantifying remaining oil saturation using seismic time-lapse amplitude changes at fluid contacts Alvarez, Erick; MacBeth, Colin; Brain, Jon

Time lapse seismic - past and future

Pareto Securities Oil & Offshore Conference

E014 4D Case Study at Ringhorne, Ringhorne East, Balder and Forseti - Integrating OBC with Streamer Data

Mapping the fluid front and pressure buildup using 4D data on Norne Field

New Frontier Advanced Multiclient Data Offshore Uruguay. Advanced data interpretation to empower your decision making in the upcoming bid round

Four-D seismic monitoring: Blackfoot reservoir feasibility

Monitoring CO 2 Injection at Weyburn Reservoir Using 3-D/3-C Seismic Datasets

The Hangingstone steam-assisted gravity drainage

Toward an Integrated and Realistic Interpretation of Continuous 4D Seismic Data for a CO 2 EOR and Sequestration Project

Use of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization

Geomechanics for reservoir and beyond Examples of faults impact on fluid migration. Laurent Langhi Team Leader August 2014

4D seismic pressure-saturation inversion at Gullfaks field, Norway

Downloaded 09/16/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

A Model for Non-Newtonian Flow in Porous Media at Different Flow Regimes

SPE These in turn can be used to estimate mechanical properties.

Fr CO2 02 Fault Leakage Detection From Pressure Transient Analysis

ScienceDirect. Model-based assessment of seismic monitoring of CO 2 in a CCS project in Alberta, Canada, including a poroelastic approach

Seismic validation of reservoir simulation using a shared earth model

Statistical Rock Physics

2011 SEG SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting 771. Summary. Method

Time-lapse well logging to monitor injected CO 2 in an aquifer at Nagaoka

A look into Gassmann s Equation

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

HampsonRussell. A comprehensive suite of reservoir characterization tools. cgg.com/geosoftware

Time-lapse seismic modelling for Pikes Peak field

F. Bacciotti K. D Amore J. Seguin

Baseline VSP processing for the Violet Grove CO 2 Injection Site

Updating the low-frequency model in time-lapse seismic inversion: A case study from a heavy-oil steam-injection project

scaling parameters of laboratory modelling of

URTeC: Summary

WP 4.1. Site selection criteria and ranking methodology. Karen Kirk

Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

Cold production footprints of heavy oil on time-lapse seismology: Lloydminster field, Alberta

11282 Rock Physics Analysis and Time-lapse Rock Imaging of Geochemical Effects Due to CO2 Injection into Reservoir Rocks

URTeC: Abstract

The Weyburn Field in southeastern Saskatchewan,

Improving 4D Seismic Imaging by Modifying Baseline Depth Migration Velocity Model

CSLF Mid-Year Meeting, Regina

PRELIMINARY REPORT. Evaluations of to what extent CO 2 accumulations in the Utsira formations are possible to quantify by seismic by August 1999.

OTC OTC PP. Abstract

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE PETROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES VARIATIONS ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A CO2 STORAGE SITE. Juan E. Santos

AVO analysis of 3-D seismic data at G-field, Norway

Facies Classification Based on Seismic waveform -A case study from Mumbai High North

ROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES ABSTRACT

Downloaded 10/02/18 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

USE OF QUANTITATIVE SEISMIC ANALYSIS TO DEFINE RESERVOIR ARCHITECTURE AND VOLUMES AN EXAMPLE FROM THE JOHAN SVERDRUP FIELD

Reservoir Management Background OOIP, OGIP Determination and Production Forecast Tool Kit Recovery Factor ( R.F.) Tool Kit

The Alba Field: Improved Reservoir Characterisation using 4D Seismic Data. Elaine Campbell Oliver Hermann Steve Dobbs Andrew Warnock John Hampson

Velocity Measurements of Pore Fluids at Pressure and Temperature: Application to bitumen

