Main aim: Preparation for high bunch intensity operation with β*=3.5 m and crossing angle (-100 µrad in IR1 and +100 µrad in IR5)

Similar documents
LHC commissioning. 22nd June Mike Lamont LHC commissioning - CMS 1

Plans for 2016 and Run 2

LHC Commissioning in 2008

LHC status & 2009/2010 operations. Mike Lamont

LHC Run 2: Results and Challenges. Roderik Bruce on behalf of the CERN teams

LHC ORBIT SYSTEM, PERFORMANCE AND STABILITY

Status and Outlook of the LHC

TRANSVERSE DAMPER. W. Höfle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract INTRODUCTION AND HIGHLIGHTS IN Controlled Transverse Blow-up

Practical Lattice Design

Turn-around improvements

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

HL-LHC OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS

LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

Emittance blow-up and loss maps in LHC using the transverse damper as exciter

Status of the LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group

LHC Collimation and Loss Locations

Beam Loss Monitors, Specification

LHC Commissioning and First Operation

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

OTHER MEANS TO INCREASE THE SPS 25 ns PERFORMANCE TRANSVERSE PLANE

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Operational Experience with HERA

LHC Studies Working Group Notes from the meeting held on 8 December 2011

LHC Beam Operations: Past, Present and Future

(Lead) Ions in the LHC

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPERIENCE WITH LUMINOSITY LEVELLING WITH OFFSET BEAM

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

LHC Studies Working Group Notes from the meeting held on 13th September 2011

Simulations and measurements of collimation cleaning with 100MJ beams in the LHC

BETATRON SQUEEZE: STATUS, STRATEGY AND ISSUES

LHC. Construction Understanding first the commissioning. Prospects for

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

THE MAGNETIC MODEL OF THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER

Gianluigi Arduini CERN - Beams Dept. - Accelerator & Beam Physics Group

Commissioning of the LHC collimation system S. Redaelli, R. Assmann, C. Bracco, M. Jonker and G. Robert-Demolaize CERN, AB department

Beam Optics & Dynamics Studies for LHC

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

Are we ready for the 2009 beam operation?

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

LHC RUN 2: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES

COLLECTIVE EFFECTS IN THE LHC AND ITS INJECTORS

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

STATUS OF LHC COMMISSIONING

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework

CUIT ) SHOULD BE COMMIS

The Beam Instrumentation and Diagnostic Challenges for LHC Operation at High Energy

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

LUMINOSITY LEVELLING TECHNIQUES FOR THE LHC

Beam-Beam DA Simulations for HL-LHC

FCC-hh Final-Focus for Flat-Beams: Parameters and Energy Deposition Studies

Status of linear collider designs:

The MD was done at 450GeV using beam 2 only. An MD focussing on injection of bunches with nominal emittance was done in parallel on beam 1.

Collimators and Cleaning, Could this Limit the LHC Performance?

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 10 Aug 2016

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

MD Landau Damping: Beam Transfer Functions and diffusion mechanisms

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Emittance preservation in TESLA

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

FACET-II Design Update

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

Simulations of HL halo loss and IR losses. R. Bruce, F. Cerutti, R. de Maria, A. Marsili, S. Redaelli

LHC Commissioning The good, the bad the ugly

Simulations of HL-LHC Crab Cavity Noise using HEADTAIL

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Task 2.4 on LHC Collective Effects Studies

LC Commissioning, Operations and Availability

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

HL-LHC ALTERNATIVES SCENARIOS

Integrated luminosity performance studies of linear colliders with intra-train IP-FB system: ILC and CLIC

DEBRIEFING AND FOLLOW-UP OF THE LPL REVIEW

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

Report. LHC Full Energy Exploitation Study: Operation at 7 TeV

CHAMONIX WORKSHOP, SESSION 5 LIU SUMMARY

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Analysis of Ground Motion at SPS and LEP - Implications for the LHC

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES (FEED FORWARD FROM EVIAN LHC OPERATION WORKSHOP)

LHC RunII Commissioning and HL-LHC Status

Beam dynamics measurement during ALBA commissioning

Two Beamline Ground Motion Simulation for NLC

Collimation strategy for the high-β Special Physics run at injection

Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Low- alpha mode at SOLEIL 1

Challenges and Plans for the Proton Injectors *

Status of the LIU project and progress on space charge studies

Sunday morning: Beam Dynamics Issues. Session highlights and outstanding questions. M. Pivi and D. Rubin ECLOUD10 October 8-12 Cornell University

MACHINE PROTECTION ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR THE LHC

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

PEP-II Lattices. U. Wienands for many others from AD, ARD, NLC. U. Wienands, PEP-II MAC

RUN II LUMINOSITY PROGRESS*

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

Tevatron Beam-Beam Phenomena and Counter-Measures

Daniel Wollmann, CERN

LEP Operation and Performance

The LHC Collider. STOA lecture, Brussels, 27 th November 2012 Steve Myers Director of Accelerators and Technology, CERN

Run II Status and Prospects

Transcription:

Week 24 Main aim: Preparation for high bunch intensity operation with β*=3.5 m and crossing angle (-100 µrad in IR1 and +100 µrad in IR5) Commission systems required for guaranteeing beam stability as expected from design with single nominal bunch and more than one bunch: Transverse feedback Controlled longitudinal emittance blow-up Octupoles at 3.5 TeV Setting-up for high intensity operation and consolidation of the beam parameters control during ramp and squeeze: Squeeze with separated beam, orbit and tune feedback Chromaticity correction and minimization Optimization and qualification of the machine protection with higher intensity: Collimation setting-up at 3.5 TeV Dump protection setting-up