Reserve Estimation of Saldanadi Gas Field

Examination paper for TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques

3D time-lapse seismic monitoring of the pilot CO 2 storage site at Ketzin, Germany

Application of advance tools for reservoir characterization- EEI & Poisson s impedance: A Case Study

P- and S-Wave Velocity Measurements and Pressure Sensitivity Analysis of AVA Response

SEISMIC PROFILE CGG SEISMIC INVERSIONS. by Lucia Levato, CGG. three offshore case studies show how one size does not fi t all. 18 seismic profile

Lithology prediction and fluid discrimination in Block A6 offshore Myanmar

Modeling seismic wave propagation during fluid injection in a fractured network: Effects of pore fluid pressure on time-lapse seismic signatures

The elastic properties such as velocity, density, impedance,

Johan Sverdrup Offshore Norway: The Story behind the Giant Sverdrup Discovery*

Summary. Introduction

Dynamic GeoScience Martyn Millwood Hargrave Chief Executive OPTIMISE SUCCESS THROUGH SCIENCE

Transcription:

PRM on Johan Sverdrup - an unique Opportunity Force seminar 2017 Stavanger, Maximilian Schuberth

Agenda Introduction to the Johan Sverdrup Field Ambition for a world class recovery rate Permanent Reservoir Monitoring (PRM) on JS an unique opportunity Summary 2

Introduction to Johan Sverdrup License Partners: Statoil (Operator) 40.0267 % Lundin Norway 22.6 % Petoro 17.36 % Aker BP 11.5733 % Maersk 8.44 % General Reservoir apex Water depth OWC ~1800 m ~110 m 1922-1934 m MSL Reservoir Facts Quality 25-30 % Porosity, High NTG Multi Darcy permeability No gas cap Pressure Thickness Hydrostatic 4 146 m (Well Observation) Area/Volume ~200 km 2 area Recoverable volumes 2 3 bbl Age Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous 3

Johan Sverdrup - the giant value creator TOP 5 70 % 50 YRS. 2 3 bn 660 000 One of the largest oil fields ever on the NCS Ambition - recovery Production horizon Resources bbl Production capacity bopd 4

Johan Sverdrup - the giant value creator 70 % Ambition - recovery Drainage Strategy Water Flooding IOR Projects WAG Injection Infill Drilling Potential advanced IOR methods Reservoir Surveillance PRM Well Monitoring 5

Reservoir Surveillance Geophysical reservoir monitoring is part of the overall field surveillance and drainage strategy. Permanent seismic cables will be installed on the seafloor. PRM is the optimal solution, allowing: High Quality Flexibility Short Turnaround 6

Time lapse Concept Base Monitor Pictures from Sascha Bussat, Statoil 7

Time lapse Concept Base Pictures from Sascha Bussat, Statoil 8

Time lapse Concept Monitor Pictures from Sascha Bussat, Statoil 9

Time lapse Concept 4D Difference Difference with better repeatability PRM Streamer Pictures from Sascha Bussat, Statoil 10

Time lapse Concept 1985 1999 11

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Converting reservoir properties to elastic rock properties Reservoir Model Seismic Domain Porosity Pore Pressure Vp Compressional Velocity Vs Shear Velocity Saturation, GOR NTG ρ Density 12

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Converting reservoir properties to elastic rock properties Reservoir Model Fluid Substitution Seismic Domain Porosity Pore Pressure Saturation, GOR NTG Dry Rock Model Pressure Model Fluid Model Mineral Model Vp Compressional Velocity Vs Shear Velocity ρ Density 13

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Converting reservoir properties to elastic rock properties Reservoir Model Fluid Substitution Seismic Domain Porosity Pore Pressure Dry Rock Model Pressure Model Fluid Model Vp Compressional Velocity Vs Shear Velocity Synthetic Seismic Saturation, GOR Mineral Model ρ Density NTG 14

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Mean AI ratio Time 1 - Baseline PEM provides a way to model expected 4D effects (or seismic amplitude changes), which can be used as input to: survey design, hypothesis testing (e.g. IOR, well placement) and ultimately model calibration. Blue: Water replacing Oil /Gas Red: Gas replacing Water/Oil Oil replacing Water 15

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Mean AI ratio Time 2 - Baseline PEM provides a way to model expected 4D effects (or seismic amplitude changes), which can be used as input to: survey design, hypothesis testing (e.g. IOR, well placement) and ultimately model calibration. Blue: Water replacing Oil /Gas Red: Gas replacing Water/Oil Oil replacing Water 16

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Mean AI ratio Time 3 - Baseline PEM provides a way to model expected 4D effects (or seismic amplitude changes), which can be used as input to: survey design, hypothesis testing (e.g. IOR, well placement) and ultimately model calibration. Blue: Water replacing Oil /Gas Red: Gas replacing Water/Oil Oil replacing Water 17

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Mean AI ratio Time 4 - Baseline PEM provides a way to model expected 4D effects (or seismic amplitude changes), which can be used as input to: survey design, hypothesis testing (e.g. IOR, well placement) and ultimately model calibration. Blue: Water replacing Oil /Gas Red: Gas replacing Water/Oil Oil replacing Water 18

Feasibility Petro-Elastic Modeling Mean AI ratio Time 5 - Baseline PEM provides a way to model expected 4D effects (or seismic amplitude changes), which can be used as input to: survey design, hypothesis testing (e.g. IOR, well placement) and ultimately model calibration. Blue: Water replacing Oil /Gas Red: Gas replacing Water/Oil Oil replacing Water 19

Defining a PRM Layout Aspects controlling the layout of the PRM system. Areal Coverage Survey Design Field development plan e.g. schedule of wells, drainage strategy Installation window e.g. time of the year, other installations ongoing Cost-Benefit e.g. expected value to cost of additional length (or area) Seismic detectability e.g. reservoir thickness, structure 20

PRM Layout Total field area about 200 km 2 PRM outline 125 km 2 400 m cable separation 335+ km of cable 21

Production PRM on JS An Unique Opportunity Early Decline Tail Production at max. process capacity Cost effective Access Recovery of challenging resources Time Early Calibration of the model Aquifer & Gas cap monitoring Well Management 22

PRM on JS An Unique Opportunity As a comprehensive monitoring solution, the PRM system on JS provides a link between IOR methods, and of course the general drainage. It can monitor them alone and their interaction, throughout the life of the field. Water Flooding Its various monitoring applications can provide an improvement for business cases of IOR methods. Infill wells WAG Other 23

PRM on JS An Unique Opportunity Possible applications include: Overburden Surveillance Seismic PLTs Production optimisation Well placement Water Flooding Infill wells WAG Other 24

Summary Technical feasibility of the PRM system on Johan Sverdrup has been shown. Substantial efforts went into designing the areal coverage and cable spacing. The derived layout is a good balance between cost, monitoring focus areas and installation constraints. As a monitoring solution, it can positively contribute to the business cases of IOR methods. Through monitoring, PRM contributes to IOR effectiveness, thus can ultimately be considered an IOR method itself. 25

Thank you! We also thank the partners for permission to present this work: 26

PRM on Johan Sverdrup - an unique Opportunity Maximilian Schuberth, Statoil www.statoil.com Statoil ASA 27 This presentation, including the contents and arrangement of the contents of each individual page or the collection of the pages, are owned by Statoil. Copyright to all material including, but not limited to, written material, photographs, drawings, images, tables and data remains the property of Statoil. All rights reserved. Any other kind of use, reproduction, translation, adaption, arrangement, any other alteration, distribution or storage of this presentation, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Statoil is prohibited. The information contained in this presentation may not be accurate, up to date or applicable to the circumstances of any particular case, despite our efforts. Statoil cannot accept any liability for any inaccuracies or omissions.