Week 24 Progress in spite of several interruptions disrupting the setting-up activity Turn-around time at 3.5 TeV squeezed is longer... ~2 ramps+squeeze/day

Week 24 Week 24 Mon 14/6 Tue 15/6 Wed 16/6 Thu 17/6 Fri 18/6 Access to fix problems encountered during the WE Commissioning of the ramp with damper and tune fdbk Squeeze commissioning with separation ON Controlled longitudinal blow-up Collimation setting-up at 3.5 TeV unsqueezed Chromaticity measurement during the ramp Access for World FIP repeater problem Collimation setting-up at 3.5 TeV un-squeezed and at 7m Alice dipole trip and thunderstorms Longitudinal emittance blow-up with more bunches Access (World FIP communication problem and Collimation setting-up at 3.5 TeV at 3.5 m separated Collimation qualification Test of the collimation sequence after setting-up Trips of RB.A78 requiring access Transverse damper setting-up for operation with >1 bunch

Week 24 Week 24 Sat 19/6 Sun 20/6 Mon 21/6 Chromaticity measurement and optics qualification through the squeeze Beam dump internal fault while squeezing Ramp and squeeze for setting-up of the beam in collision (luminosity scans) Longitudinal blow-up during the ramp commissioned with >1 bunch Loss of cryo maintain in Sector 34 (World Fip repeater) Ramp and squeeze for setting-up of the beam in collision (luminosity scans, crossing angles) and collimation settingup completion Quench heater power supply repair Dump protection qualification at 450 GeV

Injection Robust over-injection of 2b of 10 11 p with all TDI BLMs unmasked Transverse damper ON, at 450 GeV: very effective B1: H= 2.4 & V= 2.5 B2: H= 3.8 & V= 3.1 after injection RF damper synchronisation: to sort out (piquet to be called each time) RF controls Chromaticity at injection set to 2 for both planes both beams 1 st injection 2 nd injection

Remaining to further improve performance Injection systems: Brennan + team + OP Injection steering clean-up, followed by TCTL verification TDI checks wrt beam loss measurements MKI8 kicker delay jitter to be fixed (access) Injection ADT: W. Höfle 1 remaining PU to be commissioned Noise reduction Vector sum mode of operation to increase bandwidth of the system

Ramp Ramp now repeated several time with reproducible performance still some blow-up Potential issue observed yesterday with peaks appearing on the tune spectrum at ~50 Hz multiples perturbing tune tracking with damper ON. No additional blow-up observed (instrumental issue?)

Ramp Chromaticity measured and feed-forward corrections applied (3 systematic iterations). Now chromaticity controlled to 2 at injection, along the ramp and at 3.5 TeV Transverse damper, long. blow-up, tune and orbit feedbacks ON trough the ramp Longitudinal beam blow-up during the ramp with nominal bunches (A. Butterworth, E. Shaposhnikova, P. Baudrenghien) some more beam time in parallel with the regular operation to fine tune

Squeeze & Collision Beta beating measurements: R. Tomas, R. Miyamoto, G.Vanbavinckhove Beta beating below 20 % in H plane and below 30 % in the V- plane (similar to 2 m after correction) possible localized errors in IP2 and IP8

Robust squeeze to 3.5 m Tune, orbit FB on One stop at 7 m to drive the collimators Collapse of the separation bumps IP1: 1x1 IP8: 17851 x 8911 IP2: 1x 8911 IP5: 1x1 Squeeze & collision Collapsed IP1, IP8, and adding IP2 Beam 2 vert. emittance increased by 2 Introduced tune split of 0.002 between beams for both planes Collapsed IP1, IP8, IP8 and adding IP5 Lost intensity mainly on bunch 1 beam 1 (3 collisions) Beam blow-up particularly V Cured by octupole strength increase Beam 2 Beam 1

Squeeze & collision Non-closure was corrected with the separation s knob correctors thanks Jorg for the new YASP release Luminosity scans performed for all IPs Introduced after the bump collapse action Introduced the crossing angle in IP1 (-100 µrad) and IP5 (+100 µrad) Saved a new reference orbit Cures found included in the procedure for next fill (tune split, octupoles)

Collimation setup and qualification: R. Assmann, R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, D. Wollmann Completed the setting-up of the collimators at 3.5 TeV, unsqueezed and squeezed (with separation ON and OFF) Loss maps showed correct hierarchy for the collimation system Beam-based work finished for collimation, given golden orbits and optics. Will be ready for stable beams from collimation side, as soon as we have finished the sequences. Beam dump protection qualification: Machine Protection 450 GeV qualification with nominal bunch intensity ongoing Qualification at high energy remaining (asynch. dumps) 2 to 3 ramps

Today 21 Mon M LBDS 450 GeV setting up and qualification with nominal bunch intensity 21 Mon A 21 Mon N Inject 2bx2b, 1e11, with longitudinal blow-up in the LHC ramp - squeeze - collapse separation in 1/5/2/8, switch on crossing angle in IP1/5 - Simulation of asynchronous dump Inject 2bx2b, 1e11, with longitudinal blow-up in the LHC ramp - squeeze - collapse separation in 1/5/2/8, switch on crossing angle in IP1/5 - Simulation of asynchronous dump

Issues Access requests: C26.R2 (heater 3) because of a quench heater discharging/charging Water pump in point 7 (sump) QPS noisy card (B21R8) threshold increased. To be replaced. MKI8: timing instability of the injection kicker pulse. RR17: ventilation QTL7.L7 current lead temperature measurement (we had the same problem on the same circuit during the past week-end but on a different current lead) BPM giving wrong sign (BPMSY.4L1.B2) Power converter problems RCBH14.R1B2 to be replaced RCBH27.R1B1 to be replaced To be understood: 3 failures of World FIP repeaters in the tunnel in the last few weeks